Kimi K2.6 vs Mistral Large 4
Mistral Large 4 leads Kimi K2.6 on coding, 56.4 to 52.1 on the Vibe Coding Index, at about the same output price ($4.18 vs $4.00 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 65 benchmarks have a result for both.
Kimi K2.6 or Mistral Large 4: which to pick
Pick Mistral Large 4 for coding: it scores 56.4 on the Vibe Coding Index against 52.1 for Kimi K2.6.
Pick Kimi K2.6 for output tokens 1.0x cheaper ($4.00 vs $4.18 per million) and work measured by LMArena Text: coding or LMArena Text: software and IT, where it leads.
- Shared results
- 65
- Kimi K2.6 only
- 44
- Mistral Large 4 only
- 16
- Like-for-like categories
- 8 of 9
Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
Mistral Large 4
Mistral Large 4 scores 56.4 against 52.1.
3 and 5 benchmarks behind the scores
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
Mistral Large 4
Mistral Large 4 leads, 38.4 against 27.0.
Same board, both measured
Agentic work
AA Agentic Index
No call
Only Kimi K2.6 has a AA Agentic Index result, 20.5.
Directional only
Reasoning
GPQA Diamond
No call
Only Kimi K2.6 has a GPQA Diamond result, 89.1%.
Directional only
Knowledge
MMLU Pro
No call
Only Kimi K2.6 has a MMLU Pro result, 87.6%.
Directional only
Web design
Design Arena: websites
Kimi K2.6
Kimi K2.6 leads, 1269 against 1258.
Same board, both measured
Long documents
Listed context window
Mistral Large 4
Mistral Large 4 takes 1.05M tokens against 262K.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
Kimi K2.6
Kimi K2.6 $0.0029, Mistral Large 4 $0.0034 per turn.
List prices
Cost per solved task
One SWE-bench Verified task, solved
No call
Only Kimi K2.6 has the number, $0.35.
Directional only
At a glance
- Coding index
- Kimi K2.6 52.1 from 3 benchmarks, Mistral Large 4 56.4 from 5 benchmarks.
- Widest category
- Agentic work, 11.3 points apart on average over 4 shared benchmarks.
- Widest single gap
- Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI): Kimi K2.6 37.9% against Mistral Large 4 78.4%, 40.5 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- Kimi K2.6 $4.00 against Mistral Large 4 $4.18 per million output tokens, 1.0x apart.
- Context window
- Kimi K2.6 takes 262K tokens, Mistral Large 4 1.05M.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | Kimi K2.6 | Bars | Mistral Large 4 | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 2 | 7 | ||
| Intelligence | 1 | 1 | ||
| Agentic work | 1 | 3 | ||
| Reasoning | 7 | 1 | ||
| Math | 3 | 3 | ||
| Knowledge | 5 | 1 | ||
| Web design | 4 | 4 | ||
| General | 19 | 3 | ||
| All shared boards | 42 | 23 |
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index27
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.6 | Mistral Large 4 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench coding | Not measured | 60.0% | Only Mistral Large 4 measured |
| LMArena WebDev | 1509 | 1543 | Mistral Large 4 |
| AA Coding Index | 61.8 | Not measured | Only Kimi K2.6 measured |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) | 86.8% | Not measured | Only Kimi K2.6 measured |
| SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI) | 76.2% | Not measured | Only Kimi K2.6 measured |
| Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI) | Not measured | 27.8% | Only Mistral Large 4 measured |
| Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) | 37.9% | 78.4% | Mistral Large 4 |
| Code migration (Vals AI) | 27.8% | 30.6% | Mistral Large 4 |
| ProgramBench (Vals AI) | 0.0% | Not measured | Only Kimi K2.6 measured |
| IOI (Vals AI) | Not measured | 45.3% | Only Mistral Large 4 measured |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI) | 53.6% | Not measured | Only Kimi K2.6 measured |
| SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI) | Not measured | 33.1% | Only Mistral Large 4 measured |
| Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI) | Not measured | 14.3% | Only Mistral Large 4 measured |
| SciCode | 51.5% | 54.2% | Mistral Large 4 |
| Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) | 43.9% | Not measured | Only Kimi K2.6 measured |
| FrontierCode | Not measured | 39.4% | Only Mistral Large 4 measured |
| WeirdML | 55.9% | Not measured | Only Kimi K2.6 measured |
| ALE-Bench | 1092.7 | 1213.2 | Mistral Large 4 |
| LMArena Text: coding | 1489 | 1478 | Kimi K2.6 |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | 1484 | 1467 | Kimi K2.6 |
| LMArena WebDev: React | 1505 | 1559 | Mistral Large 4 |
| LMArena WebDev: HTML | 1485 | 1487 | Mistral Large 4 |
| LMArena WebDev: from an image | 1521 | Not measured | Only Kimi K2.6 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here | |||
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.6 | Mistral Large 4 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 27.0 | 38.4 | Mistral Large 4 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 150.9 | 150.0 | Kimi K2.6 |
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index13
