Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Muse Ember vs Muse Spark 1.1

Muse Spark 1.1 leads Muse Ember on coding, 70.2 to 64.9 on the Vibe Coding Index, and Muse Ember costs 8.5x less per output token ($0.50 vs $4.25 per million). Updated November 14, 2026; 7 benchmarks have a result for both.

Muse EmberMeta
Coding
64.9
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.50
7
Muse Spark 1.1Meta
Coding
70.2
Overall
73.3
Output $/M
$4.25
0
vs boards won of 7 shared

Muse Ember or Muse Spark 1.1: which to pick

Pick Muse Spark 1.1 for coding: it scores 70.2 on the Vibe Coding Index against 64.9 for Muse Ember.

Pick Muse Ember for output tokens 8.5x cheaper ($0.50 vs $4.25 per million) and work measured by LMArena WebDev or Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI), where it leads.

Shared results
7
Muse Ember only
8
Muse Spark 1.1 only
101
Like-for-like categories
2 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Muse Ember 64.9 from 3 benchmarks, Muse Spark 1.1 70.2 from 3 benchmarks.
Widest category
Agentic work, 21.8 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Terminal-Bench 4.0 (Artificial Analysis run): Muse Ember 40.9% against Muse Spark 1.1 6.1%, 34.8 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Muse Ember $0.50 against Muse Spark 1.1 $4.25 per million output tokens, 8.5x apart.
Context window
Both take 1.05M tokens.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryMuse EmberBarsMuse Spark 1.1Ties
Coding50
Agentic work20
All shared boards70
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index50
Coding benchmarks for Muse Ember and Muse Spark 1.1
BenchmarkMuse EmberMuse Spark 1.1Leader
LMArena WebDev16091541Muse Ember
AA Coding IndexNot measured71.3Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured85.9%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured82.0%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)39.4%Not measuredOnly Muse Ember measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)83.7%72.2%Muse Ember
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured31.1%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured69.3%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)Not measured59.2%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
SciCodeNot measured58.8%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Terminal-Bench 4.0 (Artificial Analysis run)40.9%6.1%Muse Ember
FrontierCode 2.027.2%Not measuredOnly Muse Ember measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1498Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1499Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena WebDev: React16161531Muse Ember
LMArena WebDev: HTML16211539Muse Ember
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1539Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
SWE Atlas: Codebase QnANot measured42.2%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
SWE Atlas: Test WritingNot measured41.5%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1Not measured76.2%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
ProgramBenchNot measured0.0%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 30 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for Muse Ember and Muse Spark 1.1
BenchmarkMuse EmberMuse Spark 1.1Leader
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured154.9Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Agentic work benchmarks for Muse Ember and Muse Spark 1.1
BenchmarkMuse EmberMuse Spark 1.1Leader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured25.8Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1186Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack appsNot measured1170Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile appsNot measured1170Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: agents building Android appsNot measured1175Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot gamesNot measured1083Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: agents building gamesNot measured1133Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: HTML slidesNot measured1090Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slidesNot measured1123Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: spreadsheetsNot measured1048Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured57.2%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)38.2%Not measuredOnly Muse Ember measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)49.0%38.0%Muse Ember
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)25.0%Not measuredOnly Muse Ember measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured56.4%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Time Horizon Index (Vals AI)Not measured1.7%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
APEX-Agents64.3%31.8%Muse Ember
Vending-Bench 2Not measured$6,520Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
MCP AtlasNot measured88.1%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Toolathlon-VerifiedNot measured75.6%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
τ³-BankingNot measured40.5%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 23 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index12 boards, none shared
Reasoning benchmarks for Muse Ember and Muse Spark 1.1
BenchmarkMuse EmberMuse Spark 1.1Leader
GPQA DiamondNot measured91.2%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured86.6%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured89.8%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured46.2%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
HLE-Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)25.1%Not measuredOnly Muse Ember measured
CritPt v2, hard subset (Artificial Analysis run)39.0%Not measuredOnly Muse Ember measured
Chess puzzlesNot measured34.0%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1486Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1479Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1481Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1305Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1284Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Muse Ember and Muse Spark 1.1
BenchmarkMuse EmberMuse Spark 1.1Leader
ProofBenchNot measured39.0%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1481Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1484Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
MathArenaNot measured39.1%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index13 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Muse Ember and Muse Spark 1.1
BenchmarkMuse EmberMuse Spark 1.1Leader
MMLU ProNot measured88.7%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured85.0%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured71.3%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured79.7%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured66.1%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
AA-Omniscience7.7Not measuredOnly Muse Ember measured
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured57.8%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1484Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1481Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1481Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1470Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
PRBench FinanceNot measured55.0%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
PRBench LegalNot measured57.0%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Muse Ember and Muse Spark 1.1
BenchmarkMuse EmberMuse Spark 1.1Leader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1263Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1280Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1257Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1263Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1237Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1266Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1223Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1256Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index35 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for Muse Ember and Muse Spark 1.1
BenchmarkMuse EmberMuse Spark 1.1Leader
Vals Index60.5%Not measuredOnly Muse Ember measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured61.3%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured88.9%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Vals Multimodal IndexNot measured66.7%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured77.7%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
GDPval-AANot measured1216Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
DTBenchNot measured94.4%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMCANot measured49.9%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Surface Evolver BenchNot measured52.5%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena TextNot measured1479Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1457Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1435Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena VisionNot measured1292Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1478Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1472Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1517Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1470Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1450Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1456Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1492Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1463Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1483Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1502Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1485Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1462Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1448Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1437Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1291Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1348Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1300Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1296Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1257Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena DocumentNot measured1463Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
MultiChallengeNot measured75.3%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
EQ-Bench 4Not measured1244Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Muse Ember and Muse Spark 1.1
BenchmarkMuse EmberMuse Spark 1.1Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Muse Ember$0.0003Fits in one request
Muse Spark 1.1$0.0034Fits in one request

