LLMBenchmark.ai

Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Muse Spark 1.3

Updated October 21, 2026. 82 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

DeepSeek V4.1 FlashDeepSeek
Coding
77.2
Overall
24.7
Output $/M
$0.525
14
Muse Spark 1.3Meta
Coding
79.7
Overall
48.1
Output $/M
$4.25
66
vs boards won of 82 shared, 2 tied

Decision reading

Pick Muse Spark 1.3 for coding: it scores 79.7 on the Vibe Coding Index against 77.2 for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash.

Pick DeepSeek V4.1 Flash when output tokens cost 8.1x less, or when what matters is Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI) or Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI), where it leads.

Shared results
82
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash only
19
Muse Spark 1.3 only
10
Like-for-like categories
8 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 77.2 from 2 benchmarks, Muse Spark 1.3 79.7 from 2 benchmarks.
Widest category
Intelligence, 12.5 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
AA Intelligence Index: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 24.7 against Muse Spark 1.3 48.1, 23.4 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash $0.525 against Muse Spark 1.3 $4.25 per million output tokens, 8.1x apart.
Context window
Both take 1.05M tokens.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryDeepSeek V4.1 FlashBarsMuse Spark 1.3Ties
Coding592 ties
Intelligence02
Agentic work36
Reasoning36
Math06
Knowledge04
Web design27
General126
All shared boards14662 ties
CodingLike-for-likeFour of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index59
Coding benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Muse Spark 1.3
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashMuse Spark 1.3Leader
LiveBench coding90.2%90.2%Tie
LMArena WebDev16181659Muse Spark 1.3
AA Coding IndexNot measured75.8Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)19.7%10.6%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)84.7%82.9%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Code migration (Vals AI)45.6%27.6%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.5%0.5%Tie
IOI (Vals AI)40.3%43.9%Muse Spark 1.3
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)74.5%72.3%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)46.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)16.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)69.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)73.7%69.4%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
SciCode51.9%59.7%Muse Spark 1.3
FrontierCode43.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
FrontierSWENot measured25.8%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
ALE-Bench1092.31688.3Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: coding15021510Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: software and IT14961511Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena WebDev: React16281672Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena WebDev: HTML16121653Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena WebDev: from an image16061640Muse Spark 1.3
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Intelligence benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Muse Spark 1.3
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashMuse Spark 1.3Leader
AA Intelligence Index24.748.1Muse Spark 1.3
Epoch Capabilities Index155.9157.2Muse Spark 1.3
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index36
Agentic work benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Muse Spark 1.3
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashMuse Spark 1.3Leader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured55.5Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1297Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack appsNot measured1295Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile appsNot measured1217Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot gamesNot measured1241Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slidesNot measured1244Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Design Arena: spreadsheetsNot measured1048Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
LiveBench research86.8%68.6%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LiveBench browser84.0%80.0%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LiveBench long agentic40.1%40.4%Muse Spark 1.3
SREBench (Vals AI)0.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)53.5%58.9%Muse Spark 1.3
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)26.6%36.0%Muse Spark 1.3
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)41.4%40.9%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)57.2%62.7%Muse Spark 1.3
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)67.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)0.0%4.3%Muse Spark 1.3
Vals Science Index29.6%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
APEX-Agents39.5%58.6%Muse Spark 1.3
Neither model has a result on the other 20 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index36
Reasoning benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Muse Spark 1.3
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashMuse Spark 1.3Leader
LiveBench reasoning86.7%89.7%Muse Spark 1.3
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)21.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured94.1%Only Muse Spark 1.3 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)39.2%48.7%Muse Spark 1.3
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)89.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
ARC-AGI94.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
ARC-AGI-272.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Chess puzzles48.0%37.0%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Mystery game puzzles43.0%25.0%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Text: hard prompts14831503Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: expert15011519Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14881500Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Vision: diagrams12971330Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Vision: homework13071296DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index06
Math benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Muse Spark 1.3
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashMuse Spark 1.3Leader
OTIS Mock AIME98.3%99.2%Muse Spark 1.3
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 367.4%74.4%Muse Spark 1.3
FrontierMath, tier 426.8%46.3%Muse Spark 1.3
ProofBench54.0%58.0%Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: math14781497Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: mathematical work14851491Muse Spark 1.3
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Knowledge benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Muse Spark 1.3
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashMuse Spark 1.3Leader
LegalBench (Vals AI)83.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
MedCode (Vals AI)41.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
SimpleQA Verified42.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Text: science14691507Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14841493Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: legal and government14431499Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: business and finance14611490Muse Spark 1.3
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index27
Web design benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Muse Spark 1.3
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashMuse Spark 1.3Leader
Design Arena: websites13091356Muse Spark 1.3
Design Arena: UI components13141352Muse Spark 1.3
Design Arena: game dev13311329DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Design Arena: data viz12901343Muse Spark 1.3
Design Arena: 3D13561359Muse Spark 1.3
Design Arena: all code categories13201353Muse Spark 1.3
Design Arena: SVG12431300Muse Spark 1.3
Design Arena: ASCII art12651280Muse Spark 1.3
LiveBench design79.2%74.8%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index126
General benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Muse Spark 1.3
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashMuse Spark 1.3Leader
LiveBench data analysis79.3%79.6%Muse Spark 1.3
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)64.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
SAGE (Vals AI)47.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)85.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)84.0%83.0%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
DTBench89.9%96.5%Muse Spark 1.3
LMCA47.0%53.9%Muse Spark 1.3
Surface Evolver Bench46.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Furniture assembly34.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Text14641490Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: instruction following14731479Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: creative writing14371462Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Vision12781308Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: English14731495Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: non-English14491481Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: Chinese15011532Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: German14701513Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: Japanese14321470Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: Korean14361490Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: French14651511Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: Spanish14591496Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: Russian14671491Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: Polish14571490Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: multi-turn14611487Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: longer queries14731488Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: writing and language14501470Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text: entertainment and media14451457Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Vision: English12881298Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Vision: Chinese13271384Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Vision: reading text12821319Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Vision: humor12601293Muse Spark 1.3
LMArena Vision: creative writing12751296Muse Spark 1.3
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Muse Spark 1.3
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashMuse Spark 1.3Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash$0.0003Fits in one request
Muse Spark 1.3$0.0034Fits in one request

