LLMBenchmark.ai

Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Kimi K2 0711 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)

Updated October 21, 2026. 16 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

Kimi K2 0711Moonshot AI
Coding
64.7
Overall
12.7
Output $/M
$2.30
0
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Qwen
Coding
63.5
Overall
45.4
Output $/M
$6.00
16
vs boards won of 16 shared

Decision reading

Kimi K2 0711 and Qwen3.8 Max (0902) are level for coding, 64.7 against 63.5 on the Vibe Coding Index, so price and context decide.

Pick Qwen3.8 Max (0902) when the context window is larger, 1M against 131K tokens, or when what matters is LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) or AA Intelligence Index, where it leads. Pick Kimi K2 0711 when output tokens cost 2.6x less.

Shared results
16
Kimi K2 0711 only
20
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) only
97
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Kimi K2 0711 64.7 from 2 benchmarks, Qwen3.8 Max (0902) 63.5 from 2 benchmarks.
Widest category
Web design, 34.9 points apart on average over 5 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Design Arena: game dev: Kimi K2 0711 974 against Qwen3.8 Max (0902) 1313, 42.4 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Kimi K2 0711 $2.30 against Qwen3.8 Max (0902) $6.00 per million output tokens, 2.6x apart.
Context window
Kimi K2 0711 takes 131K tokens, Qwen3.8 Max (0902) 1M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryKimi K2 0711BarsQwen3.8 Max (0902)Ties
Coding01
Intelligence02
Reasoning03
Knowledge04
Web design05
General01
All shared boards016
CodingLike-for-likeFour of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index01
Coding benchmarks for Kimi K2 0711 and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkKimi K2 0711Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
Aider polyglot59.1%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 0711 measured
SWE-bench Verified71.2%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 0711 measured
LiveBench codingNot measured60.3%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena WebDevNot measured1674Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
AA Coding IndexNot measured76.2Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)70.5%87.8%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured85.6%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured34.3%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured64.7%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured24.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured68.9%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured67.4%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)Not measured42.5%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)Not measured12.8%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)Not measured42.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)Not measured28.6%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)55.6%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 0711 measured
SciCodeNot measured53.2%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)15.9%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 0711 measured
Terminal-Bench27.8%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 0711 measured
FrontierSWENot measured17.8%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
GSO-Bench4.9%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 0711 measured
WeirdML39.4%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 0711 measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1502Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1498Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1692Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1649Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1637Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Intelligence benchmarks for Kimi K2 0711 and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkKimi K2 0711Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
AA Intelligence Index12.745.4Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Epoch Capabilities Index140.0157.4Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index19 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Kimi K2 0711 and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkKimi K2 0711Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured56.0Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1301Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack appsNot measured1305Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile appsNot measured1223Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: agents building Android appsNot measured1207Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot gamesNot measured1234Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slidesNot measured1257Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: spreadsheetsNot measured868Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LiveBench researchNot measured69.9%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LiveBench browserNot measured32.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured42.3%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured50.6%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured32.1%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured47.6%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured60.1%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)Not measured12.9%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
τ²-Bench Telecom61.1%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 0711 measured
APEX-AgentsNot measured63.3%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena SearchNot measured1261Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 20 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index03
Reasoning benchmarks for Kimi K2 0711 and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkKimi K2 0711Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
GPQA Diamond71.5%93.7%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LiveBench reasoningNot measured88.2%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)Not measured23.9%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured88.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)76.6%92.8%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)7.4%43.1%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured92.7%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
SimpleBench26.3%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 0711 measured
Chess puzzlesNot measured46.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured38.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1496Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1507Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1503Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1323Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1336Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Kimi K2 0711 and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkKimi K2 0711Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
AIME62.7%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 0711 measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)94.2%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 0711 measured
MGSM (Vals AI)91.0%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 0711 measured
AA Math Index57.0Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 0711 measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)57.0%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 0711 measured
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured100.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Not measured74.7%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
FrontierMath, tier 4Not measured46.3%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
ProofBenchNot measured58.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1501Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1491Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Knowledge benchmarks for Kimi K2 0711 and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkKimi K2 0711Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
MMLU Pro79.4%88.6%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LegalBench (Vals AI)81.5%83.6%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
CorpFin (Vals AI)50.4%65.8%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
TaxEval (Vals AI)70.2%75.5%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured64.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
MedQA (Vals AI)84.0%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 0711 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured40.7%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)82.4%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 0711 measured
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured47.3%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1512Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1503Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1492Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1480Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
Web design benchmarks for Kimi K2 0711 and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkKimi K2 0711Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
Design Arena: websites10501275Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Design Arena: UI components10301340Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Design Arena: game dev9741313Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Design Arena: data viz10181281Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1337Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: all code categories10341293Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1201Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LiveBench designNot measured78.6%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
General benchmarks for Kimi K2 0711 and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkKimi K2 0711Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
LiveBench data analysisNot measured78.4%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured67.1%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured51.2%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured85.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Vals Multimodal IndexNot measured65.4%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
IFBench41.5%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 0711 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)53.0%80.3%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
DTBenchNot measured92.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMCANot measured46.2%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Fiction.LiveBench61.1%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 0711 measured
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)85.6%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 0711 measured
CL-bench11.9%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 0711 measured
Furniture assemblyNot measured20.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena TextNot measured1483Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1481Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1477Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena VisionNot measured1313Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1491Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1473Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1539Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1478Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1473Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1460Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1498Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1489Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1482Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1471Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1489Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1488Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1477Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1464Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1311Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1358Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1322Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1304Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1312Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Kimi K2 0711 and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkKimi K2 0711Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Kimi K2 0711$0.0017Fits in one request
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)$0.0050Fits in one request

Kimi K2 0711 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Kimi K2 0711$0.035Fits in one request
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)$0.118Fits in one request

Kimi K2 0711 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Kimi K2 0711$0.137Exceeds the context window
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)$0.460Fits in one request

Kimi K2 0711 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Kimi K2 0711 and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
SpecificationMoonshotAI Kimi K2 0711Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
MakerMoonshot AIQwen
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedJuly 11, 2025September 3, 2026
Context window131K1M
Input $/Mtok$0.57$2.00
Output $/Mtok$2.30$6.00
Coding index64.763.5
Independent measurements behind it22
Cost per solved taskNot computable$1.32
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Kimi K2 0711 better than Qwen3.8 Max (0902) for coding?

Kimi K2 0711 and Qwen3.8 Max (0902) are level for coding, 64.7 against 63.5 on the Vibe Coding Index, so price and context decide. Pick Qwen3.8 Max (0902) when the context window is larger, 1M against 131K tokens, or when what matters is LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) or AA Intelligence Index, where it leads. Pick Kimi K2 0711 when output tokens cost 2.6x less.

Which is cheaper, Kimi K2 0711 or Qwen3.8 Max (0902)?

Kimi K2 0711 costs $0.57 per million input tokens and $2.30 per million output tokens; Qwen3.8 Max (0902) costs $2.00 and $6.00. Cost per solved task is known for Qwen3.8 Max (0902) only.

Which has the bigger context window, Kimi K2 0711 or Qwen3.8 Max (0902)?

Qwen3.8 Max (0902), with 1M tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks is the Kimi K2 0711 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902) comparison based on?

16 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Kimi K2 0711's coding index rests on 2 independent benchmarks and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)'s on 2. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/kimi-k2-vs-qwen3-8-max-0902" title="Kimi K2 0711 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902), LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/kimi-k2-vs-qwen3-8-max-0902">LLMBenchmark.ai, Kimi K2 0711 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)</a></p>