Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Kimi K3 vs Llama 4 Scout

Kimi K3 leads Llama 4 Scout on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 43.6 to 6.5, and Llama 4 Scout costs 30.0x less per output token ($0.50 vs $15.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 58 benchmarks have a result for both.

Kimi K3Moonshot AI
Coding
62.3
Overall
66.5
Output $/M
$15.00
58
Llama 4 ScoutMeta Llama
Coding
No data
Overall
24.9
Output $/M
$0.50
0
vs boards won of 58 shared

Kimi K3 or Llama 4 Scout: which to pick

Only Kimi K3 has a coding score, 62.3 on the Vibe Coding Index; Llama 4 Scout has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Llama 4 Scout for output tokens 30.0x cheaper ($0.50 vs $15.00 per million) and a larger context window (1.31M against 1.05M tokens).

Shared results
58
Kimi K3 only
59
Llama 4 Scout only
24
Like-for-like categories
8 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Kimi K3 62.3 from 6 benchmarks, Llama 4 Scout not benchmarked.
Widest category
Web design, 69.3 points apart on average over 5 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
ARC-AGI: Kimi K3 94.5% against Llama 4 Scout 0.5%, 94.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Kimi K3 $15.00 against Llama 4 Scout $0.50 per million output tokens, 30.0x apart.
Context window
Kimi K3 takes 1.05M tokens, Llama 4 Scout 1.31M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryKimi K3BarsLlama 4 ScoutTies
Coding50
Intelligence20
Agentic work10
Reasoning100
Math30
Knowledge100
Web design50
General220
All shared boards580
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index50
Coding benchmarks for Kimi K3 and Llama 4 Scout
BenchmarkKimi K3Llama 4 ScoutLeader
SWE-bench VerifiedNot measured9.1%Only Llama 4 Scout measured
LiveBench coding59.3%Not measuredOnly Kimi K3 measured
LMArena WebDev1655Not measuredOnly Kimi K3 measured
AA Coding Index76.28.2Kimi K3
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)87.2%38.5%Kimi K3
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)93.4%Not measuredOnly Kimi K3 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)17.2%Not measuredOnly Kimi K3 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)85.0%Not measuredOnly Kimi K3 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)16.1%Not measuredOnly Kimi K3 measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)2.0%Not measuredOnly Kimi K3 measured
IOI (Vals AI)48.9%Not measuredOnly Kimi K3 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)80.9%Not measuredOnly Kimi K3 measured
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)44.2%Not measuredOnly Kimi K3 measured
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)18.2%Not measuredOnly Kimi K3 measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)75.2%Not measuredOnly Kimi K3 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured29.9%Only Llama 4 Scout measured
SciCode59.5%21.3%Kimi K3
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured1.5%Only Llama 4 Scout measured
FrontierCode44.2%Not measuredOnly Kimi K3 measured
FrontierSWE25.9%Not measuredOnly Kimi K3 measured
WeirdML82.6%Not measuredOnly Kimi K3 measured
ALE-Bench1524.5Not measuredOnly Kimi K3 measured
LMArena Text: coding15081286Kimi K3
LMArena Text: software and IT14991286Kimi K3
LMArena WebDev: React1670Not measuredOnly Kimi K3 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1644Not measuredOnly Kimi K3 measured
LMArena WebDev: from an image1579Not measuredOnly Kimi K3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Intelligence benchmarks for Kimi K3 and Llama 4 Scout
BenchmarkKimi K3Llama 4 ScoutLeader
AA Intelligence Index43.66.5Kimi K3
Epoch Capabilities Index157.9129.6Kimi K3
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Agentic work benchmarks for Kimi K3 and Llama 4 Scout
BenchmarkKimi K3Llama 4 ScoutLeader
AA Agentic Index50.00.5Kimi K3
Design Arena: agents building web apps1295Not measuredOnly Kimi K3 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1315Not measuredOnly Kimi K3 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1269Not measuredOnly Kimi K3 measured
Design Arena: agents building Android apps1253Not measuredOnly Kimi K3 measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot games1223Not measuredOnly Kimi K3 measured
Design Arena: agents building games1252Not measuredOnly Kimi K3 measured
Design Arena: HTML slides1206Not measuredOnly Kimi K3 measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slides1247Not measuredOnly Kimi K3 measured
Design Arena: spreadsheets1070Not measuredOnly Kimi K3 measured
LiveBench research79.0%Not measuredOnly Kimi K3 measured
LiveBench browser16.0%Not measuredOnly Kimi K3 measured
LiveBench long agentic42.8%Not measuredOnly Kimi K3 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)53.1%Not measuredOnly Kimi K3 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)33.4%Not measuredOnly Kimi K3 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)46.1%Not measuredOnly Kimi K3 measured
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)12.9%Not measuredOnly Kimi K3 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)66.7%Not measuredOnly Kimi K3 measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)72.6%Not measuredOnly Kimi K3 measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)1.4%Not measuredOnly Kimi K3 measured
Time Horizon Index (Vals AI)10.5%Not measuredOnly Kimi K3 measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured15.5%Only Llama 4 Scout measured
APEX-Agents47.8%Not measuredOnly Kimi K3 measured
