Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Claude Opus 5 vs Hy4 preview

Claude Opus 5 leads Hy4 preview on coding, 83.0 to 44.3 on the Vibe Coding Index, and Hy4 preview costs 10.0x less per output token ($2.501 vs $25.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 22 benchmarks have a result for both.

Claude Opus 5Anthropic
Coding
83.0
Overall
81.6
Output $/M
$25.00
21
Hy4 previewTencent
Coding
44.3
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$2.501
0
vs boards won of 22 shared, 1 tied

Claude Opus 5 or Hy4 preview: which to pick

Pick Claude Opus 5 for coding: it scores 83.0 on the Vibe Coding Index against 44.3 for Hy4 preview.

Pick Hy4 preview for output tokens 10.0x cheaper ($2.501 vs $25.00 per million) and a larger context window (1.05M against 1M tokens).

Shared results
22
Claude Opus 5 only
109
Hy4 preview only
2
Like-for-like categories
5 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Claude Opus 5 83.0 from 6 benchmarks, Hy4 preview 44.3 from 3 benchmarks.
Widest category
Math, 24.0 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI): Claude Opus 5 53.5% against Hy4 preview 8.1%, 60.6 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Claude Opus 5 $25.00 against Hy4 preview $2.501 per million output tokens, 10.0x apart.
Context window
Claude Opus 5 takes 1M tokens, Hy4 preview 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryClaude Opus 5BarsHy4 previewTies
Coding901 tie
Agentic work70
Math10
Knowledge20
General20
All shared boards2101 tie
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index90
Coding benchmarks for Claude Opus 5 and Hy4 preview
BenchmarkClaude Opus 5Hy4 previewLeader
LiveBench coding90.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5 measured
LMArena WebDev16891631Claude Opus 5
AA Coding Index78.0Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)89.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)97.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)53.5%8.1%Claude Opus 5
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)88.4%77.5%Claude Opus 5
Code migration (Vals AI)57.5%47.4%Claude Opus 5
ProgramBench (Vals AI)3.0%0.0%Claude Opus 5
IOI (Vals AI)84.3%59.3%Claude Opus 5
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)84.6%55.1%Claude Opus 5
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)28.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5 measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)60.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5 measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)65.4%65.4%Tie
SciCode56.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5 measured
FrontierCode53.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5 measured
FrontierSWE52.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5 measured
WeirdML91.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5 measured
ALE-Bench2164.6Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5 measured
LMArena Text: coding1533Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5 measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1527Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5 measured
LMArena WebDev: React17111653Claude Opus 5
LMArena WebDev: HTML16801620Claude Opus 5
LMArena WebDev: from an image1662Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5 measured
SciCode13.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for Claude Opus 5 and Hy4 preview
BenchmarkClaude Opus 5Hy4 previewLeader
AA Intelligence Index50.8Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5 measured
Epoch Capabilities Index163.9Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5 measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index70
Agentic work benchmarks for Claude Opus 5 and Hy4 preview
BenchmarkClaude Opus 5Hy4 previewLeader
AA Agentic Index56.5Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5 measured
Design Arena: agents building web apps1266Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1306Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1348Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5 measured
Design Arena: agents building Android apps1257Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5 measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot games1279Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5 measured
Design Arena: agents building games1261Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5 measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slides1240Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5 measured
LiveBench research88.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5 measured
LiveBench browser84.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5 measured
LiveBench long agentic62.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5 measured
SREBench (Vals AI)12.2%2.3%Claude Opus 5
Finance Agent (Vals AI)58.6%55.1%Claude Opus 5
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)45.5%32.6%Claude Opus 5
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)55.3%45.2%Claude Opus 5
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured8.8%Only Hy4 preview measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)73.6%58.1%Claude Opus 5
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)79.3%69.3%Claude Opus 5
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)27.1%1.4%Claude Opus 5
Vals Science Index47.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5 measured
Time Horizon Index (Vals AI)18.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5 measured
CUA-bench (Vals AI)9.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5 measured
APEX-Agents65.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5 measured
OSWorld 2.031.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5 measured
BALROG63.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5 measured
PostTrainBench35.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5 measured
Vending-Bench 2$11,182Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5 measured
LMArena Search1242Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index18 boards, none shared
Reasoning benchmarks for Claude Opus 5 and Hy4 preview
BenchmarkClaude Opus 5Hy4 previewLeader
GPQA Diamond93.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5 measured
LiveBench reasoning91.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5 measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)37.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)89.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)93.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)54.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5 measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)93.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5 measured
ARC-AGI97.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5 measured
ARC-AGI-290.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5 measured
SimpleBench80.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5 measured
Chess puzzles43.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5 measured
Mystery game puzzles59.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5 measured
EBR-bench45.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1527Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5 measured
LMArena Text: expert1554Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1523Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5 measured
LMArena Vision: diagrams1348Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5 measured
LMArena Vision: homework1338Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Math benchmarks for Claude Opus 5 and Hy4 preview
BenchmarkClaude Opus 5Hy4 previewLeader
OTIS Mock AIME98.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5 measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 385.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5 measured
FrontierMath, tier 473.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5 measured
ProofBench99.0%75.0%Claude Opus 5
LMArena Text: math1533Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1544Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Knowledge benchmarks for Claude Opus 5 and Hy4 preview
BenchmarkClaude Opus 5Hy4 previewLeader
MMLU Pro91.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)87.0%83.8%Claude Opus 5
CorpFin (Vals AI)73.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)75.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)72.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)63.6%43.3%Claude Opus 5
SimpleQA Verified59.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5 measured
LMArena Text: science1531Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1525Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5 measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1530Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5 measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1501Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Claude Opus 5 and Hy4 preview
BenchmarkClaude Opus 5Hy4 previewLeader
Design Arena: websites1309Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5 measured
Design Arena: UI components1346Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5 measured
Design Arena: game dev1337Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5 measured
Design Arena: data viz1329Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5 measured
Design Arena: 3D1334Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1323Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5 measured
Design Arena: SVG1311Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5 measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1352Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5 measured
LiveBench design83.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5 measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
General benchmarks for Claude Opus 5 and Hy4 preview
BenchmarkClaude Opus 5Hy4 previewLeader
Vals IndexNot measured53.2%Only Hy4 preview measured
LiveBench data analysis74.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5 measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)76.9%68.6%Claude Opus 5
SAGE (Vals AI)49.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)91.0%83.6%Claude Opus 5
Vals Multimodal Index73.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)82.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5 measured
DTBench97.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5 measured
LMCA64.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5 measured
Furniture assembly60.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5 measured
LMArena Text1509Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5 measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1518Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5 measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1493Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5 measured
LMArena Vision1320Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5 measured
LMArena Text: English1508Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5 measured
LMArena Text: non-English1502Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5 measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1573Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5 measured
LMArena Text: German1527Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5 measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1520Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5 measured
LMArena Text: Korean1517Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5 measured
LMArena Text: French1519Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5 measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1523Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5 measured
LMArena Text: Russian1507Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5 measured
LMArena Text: Polish1522Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1500Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5 measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1517Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5 measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1499Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1481Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5 measured
LMArena Vision: English1315Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5 measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1400Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5 measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1329Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5 measured
LMArena Vision: humor1293Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1313Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5 measured
LMArena Document1516Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Claude Opus 5 and Hy4 preview
BenchmarkClaude Opus 5Hy4 previewLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Claude Opus 5$0.018Fits in one request
Hy4 preview$0.0021Fits in one request

