Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Claude Fable 5.2 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra

Claude Fable 5.2 leads Nemotron 3 Ultra on coding, 87.8 to 30.0 on the Vibe Coding Index, and Nemotron 3 Ultra costs 17.4x less per output token ($2.30 vs $40.00 per million). Updated November 14, 2026; 28 benchmarks have a result for both.

Claude Fable 5.2Anthropic
Coding
87.8
Overall
91.7
Output $/M
$40.00
28
Nemotron 3 UltraNVIDIA
Coding
30.0
Overall
49.9
Output $/M
$2.30
0
vs boards won of 28 shared

Claude Fable 5.2 or Nemotron 3 Ultra: which to pick

Pick Claude Fable 5.2 for coding: it scores 87.8 on the Vibe Coding Index against 30.0 for Nemotron 3 Ultra.

Pick Nemotron 3 Ultra for output tokens 17.4x cheaper ($2.30 vs $40.00 per million).

Shared results
28
Claude Fable 5.2 only
40
Nemotron 3 Ultra only
52
Like-for-like categories
8 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Claude Fable 5.2 87.8 from 4 benchmarks, Nemotron 3 Ultra 30.0 from 3 benchmarks.
Widest category
Math, 55.5 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
ProofBench: Claude Fable 5.2 100.0% against Nemotron 3 Ultra 2.0%, 98.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Claude Fable 5.2 $40.00 against Nemotron 3 Ultra $2.30 per million output tokens, 17.4x apart.
Context window
Claude Fable 5.2 takes 1M tokens, Nemotron 3 Ultra 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryClaude Fable 5.2BarsNemotron 3 UltraTies
Coding60
Intelligence20
Agentic work20
Reasoning60
Math20
Knowledge10
Web design50
General40
All shared boards280
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index60
Coding benchmarks for Claude Fable 5.2 and Nemotron 3 Ultra
BenchmarkClaude Fable 5.2Nemotron 3 UltraLeader
LiveBench coding79.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
LMArena WebDev1838Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
AA Coding IndexNot measured49.3Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured86.0%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured69.0%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)65.2%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)93.8%7.6%Claude Fable 5.2
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured4.9%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)19.0%0.0%Claude Fable 5.2
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured50.9%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)62.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
SciCode67.7%40.3%Claude Fable 5.2
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured36.4%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Terminal-Bench 4.0 (Artificial Analysis run)61.6%0.5%Claude Fable 5.2
FrontierCode 2.049.1%1.1%Claude Fable 5.2
FrontierCodeNot measured13.6%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
FrontierSWE69.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
WeirdMLNot measured43.5%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
ALE-Bench2509.8Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1468Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1468Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena WebDev: React1915Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1738Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
GameBench 299.145.6Claude Fable 5.2
CursorBench 4.060.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 27 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Intelligence benchmarks for Claude Fable 5.2 and Nemotron 3 Ultra
BenchmarkClaude Fable 5.2Nemotron 3 UltraLeader
AA Intelligence Index64.611.8Claude Fable 5.2
Epoch Capabilities Index173.4146.9Claude Fable 5.2
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Agentic work benchmarks for Claude Fable 5.2 and Nemotron 3 Ultra
BenchmarkClaude Fable 5.2Nemotron 3 UltraLeader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured20.1Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1402Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1325Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
Design Arena: spreadsheets1434Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
LiveBench research94.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
LiveBench browser86.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
LiveBench long agentic82.9%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured37.7%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)32.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)46.1%15.4%Claude Fable 5.2
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)5.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured31.7%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)83.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)55.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
Vals Science Index63.7%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured83.3%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
APEX-Agents80.1%22.7%Claude Fable 5.2
Remote Labor Index41.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
SpireClimb15.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
MCP AtlasNot measured63.1%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Toolathlon-VerifiedNot measured34.3%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Neither model has a result on the other 23 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index60
Reasoning benchmarks for Claude Fable 5.2 and Nemotron 3 Ultra
BenchmarkClaude Fable 5.2Nemotron 3 UltraLeader
GPQA DiamondNot measured86.1%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LiveBench reasoning88.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)51.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured86.7%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)74.3%28.4%Claude Fable 5.2
HLE-Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)80.2%8.5%Claude Fable 5.2
CritPt v2, hard subset (Artificial Analysis run)76.5%15.0%Claude Fable 5.2
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)93.9%85.4%Claude Fable 5.2
ARC-AGI98.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
ARC-AGI-293.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
SimpleBench94.9%41.7%Claude Fable 5.2
Chess puzzles79.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
Mystery game puzzles90.0%20.0%Claude Fable 5.2
EBR-bench90.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1452Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1473Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1452Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Scale run)72.4%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
GoBench2566Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Math benchmarks for Claude Fable 5.2 and Nemotron 3 Ultra
BenchmarkClaude Fable 5.2Nemotron 3 UltraLeader
OTIS Mock AIME99.7%86.7%Claude Fable 5.2
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 395.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
FrontierMath, tier 4100.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
ProofBench100.0%2.0%Claude Fable 5.2
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1456Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1462Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
MathArena82.8%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Knowledge benchmarks for Claude Fable 5.2 and Nemotron 3 Ultra
BenchmarkClaude Fable 5.2Nemotron 3 UltraLeader
MMLU ProNot measured85.8%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured82.1%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured65.5%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured73.1%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured38.6%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
AA-Omniscience66.83.4Claude Fable 5.2
SimpleQA Verified94.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1465Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1457Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1455Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1435Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
PRBench Finance47.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
PRBench Legal49.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index50
Web design benchmarks for Claude Fable 5.2 and Nemotron 3 Ultra
BenchmarkClaude Fable 5.2Nemotron 3 UltraLeader
Design Arena: websites13511129Claude Fable 5.2
Design Arena: UI components13711126Claude Fable 5.2
Design Arena: game dev13961126Claude Fable 5.2
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1137Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Design Arena: 3D15171108Claude Fable 5.2
Design Arena: all code categories13731131Claude Fable 5.2
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1060Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1093Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LiveBench design85.1%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
General benchmarks for Claude Fable 5.2 and Nemotron 3 Ultra
BenchmarkClaude Fable 5.2Nemotron 3 UltraLeader
Vals Index71.3%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
LiveBench data analysis81.5%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
IFBenchNot measured81.4%Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)83.3%79.3%Claude Fable 5.2
GDPval-AA18311020Claude Fable 5.2
DTBench99.2%90.1%Claude Fable 5.2
LMCA70.6%36.9%Claude Fable 5.2
Furniture assembly90.0%Not measuredOnly Claude Fable 5.2 measured
LMArena TextNot measured1445Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1418Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1399Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1454Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1428Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1498Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1473Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1383Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1472Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1458Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1420Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1382Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1410Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1437Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1407Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1399Only Nemotron 3 Ultra measured
Neither model has a result on the other 25 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Claude Fable 5.2 and Nemotron 3 Ultra
BenchmarkClaude Fable 5.2Nemotron 3 UltraLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Claude Fable 5.2$0.028Fits in one request
Nemotron 3 Ultra$0.0017Fits in one request

