Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Grok 4.5 vs Hy4

Hy4 leads Grok 4.5 on coding, 65.2 to 52.3 on the Vibe Coding Index, and Hy4 costs 4.8x less per output token ($1.2505 vs $6.00 per million). Updated November 5, 2026; 4 benchmarks have a result for both.

Grok 4.5xAI
Coding
52.3
Overall
60.3
Output $/M
$6.00
0
Hy4Tencent
Coding
65.2
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.2505
4
vs boards won of 4 shared

Grok 4.5 or Hy4: which to pick

Pick Hy4 for coding: it scores 65.2 on the Vibe Coding Index against 52.3 for Grok 4.5, though on 2 benchmarks against 5.

Grok 4.5 is neither cheaper nor larger in context, and leads no benchmark both models were measured on.

Shared results
4
Grok 4.5 only
118
Hy4 only
2
Like-for-like categories
2 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Grok 4.5 52.3 from 5 benchmarks, Hy4 65.2 from 2 benchmarks.
Widest category
Coding, 26.5 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI): Grok 4.5 8.6% against Hy4 39.4%, 41.1 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Grok 4.5 $6.00 against Hy4 $1.2505 per million output tokens, 4.8x apart.
Context window
Grok 4.5 takes 500K tokens, Hy4 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGrok 4.5BarsHy4Ties
Coding02
Agentic work02
All shared boards04
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index02
Coding benchmarks for Grok 4.5 and Hy4
BenchmarkGrok 4.5Hy4Leader
LMArena WebDev1553Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
AA Coding Index72.4Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)87.3%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)86.6%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)8.6%39.4%Hy4
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)69.0%81.0%Hy4
Code migration (Vals AI)36.6%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
IOI (Vals AI)40.6%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)67.8%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)66.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)71.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
SciCode55.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
FrontierCode42.4%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
WeirdML46.4%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
MirrorCode32.2%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
ALE-Bench1309.3Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: coding1474Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1471Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena WebDev: React1556Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1568Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena WebDev: from an image1562Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
SciCode6.5%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
GameBench 261.4Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.179.3%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Terminal-Bench 3.015.7%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Terminal-Bench 4.012.4%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 23 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for Grok 4.5 and Hy4
BenchmarkGrok 4.5Hy4Leader
Epoch Capabilities Index155.1Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Agentic work benchmarks for Grok 4.5 and Hy4
BenchmarkGrok 4.5Hy4Leader
AA Agentic Index41.2Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Design Arena: agents building web apps1204Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1244Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1215Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Design Arena: agents building Android apps1233Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot games1229Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Design Arena: agents building games1182Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Design Arena: HTML slides1101Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slides1187Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Design Arena: spreadsheets1129Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
SREBench (Vals AI)0.8%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)48.4%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)24.9%34.4%Hy4
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)38.0%41.4%Hy4
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured12.5%Only Hy4 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)52.9%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Time Horizon Index (Vals AI)6.3%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
APEX-Agents56.2%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
PostTrainBench23.4%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Vending-Bench 2$3,887Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Search1216Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
τ³-Banking47.9%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 22 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index15 boards, none shared
Reasoning benchmarks for Grok 4.5 and Hy4
BenchmarkGrok 4.5Hy4Leader
GPQA Diamond92.9%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)61.8%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)93.1%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)42.7%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)93.4%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
ARC-AGI87.2%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
ARC-AGI-252.6%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
SimpleBench70.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Chess puzzles35.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1462Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: expert1465Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1464Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Vision: diagrams1304Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Vision: homework1295Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Kagi LLM Benchmark83.5%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Grok 4.5 and Hy4
BenchmarkGrok 4.5Hy4Leader
OTIS Mock AIME97.8%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 357.2%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
FrontierMath, tier 424.4%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
ProofBench31.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: math1459Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1482Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
MathArena34.1%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index12 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Grok 4.5 and Hy4
BenchmarkGrok 4.5Hy4Leader
MMLU Pro89.2%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)86.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)67.4%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)71.7%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)61.8%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)43.3%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
SimpleQA Verified48.3%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: science1465Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1440Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1463Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1441Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
FACTS Benchmark Suite40.6%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Grok 4.5 and Hy4
BenchmarkGrok 4.5Hy4Leader
Design Arena: websites1280Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Design Arena: UI components1276Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Design Arena: game dev1263Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Design Arena: data viz1267Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Design Arena: 3D1254Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1274Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Design Arena: SVG1207Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1256Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index32 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for Grok 4.5 and Hy4
BenchmarkGrok 4.5Hy4Leader
Vals IndexNot measured59.4%Only Hy4 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)86.9%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Vals Multimodal Index63.4%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)79.3%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
DTBench96.5%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMCA45.2%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Surface Evolver Bench74.4%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Furniture assembly22.5%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text1448Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1445Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1442Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Vision1287Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: English1453Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: non-English1440Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1494Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: German1446Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1429Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: Korean1403Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: French1457Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1451Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: Russian1450Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: Polish1431Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1456Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1462Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1445Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1433Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Vision: English1285Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1345Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1293Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Vision: humor1276Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1293Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Document1452Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Grok 4.5 and Hy4
BenchmarkGrok 4.5Hy4Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Grok 4.5$0.0050Fits in one request
Hy4$0.0010Fits in one request

Hy4 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Grok 4.5$0.118Fits in one request
Hy4$0.025Fits in one request

Hy4 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Grok 4.5$0.460Fits in one request
Hy4$0.096Fits in one request

Hy4 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Grok 4.5 and Hy4
SpecificationSpaceXAI Grok 4.5Tencent Hy4
MakerxAITencent
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedJuly 8, 2026November 4, 2026
Context window500K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$2.00$0.417
Output $/Mtok$6.00$1.2505
Coding index52.365.2
Independent measurements behind it52
Cost per solved task$0.62Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Grok 4.5 better than Hy4 for coding?

Pick Hy4 for coding: it scores 65.2 on the Vibe Coding Index against 52.3 for Grok 4.5, though on 2 benchmarks against 5. Grok 4.5 is neither cheaper nor larger in context, and leads no benchmark both models were measured on.

Which is cheaper, Grok 4.5 or Hy4?

Grok 4.5 costs $2.00 per million input tokens and $6.00 per million output tokens; Hy4 costs $0.417 and $1.2505. Cost per solved task is known for Grok 4.5 only.

Which has the bigger context window, Grok 4.5 or Hy4?

Hy4, with 1.05M tokens against 500K.

How many benchmarks is the Grok 4.5 vs Hy4 comparison based on?

4 benchmarks have a result for both models as of November 5, 2026. Grok 4.5's coding index rests on 5 independent benchmarks and Hy4's on 2. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/grok-4-5-vs-tencent-hy4" title="Grok 4.5 vs Hy4, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/grok-4-5-vs-tencent-hy4">LLMBenchmark.ai, Grok 4.5 vs Hy4</a></p>