Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Claude Opus 4.8 vs Inkling 2 Small

Claude Opus 4.8 leads Inkling 2 Small on coding, 62.8 to 48.9 on the Vibe Coding Index, and Inkling 2 Small costs 25.0x less per output token ($1.00 vs $25.00 per million). Updated November 14, 2026; 36 benchmarks have a result for both.

Claude Opus 4.8Anthropic
Coding
62.8
Overall
68.2
Output $/M
$25.00
25
T Inkling 2 SmallThinking Machines
Coding
48.9
Overall
56.9
Output $/M
$1.00
11
vs boards won of 36 shared

Claude Opus 4.8 or Inkling 2 Small: which to pick

Pick Claude Opus 4.8 for coding: it scores 62.8 on the Vibe Coding Index against 48.9 for Inkling 2 Small.

Pick Inkling 2 Small for output tokens 25.0x cheaper ($1.00 vs $25.00 per million) and a larger context window (1.05M against 1M tokens).

Shared results
36
Claude Opus 4.8 only
101
Inkling 2 Small only
15
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Claude Opus 4.8 62.8 from 5 benchmarks, Inkling 2 Small 48.9 from 3 benchmarks.
Widest category
General, 12.2 points apart on average over 12 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
LMArena Text: creative writing: Claude Opus 4.8 1455 against Inkling 2 Small 1348, 17.9 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Claude Opus 4.8 $25.00 against Inkling 2 Small $1.00 per million output tokens, 25.0x apart.
Context window
Claude Opus 4.8 takes 1M tokens, Inkling 2 Small 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryClaude Opus 4.8BarsInkling 2 SmallTies
Coding73
Agentic work23
Reasoning42
Math01
Knowledge20
General102
All shared boards2511
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index73
Coding benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.8 and Inkling 2 Small
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.8Inkling 2 SmallLeader
LMArena WebDev15551647Inkling 2 Small
AA Coding Index74.3Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)87.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)88.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)23.2%12.6%Claude Opus 4.8
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)82.7%81.5%Claude Opus 4.8
Code migration (Vals AI)47.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)1.0%0.5%Claude Opus 4.8
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)71.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)Not measured43.1%Only Inkling 2 Small measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)59.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)Not measured72.7%Only Inkling 2 Small measured
SciCode54.4%52.3%Claude Opus 4.8
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)58.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Terminal-Bench 4.0 (Artificial Analysis run)21.7%13.1%Claude Opus 4.8
FrontierCode 2.0Not measured25.4%Only Inkling 2 Small measured
FrontierCode46.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
GSO-Bench47.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
WeirdML82.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
MirrorCode65.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
LMArena Text: coding14911455Claude Opus 4.8
LMArena Text: software and IT14881443Claude Opus 4.8
LMArena WebDev: React15561660Inkling 2 Small
LMArena WebDev: HTML15421661Inkling 2 Small
SciCode12.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
SWE-Bench Pro V2Not measured97.7%Only Inkling 2 Small measured
SWE Atlas: Codebase QnA57.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
SWE Atlas: Refactoring46.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
SWE Atlas: Test Writing49.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
GameBench 262.5Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.178.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Terminal-Bench 3.021.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Terminal-Bench 4.023.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
ProgramBench0.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.8 and Inkling 2 Small
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.8Inkling 2 SmallLeader
AA Intelligence IndexNot measured30.6Only Inkling 2 Small measured
Epoch Capabilities Index159.9Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index23
Agentic work benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.8 and Inkling 2 Small
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.8Inkling 2 SmallLeader
AA Agentic Index41.9Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Design Arena: agents building web apps1210Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1224Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1209Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Design Arena: agents building Android apps1222Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot games1211Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Design Arena: agents building games1179Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Design Arena: HTML slides1116Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slides1192Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Design Arena: spreadsheets1018Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
SREBench (Vals AI)Not measured1.9%Only Inkling 2 Small measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)53.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)30.0%38.9%Inkling 2 Small
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)43.8%46.6%Inkling 2 Small
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured21.7%Only Inkling 2 Small measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)69.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)Not measured70.0%Only Inkling 2 Small measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)4.3%2.9%Claude Opus 4.8
Vals Science IndexNot measured32.7%Only Inkling 2 Small measured
Time Horizon Index (Vals AI)11.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
τ²-Bench Telecom94.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
APEX-Agents48.9%46.8%Claude Opus 4.8
Remote Labor Index8.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
OSWorld 2.020.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
DeepResearch Bench50.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
PostTrainBench31.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Vending-Bench 2$5,787Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
LMArena Search1202Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
MCP Atlas82.2%85.4%Inkling 2 Small
Toolathlon-Verified76.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
τ³-Banking39.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index42
Reasoning benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.8 and Inkling 2 Small
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.8Inkling 2 SmallLeader
GPQA Diamond92.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)Not measured25.2%Only Inkling 2 Small measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)86.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)92.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)48.7%44.1%Claude Opus 4.8
HLE-Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured28.7%Only Inkling 2 Small measured
CritPt v2, hard subset (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured35.0%Only Inkling 2 Small measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)91.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
ARC-AGI92.5%96.5%Inkling 2 Small
ARC-AGI-272.1%81.7%Inkling 2 Small
SimpleBench64.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Chess puzzles52.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Mystery game puzzles36.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
EBR-bench28.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14821421Claude Opus 4.8
LMArena Text: expert15021478Claude Opus 4.8
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14871424Claude Opus 4.8
LMArena Vision: diagrams1313Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
LMArena Vision: homework1336Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Kagi LLM Benchmark88.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Math benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.8 and Inkling 2 Small
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.8Inkling 2 SmallLeader
OTIS Mock AIME98.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 380.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
FrontierMath, tier 456.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
ProofBench69.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
LMArena Text: math1485Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1494Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
MathArena35.3%42.4%Inkling 2 Small
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Knowledge benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.8 and Inkling 2 Small
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.8Inkling 2 SmallLeader
MMLU Pro89.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)83.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)66.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)75.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)69.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)53.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
AA-OmniscienceNot measured16.1Only Inkling 2 Small measured
SimpleQA Verified53.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
GeoBench81.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
LMArena Text: science14771409Claude Opus 4.8
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1465Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1477Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
LMArena Text: business and finance14581415Claude Opus 4.8
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.8 and Inkling 2 Small
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.8Inkling 2 SmallLeader
Design Arena: websites1250Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Design Arena: UI components1248Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Design Arena: game dev1251Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Design Arena: data viz1234Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Design Arena: 3D1201Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1243Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Design Arena: SVG1182Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1270Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index102
General benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.8 and Inkling 2 Small
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.8Inkling 2 SmallLeader
Vals IndexNot measured56.1%Only Inkling 2 Small measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)68.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured88.6%Only Inkling 2 Small measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)85.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Vals Multimodal Index70.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
IFBench62.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)77.7%83.3%Inkling 2 Small
GDPval-AA14611630Inkling 2 Small
DTBench94.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
LMCA57.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Surface Evolver Bench87.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Furniture assembly42.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
LMArena Text14621403Claude Opus 4.8
LMArena Text: instruction following14771408Claude Opus 4.8
LMArena Text: creative writing14551348Claude Opus 4.8
LMArena Vision1295Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
LMArena Text: English14691418Claude Opus 4.8
LMArena Text: non-English14511390Claude Opus 4.8
LMArena Text: Chinese1508Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
LMArena Text: German1469Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1443Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
LMArena Text: Korean1422Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
LMArena Text: French1481Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1467Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
LMArena Text: Russian14751377Claude Opus 4.8
LMArena Text: Polish1460Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn14761408Claude Opus 4.8
LMArena Text: longer queries14841403Claude Opus 4.8
LMArena Text: writing and language14621381Claude Opus 4.8
LMArena Text: entertainment and media14411359Claude Opus 4.8
LMArena Vision: English1294Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1344Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1303Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
LMArena Vision: humor1283Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1301Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
LMArena Document1475Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
EQ-Bench 41268Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.8 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.8 and Inkling 2 Small
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.8Inkling 2 SmallLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Claude Opus 4.8$0.018Fits in one request
Inkling 2 Small$0.0008Fits in one request

