Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Command A vs GPT-6 Astra

Updated October 21, 2026. 41 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

Command ACohere
Coding
No data
Overall
13.1
Output $/M
$10.00
0
GPT-6 AstraOpenAI
Coding
85.1
Overall
52.7
Output $/M
$50.00
41
vs boards won of 41 shared

Decision reading

Only GPT-6 Astra has a coding score, 85.1 on the Vibe Coding Index; Command A has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Command A has the edge where output tokens cost 5.0x less.

Shared results
41
Command A only
19
GPT-6 Astra only
78
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Command A not benchmarked, GPT-6 Astra 85.1 from 5 benchmarks.
Widest category
Agentic work, 47.3 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI): Command A 17.6% against GPT-6 Astra 87.3%, 69.7 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Command A $10.00 against GPT-6 Astra $50.00 per million output tokens, 5.0x apart.
Context window
Command A takes 256K tokens, GPT-6 Astra 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryCommand ABarsGPT-6 AstraTies
Coding05
Intelligence01
Agentic work02
Reasoning05
Math02
Knowledge05
General021
All shared boards041
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index05
Coding benchmarks for Command A and GPT-6 Astra
BenchmarkCommand AGPT-6 AstraLeader
LiveBench codingNot measured93.7%Only GPT-6 Astra measured
LMArena WebDevNot measured1774Only GPT-6 Astra measured
AA Coding Index27.876.9GPT-6 Astra
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)35.1%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)7.8%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured59.6%Only GPT-6 Astra measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured89.6%Only GPT-6 Astra measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured67.7%Only GPT-6 Astra measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured5.5%Only GPT-6 Astra measured
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured100.0%Only GPT-6 Astra measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)17.6%87.3%GPT-6 Astra
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)Not measured43.3%Only GPT-6 Astra measured
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)Not measured27.6%Only GPT-6 Astra measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)Not measured41.1%Only GPT-6 Astra measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)28.7%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
SciCode38.5%56.5%GPT-6 Astra
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)25.0%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
FrontierCodeNot measured53.3%Only GPT-6 Astra measured
FrontierSWENot measured65.5%Only GPT-6 Astra measured
GSO-BenchNot measured79.4%Only GPT-6 Astra measured
WeirdMLNot measured93.3%Only GPT-6 Astra measured
MirrorCodeNot measured46.7%Only GPT-6 Astra measured
ALE-BenchNot measured2951.3Only GPT-6 Astra measured
LMArena Text: coding13301489GPT-6 Astra
LMArena Text: software and IT13361474GPT-6 Astra
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1798Only GPT-6 Astra measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1775Only GPT-6 Astra measured
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1726Only GPT-6 Astra measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Command A and GPT-6 Astra
BenchmarkCommand AGPT-6 AstraLeader
AA Intelligence Index13.152.7GPT-6 Astra
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured168.8Only GPT-6 Astra measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Agentic work benchmarks for Command A and GPT-6 Astra
BenchmarkCommand AGPT-6 AstraLeader
AA Agentic Index1.051.0GPT-6 Astra
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1374Only GPT-6 Astra measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack appsNot measured1357Only GPT-6 Astra measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile appsNot measured1312Only GPT-6 Astra measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot gamesNot measured1348Only GPT-6 Astra measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slidesNot measured1244Only GPT-6 Astra measured
Design Arena: spreadsheetsNot measured1369Only GPT-6 Astra measured
LiveBench researchNot measured85.2%Only GPT-6 Astra measured
LiveBench browserNot measured84.0%Only GPT-6 Astra measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured82.4%Only GPT-6 Astra measured
SREBench (Vals AI)Not measured56.9%Only GPT-6 Astra measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)9.0%53.5%GPT-6 Astra
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured20.7%Only GPT-6 Astra measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured39.4%Only GPT-6 Astra measured
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured7.1%Only GPT-6 Astra measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured71.7%Only GPT-6 Astra measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)Not measured79.3%Only GPT-6 Astra measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)Not measured62.9%Only GPT-6 Astra measured
Vals Science IndexNot measured65.1%Only GPT-6 Astra measured
Time Horizon Index (Vals AI)Not measured90.5%Only GPT-6 Astra measured
CUA-bench (Vals AI)Not measured19.2%Only GPT-6 Astra measured
Robo-bench (Vals AI)Not measured23.3%Only GPT-6 Astra measured
τ²-Bench Telecom80.7%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
APEX-AgentsNot measured64.7%Only GPT-6 Astra measured
Remote Labor IndexNot measured20.8%Only GPT-6 Astra measured
BALROGNot measured68.3%Only GPT-6 Astra measured
SpireClimbNot measured25.7%Only GPT-6 Astra measured
Vending-Bench 2Not measured$15,515Only GPT-6 Astra measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
Reasoning benchmarks for Command A and GPT-6 Astra
BenchmarkCommand AGPT-6 AstraLeader
GPQA Diamond48.5%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
LiveBench reasoningNot measured92.7%Only GPT-6 Astra measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)Not measured53.1%Only GPT-6 Astra measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)76.1%96.3%GPT-6 Astra
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)12.0%54.7%GPT-6 Astra
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured95.8%Only GPT-6 Astra measured
ARC-AGINot measured98.5%Only GPT-6 Astra measured
ARC-AGI-2Not measured95.0%Only GPT-6 Astra measured
Chess puzzlesNot measured74.0%Only GPT-6 Astra measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured84.0%Only GPT-6 Astra measured
