LLMBenchmark.ai

Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Kimi K2.6 vs Muse Spark Open

Updated October 21, 2026. 17 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

Kimi K2.6Moonshot AI
Coding
44.2
Overall
27.0
Output $/M
$3.41
4
Muse Spark OpenMeta
Coding
62.1
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$4.25
13
vs boards won of 17 shared

Decision reading

Pick Muse Spark Open for coding: it scores 62.1 on the Vibe Coding Index against 44.2 for Kimi K2.6.

Pick Kimi K2.6 when output tokens cost 1.2x less, or when what matters is Code migration (Vals AI) or Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI), where it leads.

Shared results
17
Kimi K2.6 only
92
Muse Spark Open only
9
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Kimi K2.6 44.2 from 1 benchmark, Muse Spark Open 62.1 from 2 benchmarks.
Widest category
Agentic work, 14.3 points apart on average over 4 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI): Kimi K2.6 37.9% against Muse Spark Open 76.2%, 38.3 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Kimi K2.6 $3.41 against Muse Spark Open $4.25 per million output tokens, 1.2x apart.
Context window
Kimi K2.6 takes 262K tokens, Muse Spark Open 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryKimi K2.6BarsMuse Spark OpenTies
Coding16
Intelligence01
Agentic work13
Reasoning11
Web design02
General10
All shared boards413
CodingLike-for-likeFour of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index16
Coding benchmarks for Kimi K2.6 and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkKimi K2.6Muse Spark OpenLeader
LiveBench codingNot measured73.6%Only Muse Spark Open measured
LMArena WebDev15091528Muse Spark Open
AA Coding Index61.8Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.6 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)86.8%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.6 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)76.2%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.6 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured6.6%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)37.9%76.2%Muse Spark Open
Code migration (Vals AI)27.8%21.2%Kimi K2.6
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.0%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.6 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)53.6%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.6 measured
SciCode51.5%58.4%Muse Spark Open
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)43.9%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.6 measured
WeirdML55.9%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.6 measured
ALE-Bench1092.71590.1Muse Spark Open
LMArena Text: coding1489Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.6 measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1484Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.6 measured
LMArena WebDev: React15051529Muse Spark Open
LMArena WebDev: HTML14851495Muse Spark Open
LMArena WebDev: from an image1521Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.6 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Kimi K2.6 and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkKimi K2.6Muse Spark OpenLeader
AA Intelligence Index27.0Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.6 measured
Epoch Capabilities Index150.9155.1Muse Spark Open
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index13
Agentic work benchmarks for Kimi K2.6 and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkKimi K2.6Muse Spark OpenLeader
AA Agentic Index20.5Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.6 measured
Design Arena: agents building web apps1268Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.6 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1155Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.6 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1156Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.6 measured
Design Arena: agents building Android apps1166Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.6 measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot games1120Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.6 measured
Design Arena: agents building games1141Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.6 measured
Design Arena: HTML slides1184Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.6 measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slides1128Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.6 measured
Design Arena: spreadsheets1276Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.6 measured
LiveBench researchNot measured80.3%Only Muse Spark Open measured
LiveBench browserNot measured36.0%Only Muse Spark Open measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured18.9%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)44.9%61.3%Muse Spark Open
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)12.4%26.3%Muse Spark Open
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)15.9%38.5%Muse Spark Open
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)57.9%53.7%Kimi K2.6
τ²-Bench Telecom95.9%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.6 measured
APEX-AgentsNot measured33.4%Only Muse Spark Open measured
OSWorld 2.04.6%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.6 measured
Vending-Bench 2$6,205Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.6 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11
Reasoning benchmarks for Kimi K2.6 and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkKimi K2.6Muse Spark OpenLeader
GPQA Diamond89.1%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.6 measured
LiveBench reasoningNot measured73.7%Only Muse Spark Open measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)86.3%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.6 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)91.1%89.0%Kimi K2.6
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)37.5%43.9%Muse Spark Open
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)90.8%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.6 measured
Chess puzzles20.0%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.6 measured
Mystery game puzzles18.0%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.6 measured
EBR-bench2.4%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.6 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1470Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.6 measured
LMArena Text: expert1491Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.6 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1471Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.6 measured
LMArena Vision: diagrams1298Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.6 measured
LMArena Vision: homework1310Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.6 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Kimi K2.6 and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkKimi K2.6Muse Spark OpenLeader
OTIS Mock AIME96.1%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.6 measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 357.2%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.6 measured
FrontierMath, tier 425.6%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.6 measured
ProofBench16.0%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.6 measured
LMArena Text: math1474Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.6 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1480Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.6 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index12 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Kimi K2.6 and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkKimi K2.6Muse Spark OpenLeader
MMLU Pro87.6%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.6 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)84.7%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.6 measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)61.2%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.6 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)66.7%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.6 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)74.7%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.6 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)65.8%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.6 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)40.1%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.6 measured
SimpleQA Verified34.9%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.6 measured
LMArena Text: science1468Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.6 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1457Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.6 measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1462Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.6 measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1445Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.6 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Web design benchmarks for Kimi K2.6 and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkKimi K2.6Muse Spark OpenLeader
Design Arena: websites12691311Muse Spark Open
Design Arena: UI components1266Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.6 measured
Design Arena: game dev12511290Muse Spark Open
Design Arena: data viz1249Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.6 measured
Design Arena: 3D1268Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.6 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1272Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.6 measured
Design Arena: SVG1181Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.6 measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1164Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.6 measured
LiveBench designNot measured60.3%Only Muse Spark Open measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
General benchmarks for Kimi K2.6 and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkKimi K2.6Muse Spark OpenLeader
LiveBench data analysisNot measured60.2%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)56.6%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.6 measured
SAGE (Vals AI)50.2%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.6 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)78.2%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.6 measured
Vals Multimodal Index56.4%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.6 measured
IFBench76.0%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.6 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)81.0%78.3%Kimi K2.6
DTBench90.9%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.6 measured
LMCA37.3%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.6 measured
Furniture assembly21.7%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.6 measured
ExploitBench18.4%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.6 measured
LMArena Text1455Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.6 measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1451Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.6 measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1434Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.6 measured
LMArena Vision1282Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.6 measured
LMArena Text: English1460Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.6 measured
LMArena Text: non-English1446Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.6 measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1520Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.6 measured
LMArena Text: German1451Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.6 measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1443Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.6 measured
LMArena Text: Korean1427Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.6 measured
LMArena Text: French1471Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.6 measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1464Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.6 measured
LMArena Text: Russian1446Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.6 measured
LMArena Text: Polish1438Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.6 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1453Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.6 measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1468Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.6 measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1439Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.6 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1428Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.6 measured
LMArena Vision: English1287Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.6 measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1346Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.6 measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1291Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.6 measured
LMArena Vision: humor1280Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.6 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1273Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.6 measured
LMArena Document1451Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.6 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Kimi K2.6 and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkKimi K2.6Muse Spark OpenLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Kimi K2.6$0.0024Fits in one request
Muse Spark Open$0.0034Fits in one request