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.6 | Mistral Large 4 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Agentic Index | 20.5 | Not measured | Only Kimi K2.6 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building web apps | 1268 | Not measured | Only Kimi K2.6 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps | 1155 | Not measured | Only Kimi K2.6 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building mobile apps | 1157 | Not measured | Only Kimi K2.6 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building Android apps | 1160 | Not measured | Only Kimi K2.6 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building Godot games | 1120 | Not measured | Only Kimi K2.6 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building games | 1141 | Not measured | Only Kimi K2.6 measured |
| Design Arena: HTML slides | 1184 | Not measured | Only Kimi K2.6 measured |
| Design Arena: PowerPoint slides | 1128 | Not measured | Only Kimi K2.6 measured |
| Design Arena: spreadsheets | 1276 | Not measured | Only Kimi K2.6 measured |
| LiveBench research | Not measured | 28.1% | Only Mistral Large 4 measured |
| LiveBench browser | Not measured | 8.0% | Only Mistral Large 4 measured |
| LiveBench long agentic | Not measured | 11.8% | Only Mistral Large 4 measured |
| Finance Agent (Vals AI) | 44.9% | 54.7% | Mistral Large 4 |
| Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI) | 12.4% | 30.4% | Mistral Large 4 |
| Legal Research Bench (Vals AI) | 15.9% | 31.7% | Mistral Large 4 |
| Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI) | Not measured | 17.5% | Only Mistral Large 4 measured |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI) | 57.9% | 56.2% | Kimi K2.6 |
| BioMysteryBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 67.0% | Only Mistral Large 4 measured |
| τ²-Bench Telecom | 95.9% | Not measured | Only Kimi K2.6 measured |
| OSWorld 2.0 | 4.6% | Not measured | Only Kimi K2.6 measured |
| Vending-Bench 2 | $6,205 | Not measured | Only Kimi K2.6 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index71
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.6 | Mistral Large 4 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 89.1% | Not measured | Only Kimi K2.6 measured |
| LiveBench reasoning | Not measured | 83.9% | Only Mistral Large 4 measured |
| MysteryMechanism (Vals AI) | Not measured | 12.2% | Only Mistral Large 4 measured |
| MMMU Pro (Vals AI) | 86.3% | Not measured | Only Kimi K2.6 measured |
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | 91.1% | Not measured | Only Kimi K2.6 measured |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | 37.5% | 35.0% | Kimi K2.6 |
| GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run) | 90.8% | 88.1% | Kimi K2.6 |
| Chess puzzles | 20.0% | 33.0% | Mistral Large 4 |
| Mystery game puzzles | 18.0% | 17.0% | Kimi K2.6 |
| EBR-bench | 2.4% | Not measured | Only Kimi K2.6 measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | 1470 | 1444 | Kimi K2.6 |
| LMArena Text: expert | 1491 | 1444 | Kimi K2.6 |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | 1471 | 1442 | Kimi K2.6 |
| LMArena Vision: diagrams | 1298 | 1288 | Kimi K2.6 |
| LMArena Vision: homework | 1310 | Not measured | Only Kimi K2.6 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here | |||
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index33
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.6 | Mistral Large 4 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME | 96.1% | 98.3% | Mistral Large 4 |
| FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3 | 57.2% | 58.6% | Mistral Large 4 |
| FrontierMath, tier 4 | 25.6% | 26.8% | Mistral Large 4 |
| ProofBench | 16.0% | 10.0% | Kimi K2.6 |
| LMArena Text: math | 1474 | 1469 | Kimi K2.6 |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | 1480 | 1462 | Kimi K2.6 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here | |||
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index51
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.6 | Mistral Large 4 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU Pro | 87.6% | Not measured | Only Kimi K2.6 measured |
| LegalBench (Vals AI) | 84.7% | Not measured | Only Kimi K2.6 measured |
| CaseLaw (Vals AI) | 61.2% | Not measured | Only Kimi K2.6 measured |
| CorpFin (Vals AI) | 66.7% | Not measured | Only Kimi K2.6 measured |
| TaxEval (Vals AI) | 74.7% | Not measured | Only Kimi K2.6 measured |
| MortgageTax (Vals AI) | 65.8% | Not measured | Only Kimi K2.6 measured |
| MedCode (Vals AI) | 40.1% | 40.7% | Mistral Large 4 |
| SimpleQA Verified | 34.9% | 20.0% | Kimi K2.6 |
| LMArena Text: science | 1468 | 1448 | Kimi K2.6 |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | 1457 | 1433 | Kimi K2.6 |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | 1462 | 1425 | Kimi K2.6 |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | 1445 | 1439 | Kimi K2.6 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here | |||
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index44