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash$0.0040Fits in one request
Muse Spark 1.3$0.075Fits in one request

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash$0.015Fits in one request
Muse Spark 1.3$0.292Fits in one request

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Muse Spark 1.3
SpecificationDeepSeek V4.1 FlashMeta Muse Spark 1.3
MakerDeepSeekMeta
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedSeptember 10, 2026September 2, 2026
Context window1.05M1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.049$1.25
Output $/Mtok$0.525$4.25
Coding index77.279.7
Independent measurements behind it22
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash better than Muse Spark 1.3 for coding?

Pick Muse Spark 1.3 for coding: it scores 79.7 on the Vibe Coding Index against 77.2 for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash. Pick DeepSeek V4.1 Flash when output tokens cost 8.1x less, or when what matters is Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI) or Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI), where it leads.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Muse Spark 1.3?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash costs $0.049 per million input tokens and $0.525 per million output tokens; Muse Spark 1.3 costs $1.25 and $4.25. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Muse Spark 1.3?

Neither: both take 1.05M tokens.

How many benchmarks is the DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Muse Spark 1.3 comparison based on?

82 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash's coding index rests on 2 independent benchmarks and Muse Spark 1.3's on 2. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-vs-meta-muse-spark-1-3" title="DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Muse Spark 1.3, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-vs-meta-muse-spark-1-3">LLMBenchmark.ai, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Muse Spark 1.3</a></p>