Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Claude Opus 4.5 vs Hy4 preview

Hy4 preview leads Claude Opus 4.5 on coding, 44.3 to 44.0 on the Vibe Coding Index, and Hy4 preview costs 10.0x less per output token ($2.501 vs $25.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 8 benchmarks have a result for both.

Claude Opus 4.5Anthropic
Coding
44.0
Overall
55.7
Output $/M
$25.00
3
Hy4 previewTencent
Coding
44.3
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$2.501
5
vs boards won of 8 shared

Claude Opus 4.5 or Hy4 preview: which to pick

Claude Opus 4.5 and Hy4 preview are level for coding, 44.0 against 44.3 on the Vibe Coding Index, so price and context decide.

Pick Claude Opus 4.5 for work measured by LegalBench (Vals AI) or MedCode (Vals AI), where it leads. Pick Hy4 preview for output tokens 10.0x cheaper ($2.501 vs $25.00 per million) and a larger context window (1.05M against 200K tokens).

Shared results
8
Claude Opus 4.5 only
100
Hy4 preview only
16
Like-for-like categories
4 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Claude Opus 4.5 44.0 from 3 benchmarks, Hy4 preview 44.3 from 3 benchmarks.
Widest category
Math, 39.0 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI): Claude Opus 4.5 20.6% against Hy4 preview 77.5%, 56.9 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Claude Opus 4.5 $25.00 against Hy4 preview $2.501 per million output tokens, 10.0x apart.
Context window
Claude Opus 4.5 takes 200K tokens, Hy4 preview 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryClaude Opus 4.5BarsHy4 previewTies
Coding04
Math01
Knowledge20
General10
All shared boards35
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index04
Coding benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.5 and Hy4 preview
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.5Hy4 previewLeader
SWE-bench Verified79.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
SWE-bench (full test set)52.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
SWE-bench Multilingual70.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
LMArena WebDev14941631Hy4 preview
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)83.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)76.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured8.1%Only Hy4 preview measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)20.6%77.5%Hy4 preview
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured47.4%Only Hy4 preview measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only Hy4 preview measured
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured59.3%Only Hy4 preview measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured55.1%Only Hy4 preview measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)Not measured65.4%Only Hy4 preview measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)87.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)47.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
Terminal-Bench63.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
GSO-Bench26.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
WeirdML63.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
Cybench82.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: coding1503Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1483Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
LMArena WebDev: React14781653Hy4 preview
LMArena WebDev: HTML15101620Hy4 preview
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.5 and Hy4 preview
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.5Hy4 previewLeader
AA Intelligence Index29.1Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
Epoch Capabilities Index150.1Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index21 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.5 and Hy4 preview
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.5Hy4 previewLeader
Design Arena: agents building web apps1159Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1156Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1189Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
Design Arena: agents building Android apps1176Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
SREBench (Vals AI)Not measured2.3%Only Hy4 preview measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured55.1%Only Hy4 preview measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured32.6%Only Hy4 preview measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured45.2%Only Hy4 preview measured
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured8.8%Only Hy4 preview measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured58.1%Only Hy4 preview measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)Not measured69.3%Only Hy4 preview measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)Not measured1.4%Only Hy4 preview measured
τ²-Bench Telecom89.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
METR time horizons75.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
Remote Labor Index3.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
GDPval45.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
BALROG43.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
DeepResearch Bench54.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
OSWorld66.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
Vending-Bench 2$4,967Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)77.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 20 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index16 boards, none shared
Reasoning benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.5 and Hy4 preview
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.5Hy4 previewLeader
GPQA Diamond85.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)83.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)86.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)30.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)86.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
ARC-AGI80.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
ARC-AGI-237.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
SimpleBench62.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
Chess puzzles14.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
Mystery game puzzles22.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
EBR-bench14.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
VPCT40.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1476Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: expert1487Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1482Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
Kagi LLM Benchmark80.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Math benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.5 and Hy4 preview
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.5Hy4 previewLeader
AIME95.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
MGSM (Vals AI)95.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
AA Math Index91.3Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)91.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
OTIS Mock AIME86.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 334.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
FrontierMath, tier 44.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
ProofBench36.0%75.0%Hy4 preview
LMArena Text: math1463Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1468Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Knowledge benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.5 and Hy4 preview
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.5Hy4 previewLeader
MMLU Pro87.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)84.6%83.8%Claude Opus 4.5
CaseLaw (Vals AI)62.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)65.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)74.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)68.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
MedQA (Vals AI)95.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)49.2%43.3%Claude Opus 4.5
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)89.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
SimpleQA Verified45.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
GeoBench75.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: science1454Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1444Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1459Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1448Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
FACTS Benchmark Suite43.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.5 and Hy4 preview
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.5Hy4 previewLeader
Design Arena: websites1247Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
Design Arena: UI components1235Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
Design Arena: game dev1228Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
Design Arena: data viz1243Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
Design Arena: 3D1213Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1242Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
Design Arena: SVG1180Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1190Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
General benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.5 and Hy4 preview
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.5Hy4 previewLeader
Vals IndexNot measured53.2%Only Hy4 preview measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured68.6%Only Hy4 preview measured
SAGE (Vals AI)52.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)85.3%83.6%Claude Opus 4.5
IFBench58.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)77.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
DTBench89.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
LMCA44.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
CL-bench21.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
Furniture assembly28.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
LMArena Text1451Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1478Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1445Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: English1461Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: non-English1438Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1470Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: German1449Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1417Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: Korean1424Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: French1471Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1457Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: Russian1447Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: Polish1439Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1466Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1479Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1452Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1434Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
LMArena Document1462Not measuredOnly Claude Opus 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Claude Opus 4.5 and Hy4 preview
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.5Hy4 previewLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Claude Opus 4.5$0.018Fits in one request
Hy4 preview$0.0021Fits in one request