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.6 | Mistral Large 4 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: websites | 1269 | 1258 | Kimi K2.6 |
| Design Arena: UI components | 1266 | 1275 | Mistral Large 4 |
| Design Arena: game dev | 1251 | 1226 | Kimi K2.6 |
| Design Arena: data viz | 1249 | 1274 | Mistral Large 4 |
| Design Arena: 3D | 1268 | 1253 | Kimi K2.6 |
| Design Arena: all code categories | 1272 | 1259 | Kimi K2.6 |
| Design Arena: SVG | 1181 | 1233 | Mistral Large 4 |
| Design Arena: ASCII art | 1165 | 1202 | Mistral Large 4 |
| LiveBench design | Not measured | 65.6% | Only Mistral Large 4 measured |
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index193
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.6 | Mistral Large 4 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench data analysis | Not measured | 76.5% | Only Mistral Large 4 measured |
| Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI) | 56.6% | Not measured | Only Kimi K2.6 measured |
| SAGE (Vals AI) | 50.2% | Not measured | Only Kimi K2.6 measured |
| MedScribe (Vals AI) | 78.2% | 80.4% | Mistral Large 4 |
| Vals Multimodal Index | 56.4% | Not measured | Only Kimi K2.6 measured |
| IFBench | 76.0% | Not measured | Only Kimi K2.6 measured |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | 81.0% | 81.3% | Mistral Large 4 |
| DTBench | 90.9% | 88.2% | Kimi K2.6 |
| LMCA | 37.3% | 35.8% | Kimi K2.6 |
| Surface Evolver Bench | Not measured | 28.1% | Only Mistral Large 4 measured |
| Furniture assembly | 21.7% | 20.8% | Kimi K2.6 |
| ExploitBench | 18.4% | Not measured | Only Kimi K2.6 measured |
| LMArena Text | 1455 | 1431 | Kimi K2.6 |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | 1451 | 1422 | Kimi K2.6 |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | 1434 | 1363 | Kimi K2.6 |
| LMArena Vision | 1282 | 1272 | Kimi K2.6 |
| LMArena Text: English | 1460 | 1433 | Kimi K2.6 |
| LMArena Text: non-English | 1446 | 1422 | Kimi K2.6 |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | 1520 | 1492 | Kimi K2.6 |
| LMArena Text: German | 1451 | Not measured | Only Kimi K2.6 measured |
| LMArena Text: Japanese | 1443 | 1415 | Kimi K2.6 |
| LMArena Text: Korean | 1427 | Not measured | Only Kimi K2.6 measured |
| LMArena Text: French | 1471 | 1492 | Mistral Large 4 |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | 1464 | 1455 | Kimi K2.6 |
| LMArena Text: Russian | 1446 | 1417 | Kimi K2.6 |
| LMArena Text: Polish | 1438 | Not measured | Only Kimi K2.6 measured |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | 1453 | 1435 | Kimi K2.6 |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | 1468 | 1428 | Kimi K2.6 |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | 1439 | 1386 | Kimi K2.6 |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | 1428 | 1378 | Kimi K2.6 |
| LMArena Vision: English | 1287 | 1283 | Kimi K2.6 |
| LMArena Vision: Chinese | 1346 | Not measured | Only Kimi K2.6 measured |
| LMArena Vision: reading text | 1291 | 1284 | Kimi K2.6 |
| LMArena Vision: humor | 1280 | Not measured | Only Kimi K2.6 measured |
| LMArena Vision: creative writing | 1273 | Not measured | Only Kimi K2.6 measured |
| LMArena Document | 1451 | Not measured | Only Kimi K2.6 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.6 | Mistral Large 4 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
Kimi K2.6 costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
Kimi K2.6 costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
Kimi K2.6 costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | MoonshotAI Kimi K2.6 | Mistral Large 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Moonshot AI | Mistral AI |
| Weights | Open weights | No public weights listed |
| Released | April 20, 2026 | October 6, 2026 |
| Context window | 262K | 1.05M |
| Input $/Mtok | $0.95 | $1.36 |
| Output $/Mtok | $4.00 | $4.18 |
| Coding index | 52.1 | 56.4 |
| Independent measurements behind it | 3 | 5 |
| Cost per solved task | $0.35 | Not computable |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is Kimi K2.6 better than Mistral Large 4 for coding?
Pick Mistral Large 4 for coding: it scores 56.4 on the Vibe Coding Index against 52.1 for Kimi K2.6. Pick Kimi K2.6 for output tokens 1.0x cheaper ($4.00 vs $4.18 per million) and work measured by LMArena Text: coding or LMArena Text: software and IT, where it leads.
Which is cheaper, Kimi K2.6 or Mistral Large 4?
Kimi K2.6 costs $0.95 per million input tokens and $4.00 per million output tokens; Mistral Large 4 costs $1.36 and $4.18. Cost per solved task is known for Kimi K2.6 only.
Which has the bigger context window, Kimi K2.6 or Mistral Large 4?
Mistral Large 4, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.
How many benchmarks is the Kimi K2.6 vs Mistral Large 4 comparison based on?
65 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Kimi K2.6's coding index rests on 3 independent benchmarks and Mistral Large 4's on 5. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.