Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

DeepSeek V3.2 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads DeepSeek V3.2 on coding, 62.5 to 30.0 on the Vibe Coding Index, at about the same output price ($0.84 vs $0.88 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 50 benchmarks have a result for both.

DeepSeek V3.2DeepSeek
Coding
30.0
Overall
37.9
Output $/M
$0.88
0
DeepSeek V4.1 FlashDeepSeek
Coding
62.5
Overall
62.4
Output $/M
$0.84
50
vs boards won of 50 shared

DeepSeek V3.2 or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: which to pick

Pick DeepSeek V4.1 Flash for coding: it scores 62.5 on the Vibe Coding Index against 30.0 for DeepSeek V3.2.

DeepSeek V3.2 is neither cheaper nor larger in context, and leads no benchmark both models were measured on.

Shared results
50
DeepSeek V3.2 only
25
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash only
51
Like-for-like categories
8 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
DeepSeek V3.2 30.0 from 3 benchmarks, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 62.5 from 5 benchmarks.
Widest category
Coding, 35.3 points apart on average over 6 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI): DeepSeek V3.2 5.1% against DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 84.7%, 79.6 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
DeepSeek V3.2 $0.88 against DeepSeek V4.1 Flash $0.84 per million output tokens, 1.0x apart.
Context window
DeepSeek V3.2 takes 164K tokens, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryDeepSeek V3.2BarsDeepSeek V4.1 FlashTies
Coding06
Intelligence02
Agentic work01
Reasoning06
Math02
Knowledge05
Web design08
General020
All shared boards050
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index06
Coding benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2DeepSeek V4.1 FlashLeader
SWE-bench Verified70.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
SWE-bench Multilingual59.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
LiveBench codingNot measured90.2%Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena WebDev13621618DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
AA Coding Index44.2Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)80.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)67.6%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured19.7%Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)5.1%84.7%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured45.6%Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.5%Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured40.3%Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured74.5%Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)Not measured46.5%Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)Not measured16.4%Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)Not measured69.8%Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)Not measured73.7%Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)86.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
SciCodeNot measured51.9%Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)35.6%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
Terminal-Bench39.6%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
FrontierCodeNot measured43.9%Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
ALE-BenchNot measured1092.3Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Text: coding14531502DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Text: software and IT14491496DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena WebDev: React13501628DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena WebDev: HTML13711612DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1606Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Intelligence benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2DeepSeek V4.1 FlashLeader
AA Intelligence Index21.524.7DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Epoch Capabilities Index146.1155.9DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Agentic work benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2DeepSeek V4.1 FlashLeader
LiveBench researchNot measured86.8%Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LiveBench browserNot measured84.0%Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured40.1%Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
SREBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.8%Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured53.5%Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured26.6%Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured41.4%Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured57.2%Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)Not measured67.8%Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Vals Science IndexNot measured29.6%Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
τ²-Bench Telecom90.6%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
APEX-Agents21.3%39.5%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Vending-Bench 2$1,034Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 27 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index06
Reasoning benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2DeepSeek V4.1 FlashLeader
GPQA Diamond80.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
LiveBench reasoningNot measured86.7%Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)Not measured21.2%Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)84.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)24.6%39.2%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured89.8%Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
ARC-AGI57.0%94.5%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
ARC-AGI-24.0%72.9%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Chess puzzlesNot measured48.0%Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured43.0%Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14341483DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Text: expert14361501DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14461488DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1297Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1307Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2DeepSeek V4.1 FlashLeader
AIME84.6%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
MGSM (Vals AI)86.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
AA Math Index92.0Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)92.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured98.3%Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Not measured67.4%Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
FrontierMath, tier 4Not measured26.8%Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
ProofBenchNot measured54.0%Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Text: math14351478DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Text: mathematical work14401485DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
Knowledge benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2DeepSeek V4.1 FlashLeader
MMLU Pro84.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)76.1%83.3%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
CaseLaw (Vals AI)55.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)51.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)68.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
MedQA (Vals AI)93.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured41.2%Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)86.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured42.9%Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Text: science14461469DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14401484DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Text: legal and government14251443DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Text: business and finance14101461DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index08
Web design benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2DeepSeek V4.1 FlashLeader
Design Arena: websites11751308DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Design Arena: UI components11461312DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Design Arena: game dev11311330DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Design Arena: data viz11581291DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Design Arena: 3D11321355DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Design Arena: all code categories11631320DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Design Arena: SVG10321245DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Design Arena: ASCII art10831265DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LiveBench designNot measured79.2%Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index020
General benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2DeepSeek V4.1 FlashLeader
LiveBench data analysisNot measured79.3%Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured64.3%Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured47.9%Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured85.5%Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
IFBench60.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)73.3%84.0%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
DTBench85.6%89.9%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMCA28.8%47.0%DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
CL-bench12.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
Surface Evolver BenchNot measured46.3%Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Furniture assemblyNot measured34.2%Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
CL-bench Life7.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
LMArena Text14251464DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Text: instruction following14131473DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Text: creative writing14001437DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena VisionNot measured1278Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Text: English14391473DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Text: non-English14091449DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Text: Chinese14551501DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Text: German14131470DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Text: Japanese13741432DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Text: Korean13701436DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Text: French14291465DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Text: Spanish14241459DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Text: Russian14241467DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Text: Polish14191457DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Text: multi-turn14271461DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Text: longer queries14281473DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Text: writing and language14071450DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Text: entertainment and media13951445DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1288Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1327Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1282Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1260Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1275Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2DeepSeek V4.1 FlashLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

DeepSeek V3.2$0.0007Fits in one request
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash$0.0006Fits in one request

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

DeepSeek V3.2$0.017Fits in one request
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash$0.014Fits in one request

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

DeepSeek V3.2$0.067Exceeds the context window
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash$0.053Fits in one request

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of DeepSeek V3.2 and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
SpecificationDeepSeek V3.2DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
MakerDeepSeekDeepSeek
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedDecember 1, 2025September 10, 2026
Context window164K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.29$0.2225
Output $/Mtok$0.88$0.84
Coding index30.062.5
Independent measurements behind it35
Cost per solved task$0.99Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is DeepSeek V3.2 better than DeepSeek V4.1 Flash for coding?

Pick DeepSeek V4.1 Flash for coding: it scores 62.5 on the Vibe Coding Index against 30.0 for DeepSeek V3.2. DeepSeek V3.2 is neither cheaper nor larger in context, and leads no benchmark both models were measured on.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V3.2 or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash?

DeepSeek V3.2 costs $0.29 per million input tokens and $0.88 per million output tokens; DeepSeek V4.1 Flash costs $0.2225 and $0.84. Cost per solved task is known for DeepSeek V3.2 only.

Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V3.2 or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, with 1.05M tokens against 164K.

How many benchmarks is the DeepSeek V3.2 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash comparison based on?

50 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. DeepSeek V3.2's coding index rests on 3 independent benchmarks and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash's on 5. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/deepseek-v3-2-vs-deepseek-v4-1-flash" title="DeepSeek V3.2 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/deepseek-v3-2-vs-deepseek-v4-1-flash">LLMBenchmark.ai, DeepSeek V3.2 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash</a></p>