Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Mistral Medium 3.5 vs Inkling Small

Updated October 21, 2026. 64 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

Mistral Medium 3.5Mistral AI
Coding
9.2
Overall
14.2
Output $/M
$7.50
25
T Inkling SmallThinking Machines
Coding
29.9
Overall
25.7
Output $/M
$1.20
39
vs boards won of 64 shared

Decision reading

Pick Inkling Small for coding: it scores 29.9 on the Vibe Coding Index against 9.2 for Mistral Medium 3.5.

Pick Mistral Medium 3.5 when what matters is LMArena Text: coding or LMArena Text: software and IT, where it leads.

Shared results
64
Mistral Medium 3.5 only
16
Inkling Small only
20
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Mistral Medium 3.5 9.2 from 1 benchmark, Inkling Small 29.9 from 1 benchmark.
Widest category
Agentic work, 14.7 points apart on average over 5 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
GPQA Diamond: Mistral Medium 3.5 34.9% against Inkling Small 83.6%, 48.7 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Mistral Medium 3.5 $7.50 against Inkling Small $1.20 per million output tokens, 6.3x apart.
Context window
Mistral Medium 3.5 takes 262K tokens, Inkling Small 524K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryMistral Medium 3.5BarsInkling SmallTies
Coding29
Intelligence02
Agentic work05
Reasoning35
Math12
Knowledge36
General1610
All shared boards2539
CodingLike-for-likeFour of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index29
Coding benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3.5 and Inkling Small
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.5Inkling SmallLeader
LMArena WebDev12641409Inkling Small
AA Coding Index46.952.9Inkling Small
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured85.9%Only Inkling Small measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)66.4%82.2%Inkling Small
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only Inkling Small measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)2.9%19.1%Inkling Small
Code migration (Vals AI)5.1%13.7%Inkling Small
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.5%Only Inkling Small measured
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured9.3%Only Inkling Small measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)39.0%55.1%Inkling Small
SkillsBench (Vals AI)Not measured33.6%Only Inkling Small measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)Not measured64.1%Only Inkling Small measured
SciCode40.2%49.7%Inkling Small
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)33.3%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
ALE-Bench764.0Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: coding14601450Mistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Text: software and IT14581447Mistral Medium 3.5
LMArena WebDev: React12541399Inkling Small
LMArena WebDev: HTML13081398Inkling Small
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1410Only Inkling Small measured
Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Intelligence benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3.5 and Inkling Small
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.5Inkling SmallLeader
AA Intelligence Index14.225.7Inkling Small
Epoch Capabilities Index141.4150.3Inkling Small
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
Agentic work benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3.5 and Inkling Small
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.5Inkling SmallLeader
AA Agentic Index7.023.5Inkling Small
Finance Agent (Vals AI)32.1%41.3%Inkling Small
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)4.5%15.4%Inkling Small
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)9.1%25.5%Inkling Small
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured2.9%Only Inkling Small measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)11.2%31.8%Inkling Small
τ²-Bench Telecom94.2%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 32 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index35
Reasoning benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3.5 and Inkling Small
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.5Inkling SmallLeader
GPQA Diamond34.9%83.6%Inkling Small
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)74.8%89.5%Inkling Small
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)13.8%33.3%Inkling Small
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured88.5%Only Inkling Small measured
ARC-AGINot measured84.0%Only Inkling Small measured
ARC-AGI-2Not measured40.1%Only Inkling Small measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured6.0%Only Inkling Small measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14361423Mistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Text: expert14321441Inkling Small
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14451429Mistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Vision: diagrams12541251Mistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Vision: homework12301257Inkling Small
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index12
Math benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3.5 and Inkling Small
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.5Inkling SmallLeader
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured90.0%Only Inkling Small measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Not measured46.3%Only Inkling Small measured
FrontierMath, tier 4Not measured17.1%Only Inkling Small measured
ProofBench9.0%6.0%Mistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Text: math14311459Inkling Small
LMArena Text: mathematical work14401441Inkling Small
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index36
Knowledge benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3.5 and Inkling Small
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.5Inkling SmallLeader
MMLU Pro75.3%85.6%Inkling Small
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured83.0%Only Inkling Small measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)44.2%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)58.8%69.6%Inkling Small
TaxEval (Vals AI)68.0%75.5%Inkling Small
MortgageTax (Vals AI)28.9%62.3%Inkling Small
MedCode (Vals AI)33.8%37.9%Inkling Small
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured19.1%Only Inkling Small measured
LMArena Text: science14281428Mistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14091413Inkling Small
LMArena Text: legal and government14371415Mistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Text: business and finance14261413Mistral Medium 3.5
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3.5 and Inkling Small
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.5Inkling SmallLeader
Design Arena: websites1142Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Design Arena: UI components1079Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Design Arena: game dev1079Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Design Arena: data viz1120Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Design Arena: 3D1061Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1122Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Design Arena: SVG949Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1062Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1610
General benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3.5 and Inkling Small
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.5Inkling SmallLeader
Vals IndexNot measured27.6%Only Inkling Small measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured59.4%Only Inkling Small measured
SAGE (Vals AI)37.6%32.7%Mistral Medium 3.5
MedScribe (Vals AI)67.7%84.1%Inkling Small
Vals Multimodal Index34.8%50.0%Inkling Small
IFBench68.8%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)69.3%75.7%Inkling Small
DTBench75.5%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMCA26.1%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Surface Evolver Bench26.9%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text14211413Mistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Text: instruction following14151399Mistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Text: creative writing13741334Mistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Vision12221237Inkling Small
LMArena Text: English14331421Mistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Text: non-English14041401Mistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Text: Chinese14441464Inkling Small
LMArena Text: German14531408Mistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1401Only Inkling Small measured
LMArena Text: Korean13841367Mistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Text: French14481435Mistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Text: Spanish14111422Inkling Small
LMArena Text: Russian13951394Mistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Text: Polish14301428Mistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Text: multi-turn14231416Mistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Text: longer queries14151402Mistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Text: writing and language13841357Mistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Text: entertainment and media13821352Mistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Vision: English12401243Inkling Small
LMArena Vision: Chinese12441292Inkling Small
LMArena Vision: reading text12331243Inkling Small
LMArena Vision: humor12161207Mistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Vision: creative writing11981205Inkling Small
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3.5 and Inkling Small
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.5Inkling SmallLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Mistral Medium 3.5$0.0053Fits in one request
Inkling Small$0.0010Fits in one request

