Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Claude Fable 5 vs Hy4

Claude Fable 5 leads Hy4 on coding, 75.9 to 65.2 on the Vibe Coding Index, and Hy4 costs 40.0x less per output token ($1.2505 vs $50.00 per million). Updated November 5, 2026; 4 benchmarks have a result for both.

Claude Fable 5Anthropic
Coding
75.9
Overall
78.9
Output $/M
$50.00
4
Hy4Tencent
Coding
65.2
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.2505
0
vs boards won of 4 shared

Claude Fable 5 or Hy4: which to pick

Pick Claude Fable 5 for coding: it scores 75.9 on the Vibe Coding Index against 65.2 for Hy4.

Pick Hy4 for output tokens 40.0x cheaper ($1.2505 vs $50.00 per million) and a larger context window (1.05M against 1M tokens).

Shared results
4
Claude Fable 5 only
127
Hy4 only
2
Like-for-like categories
2 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Claude Fable 5 75.9 from 5 benchmarks, Hy4 65.2 from 2 benchmarks.
Widest category
Agentic work, 6.0 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI): Claude Fable 5 90.3% against Hy4 81.0%, 9.3 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Claude Fable 5 $50.00 against Hy4 $1.2505 per million output tokens, 40.0x apart.
Context window
Claude Fable 5 takes 1M tokens, Hy4 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryClaude Fable 5BarsHy4Ties
Coding20
Agentic work20
All shared boards40
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index20
Coding benchmarks for Claude Fable 5 and Hy4
BenchmarkClaude Fable 5Hy4Leader
LMArena WebDev1624Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
AA Coding Index76.5Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)89.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)95.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)41.4%39.4%Claude Fable 5
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)90.3%81.0%Claude Fable 5
Code migration (Vals AI)55.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)2.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)80.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
SciCode61.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)62.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
FrontierCode53.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
FrontierSWE47.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
GSO-Bench78.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
WeirdML91.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
MirrorCode63.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
ALE-Bench2041.3Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
LMArena Text: coding1518Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1512Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
LMArena WebDev: React1630Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1651Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
LMArena WebDev: from an image1623Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
SWE Atlas: Codebase QnA39.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
SWE Atlas: Refactoring54.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
SWE Atlas: Test Writing55.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
GameBench 275.0Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.183.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
Terminal-Bench 3.034.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
Terminal-Bench 4.044.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for Claude Fable 5 and Hy4
BenchmarkClaude Fable 5Hy4Leader
Epoch Capabilities Index164.2Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Agentic work benchmarks for Claude Fable 5 and Hy4
BenchmarkClaude Fable 5Hy4Leader
AA Agentic Index50.7Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
Design Arena: agents building web apps1247Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1276Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1261Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
Design Arena: agents building Android apps1282Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot games1292Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
Design Arena: agents building games1231Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
Design Arena: HTML slides1173Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slides1251Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)56.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)38.3%34.4%Claude Fable 5
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)49.5%41.4%Claude Fable 5
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured12.5%Only Hy4 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)73.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)15.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
τ²-Bench Telecom98.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
APEX-Agents63.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
Remote Labor Index16.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
PostTrainBench41.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
Vending-Bench 2$5,680Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
LMArena Search1229Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
MCP Atlas83.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
τ³-Banking39.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index17 boards, none shared
Reasoning benchmarks for Claude Fable 5 and Hy4
BenchmarkClaude Fable 5Hy4Leader
GPQA Diamond93.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)89.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)92.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)55.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)85.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
ARC-AGI98.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
ARC-AGI-289.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
SimpleBench81.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
Chess puzzles47.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
Mystery game puzzles52.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
EBR-bench39.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1508Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
LMArena Text: expert1535Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1510Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
LMArena Vision: diagrams1357Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
LMArena Vision: homework1361Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
Kagi LLM Benchmark91.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Claude Fable 5 and Hy4
BenchmarkClaude Fable 5Hy4Leader
OTIS Mock AIME100.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 387.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
FrontierMath, tier 490.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
ProofBench95.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
LMArena Text: math1516Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1518Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
MathArena50.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index13 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Claude Fable 5 and Hy4
BenchmarkClaude Fable 5Hy4Leader
MMLU Pro91.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)88.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)71.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)76.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)68.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)56.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
SimpleQA Verified70.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
LMArena Text: science1508Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1480Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1498Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1480Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
PRBench Finance53.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
PRBench Legal52.6%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Claude Fable 5 and Hy4
BenchmarkClaude Fable 5Hy4Leader
Design Arena: websites1294Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
Design Arena: UI components1314Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
Design Arena: game dev1334Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
Design Arena: data viz1304Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
Design Arena: 3D1315Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1308Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
Design Arena: SVG1298Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1324Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index35 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for Claude Fable 5 and Hy4
BenchmarkClaude Fable 5Hy4Leader
Vals IndexNot measured59.4%Only Hy4 measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)70.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)88.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
Vals Multimodal Index74.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
IFBench63.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)82.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
DTBench98.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
LMCA61.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
Surface Evolver Bench95.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
Furniture assembly35.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
LMArena Text1492Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1503Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1493Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
LMArena Vision1325Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
LMArena Text: English1498Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
LMArena Text: non-English1482Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1544Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
LMArena Text: German1483Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1503Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
LMArena Text: Korean1488Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
LMArena Text: French1507Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1493Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
LMArena Text: Russian1502Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
LMArena Text: Polish1493Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1503Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1510Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1501Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1482Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
LMArena Vision: English1323Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1373Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1337Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
LMArena Vision: humor1341Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1338Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
LMArena Document1496Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
EQ-Bench 41313Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Claude Fable 5 and Hy4
BenchmarkClaude Fable 5Hy4Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Claude Fable 5$0.035Fits in one request
Hy4$0.0010Fits in one request

Hy4 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Claude Fable 5$0.650Fits in one request
Hy4$0.025Fits in one request

Hy4 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Claude Fable 5$2.50Fits in one request
Hy4$0.096Fits in one request

Hy4 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Claude Fable 5 and Hy4
SpecificationAnthropic Claude Fable 5Tencent Hy4
MakerAnthropicTencent
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedJune 9, 2026November 4, 2026
Context window1M1.05M
Input $/Mtok$10.00$0.417
Output $/Mtok$50.00$1.2505
Coding index75.965.2
Independent measurements behind it52
Cost per solved task$2.16Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Claude Fable 5 better than Hy4 for coding?

Pick Claude Fable 5 for coding: it scores 75.9 on the Vibe Coding Index against 65.2 for Hy4. Pick Hy4 for output tokens 40.0x cheaper ($1.2505 vs $50.00 per million) and a larger context window (1.05M against 1M tokens).

Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5 or Hy4?

Claude Fable 5 costs $10.00 per million input tokens and $50.00 per million output tokens; Hy4 costs $0.417 and $1.2505. Cost per solved task is known for Claude Fable 5 only.

Which has the bigger context window, Claude Fable 5 or Hy4?

Hy4, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.

How many benchmarks is the Claude Fable 5 vs Hy4 comparison based on?

4 benchmarks have a result for both models as of November 5, 2026. Claude Fable 5's coding index rests on 5 independent benchmarks and Hy4's on 2. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/claude-fable-5-vs-tencent-hy4" title="Claude Fable 5 vs Hy4, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/claude-fable-5-vs-tencent-hy4">LLMBenchmark.ai, Claude Fable 5 vs Hy4</a></p>