PostTrainBench32.0%Not measuredOnly Kimi K3 measured
Vending-Bench 2$5,165Not measuredOnly Kimi K3 measured
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)Not measured28.1%Only Llama 4 Scout measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index100
Reasoning benchmarks for Kimi K3 and Llama 4 Scout
BenchmarkKimi K3Llama 4 ScoutLeader
GPQA Diamond92.9%47.0%Kimi K3
LiveBench reasoning90.7%Not measuredOnly Kimi K3 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)88.2%58.8%Kimi K3
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)93.5%58.7%Kimi K3
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)46.9%3.8%Kimi K3
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)93.1%51.8%Kimi K3
ARC-AGI94.5%0.5%Kimi K3
ARC-AGI-260.4%0.0%Kimi K3
SimpleBench60.7%Not measuredOnly Kimi K3 measured
Chess puzzles37.0%Not measuredOnly Kimi K3 measured
Mystery game puzzles26.0%Not measuredOnly Kimi K3 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14951266Kimi K3
LMArena Text: expert15201235Kimi K3
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14961293Kimi K3
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1125Only Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1148Only Llama 4 Scout measured
Kagi LLM BenchmarkNot measured36.9%Only Llama 4 Scout measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index30
Math benchmarks for Kimi K3 and Llama 4 Scout
BenchmarkKimi K3Llama 4 ScoutLeader
AIMENot measured19.0%Only Llama 4 Scout measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)Not measured79.2%Only Llama 4 Scout measured
MGSM (Vals AI)Not measured88.0%Only Llama 4 Scout measured
AA Math IndexNot measured14.0Only Llama 4 Scout measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured14.0%Only Llama 4 Scout measured
OTIS Mock AIME97.2%7.8%Kimi K3
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 372.2%Not measuredOnly Kimi K3 measured
FrontierMath, tier 439.0%Not measuredOnly Kimi K3 measured
ProofBench87.0%Not measuredOnly Kimi K3 measured
MATH level 5Not measured62.3%Only Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Text: math14941287Kimi K3
LMArena Text: mathematical work15051286Kimi K3
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index100
Knowledge benchmarks for Kimi K3 and Llama 4 Scout
BenchmarkKimi K3Llama 4 ScoutLeader
MMLU Pro88.0%69.6%Kimi K3
LegalBench (Vals AI)86.2%72.0%Kimi K3
CorpFin (Vals AI)71.6%46.8%Kimi K3
TaxEval (Vals AI)75.7%55.2%Kimi K3
MortgageTax (Vals AI)66.3%57.8%Kimi K3
MedQA (Vals AI)Not measured50.9%Only Llama 4 Scout measured
MedCode (Vals AI)49.4%23.3%Kimi K3
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured75.2%Only Llama 4 Scout measured
SimpleQA Verified50.6%Not measuredOnly Kimi K3 measured
LMArena Text: science15081278Kimi K3
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14891275Kimi K3
LMArena Text: legal and government15031285Kimi K3
LMArena Text: business and finance14701257Kimi K3
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index50
Web design benchmarks for Kimi K3 and Llama 4 Scout
BenchmarkKimi K3Llama 4 ScoutLeader
Design Arena: websites1334750Kimi K3
Design Arena: UI components1341765Kimi K3
Design Arena: game dev1358772Kimi K3
Design Arena: data viz1351896Kimi K3
Design Arena: 3D1387Not measuredOnly Kimi K3 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1360789Kimi K3
Design Arena: SVG1302Not measuredOnly Kimi K3 measured
LiveBench design77.2%Not measuredOnly Kimi K3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index220
General benchmarks for Kimi K3 and Llama 4 Scout
BenchmarkKimi K3Llama 4 ScoutLeader
Vals Index53.0%Not measuredOnly Kimi K3 measured
LiveBench data analysis78.7%Not measuredOnly Kimi K3 measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)68.2%Not measuredOnly Kimi K3 measured
SAGE (Vals AI)52.8%34.8%Kimi K3
MedScribe (Vals AI)88.0%50.6%Kimi K3
Vals Multimodal Index73.4%Not measuredOnly Kimi K3 measured
IFBenchNot measured39.5%Only Llama 4 Scout measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)88.7%27.7%Kimi K3
DTBench91.2%57.9%Kimi K3
LMCA52.7%12.0%Kimi K3
Fiction.LiveBenchNot measured36.0%Only Llama 4 Scout measured
Surface Evolver Bench95.0%Not measuredOnly Kimi K3 measured
Furniture assembly34.2%Not measuredOnly Kimi K3 measured
LMArena Text14761279Kimi K3
LMArena Text: instruction following14851248Kimi K3
LMArena Text: creative writing14571249Kimi K3
LMArena VisionNot measured1118Only Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Text: English14811304Kimi K3
LMArena Text: non-English14661252Kimi K3
LMArena Text: Chinese15291255Kimi K3
LMArena Text: German14901273Kimi K3
LMArena Text: Japanese14941206Kimi K3
LMArena Text: Korean14601207Kimi K3
LMArena Text: French14921283Kimi K3
LMArena Text: Spanish14721278Kimi K3
LMArena Text: Russian14851263Kimi K3
LMArena Text: Polish14581265Kimi K3
LMArena Text: multi-turn14891280Kimi K3
LMArena Text: longer queries14941265Kimi K3
LMArena Text: writing and language14711269Kimi K3
LMArena Text: entertainment and media14531242Kimi K3
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1143Only Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1106Only Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1117Only Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1102Only Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1126Only Llama 4 Scout measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Kimi K3 and Llama 4 Scout
BenchmarkKimi K3Llama 4 ScoutLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Kimi K3$0.011Fits in one request
Llama 4 Scout$0.0004Fits in one request