Inkling 2 Small costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Claude Opus 4.8$0.325Fits in one request
Inkling 2 Small$0.018Fits in one request

Inkling 2 Small costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Claude Opus 4.8$1.25Fits in one request
Inkling 2 Small$0.070Fits in one request

Inkling 2 Small costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Claude Opus 4.8 and Inkling 2 Small
SpecificationAnthropic Claude Opus 4.8Thinking Machines Inkling 2 Small
MakerAnthropicThinking Machines
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedMay 27, 2026November 9, 2026
Context window1M1.05M
Input $/Mtok$5.00$0.30
Output $/Mtok$25.00$1.00
Coding index62.848.9
Independent measurements behind it53
Cost per solved task$2.17Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Claude Opus 4.8 better than Inkling 2 Small for coding?

Pick Claude Opus 4.8 for coding: it scores 62.8 on the Vibe Coding Index against 48.9 for Inkling 2 Small. Pick Inkling 2 Small for output tokens 25.0x cheaper ($1.00 vs $25.00 per million) and a larger context window (1.05M against 1M tokens).

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.8 or Inkling 2 Small?

Claude Opus 4.8 costs $5.00 per million input tokens and $25.00 per million output tokens; Inkling 2 Small costs $0.30 and $1.00. Cost per solved task is known for Claude Opus 4.8 only.

Which has the bigger context window, Claude Opus 4.8 or Inkling 2 Small?

Inkling 2 Small, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.

How many benchmarks is the Claude Opus 4.8 vs Inkling 2 Small comparison based on?

36 benchmarks have a result for both models as of November 14, 2026. Claude Opus 4.8's coding index rests on 5 independent benchmarks and Inkling 2 Small's on 3. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/claude-opus-4-8-vs-thinkingmachines-inkling-2-small" title="Claude Opus 4.8 vs Inkling 2 Small, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/claude-opus-4-8-vs-thinkingmachines-inkling-2-small">LLMBenchmark.ai, Claude Opus 4.8 vs Inkling 2 Small</a></p>