Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-6 Luna vs Hy4 preview

Updated October 21, 2026. 23 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

GPT-6 LunaOpenAI
Coding
71.4
Overall
38.1
Output $/M
$0.50
10
Hy4 previewTencent
Coding
61.6
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$2.501
13
vs boards won of 23 shared

Decision reading

Pick GPT-6 Luna for coding: it scores 71.4 on the Vibe Coding Index against 61.6 for Hy4 preview.

Pick Hy4 preview when what matters is LMArena WebDev or Code migration (Vals AI), where it leads.

Shared results
23
GPT-6 Luna only
79
Hy4 preview only
1
Like-for-like categories
5 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-6 Luna 71.4 from 2 benchmarks, Hy4 preview 61.6 from 1 benchmark.
Widest category
Math, 11.0 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI): GPT-6 Luna 73.0% against Hy4 preview 55.1%, 18.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GPT-6 Luna $0.50 against Hy4 preview $2.501 per million output tokens, 5.0x apart.
Context window
GPT-6 Luna takes 1.05M tokens, Hy4 preview 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGPT-6 LunaBarsHy4 previewTies
Coding55
Agentic work35
Math01
Knowledge10
General12
All shared boards1013
CodingLike-for-likeFour of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index55
Coding benchmarks for GPT-6 Luna and Hy4 preview
BenchmarkGPT-6 LunaHy4 previewLeader
LiveBench coding84.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena WebDev15781631Hy4 preview
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)13.6%8.1%GPT-6 Luna
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)81.7%77.5%GPT-6 Luna
Code migration (Vals AI)42.5%47.4%Hy4 preview
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.5%0.0%GPT-6 Luna
IOI (Vals AI)55.6%59.3%Hy4 preview
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)73.0%55.1%GPT-6 Luna
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)37.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)76.3%65.4%GPT-6 Luna
SciCode54.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
FrontierCode42.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
ALE-Bench1576.9Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: coding1437Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1423Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena WebDev: React15731653Hy4 preview
LMArena WebDev: HTML15951620Hy4 preview
LMArena WebDev: from an image1571Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
Neither model has a result on the other 20 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for GPT-6 Luna and Hy4 preview
BenchmarkGPT-6 LunaHy4 previewLeader
AA Intelligence Index38.1Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
Epoch Capabilities Index156.8Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index35
Agentic work benchmarks for GPT-6 Luna and Hy4 preview
BenchmarkGPT-6 LunaHy4 previewLeader
Design Arena: agents building web apps1189Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1158Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1133Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LiveBench research43.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LiveBench browser72.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LiveBench long agentic48.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
SREBench (Vals AI)2.7%2.3%GPT-6 Luna
Finance Agent (Vals AI)49.9%55.1%Hy4 preview
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)19.9%32.6%Hy4 preview
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)30.3%45.2%Hy4 preview
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)4.2%8.8%Hy4 preview
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)68.5%58.1%GPT-6 Luna
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)61.5%69.3%Hy4 preview
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)4.3%1.4%GPT-6 Luna
Vals Science Index28.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
APEX-Agents44.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
SpireClimb0.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
Neither model has a result on the other 22 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index13 boards, none shared
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-6 Luna and Hy4 preview
BenchmarkGPT-6 LunaHy4 previewLeader
LiveBench reasoning81.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)19.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)38.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)90.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
ARC-AGI86.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
ARC-AGI-259.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
Chess puzzles36.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
Mystery game puzzles7.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1410Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: expert1442Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1410Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Vision: diagrams1245Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Vision: homework1261Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Math benchmarks for GPT-6 Luna and Hy4 preview
BenchmarkGPT-6 LunaHy4 previewLeader
OTIS Mock AIME98.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 378.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
FrontierMath, tier 456.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
ProofBench64.0%75.0%Hy4 preview
LMArena Text: math1409Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1427Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Knowledge benchmarks for GPT-6 Luna and Hy4 preview
BenchmarkGPT-6 LunaHy4 previewLeader
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured83.8%Only Hy4 preview measured
MedCode (Vals AI)44.7%43.3%GPT-6 Luna
SimpleQA Verified41.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: science1386Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1352Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1400Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1388Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for GPT-6 Luna and Hy4 preview
BenchmarkGPT-6 LunaHy4 previewLeader
Design Arena: websites1272Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
Design Arena: UI components1297Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
Design Arena: game dev1259Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
Design Arena: data viz1215Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
Design Arena: 3D1217Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
Design Arena: all code categories1271Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
Design Arena: SVG1253Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1156Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LiveBench design82.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index12
General benchmarks for GPT-6 Luna and Hy4 preview
BenchmarkGPT-6 LunaHy4 previewLeader
Vals Index52.3%53.2%Hy4 preview
LiveBench data analysis73.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)57.6%68.6%Hy4 preview
SAGE (Vals AI)48.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)83.7%83.6%GPT-6 Luna
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)83.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
DTBench90.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMCA44.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
Furniture assembly44.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Text1389Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1408Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1363Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Vision1216Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: English1393Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: non-English1381Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1427Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: German1376Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1369Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: Korean1359Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: French1408Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1391Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: Russian1392Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: Polish1383Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1392Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1408Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1384Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1364Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Vision: English1204Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1266Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1225Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1205Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GPT-6 Luna and Hy4 preview
BenchmarkGPT-6 LunaHy4 previewLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-6 Luna$0.0003Fits in one request
Hy4 preview$0.0021Fits in one request

GPT-6 Luna costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-6 Luna$0.0065Fits in one request
Hy4 preview$0.049Fits in one request

GPT-6 Luna costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-6 Luna$0.025Fits in one request
Hy4 preview$0.192Fits in one request

GPT-6 Luna costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-6 Luna and Hy4 preview
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-6 LunaTencent Hy4 preview
MakerOpenAITencent
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedSeptember 22, 2026August 28, 2026
Context window1.05M1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.10$0.834
Output $/Mtok$0.50$2.501
Coding index71.461.6
Independent measurements behind it21
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-6 Luna better than Hy4 preview for coding?

Pick GPT-6 Luna for coding: it scores 71.4 on the Vibe Coding Index against 61.6 for Hy4 preview. Pick Hy4 preview when what matters is LMArena WebDev or Code migration (Vals AI), where it leads.

Which is cheaper, GPT-6 Luna or Hy4 preview?

GPT-6 Luna costs $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.50 per million output tokens; Hy4 preview costs $0.834 and $2.501. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-6 Luna or Hy4 preview?

GPT-6 Luna, with 1.05M tokens against 1.05M.

How many benchmarks is the GPT-6 Luna vs Hy4 preview comparison based on?

23 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. GPT-6 Luna's coding index rests on 2 independent benchmarks and Hy4 preview's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next