DeepSeek V3.2 vs GPT-5.5
Updated October 21, 2026. 65 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.
Decision reading
Pick GPT-5.5 for coding: it scores 67.8 on the Vibe Coding Index against 54.4 for DeepSeek V3.2.
Pick DeepSeek V3.2 when output tokens cost 71.4x less, or when a solved task costs $0.99 against $1.65.
- Shared results
- 65
- DeepSeek V3.2 only
- 10
- GPT-5.5 only
- 67
- Like-for-like categories
- 8 of 9
Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, four public coding benchmarks
GPT-5.5
GPT-5.5 scores 67.8 against 54.4.
2 benchmarks behind each score
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
GPT-5.5
GPT-5.5 leads, 38.4 against 21.5.
Same board, both measured
Agentic work
AA Agentic Index
No call
Only GPT-5.5 has a AA Agentic Index result, 36.4.
Directional only
Reasoning
GPQA Diamond
GPT-5.5
GPT-5.5 leads, 93.2% against 80.3%.
Same board, both measured
Math
AIME
No call
Only DeepSeek V3.2 has a AIME result, 84.6%.
Directional only
Knowledge
MMLU Pro
GPT-5.5
GPT-5.5 leads, 88.1% against 84.9%.
Same board, both measured
Web design
Design Arena: websites
GPT-5.5
GPT-5.5 leads, 1256 against 1175.
Same board, both measured
Long documents
Listed context window
GPT-5.5
GPT-5.5 takes 1.05M tokens against 164K.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
DeepSeek V3.2
DeepSeek V3.2 $0.0005, GPT-5.5 $0.020 per turn.
List prices
Cost per solved task
One SWE-bench Verified task, solved
DeepSeek V3.2
DeepSeek V3.2 $0.99, GPT-5.5 $1.65.
Published attempt cost and pass rate
At a glance
- Coding index
- DeepSeek V3.2 54.4 from 2 benchmarks, GPT-5.5 67.8 from 2 benchmarks.
- Widest category
- Agentic work, 25.9 points apart on average over 3 shared benchmarks.
- Widest single gap
- ARC-AGI-2: DeepSeek V3.2 4.0% against GPT-5.5 85.0%, 81.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- DeepSeek V3.2 $0.42 against GPT-5.5 $30.00 per million output tokens, 71.4x apart.
- Context window
- DeepSeek V3.2 takes 164K tokens, GPT-5.5 1.05M.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | DeepSeek V3.2 | Bars | GPT-5.5 | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 0 | 11 | ||
| Intelligence | 0 | 2 | ||
| Agentic work | 0 | 3 | ||
| Reasoning | 0 | 8 | ||
| Math | 0 | 2 | ||
| Knowledge | 0 | 9 | ||
| Web design | 0 | 8 | ||
| General | 0 | 22 | ||
| All shared boards | 0 | 65 |
CodingLike-for-likeFour of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index011
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V3.2 | GPT-5.5 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified | 70.0% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V3.2 measured |
| SWE-bench Multilingual | 59.0% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V3.2 measured |
| LiveBench coding | Not measured | 85.1% | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| LMArena WebDev | 1362 | 1513 | GPT-5.5 |
| AA Coding Index | 44.2 | 74.9 | GPT-5.5 |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) | 80.7% | 85.3% | GPT-5.5 |
| SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI) | 67.6% | 82.6% | GPT-5.5 |
| Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) | 5.1% | 69.8% | GPT-5.5 |
| Code migration (Vals AI) | Not measured | 45.2% | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| ProgramBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 0.5% | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI) | Not measured | 76.4% | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| SkillsBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 62.5% | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) | 86.2% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V3.2 measured |
| SciCode | Not measured | 56.1% | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) | 35.6% | 60.6% | GPT-5.5 |
| Terminal-Bench | 39.6% | 84.7% | GPT-5.5 |
| FrontierCode | Not measured | 43.0% | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| GSO-Bench | Not measured | 40.2% | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| WeirdML | Not measured | 84.9% | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| MirrorCode | Not measured | 10.0% | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| ALE-Bench | Not measured | 1943.0 | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: coding | 1453 | 1494 | GPT-5.5 |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | 1449 | 1493 | GPT-5.5 |
| LMArena WebDev: React | 1350 | 1506 | GPT-5.5 |
| LMArena WebDev: HTML | 1371 | 1543 | GPT-5.5 |
| LMArena WebDev: from an image | Not measured | 1532 | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here | |||
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V3.2 | GPT-5.5 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 21.5 | 38.4 | GPT-5.5 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 146.1 | 159.7 | GPT-5.5 |
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index03
