LLMBenchmark.ai

Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Grok 4.7 vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro

Updated October 21, 2026. 55 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

Replace Grok 4.7 Replace MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Grok 4.7xAI
Coding
75.0
Overall
46.4
Output $/M
$6.00
25
MiMo-V2.5-ProXiaomi
Coding
40.0
Overall
26.0
Output $/M
$0.609
30
vs boards won of 55 shared

Decision reading

Pick Grok 4.7 for coding: it scores 75.0 on the Vibe Coding Index against 40.0 for MiMo-V2.5-Pro.

Pick MiMo-V2.5-Pro when output tokens cost 9.9x less, or when the context window is larger, 1.05M against 500K tokens.

Model AGrok 4.7xAI75.0/1002 independent benchmarksNo cost per solved taskModel BMiMo-V2.5-ProXiaomi40.0/1001 independent benchmark$0.03 per solved task
Shared results
55
Grok 4.7 only
44
MiMo-V2.5-Pro only
15
Like-for-like categories
8 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Grok 4.7 75.0 from 2 benchmarks, MiMo-V2.5-Pro 40.0 from 1 benchmark.
Widest category
Coding, 21.6 points apart on average over 10 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI): Grok 4.7 86.2% against MiMo-V2.5-Pro 34.1%, 52.1 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Grok 4.7 $6.00 against MiMo-V2.5-Pro $0.609 per million output tokens, 9.9x apart.
Context window
Grok 4.7 takes 500K tokens, MiMo-V2.5-Pro 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGrok 4.7BarsMiMo-V2.5-ProTies
Coding82
Intelligence10
Agentic work40
Reasoning13
Math12
Knowledge24
Web design42
General417
All shared boards2530
CodingLike-for-likeFour of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index82
Coding benchmarks for Grok 4.7 and MiMo-V2.5-Pro
BenchmarkGrok 4.7MiMo-V2.5-ProLeader
LiveBench coding84.5%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.7 measured
LMArena WebDev16371480Grok 4.7
AA Coding IndexNot measured60.2Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured81.3%Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured74.0%Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)28.8%0.5%Grok 4.7
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)86.2%34.1%Grok 4.7
Code migration (Vals AI)44.8%21.6%Grok 4.7
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.5%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.7 measured
IOI (Vals AI)57.7%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.7 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)73.4%57.3%Grok 4.7
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)42.9%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.7 measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)69.5%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.7 measured
SciCode57.8%50.6%Grok 4.7
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured43.2%Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured
FrontierCode47.6%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.7 measured
FrontierSWE29.5%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.7 measured
ALE-BenchNot measured899.8Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured
LMArena Text: coding14321501MiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Text: software and IT14211495MiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena WebDev: React16631469Grok 4.7
LMArena WebDev: HTML16271473Grok 4.7
LMArena WebDev: from an image1586Not measuredOnly Grok 4.7 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for Grok 4.7 and MiMo-V2.5-Pro
BenchmarkGrok 4.7MiMo-V2.5-ProLeader
AA Intelligence Index46.426.0Grok 4.7
Epoch Capabilities Index154.4Not measuredOnly Grok 4.7 measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
Agentic work benchmarks for Grok 4.7 and MiMo-V2.5-Pro
BenchmarkGrok 4.7MiMo-V2.5-ProLeader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured21.3Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured
LiveBench research86.4%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.7 measured
LiveBench browser60.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.7 measured
LiveBench long agentic50.1%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.7 measured
SREBench (Vals AI)3.8%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.7 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)52.3%41.5%Grok 4.7
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)34.2%11.5%Grok 4.7
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)47.1%15.9%Grok 4.7
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)18.3%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.7 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)67.0%55.2%Grok 4.7
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)69.3%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.7 measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)10.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.7 measured
Vals Science Index34.8%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.7 measured
Robo-bench (Vals AI)0.2%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.7 measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured94.2%Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured
APEX-Agents54.6%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.7 measured
Vending-Bench 2$10,537Not measuredOnly Grok 4.7 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 22 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index13
Reasoning benchmarks for Grok 4.7 and MiMo-V2.5-Pro
BenchmarkGrok 4.7MiMo-V2.5-ProLeader
GPQA DiamondNot measured82.6%Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured
LiveBench reasoning82.7%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.7 measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)25.2%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.7 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured86.6%Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)43.1%35.7%Grok 4.7
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)92.7%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.7 measured
ARC-AGI90.2%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.7 measured
ARC-AGI-261.4%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.7 measured
Chess puzzles41.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.7 measured
Mystery game puzzles29.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.7 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14151486MiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Text: expert14391501MiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14271494MiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Vision: diagrams1254Not measuredOnly Grok 4.7 measured
LMArena Vision: homework1309Not measuredOnly Grok 4.7 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index12
Math benchmarks for Grok 4.7 and MiMo-V2.5-Pro
BenchmarkGrok 4.7MiMo-V2.5-ProLeader
OTIS Mock AIME98.1%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.7 measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 353.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.7 measured
FrontierMath, tier 417.1%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.7 measured
ProofBench26.0%22.0%Grok 4.7
LMArena Text: math14141481MiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Text: mathematical work14351491MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index24
Knowledge benchmarks for Grok 4.7 and MiMo-V2.5-Pro
BenchmarkGrok 4.7MiMo-V2.5-ProLeader
MMLU ProNot measured84.6%Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)84.4%77.1%Grok 4.7
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured61.4%Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured73.8%Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured
MedCode (Vals AI)49.5%32.5%Grok 4.7
SimpleQA Verified56.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.7 measured
LMArena Text: science14191482MiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare13951473MiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Text: legal and government14231474MiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Text: business and finance13891466MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index42
Web design benchmarks for Grok 4.7 and MiMo-V2.5-Pro
BenchmarkGrok 4.7MiMo-V2.5-ProLeader
Design Arena: websites12551267MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Design Arena: UI components12711248Grok 4.7
Design Arena: game dev13141261Grok 4.7
Design Arena: data viz12271257MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Design Arena: 3D12691244Grok 4.7
Design Arena: all code categories12711266Grok 4.7
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1181Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1157Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured
LiveBench design78.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.7 measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index417
General benchmarks for Grok 4.7 and MiMo-V2.5-Pro
BenchmarkGrok 4.7MiMo-V2.5-ProLeader
Vals Index58.6%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.7 measured
LiveBench data analysis76.9%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.7 measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)65.6%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.7 measured
SAGE (Vals AI)40.8%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.7 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)89.4%83.7%Grok 4.7
IFBenchNot measured79.9%Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)80.0%79.7%Grok 4.7
DTBench96.0%84.5%Grok 4.7
LMCA49.4%29.5%Grok 4.7
Furniture assembly20.8%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.7 measured
LMArena Text13991464MiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Text: instruction following14061475MiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Text: creative writing13811438MiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Vision1231Not measuredOnly Grok 4.7 measured
LMArena Text: English14111477MiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Text: non-English13861448MiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Text: Chinese14491507MiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Text: German13661459MiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Text: Japanese13591410MiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Text: Korean13831435MiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Text: French14311487MiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Text: Spanish14061469MiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Text: Russian13991449MiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Text: Polish14201464MiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Text: multi-turn13941476MiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Text: longer queries14161481MiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Text: writing and language13941451MiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Text: entertainment and media13761438MiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Vision: English1229Not measuredOnly Grok 4.7 measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1250Not measuredOnly Grok 4.7 measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1241Not measuredOnly Grok 4.7 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1217Not measuredOnly Grok 4.7 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Grok 4.7 and MiMo-V2.5-Pro
BenchmarkGrok 4.7MiMo-V2.5-ProLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Grok 4.7$0.0050Fits in one request
MiMo-V2.5-Pro$0.0006Fits in one request

