Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)

Qwen3.8 Max (0902) leads Mistral Medium 3.1 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 45.4 to 9.2, and Mistral Medium 3.1 costs 3.0x less per output token ($2.00 vs $6.00 per million). Updated October 23, 2026; 59 benchmarks have a result for both.

Mistral Medium 3.1Mistral AI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$2.00
0
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Qwen
Coding
67.1
Overall
70.1
Output $/M
$6.00
59
vs boards won of 59 shared

Mistral Medium 3.1 or Qwen3.8 Max (0902): which to pick

Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) has a coding score, 67.1 on the Vibe Coding Index; Mistral Medium 3.1 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Mistral Medium 3.1 for output tokens 3.0x cheaper ($2.00 vs $6.00 per million).

Shared results
59
Mistral Medium 3.1 only
15
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) only
57
Like-for-like categories
8 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Mistral Medium 3.1 not benchmarked, Qwen3.8 Max (0902) 67.1 from 5 benchmarks.
Widest category
Agentic work, 54.1 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
AA Coding Index: Mistral Medium 3.1 20.5 against Qwen3.8 Max (0902) 76.2, 55.7 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Mistral Medium 3.1 $2.00 against Qwen3.8 Max (0902) $6.00 per million output tokens, 3.0x apart.
Context window
Mistral Medium 3.1 takes 131K tokens, Qwen3.8 Max (0902) 1M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryMistral Medium 3.1BarsQwen3.8 Max (0902)Ties
Coding05
Intelligence01
Agentic work01
Reasoning08
Math02
Knowledge09
Web design07
General026
All shared boards059
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index05
Coding benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3.1 and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.1Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
LiveBench codingNot measured60.3%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena WebDevNot measured1673Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
AA Coding Index20.576.2Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)44.8%87.8%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured85.6%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured38.9%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured77.1%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured24.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured68.9%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured67.4%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)Not measured42.5%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)Not measured24.8%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)Not measured42.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)Not measured28.6%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)40.6%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
SciCode32.4%53.2%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)10.6%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
FrontierSWENot measured17.8%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
ALE-Bench210.2Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Text: coding14331503Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: software and IT14361498Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1690Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1652Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1637Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3.1 and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.1Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
AA Intelligence Index9.245.4Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured157.4Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Agentic work benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3.1 and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.1Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
AA Agentic Index1.956.0Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1300Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack appsNot measured1305Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile appsNot measured1224Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: agents building Android appsNot measured1194Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot gamesNot measured1234Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slidesNot measured1226Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: spreadsheetsNot measured995Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LiveBench researchNot measured69.9%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LiveBench browserNot measured32.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured42.3%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured57.9%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured49.7%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured47.6%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured15.4%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured72.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)Not measured12.9%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
τ²-Bench Telecom40.6%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
APEX-AgentsNot measured63.3%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena SearchNot measured1261Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 22 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index08
Reasoning benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3.1 and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.1Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
GPQA DiamondNot measured93.7%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LiveBench reasoningNot measured88.2%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)Not measured23.9%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)63.0%88.0%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)58.8%92.8%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)4.7%43.1%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured92.7%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Chess puzzlesNot measured46.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured38.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14261497Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: expert14081507Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14351504Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Vision: diagrams11751323Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Vision: homework11651336Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3.1 and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.1Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
AIME42.3%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)87.0%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
MGSM (Vals AI)90.9%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
AA Math Index38.3Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)38.3%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured100.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Not measured74.7%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
FrontierMath, tier 4Not measured46.3%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
ProofBenchNot measured58.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: math14081501Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: mathematical work14121491Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
MathArenaNot measured51.6%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index09
Knowledge benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3.1 and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.1Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
MMLU Pro75.3%88.6%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LegalBench (Vals AI)62.0%83.6%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
CorpFin (Vals AI)50.7%65.8%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
TaxEval (Vals AI)70.3%75.5%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
MortgageTax (Vals AI)36.5%64.0%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
MedQA (Vals AI)78.2%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured40.7%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)68.3%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured47.3%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: science14441512Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14491503Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: legal and government14391494Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: business and finance14181481Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index07
Web design benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3.1 and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.1Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
Design Arena: websites11321276Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Design Arena: UI components10971336Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Design Arena: game dev10731313Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Design Arena: data viz11441282Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Design Arena: 3D10821338Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Design Arena: all code categories11201293Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Design Arena: SVG992Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
Design Arena: ASCII art9971200Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LiveBench designNot measured78.6%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index026
General benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3.1 and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.1Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
Vals IndexNot measured59.1%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LiveBench data analysisNot measured78.4%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured67.1%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured51.2%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured85.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Vals Multimodal IndexNot measured65.4%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
IFBench39.8%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)42.7%80.3%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
DTBench67.5%92.0%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMCA19.1%46.2%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Furniture assemblyNot measured20.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text14241484Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: instruction following13981481Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: creative writing13911477Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Vision11721313Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: English14381492Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: non-English14081473Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: Chinese14471539Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: German14321476Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: Japanese13791473Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: Korean13801462Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: French14601502Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: Spanish14331487Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: Russian14111482Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: Polish14301471Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: multi-turn14181490Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: longer queries14061489Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: writing and language13951477Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Text: entertainment and media13901464Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Vision: English11791311Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Vision: Chinese11901358Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Vision: reading text11751322Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Vision: humor11681304Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LMArena Vision: captioning1145Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things1147Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing12001312Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3.1 and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.1Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Mistral Medium 3.1$0.0014Fits in one request
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)$0.0050Fits in one request

Mistral Medium 3.1 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Mistral Medium 3.1$0.026Fits in one request
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)$0.118Fits in one request

Mistral Medium 3.1 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Mistral Medium 3.1$0.100Exceeds the context window
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)$0.460Fits in one request

Mistral Medium 3.1 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Mistral Medium 3.1 and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
SpecificationMistral Medium 3.1Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
MakerMistral AIQwen
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedAugust 13, 2025September 3, 2026
Context window131K1M
Input $/Mtok$0.40$2.00
Output $/Mtok$2.00$6.00
Coding indexNot benchmarked67.1
Independent measurements behind it05
Cost per solved taskNot computable$1.32
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Mistral Medium 3.1 better than Qwen3.8 Max (0902) for coding?

Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) has a coding score, 67.1 on the Vibe Coding Index; Mistral Medium 3.1 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Mistral Medium 3.1 for output tokens 3.0x cheaper ($2.00 vs $6.00 per million).

Which is cheaper, Mistral Medium 3.1 or Qwen3.8 Max (0902)?

Mistral Medium 3.1 costs $0.40 per million input tokens and $2.00 per million output tokens; Qwen3.8 Max (0902) costs $2.00 and $6.00. Cost per solved task is known for Qwen3.8 Max (0902) only.

Which has the bigger context window, Mistral Medium 3.1 or Qwen3.8 Max (0902)?

Qwen3.8 Max (0902), with 1M tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks is the Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902) comparison based on?

59 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 23, 2026. Mistral Medium 3.1's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)'s on 5. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next