Inkling Small costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Mistral Medium 3.5$0.098Fits in one request
Inkling Small$0.026Fits in one request

Inkling Small costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Mistral Medium 3.5$0.375Fits in one request
Inkling Small$0.102Fits in one request

Inkling Small costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Mistral Medium 3.5 and Inkling Small
SpecificationMistral Medium 3.5Thinking Machines Inkling Small
MakerMistral AIThinking Machines
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedApril 30, 2026July 30, 2026
Context window262K524K
Input $/Mtok$1.50$0.45
Output $/Mtok$7.50$1.20
Coding index9.229.9
Independent measurements behind it11
Cost per solved task$6.02$0.16
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Mistral Medium 3.5 better than Inkling Small for coding?

Pick Inkling Small for coding: it scores 29.9 on the Vibe Coding Index against 9.2 for Mistral Medium 3.5. Pick Mistral Medium 3.5 when what matters is LMArena Text: coding or LMArena Text: software and IT, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Mistral Medium 3.5 or Inkling Small?

Mistral Medium 3.5 costs $1.50 per million input tokens and $7.50 per million output tokens; Inkling Small costs $0.45 and $1.20. Per solved SWE-bench Verified task, Mistral Medium 3.5 costs $6.02 and Inkling Small $0.16.

Which has the bigger context window, Mistral Medium 3.5 or Inkling Small?

Inkling Small, with 524K tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks is the Mistral Medium 3.5 vs Inkling Small comparison based on?

64 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Mistral Medium 3.5's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and Inkling Small's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next