Llama 4 Scout costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Kimi K3$0.195Fits in one request
Llama 4 Scout$0.010Fits in one request

Llama 4 Scout costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Kimi K3$0.750Fits in one request
Llama 4 Scout$0.040Fits in one request

Llama 4 Scout costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Kimi K3 and Llama 4 Scout
SpecificationMoonshotAI Kimi K3Meta Llama 4 Scout
MakerMoonshot AIMeta Llama
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedJuly 16, 2026April 5, 2025
Context window1.05M1.31M
Input $/Mtok$3.00$0.175
Output $/Mtok$15.00$0.50
Coding index62.3Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it60
Cost per solved task$0.81$1.276
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Kimi K3 better than Llama 4 Scout for coding?

Only Kimi K3 has a coding score, 62.3 on the Vibe Coding Index; Llama 4 Scout has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Llama 4 Scout for output tokens 30.0x cheaper ($0.50 vs $15.00 per million) and a larger context window (1.31M against 1.05M tokens).

Which is cheaper, Kimi K3 or Llama 4 Scout?

Kimi K3 costs $3.00 per million input tokens and $15.00 per million output tokens; Llama 4 Scout costs $0.175 and $0.50. Per solved SWE-bench Verified task, Kimi K3 costs $0.81 and Llama 4 Scout $1.276.

Which has the bigger context window, Kimi K3 or Llama 4 Scout?

Llama 4 Scout, with 1.31M tokens against 1.05M.

How many benchmarks is the Kimi K3 vs Llama 4 Scout comparison based on?

58 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Kimi K3's coding index rests on 6 independent benchmarks and Llama 4 Scout's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next