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V3.2 | GPT-5.5 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Agentic Index | Not measured | 36.4 | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building web apps | Not measured | 1117 | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps | Not measured | 1089 | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building mobile apps | Not measured | 1143 | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building Android apps | Not measured | 1169 | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building Godot games | Not measured | 1173 | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building games | Not measured | 1179 | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| Design Arena: HTML slides | Not measured | 1067 | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| Design Arena: PowerPoint slides | Not measured | 1108 | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| LiveBench research | Not measured | 61.6% | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| LiveBench browser | Not measured | 48.0% | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| LiveBench long agentic | Not measured | 44.6% | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| SREBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 3.8% | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| Finance Agent (Vals AI) | Not measured | 51.8% | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 21.8% | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| Legal Research Bench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 40.4% | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI) | Not measured | 64.5% | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| Time Horizon Index (Vals AI) | Not measured | 8.3% | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| τ²-Bench Telecom | 90.6% | 93.9% | GPT-5.5 |
| APEX-Agents | 21.3% | 55.1% | GPT-5.5 |
| Remote Labor Index | Not measured | 6.3% | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| OSWorld 2.0 | Not measured | 13.0% | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| DeepResearch Bench | Not measured | 54.0% | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| PostTrainBench | Not measured | 27.2% | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| Vending-Bench 2 | $1,034 | $7,524 | GPT-5.5 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index08
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V3.2 | GPT-5.5 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 80.3% | 93.2% | GPT-5.5 |
| LiveBench reasoning | Not measured | 89.7% | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| MMMU Pro (Vals AI) | Not measured | 88.3% | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | 84.0% | 93.5% | GPT-5.5 |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | 24.6% | 45.8% | GPT-5.5 |
| GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run) | Not measured | 90.7% | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| ARC-AGI | 57.0% | 95.0% | GPT-5.5 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 4.0% | 85.0% | GPT-5.5 |
| SimpleBench | Not measured | 69.0% | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| Chess puzzles | Not measured | 63.0% | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| Mystery game puzzles | Not measured | 56.0% | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| EBR-bench | Not measured | 34.3% | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | 1434 | 1489 | GPT-5.5 |
| LMArena Text: expert | 1436 | 1507 | GPT-5.5 |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | 1446 | 1483 | GPT-5.5 |
| LMArena Vision: diagrams | Not measured | 1325 | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| LMArena Vision: homework | Not measured | 1332 | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here | |||
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V3.2 | GPT-5.5 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AIME | 84.6% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V3.2 measured |
| MGSM (Vals AI) | 86.0% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V3.2 measured |
| AA Math Index | 92.0 | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V3.2 measured |
| AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run) | 92.0% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V3.2 measured |
| OTIS Mock AIME | Not measured | 84.4% | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3 | Not measured | 85.3% | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| FrontierMath, tier 4 | Not measured | 72.5% | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| ProofBench | Not measured | 50.0% | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: math | 1435 | 1487 | GPT-5.5 |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | 1440 | 1496 | GPT-5.5 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here | |||
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index09
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V3.2 | GPT-5.5 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU Pro | 84.9% | 88.1% | GPT-5.5 |
| LegalBench (Vals AI) | 76.1% | 86.5% | GPT-5.5 |
| CaseLaw (Vals AI) | 55.4% | 66.2% | GPT-5.5 |
| CorpFin (Vals AI) | 51.0% | 68.4% | GPT-5.5 |
| TaxEval (Vals AI) | 68.2% | 75.0% | GPT-5.5 |
| MortgageTax (Vals AI) | Not measured | 68.8% | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| MedQA (Vals AI) | 93.9% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V3.2 measured |
| MedCode (Vals AI) | Not measured | 49.1% | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run) | 86.2% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V3.2 measured |
| SimpleQA Verified | Not measured | 63.0% | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: science | 1446 | 1485 | GPT-5.5 |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | 1440 | 1465 | GPT-5.5 |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | 1425 | 1491 | GPT-5.5 |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | 1410 | 1478 | GPT-5.5 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here | |||
