Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

MiniMax M2.1 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)

Qwen3.8 Max (0902) leads MiniMax M2.1 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 45.4 to 20.9, and MiniMax M2.1 costs 5.0x less per output token ($1.20 vs $6.00 per million). Updated October 23, 2026; 19 benchmarks have a result for both.

MiniMax M2.1MiniMax
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.20
0
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Qwen
Coding
67.1
Overall
70.1
Output $/M
$6.00
19
vs boards won of 19 shared

MiniMax M2.1 or Qwen3.8 Max (0902): which to pick

Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) has a coding score, 67.1 on the Vibe Coding Index; MiniMax M2.1 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick MiniMax M2.1 for output tokens 5.0x cheaper ($1.20 vs $6.00 per million) and a lower cost per solved task ($0.59 against $1.32).

Shared results
19
MiniMax M2.1 only
15
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) only
97
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
MiniMax M2.1 not benchmarked, Qwen3.8 Max (0902) 67.1 from 5 benchmarks.
Widest category
Intelligence, 24.5 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
AA Intelligence Index: MiniMax M2.1 20.9 against Qwen3.8 Max (0902) 45.4, 24.5 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
MiniMax M2.1 $1.20 against Qwen3.8 Max (0902) $6.00 per million output tokens, 5.0x apart.
Context window
MiniMax M2.1 takes 205K tokens, Qwen3.8 Max (0902) 1M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryMiniMax M2.1BarsQwen3.8 Max (0902)Ties
Coding02
Intelligence01
Reasoning03
Knowledge05
Web design06
General02
All shared boards019
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index02
Coding benchmarks for MiniMax M2.1 and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkMiniMax M2.1Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
LiveBench codingNot measured60.3%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena WebDevNot measured1673Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
AA Coding IndexNot measured76.2Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)81.8%87.8%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)74.8%85.6%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured38.9%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured77.1%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured24.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured68.9%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured67.4%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)Not measured42.5%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)Not measured24.8%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)Not measured42.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)Not measured28.6%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)81.0%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.1 measured
SciCodeNot measured53.2%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)28.8%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.1 measured
Terminal-Bench36.6%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.1 measured
FrontierSWENot measured17.8%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
ALE-Bench623.8Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.1 measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1503Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1498Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1690Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1652Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1637Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for MiniMax M2.1 and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkMiniMax M2.1Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
AA Intelligence Index20.945.4Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured157.4Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for MiniMax M2.1 and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkMiniMax M2.1Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured56.0Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1300Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack appsNot measured1305Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile appsNot measured1224Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: agents building Android appsNot measured1194Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot gamesNot measured1234Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slidesNot measured1226Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Design Arena: spreadsheetsNot measured995Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LiveBench researchNot measured69.9%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LiveBench browserNot measured32.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured42.3%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured57.9%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured49.7%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured47.6%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured15.4%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured72.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)Not measured12.9%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
τ²-Bench Telecom85.4%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.1 measured
APEX-AgentsNot measured63.3%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena SearchNot measured1261Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 22 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index03
Reasoning benchmarks for MiniMax M2.1 and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkMiniMax M2.1Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
GPQA Diamond78.5%93.7%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LiveBench reasoningNot measured88.2%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)Not measured23.9%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured88.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)83.0%92.8%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)23.2%43.1%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured92.7%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Chess puzzlesNot measured46.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured38.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1497Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1507Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1504Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1323Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1336Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index12 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for MiniMax M2.1 and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkMiniMax M2.1Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
AIME77.9%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.1 measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)89.0%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.1 measured
MGSM (Vals AI)87.8%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.1 measured
AA Math Index82.7Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.1 measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)82.7%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.1 measured
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured100.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Not measured74.7%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
FrontierMath, tier 4Not measured46.3%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
ProofBenchNot measured58.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1501Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1491Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
MathArenaNot measured51.6%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
Knowledge benchmarks for MiniMax M2.1 and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkMiniMax M2.1Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
MMLU Pro87.0%88.6%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
LegalBench (Vals AI)75.5%83.6%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
CaseLaw (Vals AI)55.8%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.1 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)58.9%65.8%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
TaxEval (Vals AI)66.3%75.5%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured64.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
MedQA (Vals AI)91.2%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.1 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)34.1%40.7%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)87.5%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.1 measured
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured47.3%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1512Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1503Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1494Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1481Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index06
Web design benchmarks for MiniMax M2.1 and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkMiniMax M2.1Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
Design Arena: websites12011276Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Design Arena: UI components12201336Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Design Arena: game dev11341313Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Design Arena: data viz12071282Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Design Arena: 3D11661338Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Design Arena: all code categories11901293Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Design Arena: SVG1131Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.1 measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1200Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LiveBench designNot measured78.6%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
General benchmarks for MiniMax M2.1 and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkMiniMax M2.1Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
Vals IndexNot measured59.1%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LiveBench data analysisNot measured78.4%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured67.1%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured51.2%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)80.8%85.0%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Vals Multimodal IndexNot measured65.4%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
IFBench69.9%Not measuredOnly MiniMax M2.1 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)67.7%80.3%Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
DTBenchNot measured92.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMCANot measured46.2%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Furniture assemblyNot measured20.0%Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena TextNot measured1484Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1481Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1477Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena VisionNot measured1313Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1492Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1473Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1539Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1476Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1473Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1462Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1502Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1487Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1482Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1471Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1490Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1489Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1477Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1464Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1311Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1358Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1322Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1304Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1312Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for MiniMax M2.1 and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
BenchmarkMiniMax M2.1Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

MiniMax M2.1$0.0009Fits in one request
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)$0.0050Fits in one request

MiniMax M2.1 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

MiniMax M2.1$0.019Fits in one request
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)$0.118Fits in one request

MiniMax M2.1 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

MiniMax M2.1$0.072Exceeds the context window
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)$0.460Fits in one request

MiniMax M2.1 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of MiniMax M2.1 and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
SpecificationMiniMax M2.1Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
MakerMiniMaxQwen
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedDecember 23, 2025September 3, 2026
Context window205K1M
Input $/Mtok$0.30$2.00
Output $/Mtok$1.20$6.00
Coding indexNot benchmarked67.1
Independent measurements behind it15
Cost per solved task$0.59$1.32
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is MiniMax M2.1 better than Qwen3.8 Max (0902) for coding?

Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) has a coding score, 67.1 on the Vibe Coding Index; MiniMax M2.1 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick MiniMax M2.1 for output tokens 5.0x cheaper ($1.20 vs $6.00 per million) and a lower cost per solved task ($0.59 against $1.32).

Which is cheaper, MiniMax M2.1 or Qwen3.8 Max (0902)?

MiniMax M2.1 costs $0.30 per million input tokens and $1.20 per million output tokens; Qwen3.8 Max (0902) costs $2.00 and $6.00. Per solved SWE-bench Verified task, MiniMax M2.1 costs $0.59 and Qwen3.8 Max (0902) $1.32.

Which has the bigger context window, MiniMax M2.1 or Qwen3.8 Max (0902)?

Qwen3.8 Max (0902), with 1M tokens against 205K.

How many benchmarks is the MiniMax M2.1 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902) comparison based on?

19 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 23, 2026. MiniMax M2.1's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)'s on 5. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next