Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Qwen3.8 Max (0902) vs Hy4

Qwen3.8 Max (0902) leads Hy4 on coding, 67.1 to 65.2 on the Vibe Coding Index, and Hy4 costs 4.8x less per output token ($1.2505 vs $6.00 per million). Updated November 5, 2026; 6 benchmarks have a result for both.

Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Qwen
Coding
67.1
Overall
67.6
Output $/M
$6.00
3
Hy4Tencent
Coding
65.2
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.2505
3
vs boards won of 6 shared

Qwen3.8 Max (0902) or Hy4: which to pick

Qwen3.8 Max (0902) and Hy4 are level for coding, 67.1 against 65.2 on the Vibe Coding Index, so price and context decide.

Pick Hy4 for output tokens 4.8x cheaper ($1.2505 vs $6.00 per million) and a larger context window (1.05M against 1M tokens). Pick Qwen3.8 Max (0902) for work measured by Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI) or Legal Research Bench (Vals AI), where it leads.

Shared results
6
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) only
114
Hy4 only
0
Like-for-like categories
3 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) 67.1 from 5 benchmarks, Hy4 65.2 from 2 benchmarks.
Widest category
Agentic work, 8.1 points apart on average over 3 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI): Qwen3.8 Max (0902) 49.7% against Hy4 34.4%, 15.3 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) $6.00 against Hy4 $1.2505 per million output tokens, 4.8x apart.
Context window
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) takes 1M tokens, Hy4 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryQwen3.8 Max (0902)BarsHy4Ties
Coding02
Agentic work30
General01
All shared boards33
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index02
Coding benchmarks for Qwen3.8 Max (0902) and Hy4
BenchmarkQwen3.8 Max (0902)Hy4Leader
LiveBench coding60.3%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena WebDev1676Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
AA Coding Index76.2Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)87.8%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)85.6%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)38.9%39.4%Hy4
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)77.1%81.0%Hy4
Code migration (Vals AI)24.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
IOI (Vals AI)68.9%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)67.4%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)42.5%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)24.8%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)42.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)28.6%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
SciCode53.2%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
FrontierSWE17.8%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
ALE-Bench1679.1Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: coding1504Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1499Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena WebDev: React1692Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1657Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena WebDev: from an image1637Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
GameBench 268.1Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Terminal-Bench 4.027.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 25 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for Qwen3.8 Max (0902) and Hy4
BenchmarkQwen3.8 Max (0902)Hy4Leader
AA Intelligence Index33.7Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Epoch Capabilities Index157.4Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index30
Agentic work benchmarks for Qwen3.8 Max (0902) and Hy4
BenchmarkQwen3.8 Max (0902)Hy4Leader
AA Agentic Index56.0Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: agents building web apps1288Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1301Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1224Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: agents building Android apps1205Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot games1235Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slides1217Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: spreadsheets1056Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LiveBench research69.9%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LiveBench browser49.4%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LiveBench long agentic29.9%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)57.9%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)49.7%34.4%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)47.6%41.4%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)15.4%12.5%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)72.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)12.9%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
APEX-Agents63.3%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Search1261Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
τ³-Banking55.2%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 24 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index14 boards, none shared
Reasoning benchmarks for Qwen3.8 Max (0902) and Hy4
BenchmarkQwen3.8 Max (0902)Hy4Leader
GPQA Diamond93.7%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LiveBench reasoning88.2%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)23.9%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)88.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)92.8%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)43.1%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)92.7%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Chess puzzles46.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Mystery game puzzles38.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1496Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: expert1508Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1505Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Vision: diagrams1323Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Vision: homework1336Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Qwen3.8 Max (0902) and Hy4
BenchmarkQwen3.8 Max (0902)Hy4Leader
OTIS Mock AIME100.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 374.7%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
FrontierMath, tier 446.3%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
ProofBench58.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: math1506Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1496Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
MathArena51.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Qwen3.8 Max (0902) and Hy4
BenchmarkQwen3.8 Max (0902)Hy4Leader
MMLU Pro88.6%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)83.6%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)65.8%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)75.5%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)64.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
MedCode (Vals AI)40.7%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
SimpleQA Verified47.3%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: science1514Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1505Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1494Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1480Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Qwen3.8 Max (0902) and Hy4
BenchmarkQwen3.8 Max (0902)Hy4Leader
Design Arena: websites1274Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: UI components1335Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: game dev1314Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: data viz1284Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: 3D1334Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: all code categories1292Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1193Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LiveBench design78.6%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
General benchmarks for Qwen3.8 Max (0902) and Hy4
BenchmarkQwen3.8 Max (0902)Hy4Leader
Vals Index59.1%59.4%Hy4
LiveBench data analysis78.4%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)67.1%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
SAGE (Vals AI)81.8%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)85.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Vals Multimodal Index65.4%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)80.3%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
DTBench92.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMCA46.2%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Furniture assembly20.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text1483Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1480Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1478Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Vision1313Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: English1493Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: non-English1472Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1540Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: German1475Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1471Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: Korean1462Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: French1503Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1488Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: Russian1484Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: Polish1475Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1491Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1488Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1478Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1465Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Vision: English1311Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1358Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1322Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Vision: humor1304Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1312Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Qwen3.8 Max (0902) and Hy4
BenchmarkQwen3.8 Max (0902)Hy4Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Qwen3.8 Max (0902)$0.0050Fits in one request
Hy4$0.0010Fits in one request

Hy4 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Qwen3.8 Max (0902)$0.118Fits in one request
Hy4$0.025Fits in one request

Hy4 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Qwen3.8 Max (0902)$0.460Fits in one request
Hy4$0.096Fits in one request

Hy4 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Qwen3.8 Max (0902) and Hy4
SpecificationQwen3.8 Max (0902)Tencent Hy4
MakerQwenTencent
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedSeptember 3, 2026November 4, 2026
Context window1M1.05M
Input $/Mtok$2.00$0.417
Output $/Mtok$6.00$1.2505
Coding index67.165.2
Independent measurements behind it52
Cost per solved task$1.32Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Qwen3.8 Max (0902) better than Hy4 for coding?

Qwen3.8 Max (0902) and Hy4 are level for coding, 67.1 against 65.2 on the Vibe Coding Index, so price and context decide. Pick Hy4 for output tokens 4.8x cheaper ($1.2505 vs $6.00 per million) and a larger context window (1.05M against 1M tokens). Pick Qwen3.8 Max (0902) for work measured by Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI) or Legal Research Bench (Vals AI), where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Qwen3.8 Max (0902) or Hy4?

Qwen3.8 Max (0902) costs $2.00 per million input tokens and $6.00 per million output tokens; Hy4 costs $0.417 and $1.2505. Cost per solved task is known for Qwen3.8 Max (0902) only.

Which has the bigger context window, Qwen3.8 Max (0902) or Hy4?

Hy4, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.

How many benchmarks is the Qwen3.8 Max (0902) vs Hy4 comparison based on?

6 benchmarks have a result for both models as of November 5, 2026. Qwen3.8 Max (0902)'s coding index rests on 5 independent benchmarks and Hy4's on 2. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/qwen3-8-max-0902-vs-tencent-hy4" title="Qwen3.8 Max (0902) vs Hy4, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/qwen3-8-max-0902-vs-tencent-hy4">LLMBenchmark.ai, Qwen3.8 Max (0902) vs Hy4</a></p>