Hy4 preview costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Claude Opus 4.5$0.325Fits in one request
Hy4 preview$0.049Fits in one request

Hy4 preview costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Claude Opus 4.5$1.25Exceeds the context window
Hy4 preview$0.192Fits in one request

Hy4 preview costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Claude Opus 4.5 and Hy4 preview
SpecificationAnthropic Claude Opus 4.5Tencent Hy4 preview
MakerAnthropicTencent
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedNovember 24, 2025August 28, 2026
Context window200K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$5.00$0.834
Output $/Mtok$25.00$2.501
Coding index44.044.3
Independent measurements behind it33
Cost per solved task$1.37Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Claude Opus 4.5 better than Hy4 preview for coding?

Claude Opus 4.5 and Hy4 preview are level for coding, 44.0 against 44.3 on the Vibe Coding Index, so price and context decide. Pick Claude Opus 4.5 for work measured by LegalBench (Vals AI) or MedCode (Vals AI), where it leads. Pick Hy4 preview for output tokens 10.0x cheaper ($2.501 vs $25.00 per million) and a larger context window (1.05M against 200K tokens).

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.5 or Hy4 preview?

Claude Opus 4.5 costs $5.00 per million input tokens and $25.00 per million output tokens; Hy4 preview costs $0.834 and $2.501. Cost per solved task is known for Claude Opus 4.5 only.

Which has the bigger context window, Claude Opus 4.5 or Hy4 preview?

Hy4 preview, with 1.05M tokens against 200K.

How many benchmarks is the Claude Opus 4.5 vs Hy4 preview comparison based on?

8 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Claude Opus 4.5's coding index rests on 3 independent benchmarks and Hy4 preview's on 3. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/claude-opus-4-5-vs-tencent-hy4-preview" title="Claude Opus 4.5 vs Hy4 preview, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/claude-opus-4-5-vs-tencent-hy4-preview">LLMBenchmark.ai, Claude Opus 4.5 vs Hy4 preview</a></p>