Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Hy4 vs Inkling Small

Hy4 leads Inkling Small on coding, 65.2 to 27.3 on the Vibe Coding Index, at about the same output price ($1.2505 vs $1.20 per million). Updated November 5, 2026; 6 benchmarks have a result for both.

Hy4Tencent
Coding
65.2
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.2505
6
T Inkling SmallThinking Machines
Coding
27.3
Overall
40.9
Output $/M
$1.20
0
vs boards won of 6 shared

Hy4 or Inkling Small: which to pick

Pick Hy4 for coding: it scores 65.2 on the Vibe Coding Index against 27.3 for Inkling Small, though on 2 benchmarks against 4.

Pick Inkling Small for output tokens 1.0x cheaper ($1.20 vs $1.2505 per million).

Shared results
6
Hy4 only
0
Inkling Small only
80
Like-for-like categories
3 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Hy4 65.2 from 2 benchmarks, Inkling Small 27.3 from 4 benchmarks.
Widest category
Coding, 57.2 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI): Hy4 81.0% against Inkling Small 19.1%, 62.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Hy4 $1.2505 against Inkling Small $1.20 per million output tokens, 1.0x apart.
Context window
Hy4 takes 1.05M tokens, Inkling Small 524K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryHy4BarsInkling SmallTies
Coding20
Agentic work30
General10
All shared boards60
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index20
Coding benchmarks for Hy4 and Inkling Small
BenchmarkHy4Inkling SmallLeader
LMArena WebDevNot measured1409Only Inkling Small measured
AA Coding IndexNot measured52.9Only Inkling Small measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured85.9%Only Inkling Small measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured82.2%Only Inkling Small measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)39.4%0.0%Hy4
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)81.0%19.1%Hy4
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured13.7%Only Inkling Small measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.5%Only Inkling Small measured
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured9.3%Only Inkling Small measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured55.1%Only Inkling Small measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)Not measured33.6%Only Inkling Small measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)Not measured64.1%Only Inkling Small measured
SciCodeNot measured49.7%Only Inkling Small measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1451Only Inkling Small measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1448Only Inkling Small measured
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1399Only Inkling Small measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1396Only Inkling Small measured
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1410Only Inkling Small measured
GameBench 2Not measured33.6Only Inkling Small measured
Neither model has a result on the other 31 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for Hy4 and Inkling Small
BenchmarkHy4Inkling SmallLeader
AA Intelligence IndexNot measured12.9Only Inkling Small measured
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured150.8Only Inkling Small measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index30
Agentic work benchmarks for Hy4 and Inkling Small
BenchmarkHy4Inkling SmallLeader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured23.5Only Inkling Small measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured41.3%Only Inkling Small measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)34.4%15.4%Hy4
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)41.4%25.5%Hy4
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)12.5%2.9%Hy4
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured31.8%Only Inkling Small measured
MCP AtlasNot measured79.2%Only Inkling Small measured
Toolathlon-VerifiedNot measured54.4%Only Inkling Small measured
Neither model has a result on the other 36 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index12 boards, none shared
Reasoning benchmarks for Hy4 and Inkling Small
BenchmarkHy4Inkling SmallLeader
GPQA DiamondNot measured83.6%Only Inkling Small measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured89.5%Only Inkling Small measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured33.3%Only Inkling Small measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured88.5%Only Inkling Small measured
ARC-AGINot measured84.0%Only Inkling Small measured
ARC-AGI-2Not measured40.1%Only Inkling Small measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured6.0%Only Inkling Small measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1424Only Inkling Small measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1441Only Inkling Small measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1428Only Inkling Small measured
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1251Only Inkling Small measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1257Only Inkling Small measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Hy4 and Inkling Small
BenchmarkHy4Inkling SmallLeader
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured90.0%Only Inkling Small measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Not measured46.3%Only Inkling Small measured
FrontierMath, tier 4Not measured17.1%Only Inkling Small measured
ProofBenchNot measured6.0%Only Inkling Small measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1458Only Inkling Small measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1440Only Inkling Small measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Hy4 and Inkling Small
BenchmarkHy4Inkling SmallLeader
MMLU ProNot measured85.6%Only Inkling Small measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured83.0%Only Inkling Small measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured69.6%Only Inkling Small measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured75.5%Only Inkling Small measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured62.3%Only Inkling Small measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured37.9%Only Inkling Small measured
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured19.1%Only Inkling Small measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1427Only Inkling Small measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1414Only Inkling Small measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1414Only Inkling Small measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1414Only Inkling Small measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
Web designNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Hy4 and Inkling Small
BenchmarkHy4Inkling SmallLeader
Neither model has a result on 9 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
General benchmarks for Hy4 and Inkling Small
BenchmarkHy4Inkling SmallLeader
Vals Index59.4%27.6%Hy4
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured59.4%Only Inkling Small measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured84.1%Only Inkling Small measured
Vals Multimodal IndexNot measured50.0%Only Inkling Small measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured75.7%Only Inkling Small measured
LMArena TextNot measured1414Only Inkling Small measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1401Only Inkling Small measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1336Only Inkling Small measured
LMArena VisionNot measured1237Only Inkling Small measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1420Only Inkling Small measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1403Only Inkling Small measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1464Only Inkling Small measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1404Only Inkling Small measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1394Only Inkling Small measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1374Only Inkling Small measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1435Only Inkling Small measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1427Only Inkling Small measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1396Only Inkling Small measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1428Only Inkling Small measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1416Only Inkling Small measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1404Only Inkling Small measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1358Only Inkling Small measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1353Only Inkling Small measured
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1243Only Inkling Small measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1292Only Inkling Small measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1243Only Inkling Small measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1207Only Inkling Small measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1205Only Inkling Small measured
Neither model has a result on the other 20 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Hy4 and Inkling Small
BenchmarkHy4Inkling SmallLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Hy4$0.0010Fits in one request
Inkling Small$0.0010Fits in one request

Hy4 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Hy4$0.025Fits in one request
Inkling Small$0.026Fits in one request

Hy4 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Hy4$0.096Fits in one request
Inkling Small$0.102Fits in one request

Hy4 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Hy4 and Inkling Small
SpecificationTencent Hy4Thinking Machines Inkling Small
MakerTencentThinking Machines
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedNovember 4, 2026July 30, 2026
Context window1.05M524K
Input $/Mtok$0.417$0.45
Output $/Mtok$1.2505$1.20
Coding index65.227.3
Independent measurements behind it24
Cost per solved taskNot computable$0.16
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Hy4 better than Inkling Small for coding?

Pick Hy4 for coding: it scores 65.2 on the Vibe Coding Index against 27.3 for Inkling Small, though on 2 benchmarks against 4. Pick Inkling Small for output tokens 1.0x cheaper ($1.20 vs $1.2505 per million).

Which is cheaper, Hy4 or Inkling Small?

Hy4 costs $0.417 per million input tokens and $1.2505 per million output tokens; Inkling Small costs $0.45 and $1.20. Cost per solved task is known for Inkling Small only.

Which has the bigger context window, Hy4 or Inkling Small?

Hy4, with 1.05M tokens against 524K.

How many benchmarks is the Hy4 vs Inkling Small comparison based on?

6 benchmarks have a result for both models as of November 5, 2026. Hy4's coding index rests on 2 independent benchmarks and Inkling Small's on 4. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/tencent-hy4-vs-thinkingmachines-inkling-small" title="Hy4 vs Inkling Small, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/tencent-hy4-vs-thinkingmachines-inkling-small">LLMBenchmark.ai, Hy4 vs Inkling Small</a></p>