Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Muse Spark Open

Updated October 21, 2026. 25 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

Claude Sonnet 5.5Anthropic
Coding
88.9
Overall
56.0
Output $/M
$10.00
23
Muse Spark OpenMeta
Coding
62.1
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$4.25
2
vs boards won of 25 shared

Decision reading

Pick Claude Sonnet 5.5 for coding: it scores 88.9 on the Vibe Coding Index against 62.1 for Muse Spark Open.

Pick Muse Spark Open when output tokens cost 2.4x less, or when the context window is larger, 1.05M against 1M tokens.

Shared results
25
Claude Sonnet 5.5 only
70
Muse Spark Open only
1
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Claude Sonnet 5.5 88.9 from 2 benchmarks, Muse Spark Open 62.1 from 2 benchmarks.
Widest category
Agentic work, 25.5 points apart on average over 8 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
LiveBench long agentic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 78.8% against Muse Spark Open 18.9%, 59.9 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Claude Sonnet 5.5 $10.00 against Muse Spark Open $4.25 per million output tokens, 2.4x apart.
Context window
Claude Sonnet 5.5 takes 1M tokens, Muse Spark Open 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryClaude Sonnet 5.5BarsMuse Spark OpenTies
Coding90
Intelligence10
Agentic work71
Reasoning20
Web design30
General11
All shared boards232
CodingLike-for-likeFour of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index90
Coding benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Muse Spark OpenLeader
LiveBench coding94.7%73.6%Claude Sonnet 5.5
LMArena WebDev17681528Claude Sonnet 5.5
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)64.1%6.6%Claude Sonnet 5.5
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)92.4%76.2%Claude Sonnet 5.5
Code migration (Vals AI)69.8%21.2%Claude Sonnet 5.5
ProgramBench (Vals AI)6.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
IOI (Vals AI)83.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)83.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)58.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)59.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
SciCode61.0%58.4%Claude Sonnet 5.5
FrontierCode52.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
FrontierSWE61.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
ALE-Bench1819.11590.1Claude Sonnet 5.5
LMArena Text: coding1513Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1504Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
LMArena WebDev: React18171529Claude Sonnet 5.5
LMArena WebDev: HTML17411495Claude Sonnet 5.5
LMArena WebDev: from an image1737Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Muse Spark OpenLeader
AA Intelligence Index56.0Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
Epoch Capabilities Index166.2155.1Claude Sonnet 5.5
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index71
Agentic work benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Muse Spark OpenLeader
Design Arena: agents building web apps1303Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1265Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
Design Arena: spreadsheets1245Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
LiveBench research83.6%80.3%Claude Sonnet 5.5
LiveBench browser84.0%36.0%Claude Sonnet 5.5
LiveBench long agentic78.8%18.9%Claude Sonnet 5.5
SREBench (Vals AI)30.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)58.1%61.3%Muse Spark Open
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)42.0%26.3%Claude Sonnet 5.5
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)48.1%38.5%Claude Sonnet 5.5
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)10.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)75.7%53.7%Claude Sonnet 5.5
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)81.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)47.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
Vals Science Index59.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
APEX-Agents75.5%33.4%Claude Sonnet 5.5
SpireClimb1.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
Vending-Bench 2$11,165Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Reasoning benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Muse Spark OpenLeader
LiveBench reasoning91.6%73.7%Claude Sonnet 5.5
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)49.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured89.0%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)55.0%43.9%Claude Sonnet 5.5
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)95.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
Chess puzzles59.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
Mystery game puzzles65.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1494Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
LMArena Text: expert1531Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1502Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
LMArena Vision: diagrams1329Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
LMArena Vision: homework1331Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Muse Spark OpenLeader
OTIS Mock AIME100.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 388.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
FrontierMath, tier 480.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
ProofBench100.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
LMArena Text: math1497Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1510Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Muse Spark OpenLeader
MedCode (Vals AI)52.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
SimpleQA Verified46.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
LMArena Text: science1483Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1464Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1483Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1468Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index30
Web design benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Muse Spark OpenLeader
Design Arena: websites13261311Claude Sonnet 5.5
Design Arena: UI components1367Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
Design Arena: game dev14691290Claude Sonnet 5.5
Design Arena: data viz1389Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
Design Arena: 3D1458Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1364Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
LiveBench design85.0%60.3%Claude Sonnet 5.5
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11
General benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Muse Spark OpenLeader
Vals Index70.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
LiveBench data analysis59.5%60.2%Muse Spark Open
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)67.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
SAGE (Vals AI)51.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)91.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)82.7%78.3%Claude Sonnet 5.5
DTBench97.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
LMCA68.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
Furniture assembly75.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
LMArena Text1473Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1492Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1467Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
LMArena Vision1287Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
LMArena Text: English1484Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
LMArena Text: non-English1456Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1535Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
LMArena Text: French1499Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1451Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
LMArena Text: Russian1454Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1465Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1495Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1474Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1461Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
LMArena Vision: English1289Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1297Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1242Not measuredOnly Claude Sonnet 5.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 20 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Muse Spark OpenLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Claude Sonnet 5.5$0.0070Fits in one request
Muse Spark Open$0.0034Fits in one request

Muse Spark Open costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Claude Sonnet 5.5$0.130Fits in one request
Muse Spark Open$0.075Fits in one request

Muse Spark Open costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Claude Sonnet 5.5$0.500Fits in one request
Muse Spark Open$0.292Fits in one request

Muse Spark Open costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Muse Spark Open
SpecificationAnthropic Claude Sonnet 5.5Meta Muse Spark Open
MakerAnthropicMeta
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedSeptember 28, 2026October 15, 2026
Context window1M1.05M
Input $/Mtok$2.00$1.25
Output $/Mtok$10.00$4.25
Coding index88.962.1
Independent measurements behind it22
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Claude Sonnet 5.5 better than Muse Spark Open for coding?

Pick Claude Sonnet 5.5 for coding: it scores 88.9 on the Vibe Coding Index against 62.1 for Muse Spark Open. Pick Muse Spark Open when output tokens cost 2.4x less, or when the context window is larger, 1.05M against 1M tokens.

Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 5.5 or Muse Spark Open?

Claude Sonnet 5.5 costs $2.00 per million input tokens and $10.00 per million output tokens; Muse Spark Open costs $1.25 and $4.25. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Claude Sonnet 5.5 or Muse Spark Open?

Muse Spark Open, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.

How many benchmarks is the Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Muse Spark Open comparison based on?

25 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Claude Sonnet 5.5's coding index rests on 2 independent benchmarks and Muse Spark Open's on 2. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/claude-sonnet-5-5-vs-meta-muse-spark-open" title="Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Muse Spark Open, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/claude-sonnet-5-5-vs-meta-muse-spark-open">LLMBenchmark.ai, Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Muse Spark Open</a></p>