Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

o3 vs Inkling Small

Inkling Small leads o3 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 25.7 to 20.2, and Inkling Small costs 6.7x less per output token ($1.20 vs $8.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 58 benchmarks have a result for both.

o3OpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
51.1
Output $/M
$8.00
21
T Inkling SmallThinking Machines
Coding
27.3
Overall
43.6
Output $/M
$1.20
37
vs boards won of 58 shared

o3 or Inkling Small: which to pick

Only Inkling Small has a coding score, 27.3 on the Vibe Coding Index; o3 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick o3 for work measured by GPQA Diamond or Mystery game puzzles, where it leads.

Shared results
58
o3 only
44
Inkling Small only
26
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
o3 not benchmarked, Inkling Small 27.3 from 4 benchmarks.
Widest category
Reasoning, 10.8 points apart on average over 12 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
ARC-AGI-2: o3 6.5% against Inkling Small 40.1%, 33.6 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
o3 $8.00 against Inkling Small $1.20 per million output tokens, 6.7x apart.
Context window
o3 takes 200K tokens, Inkling Small 524K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
Categoryo3BarsInkling SmallTies
Coding03
Intelligence02
Reasoning210
Math04
Knowledge83
General1115
All shared boards2137
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index03
Coding benchmarks for o3 and Inkling Small
Benchmarko3Inkling SmallLeader
Aider polyglot81.3%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
SWE-bench Verified58.4%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
SWE-bench Multimodal36.0%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
LMArena WebDevNot measured1409Only Inkling Small measured
AA Coding IndexNot measured52.9Only Inkling Small measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)83.9%85.9%Inkling Small
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured82.2%Only Inkling Small measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only Inkling Small measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured19.1%Only Inkling Small measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured13.7%Only Inkling Small measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.5%Only Inkling Small measured
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured9.3%Only Inkling Small measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured55.1%Only Inkling Small measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)Not measured33.6%Only Inkling Small measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)Not measured64.1%Only Inkling Small measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)80.8%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
SciCodeNot measured49.7%Only Inkling Small measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)37.1%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
GSO-Bench8.8%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
WeirdML52.4%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
ALE-Bench933.5Not measuredOnly o3 measured
LMArena Text: coding14071450Inkling Small
LMArena Text: software and IT14151447Inkling Small
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1399Only Inkling Small measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1398Only Inkling Small measured
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1410Only Inkling Small measured
SciCode9.2%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Intelligence benchmarks for o3 and Inkling Small
Benchmarko3Inkling SmallLeader
AA Intelligence Index20.225.7Inkling Small
Epoch Capabilities Index146.7150.3Inkling Small
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index13 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for o3 and Inkling Small
Benchmarko3Inkling SmallLeader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured23.5Only Inkling Small measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured41.3%Only Inkling Small measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured15.4%Only Inkling Small measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured25.5%Only Inkling Small measured
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured2.9%Only Inkling Small measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured31.8%Only Inkling Small measured
τ²-Bench Telecom80.7%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
METR time horizons65.4%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
GDPval30.8%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
DeepResearch Bench45.2%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
OSWorld23.0%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)63.0%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
BrowseComp-Plus65.9%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 28 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index210
Reasoning benchmarks for o3 and Inkling Small
Benchmarko3Inkling SmallLeader
GPQA Diamond84.1%83.6%o3
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)80.4%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)82.7%89.5%Inkling Small
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)20.1%33.3%Inkling Small
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)81.8%88.5%Inkling Small
ARC-AGI60.8%84.0%Inkling Small
ARC-AGI-26.5%40.1%Inkling Small
SimpleBench53.1%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
Chess puzzles37.0%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
Mystery game puzzles29.0%6.0%o3
VPCT52.0%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14021423Inkling Small
LMArena Text: expert14021441Inkling Small
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14111429Inkling Small
LMArena Vision: diagrams12201251Inkling Small
LMArena Vision: homework12341257Inkling Small
Kagi LLM Benchmark67.6%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Math benchmarks for o3 and Inkling Small
Benchmarko3Inkling SmallLeader
AIME85.3%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)94.6%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
MGSM (Vals AI)91.8%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
AA Math Index88.3Not measuredOnly o3 measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)88.3%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
OTIS Mock AIME84.4%90.0%Inkling Small
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 333.3%46.3%Inkling Small
FrontierMath, tier 4Not measured17.1%Only Inkling Small measured
ProofBenchNot measured6.0%Only Inkling Small measured
MATH level 597.8%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
LMArena Text: math14261459Inkling Small
LMArena Text: mathematical work14231441Inkling Small
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index83
Knowledge benchmarks for o3 and Inkling Small
Benchmarko3Inkling SmallLeader
MMLU Pro85.6%85.6%o3
LegalBench (Vals AI)83.8%83.0%o3
CorpFin (Vals AI)59.7%69.6%Inkling Small
TaxEval (Vals AI)74.6%75.5%Inkling Small
MortgageTax (Vals AI)65.7%62.3%o3
MedQA (Vals AI)96.1%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)47.3%37.9%o3
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)85.3%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
SimpleQA Verified49.4%19.1%o3
GeoBench74.0%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
LMArena Text: science14291428o3
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14481413o3
LMArena Text: legal and government14281415o3
LMArena Text: business and finance13931413Inkling Small
FACTS Benchmark Suite44.4%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for o3 and Inkling Small
Benchmarko3Inkling SmallLeader
Design Arena: websites1036Not measuredOnly o3 measured
Design Arena: UI components1017Not measuredOnly o3 measured
Design Arena: game dev1034Not measuredOnly o3 measured
Design Arena: data viz1200Not measuredOnly o3 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1020Not measuredOnly o3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1115
General benchmarks for o3 and Inkling Small
Benchmarko3Inkling SmallLeader
Vals IndexNot measured27.6%Only Inkling Small measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured59.4%Only Inkling Small measured
SAGE (Vals AI)41.8%32.7%o3
MedScribe (Vals AI)76.7%84.1%Inkling Small
Vals Multimodal IndexNot measured50.0%Only Inkling Small measured
IFBench71.4%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)74.7%75.7%Inkling Small
DTBench84.8%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
LMCA39.7%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
Fiction.LiveBench88.9%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)83.9%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
CL-bench17.8%Not measuredOnly o3 measured
LMArena Text14101413Inkling Small
LMArena Text: instruction following13681399Inkling Small
LMArena Text: creative writing13591334o3
LMArena Vision12141237Inkling Small
LMArena Text: English14171421Inkling Small
LMArena Text: non-English14011401o3
LMArena Text: Chinese14371464Inkling Small
LMArena Text: German14201408o3
LMArena Text: Japanese14031401o3
LMArena Text: Korean13701367o3
LMArena Text: French14301435Inkling Small
LMArena Text: Spanish13951422Inkling Small
LMArena Text: Russian14061394o3
LMArena Text: Polish14381428o3
LMArena Text: multi-turn14051416Inkling Small
LMArena Text: longer queries13721402Inkling Small
LMArena Text: writing and language13721357o3
LMArena Text: entertainment and media13731352o3
LMArena Vision: English12211243Inkling Small
LMArena Vision: Chinese12371292Inkling Small
LMArena Vision: reading text12181243Inkling Small
LMArena Vision: humor12221207o3
LMArena Vision: captioning1210Not measuredOnly o3 measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things1234Not measuredOnly o3 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing12011205Inkling Small
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for o3 and Inkling Small
Benchmarko3Inkling SmallLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

