Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6
Claude Fable 5.1 leads Claude Sonnet 4.6 on coding, 84.2 to 57.3 on the Vibe Coding Index, and Claude Sonnet 4.6 costs 3.3x less per output token ($15.00 vs $50.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 98 benchmarks have a result for both.
Claude Fable 5.1 or Claude Sonnet 4.6: which to pick
Pick Claude Fable 5.1 for coding: it scores 84.2 on the Vibe Coding Index against 57.3 for Claude Sonnet 4.6.
Pick Claude Sonnet 4.6 for output tokens 3.3x cheaper ($15.00 vs $50.00 per million) and work measured by Vending-Bench 2 or TaxEval (Vals AI), where it leads.
- Shared results
- 98
- Claude Fable 5.1 only
- 26
- Claude Sonnet 4.6 only
- 20
- Like-for-like categories
- 8 of 9
Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
Claude Fable 5.1
Claude Fable 5.1 scores 84.2 against 57.3.
5 benchmarks behind each score
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
Claude Fable 5.1
Claude Fable 5.1 leads, 53.4 against 30.1.
Same board, both measured
Agentic work
AA Agentic Index
Claude Fable 5.1
Claude Fable 5.1 leads, 57.9 against 31.8.
Same board, both measured
Reasoning
GPQA Diamond
Claude Fable 5.1
Claude Fable 5.1 leads, 93.4% against 85.6%.
Same board, both measured
Math
AIME
No call
Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 has a AIME result, 92.3%.
Directional only
Knowledge
MMLU Pro
Claude Fable 5.1
Claude Fable 5.1 leads, 92.4% against 87.3%.
Same board, both measured
Web design
Design Arena: websites
Claude Fable 5.1
Claude Fable 5.1 leads, 1312 against 1284.
Same board, both measured
Long documents
Listed context window
No call
Both take 1M tokens.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Claude Fable 5.1 $0.035, Claude Sonnet 4.6 $0.011 per turn.
List prices
Cost per solved task
One SWE-bench Verified task, solved
No call
Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 has the number, $1.68.
Directional only
At a glance
- Coding index
- Claude Fable 5.1 84.2 from 5 benchmarks, Claude Sonnet 4.6 57.3 from 5 benchmarks.
- Widest category
- Math, 22.6 points apart on average over 4 shared benchmarks.
- Widest single gap
- LiveBench long agentic: Claude Fable 5.1 80.8% against Claude Sonnet 4.6 23.1%, 57.7 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- Claude Fable 5.1 $50.00 against Claude Sonnet 4.6 $15.00 per million output tokens, 3.3x apart.
- Context window
- Both take 1M tokens.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | Claude Fable 5.1 | Bars | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 17 | 0 | ||
| Intelligence | 2 | 0 | ||
| Agentic work | 13 | 1 | ||
| Reasoning | 14 | 0 | ||
| Math | 4 | 0 | ||
| Knowledge | 8 | 1 | ||
| Web design | 9 | 0 | ||
| General | 29 | 0 | ||
| All shared boards | 96 | 2 |
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index170
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.1 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench coding | 97.7% | 66.6% | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1743 | 1523 | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| AA Coding Index | 81.6 | 63.0 | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) | 90.5% | 82.1% | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI) | Not measured | 77.4% | Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured |
| Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI) | 58.1% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.1 measured |
| Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) | 90.3% | 55.8% | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| Code migration (Vals AI) | 54.6% | 39.9% | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| ProgramBench (Vals AI) | 7.0% | 0.5% | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| IOI (Vals AI) | 90.8% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.1 measured |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI) | 85.0% | 57.3% | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI) | 61.3% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.1 measured |
| Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI) | 28.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.1 measured |
| SkillsBench (Vals AI) | 61.5% | 49.0% | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| CyberBench (Vals AI) | 70.4% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.1 measured |
| SciCode | 63.1% | 50.1% | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 53.0% | Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured |
| Terminal-Bench | Not measured | 53.4% | Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured |
| FrontierCode | 50.9% | 24.3% | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| FrontierSWE | 56.3% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.1 measured |
| GSO-Bench | 88.2% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.1 measured |
| WeirdML | 92.9% | 66.1% | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| MirrorCode | 73.3% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.1 measured |
| ALE-Bench | 2143.2 | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.1 measured |
| LMArena Text: coding | 1532 | 1503 | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | 1530 | 1491 | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| LMArena WebDev: React | 1792 | 1512 | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| LMArena WebDev: HTML | 1684 | 1527 | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| LMArena WebDev: from an image | 1722 | 1529 | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here | |||
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.1 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 53.4 | 30.1 | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 166.5 | 152.8 | Claude Fable 5.1 |
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index131