Nemotron 3 Ultra costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Claude Fable 5.2$0.520Fits in one request
Nemotron 3 Ultra$0.034Fits in one request

Nemotron 3 Ultra costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Claude Fable 5.2$2.00Fits in one request
Nemotron 3 Ultra$0.133Fits in one request

Nemotron 3 Ultra costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Claude Fable 5.2 and Nemotron 3 Ultra
SpecificationAnthropic Claude Fable 5.2NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra
MakerAnthropicNVIDIA
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedNovember 9, 2026June 4, 2026
Context window1M262K
Input $/Mtok$8.00$0.55
Output $/Mtok$40.00$2.30
Coding index87.830.0
Independent measurements behind it43
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Claude Fable 5.2 better than Nemotron 3 Ultra for coding?

Pick Claude Fable 5.2 for coding: it scores 87.8 on the Vibe Coding Index against 30.0 for Nemotron 3 Ultra. Pick Nemotron 3 Ultra for output tokens 17.4x cheaper ($2.30 vs $40.00 per million).

Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5.2 or Nemotron 3 Ultra?

Claude Fable 5.2 costs $8.00 per million input tokens and $40.00 per million output tokens; Nemotron 3 Ultra costs $0.55 and $2.30. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Claude Fable 5.2 or Nemotron 3 Ultra?

Claude Fable 5.2, with 1M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks is the Claude Fable 5.2 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra comparison based on?

28 benchmarks have a result for both models as of November 14, 2026. Claude Fable 5.2's coding index rests on 4 independent benchmarks and Nemotron 3 Ultra's on 3. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/claude-fable-5-2-vs-nvidia-nemotron-3-ultra-550b-a55b" title="Claude Fable 5.2 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/claude-fable-5-2-vs-nvidia-nemotron-3-ultra-550b-a55b">LLMBenchmark.ai, Claude Fable 5.2 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra</a></p>