o3$0.0060Fits in one request
Inkling Small$0.0010Fits in one request

Inkling Small costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

o3$0.124Fits in one request
Inkling Small$0.026Fits in one request

Inkling Small costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

o3$0.480Exceeds the context window
Inkling Small$0.102Fits in one request

Inkling Small costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of o3 and Inkling Small
SpecificationOpenAI o3Thinking Machines Inkling Small
MakerOpenAIThinking Machines
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedApril 16, 2025July 30, 2026
Context window200K524K
Input $/Mtok$2.00$0.45
Output $/Mtok$8.00$1.20
Coding indexNot benchmarked27.3
Independent measurements behind it04
Cost per solved task$0.571$0.16
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is o3 better than Inkling Small for coding?

Only Inkling Small has a coding score, 27.3 on the Vibe Coding Index; o3 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick o3 for work measured by GPQA Diamond or Mystery game puzzles, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, o3 or Inkling Small?

o3 costs $2.00 per million input tokens and $8.00 per million output tokens; Inkling Small costs $0.45 and $1.20. Per solved SWE-bench Verified task, o3 costs $0.571 and Inkling Small $0.16.

Which has the bigger context window, o3 or Inkling Small?

Inkling Small, with 524K tokens against 200K.

How many benchmarks is the o3 vs Inkling Small comparison based on?

58 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. o3's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Inkling Small's on 4. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next