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.1 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Agentic Index | 57.9 | 31.8 | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| Design Arena: agents building web apps | 1318 | 1190 | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps | 1326 | 1213 | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| Design Arena: agents building mobile apps | 1267 | 1212 | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| Design Arena: agents building Android apps | Not measured | 1197 | Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building Godot games | 1327 | 1226 | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| Design Arena: agents building games | Not measured | 1177 | Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured |
| Design Arena: PowerPoint slides | 1305 | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.1 measured |
| Design Arena: spreadsheets | 1380 | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.1 measured |
| LiveBench research | 82.0% | 63.6% | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| LiveBench browser | 100.0% | 68.0% | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| LiveBench long agentic | 80.8% | 23.1% | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| SREBench (Vals AI) | 22.9% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.1 measured |
| Finance Agent (Vals AI) | 58.9% | 51.0% | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI) | 49.2% | 25.8% | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| Legal Research Bench (Vals AI) | 55.3% | 38.5% | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI) | 76.7% | 60.2% | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI) | 40.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.1 measured |
| Time Horizon Index (Vals AI) | 63.3% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.1 measured |
| CUA-bench (Vals AI) | 13.2% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.1 measured |
| Robo-bench (Vals AI) | 5.8% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.1 measured |
| τ²-Bench Telecom | Not measured | 79.5% | Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured |
| APEX-Agents | 68.6% | 43.0% | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| Remote Labor Index | 17.9% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.1 measured |
| OSWorld 2.0 | Not measured | 9.3% | Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured |
| DeepResearch Bench | Not measured | 54.9% | Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured |
| OSWorld | Not measured | 72.1% | Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured |
| SpireClimb | 2.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.1 measured |
| Vending-Bench 2 | $5,422 | $7,204 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 |
| LMArena Search | 1246 | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.1 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index140
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.1 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 93.4% | 85.6% | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| LiveBench reasoning | 91.7% | 86.4% | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| MysteryMechanism (Vals AI) | 47.8% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.1 measured |
| MMMU Pro (Vals AI) | 90.6% | 83.6% | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | 93.7% | 87.5% | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | 59.1% | 33.6% | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run) | Not measured | 87.4% | Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured |
| ARC-AGI | 97.5% | 86.5% | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 90.0% | 60.4% | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| Chess puzzles | 48.0% | 23.0% | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| Mystery game puzzles | 58.0% | 16.0% | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| EBR-bench | 57.1% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.1 measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | 1528 | 1485 | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| LMArena Text: expert | 1544 | 1500 | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | 1522 | 1493 | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| LMArena Vision: diagrams | 1343 | 1306 | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| LMArena Vision: homework | 1345 | 1311 | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here | |||
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.1 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AIME | Not measured | 92.3% | Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured |
| OTIS Mock AIME | 100.0% | 85.8% | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3 | 90.2% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.1 measured |
| FrontierMath, tier 4 | 87.8% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.1 measured |
| ProofBench | 100.0% | 45.0% | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| LMArena Text: math | 1531 | 1462 | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | 1541 | 1483 | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here | |||
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index81
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.1 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU Pro | 92.4% | 87.3% | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| LegalBench (Vals AI) | 88.5% | 82.1% | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| CaseLaw (Vals AI) | Not measured | 64.0% | Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured |
| CorpFin (Vals AI) | Not measured | 65.3% | Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured |
| TaxEval (Vals AI) | 76.0% | 77.1% | Claude Sonnet 4.6 |
| MortgageTax (Vals AI) | 70.8% | 67.7% | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| MedQA (Vals AI) | Not measured | 92.1% | Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured |
| MedCode (Vals AI) | 53.5% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.1 measured |
| SimpleQA Verified | 70.8% | 35.5% | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| LMArena Text: science | 1532 | 1474 | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | 1531 | 1451 | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | 1514 | 1470 | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | 1493 | 1464 | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| FACTS Benchmark Suite | Not measured | 37.0% | Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here | |||
