LLMBenchmark.ai

Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Mistral Medium 3.5 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)

Updated October 21, 2026. 73 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

Mistral Medium 3.5Mistral AI
Coding
9.2
Overall
14.2
Output $/M
$7.50
0
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Qwen
Coding
63.5
Overall
45.4
Output $/M
$6.00
73
vs boards won of 73 shared

Decision reading

Pick Qwen3.8 Max (0902) for coding: it scores 63.5 on the Vibe Coding Index against 9.2 for Mistral Medium 3.5.

Mistral Medium 3.5 is neither cheaper nor larger in context, and leads no benchmark both models were measured on.

Shared results
73
Mistral Medium 3.5 only
7
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) only
40
Like-for-like categories
8 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Mistral Medium 3.5 9.2 from 1 benchmark, Qwen3.8 Max (0902) 63.5 from 2 benchmarks.
Widest category
Agentic work, 36.5 points apart on average over 5 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI): Mistral Medium 3.5 2.9% against Qwen3.8 Max (0902) 64.7%, 61.8 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Mistral Medium 3.5 $7.50 against Qwen3.8 Max (0902) $6.00 per million output tokens, 1.3x apart.
Context window
Mistral Medium 3.5 takes 262K tokens, Qwen3.8 Max (0902) 1M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryMistral Medium 3.5BarsQwen3.8 Max (0902)Ties
Coding011
Intelligence02
Agentic work05
Reasoning08
Math03
Knowledge09
Web design07
General028
All shared boards073
CodingLike-for-likeFour of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index011
Coding benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3.5 and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.5Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
LiveBench codingNot measured60.3%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena WebDev12641674Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
AA Coding Index46.976.2Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured87.8%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)66.4%85.6%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured34.3%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)2.9%64.7%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Code migration (Vals AI)5.1%24.0%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured68.9%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)39.0%67.4%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)Not measured42.5%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)Not measured12.8%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)Not measured42.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)Not measured28.6%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
SciCode40.2%53.2%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)33.3%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
FrontierSWENot measured17.8%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
ALE-Bench764.0Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
LMArena Text: coding14601502Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: software and IT14581498Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena WebDev: React12541692Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena WebDev: HTML13081649Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1637Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Intelligence benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3.5 and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.5Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
AA Intelligence Index14.245.4Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Epoch Capabilities Index141.4157.4Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
Agentic work benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3.5 and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.5Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
AA Agentic Index7.056.0Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1301Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack appsNot measured1305Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile appsNot measured1223Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: agents building Android appsNot measured1207Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot gamesNot measured1234Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slidesNot measured1257Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: spreadsheetsNot measured868Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LiveBench researchNot measured69.9%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LiveBench browserNot measured32.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured42.3%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)32.1%50.6%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)4.5%32.1%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)9.1%47.6%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)11.2%60.1%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)Not measured12.9%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
τ²-Bench Telecom94.2%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
APEX-AgentsNot measured63.3%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena SearchNot measured1261Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 20 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index08
Reasoning benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3.5 and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.5Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
GPQA Diamond34.9%93.7%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LiveBench reasoningNot measured88.2%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)Not measured23.9%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured88.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)74.8%92.8%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)13.8%43.1%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured92.7%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Chess puzzlesNot measured46.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured38.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14361496Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: expert14321507Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14451503Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Vision: diagrams12541323Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Vision: homework12301336Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index03
Math benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3.5 and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.5Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured100.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Not measured74.7%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
FrontierMath, tier 4Not measured46.3%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
ProofBench9.0%58.0%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: math14311501Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: mathematical work14401491Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index09
Knowledge benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3.5 and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.5Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
MMLU Pro75.3%88.6%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured83.6%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)44.2%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)58.8%65.8%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
TaxEval (Vals AI)68.0%75.5%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
MortgageTax (Vals AI)28.9%64.0%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
MedCode (Vals AI)33.8%40.7%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured47.3%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: science14281512Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14091503Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: legal and government14371492Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: business and finance14261480Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index07
Web design benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3.5 and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.5Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
Design Arena: websites11421275Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Design Arena: UI components10791340Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Design Arena: game dev10791313Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Design Arena: data viz11201281Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Design Arena: 3D10611337Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Design Arena: all code categories11221293Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Design Arena: SVG949Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Design Arena: ASCII art10621201Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LiveBench designNot measured78.6%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index028
General benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3.5 and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.5Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
LiveBench data analysisNot measured78.4%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured67.1%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
SAGE (Vals AI)37.6%51.2%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
MedScribe (Vals AI)67.7%85.0%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Vals Multimodal Index34.8%65.4%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
IFBench68.8%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)69.3%80.3%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
DTBench75.5%92.0%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMCA26.1%46.2%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Surface Evolver Bench26.9%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.5 measured
Furniture assemblyNot measured20.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text14211483Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: instruction following14151481Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: creative writing13741477Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Vision12221313Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: English14331491Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: non-English14041473Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: Chinese14441539Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: German14531478Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1473Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: Korean13841460Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: French14481498Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: Spanish14111489Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: Russian13951482Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: Polish14301471Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: multi-turn14231489Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: longer queries14151488Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: writing and language13841477Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: entertainment and media13821464Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Vision: English12401311Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Vision: Chinese12441358Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Vision: reading text12331322Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Vision: humor12161304Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Vision: creative writing11981312Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3.5 and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.5Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Mistral Medium 3.5$0.0053Fits in one request
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)$0.0050Fits in one request

Qwen3.8 Max (0902) costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Mistral Medium 3.5$0.098Fits in one request
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)$0.118Fits in one request

Mistral Medium 3.5 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Mistral Medium 3.5$0.375Fits in one request
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)$0.460Fits in one request

Mistral Medium 3.5 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Mistral Medium 3.5 and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
SpecificationMistral Medium 3.5Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
MakerMistral AIQwen
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedApril 30, 2026September 3, 2026
Context window262K1M
Input $/Mtok$1.50$2.00
Output $/Mtok$7.50$6.00
Coding index9.263.5
Independent measurements behind it12
Cost per solved task$6.02$1.32
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Mistral Medium 3.5 better than Qwen3.8 Max (0902) for coding?

Pick Qwen3.8 Max (0902) for coding: it scores 63.5 on the Vibe Coding Index against 9.2 for Mistral Medium 3.5. Mistral Medium 3.5 is neither cheaper nor larger in context, and leads no benchmark both models were measured on.

Which is cheaper, Mistral Medium 3.5 or Qwen3.8 Max (0902)?

Mistral Medium 3.5 costs $1.50 per million input tokens and $7.50 per million output tokens; Qwen3.8 Max (0902) costs $2.00 and $6.00. Per solved SWE-bench Verified task, Mistral Medium 3.5 costs $6.02 and Qwen3.8 Max (0902) $1.32.

Which has the bigger context window, Mistral Medium 3.5 or Qwen3.8 Max (0902)?

Qwen3.8 Max (0902), with 1M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks is the Mistral Medium 3.5 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902) comparison based on?

73 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Mistral Medium 3.5's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)'s on 2. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next