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index08
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V3.2 | GPT-5.5 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: websites | 1175 | 1256 | GPT-5.5 |
| Design Arena: UI components | 1149 | 1260 | GPT-5.5 |
| Design Arena: game dev | 1132 | 1294 | GPT-5.5 |
| Design Arena: data viz | 1158 | 1265 | GPT-5.5 |
| Design Arena: 3D | 1133 | 1198 | GPT-5.5 |
| Design Arena: all code categories | 1164 | 1260 | GPT-5.5 |
| Design Arena: SVG | 1032 | 1234 | GPT-5.5 |
| Design Arena: ASCII art | 1082 | 1254 | GPT-5.5 |
| LiveBench design | Not measured | 70.3% | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index022
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V3.2 | GPT-5.5 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench data analysis | Not measured | 81.6% | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 60.9% | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| SAGE (Vals AI) | Not measured | 51.5% | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| MedScribe (Vals AI) | Not measured | 86.9% | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| Vals Multimodal Index | Not measured | 68.1% | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| IFBench | 60.7% | 75.9% | GPT-5.5 |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | 73.3% | 84.3% | GPT-5.5 |
| DTBench | 85.6% | 96.0% | GPT-5.5 |
| LMCA | 28.8% | 54.3% | GPT-5.5 |
| CL-bench | 12.4% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V3.2 measured |
| Surface Evolver Bench | Not measured | 88.1% | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| Furniture assembly | Not measured | 44.2% | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| ExploitBench | Not measured | 47.4% | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| CL-bench Life | 7.4% | 22.2% | GPT-5.5 |
| LMArena Text | 1425 | 1471 | GPT-5.5 |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | 1413 | 1478 | GPT-5.5 |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | 1400 | 1455 | GPT-5.5 |
| LMArena Vision | Not measured | 1297 | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: English | 1439 | 1470 | GPT-5.5 |
| LMArena Text: non-English | 1409 | 1467 | GPT-5.5 |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | 1455 | 1534 | GPT-5.5 |
| LMArena Text: German | 1413 | 1480 | GPT-5.5 |
| LMArena Text: Japanese | 1374 | 1499 | GPT-5.5 |
| LMArena Text: Korean | 1370 | 1460 | GPT-5.5 |
| LMArena Text: French | 1429 | 1485 | GPT-5.5 |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | 1424 | 1468 | GPT-5.5 |
| LMArena Text: Russian | 1424 | 1473 | GPT-5.5 |
| LMArena Text: Polish | 1419 | 1465 | GPT-5.5 |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | 1427 | 1476 | GPT-5.5 |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | 1428 | 1484 | GPT-5.5 |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | 1407 | 1466 | GPT-5.5 |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | 1395 | 1449 | GPT-5.5 |
| LMArena Vision: English | Not measured | 1292 | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| LMArena Vision: Chinese | Not measured | 1360 | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| LMArena Vision: reading text | Not measured | 1306 | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| LMArena Vision: humor | Not measured | 1293 | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| LMArena Vision: recognizing things | Not measured | 1231 | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| LMArena Vision: creative writing | Not measured | 1301 | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| LMArena Document | Not measured | 1486 | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V3.2 | GPT-5.5 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
DeepSeek V3.2 costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
DeepSeek V3.2 costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
DeepSeek V3.2 costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | DeepSeek V3.2 | OpenAI GPT-5.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | DeepSeek | OpenAI |
| Weights | Open weights | No public weights listed |
| Released | December 1, 2025 | April 24, 2026 |
| Context window | 164K | 1.05M |
| Input $/Mtok | $0.28 | $5.00 |
| Output $/Mtok | $0.42 | $30.00 |
| Coding index | 54.4 | 67.8 |
| Independent measurements behind it | 2 | 2 |
| Cost per solved task | $0.99 | $1.65 |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is DeepSeek V3.2 better than GPT-5.5 for coding?
Pick GPT-5.5 for coding: it scores 67.8 on the Vibe Coding Index against 54.4 for DeepSeek V3.2. Pick DeepSeek V3.2 when output tokens cost 71.4x less, or when a solved task costs $0.99 against $1.65.
Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V3.2 or GPT-5.5?
DeepSeek V3.2 costs $0.28 per million input tokens and $0.42 per million output tokens; GPT-5.5 costs $5.00 and $30.00. Per solved SWE-bench Verified task, DeepSeek V3.2 costs $0.99 and GPT-5.5 $1.65.
Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V3.2 or GPT-5.5?
GPT-5.5, with 1.05M tokens against 164K.
How many benchmarks is the DeepSeek V3.2 vs GPT-5.5 comparison based on?
65 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. DeepSeek V3.2's coding index rests on 2 independent benchmarks and GPT-5.5's on 2. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.