Kimi K2.6 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Kimi K2.6$0.043Fits in one request
Muse Spark Open$0.075Fits in one request

Kimi K2.6 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Kimi K2.6$0.164Fits in one request
Muse Spark Open$0.292Fits in one request

Kimi K2.6 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Kimi K2.6 and Muse Spark Open
SpecificationMoonshotAI Kimi K2.6Meta Muse Spark Open
MakerMoonshot AIMeta
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedApril 20, 2026October 15, 2026
Context window262K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.65$1.25
Output $/Mtok$3.41$4.25
Coding index44.262.1
Independent measurements behind it12
Cost per solved task$0.35Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Kimi K2.6 better than Muse Spark Open for coding?

Pick Muse Spark Open for coding: it scores 62.1 on the Vibe Coding Index against 44.2 for Kimi K2.6. Pick Kimi K2.6 when output tokens cost 1.2x less, or when what matters is Code migration (Vals AI) or Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI), where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Kimi K2.6 or Muse Spark Open?

Kimi K2.6 costs $0.65 per million input tokens and $3.41 per million output tokens; Muse Spark Open costs $1.25 and $4.25. Cost per solved task is known for Kimi K2.6 only.

Which has the bigger context window, Kimi K2.6 or Muse Spark Open?

Muse Spark Open, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks is the Kimi K2.6 vs Muse Spark Open comparison based on?

17 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Kimi K2.6's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and Muse Spark Open's on 2. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next