Hy4 preview costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Claude Opus 5$0.325Fits in one request
Hy4 preview$0.049Fits in one request

Hy4 preview costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Claude Opus 5$1.25Fits in one request
Hy4 preview$0.192Fits in one request

Hy4 preview costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Claude Opus 5 and Hy4 preview
SpecificationAnthropic Claude Opus 5Tencent Hy4 preview
MakerAnthropicTencent
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedJuly 24, 2026August 28, 2026
Context window1M1.05M
Input $/Mtok$5.00$0.834
Output $/Mtok$25.00$2.501
Coding index83.044.3
Independent measurements behind it63
Cost per solved task$1.33Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Claude Opus 5 better than Hy4 preview for coding?

Pick Claude Opus 5 for coding: it scores 83.0 on the Vibe Coding Index against 44.3 for Hy4 preview. Pick Hy4 preview for output tokens 10.0x cheaper ($2.501 vs $25.00 per million) and a larger context window (1.05M against 1M tokens).

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 5 or Hy4 preview?

Claude Opus 5 costs $5.00 per million input tokens and $25.00 per million output tokens; Hy4 preview costs $0.834 and $2.501. Cost per solved task is known for Claude Opus 5 only.

Which has the bigger context window, Claude Opus 5 or Hy4 preview?

Hy4 preview, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.

How many benchmarks is the Claude Opus 5 vs Hy4 preview comparison based on?

22 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Claude Opus 5's coding index rests on 6 independent benchmarks and Hy4 preview's on 3. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/claude-opus-5-vs-tencent-hy4-preview" title="Claude Opus 5 vs Hy4 preview, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/claude-opus-5-vs-tencent-hy4-preview">LLMBenchmark.ai, Claude Opus 5 vs Hy4 preview</a></p>