MiMo-V2.5-Pro costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Grok 4.7$0.118Fits in one request
MiMo-V2.5-Pro$0.017Fits in one request

MiMo-V2.5-Pro costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Grok 4.7$0.460Fits in one request
MiMo-V2.5-Pro$0.067Fits in one request

MiMo-V2.5-Pro costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Grok 4.7 and MiMo-V2.5-Pro
SpecificationSpaceXAI Grok 4.7Xiaomi MiMo-V2.5-Pro
MakerxAIXiaomi
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedSeptember 21, 2026April 22, 2026
Context window500K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$2.00$0.3045
Output $/Mtok$6.00$0.609
Coding index75.040.0
Independent measurements behind it21
Cost per solved taskNot computable$0.03
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Grok 4.7 better than MiMo-V2.5-Pro for coding?

Pick Grok 4.7 for coding: it scores 75.0 on the Vibe Coding Index against 40.0 for MiMo-V2.5-Pro. Pick MiMo-V2.5-Pro when output tokens cost 9.9x less, or when the context window is larger, 1.05M against 500K tokens.

Which is cheaper, Grok 4.7 or MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

Grok 4.7 costs $2.00 per million input tokens and $6.00 per million output tokens; MiMo-V2.5-Pro costs $0.3045 and $0.609. Cost per solved task is known for MiMo-V2.5-Pro only.

Which has the bigger context window, Grok 4.7 or MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro, with 1.05M tokens against 500K.

How many benchmarks is the Grok 4.7 vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro comparison based on?

55 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Grok 4.7's coding index rests on 2 independent benchmarks and MiMo-V2.5-Pro's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next