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index90
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.1 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: websites | 1312 | 1284 | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| Design Arena: UI components | 1336 | 1269 | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| Design Arena: game dev | 1381 | 1258 | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| Design Arena: data viz | 1344 | 1278 | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| Design Arena: 3D | 1392 | 1234 | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| Design Arena: all code categories | 1335 | 1275 | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| Design Arena: SVG | 1300 | 1196 | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| Design Arena: ASCII art | 1323 | 1235 | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| LiveBench design | 83.4% | 71.8% | Claude Fable 5.1 |
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index290
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.1 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench data analysis | 80.3% | 76.1% | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI) | 74.9% | 62.5% | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| SAGE (Vals AI) | 48.5% | 46.6% | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| MedScribe (Vals AI) | 91.3% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.1 measured |
| Vals Multimodal Index | Not measured | 60.6% | Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured |
| IFBench | Not measured | 56.6% | Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | 85.3% | 80.0% | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| DTBench | 97.6% | 89.9% | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| LMCA | 65.5% | 46.5% | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| Furniture assembly | 70.0% | Not measured | Only Claude Fable 5.1 measured |
| ExploitBench | Not measured | 23.6% | Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured |
| LMArena Text | 1512 | 1458 | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | 1518 | 1476 | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | 1509 | 1435 | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| LMArena Vision | 1319 | 1283 | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| LMArena Text: English | 1506 | 1472 | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| LMArena Text: non-English | 1508 | 1440 | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | 1584 | 1491 | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| LMArena Text: German | 1499 | 1428 | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| LMArena Text: Japanese | 1562 | 1420 | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| LMArena Text: Korean | 1517 | 1410 | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| LMArena Text: French | 1523 | 1465 | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | 1520 | 1464 | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| LMArena Text: Russian | 1520 | 1440 | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| LMArena Text: Polish | 1525 | 1443 | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | 1493 | 1464 | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | 1524 | 1479 | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | 1510 | 1444 | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | 1497 | 1431 | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| LMArena Vision: English | 1313 | 1298 | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| LMArena Vision: Chinese | 1391 | 1307 | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| LMArena Vision: reading text | 1327 | 1296 | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| LMArena Vision: humor | 1318 | 1248 | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| LMArena Vision: recognizing things | Not measured | 1195 | Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured |
| LMArena Vision: creative writing | 1330 | 1272 | Claude Fable 5.1 |
| LMArena Document | Not measured | 1482 | Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.1 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
Claude Sonnet 4.6 costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
Claude Sonnet 4.6 costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
Claude Sonnet 4.6 costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | Anthropic Claude Fable 5.1 | Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Anthropic | Anthropic |
| Weights | No public weights listed | No public weights listed |
| Released | September 1, 2026 | February 17, 2026 |
| Context window | 1M | 1M |
| Input $/Mtok | $10.00 | $3.00 |
| Output $/Mtok | $50.00 | $15.00 |
| Coding index | 84.2 | 57.3 |
| Independent measurements behind it | 5 | 5 |
| Cost per solved task | Not computable | $1.68 |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is Claude Fable 5.1 better than Claude Sonnet 4.6 for coding?
Pick Claude Fable 5.1 for coding: it scores 84.2 on the Vibe Coding Index against 57.3 for Claude Sonnet 4.6. Pick Claude Sonnet 4.6 for output tokens 3.3x cheaper ($15.00 vs $50.00 per million) and work measured by Vending-Bench 2 or TaxEval (Vals AI), where it leads.
Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5.1 or Claude Sonnet 4.6?
Claude Fable 5.1 costs $10.00 per million input tokens and $50.00 per million output tokens; Claude Sonnet 4.6 costs $3.00 and $15.00. Cost per solved task is known for Claude Sonnet 4.6 only.
Which has the bigger context window, Claude Fable 5.1 or Claude Sonnet 4.6?
Neither: both take 1M tokens.
How many benchmarks is the Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6 comparison based on?
98 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Claude Fable 5.1's coding index rests on 5 independent benchmarks and Claude Sonnet 4.6's on 5. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.