EBR-benchNot measured76.2%Only GPT-6 Astra measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts13261463GPT-6 Astra
LMArena Text: expert12961489GPT-6 Astra
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English13351464GPT-6 Astra
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1297Only GPT-6 Astra measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1337Only GPT-6 Astra measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for Command A and GPT-6 Astra
BenchmarkCommand AGPT-6 AstraLeader
AIME13.3%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)76.2%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
MGSM (Vals AI)85.7%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
AA Math Index13.0Not measuredOnly Command A measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)13.0%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured100.0%Only GPT-6 Astra measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Not measured93.7%Only GPT-6 Astra measured
FrontierMath, tier 4Not measured97.6%Only GPT-6 Astra measured
ProofBenchNot measured99.0%Only GPT-6 Astra measured
LMArena Text: math13001465GPT-6 Astra
LMArena Text: mathematical work13121484GPT-6 Astra
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
Knowledge benchmarks for Command A and GPT-6 Astra
BenchmarkCommand AGPT-6 AstraLeader
MMLU Pro69.2%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)79.7%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)64.5%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)46.0%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)61.4%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
MedQA (Vals AI)80.5%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
MedCode (Vals AI)19.7%48.5%GPT-6 Astra
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)71.2%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured75.6%Only GPT-6 Astra measured
LMArena Text: science13391451GPT-6 Astra
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare13341425GPT-6 Astra
LMArena Text: legal and government13481462GPT-6 Astra
LMArena Text: business and finance13151439GPT-6 Astra
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Command A and GPT-6 Astra
BenchmarkCommand AGPT-6 AstraLeader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1337Only GPT-6 Astra measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1396Only GPT-6 Astra measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1476Only GPT-6 Astra measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1334Only GPT-6 Astra measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1500Only GPT-6 Astra measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1379Only GPT-6 Astra measured
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1431Only GPT-6 Astra measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1359Only GPT-6 Astra measured
LiveBench designNot measured82.0%Only GPT-6 Astra measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index021
General benchmarks for Command A and GPT-6 Astra
BenchmarkCommand AGPT-6 AstraLeader
Vals IndexNot measured65.0%Only GPT-6 Astra measured
LiveBench data analysisNot measured83.0%Only GPT-6 Astra measured
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured46.4%Only GPT-6 Astra measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)55.7%87.9%GPT-6 Astra
IFBench73.9%Not measuredOnly Command A measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)52.7%80.7%GPT-6 Astra
DTBench61.3%97.3%GPT-6 Astra
LMCA10.3%64.4%GPT-6 Astra
Furniture assemblyNot measured80.0%Only GPT-6 Astra measured
LMArena Text13311441GPT-6 Astra
LMArena Text: instruction following13091455GPT-6 Astra
LMArena Text: creative writing13191420GPT-6 Astra
LMArena VisionNot measured1280Only GPT-6 Astra measured
LMArena Text: English13441447GPT-6 Astra
LMArena Text: non-English13131432GPT-6 Astra
LMArena Text: Chinese13271489GPT-6 Astra
LMArena Text: German13421459GPT-6 Astra
LMArena Text: Japanese12851405GPT-6 Astra
LMArena Text: Korean12851428GPT-6 Astra
LMArena Text: French13511432GPT-6 Astra
LMArena Text: Spanish13471422GPT-6 Astra
LMArena Text: Russian13141438GPT-6 Astra
LMArena Text: Polish13241422GPT-6 Astra
LMArena Text: multi-turn13381447GPT-6 Astra
LMArena Text: longer queries13341460GPT-6 Astra
LMArena Text: writing and language13281437GPT-6 Astra
LMArena Text: entertainment and media13061427GPT-6 Astra
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1280Only GPT-6 Astra measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1361Only GPT-6 Astra measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1292Only GPT-6 Astra measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1286Only GPT-6 Astra measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Command A and GPT-6 Astra
BenchmarkCommand AGPT-6 AstraLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Command A$0.0075Fits in one request
GPT-6 Astra$0.035Fits in one request

Command A costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Command A$0.155Fits in one request
GPT-6 Astra$0.650Fits in one request

Command A costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Command A$0.600Fits in one request
GPT-6 Astra$2.50Fits in one request

Command A costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Command A and GPT-6 Astra
SpecificationCohere Command AOpenAI GPT-6 Astra
MakerCohereOpenAI
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedMarch 13, 2025September 4, 2026
Context window256K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$2.50$10.00
Output $/Mtok$10.00$50.00
Coding indexNot benchmarked85.1
Independent measurements behind it15
Cost per solved task$2.69Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Command A better than GPT-6 Astra for coding?

Only GPT-6 Astra has a coding score, 85.1 on the Vibe Coding Index; Command A has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Command A has the edge where output tokens cost 5.0x less.

Which is cheaper, Command A or GPT-6 Astra?

Command A costs $2.50 per million input tokens and $10.00 per million output tokens; GPT-6 Astra costs $10.00 and $50.00. Cost per solved task is known for Command A only.

Which has the bigger context window, Command A or GPT-6 Astra?

GPT-6 Astra, with 1.05M tokens against 256K.

How many benchmarks is the Command A vs GPT-6 Astra comparison based on?

41 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Command A's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and GPT-6 Astra's on 5. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next