Muse Ember costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Muse Ember$0.0065Fits in one request
Muse Spark 1.1$0.075Fits in one request

Muse Ember costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Muse Ember$0.025Fits in one request
Muse Spark 1.1$0.292Fits in one request

Muse Ember costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Muse Ember and Muse Spark 1.1
SpecificationMeta Muse EmberMeta Muse Spark 1.1
MakerMetaMeta
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedNovember 9, 2026July 16, 2026
Context window1.05M1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.10$1.25
Output $/Mtok$0.50$4.25
Coding index64.970.2
Independent measurements behind it33
Cost per solved taskNot computable$0.43
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Muse Ember better than Muse Spark 1.1 for coding?

Pick Muse Spark 1.1 for coding: it scores 70.2 on the Vibe Coding Index against 64.9 for Muse Ember. Pick Muse Ember for output tokens 8.5x cheaper ($0.50 vs $4.25 per million) and work measured by LMArena WebDev or Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI), where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Muse Ember or Muse Spark 1.1?

Muse Ember costs $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.50 per million output tokens; Muse Spark 1.1 costs $1.25 and $4.25. Cost per solved task is known for Muse Spark 1.1 only.

Which has the bigger context window, Muse Ember or Muse Spark 1.1?

Neither: both take 1.05M tokens.

How many benchmarks is the Muse Ember vs Muse Spark 1.1 comparison based on?

7 benchmarks have a result for both models as of November 14, 2026. Muse Ember's coding index rests on 3 independent benchmarks and Muse Spark 1.1's on 3. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/meta-muse-ember-vs-meta-muse-spark-1-1" title="Muse Ember vs Muse Spark 1.1, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/meta-muse-ember-vs-meta-muse-spark-1-1">LLMBenchmark.ai, Muse Ember vs Muse Spark 1.1</a></p>