Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-5 Nano vs Inkling Small

Updated October 21, 2026. 57 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

GPT-5 NanoOpenAI
Coding
34.8
Overall
13.0
Output $/M
$0.40
2
T Inkling SmallThinking Machines
Coding
29.9
Overall
25.7
Output $/M
$1.20
55
vs boards won of 57 shared

Decision reading

Pick GPT-5 Nano for coding: it scores 34.8 on the Vibe Coding Index against 29.9 for Inkling Small.

Pick Inkling Small when the context window is larger, 524K against 400K tokens, or when what matters is LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) or LMArena Text: coding, where it leads.

Shared results
57
GPT-5 Nano only
28
Inkling Small only
27
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-5 Nano 34.8 from 1 benchmark, Inkling Small 29.9 from 1 benchmark.
Widest category
Reasoning, 22.9 points apart on average over 12 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
ARC-AGI: GPT-5 Nano 20.7% against Inkling Small 84.0%, 63.3 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GPT-5 Nano $0.40 against Inkling Small $1.20 per million output tokens, 3.0x apart.
Context window
GPT-5 Nano takes 400K tokens, Inkling Small 524K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGPT-5 NanoBarsInkling SmallTies
Coding03
Intelligence02
Reasoning111
Math15
Knowledge010
General024
All shared boards255
CodingLike-for-likeFour of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index03
Coding benchmarks for GPT-5 Nano and Inkling Small
BenchmarkGPT-5 NanoInkling SmallLeader
SWE-bench Verified34.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Nano measured
LMArena WebDevNot measured1409Only Inkling Small measured
AA Coding IndexNot measured52.9Only Inkling Small measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)70.2%85.9%Inkling Small
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured82.2%Only Inkling Small measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only Inkling Small measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured19.1%Only Inkling Small measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured13.7%Only Inkling Small measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.5%Only Inkling Small measured
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured9.3%Only Inkling Small measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured55.1%Only Inkling Small measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)Not measured33.6%Only Inkling Small measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)Not measured64.1%Only Inkling Small measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)78.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Nano measured
SciCodeNot measured49.7%Only Inkling Small measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)17.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Nano measured
Terminal-Bench21.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Nano measured
WeirdML38.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Nano measured
LMArena Text: coding13511450Inkling Small
LMArena Text: software and IT13451447Inkling Small
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1399Only Inkling Small measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1398Only Inkling Small measured
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1410Only Inkling Small measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Intelligence benchmarks for GPT-5 Nano and Inkling Small
BenchmarkGPT-5 NanoInkling SmallLeader
AA Intelligence Index13.025.7Inkling Small
Epoch Capabilities Index139.2150.3Inkling Small
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for GPT-5 Nano and Inkling Small
BenchmarkGPT-5 NanoInkling SmallLeader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured23.5Only Inkling Small measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured41.3%Only Inkling Small measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured15.4%Only Inkling Small measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured25.5%Only Inkling Small measured
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured2.9%Only Inkling Small measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured31.8%Only Inkling Small measured
τ²-Bench Telecom36.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Nano measured
Neither model has a result on the other 32 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index111
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-5 Nano and Inkling Small
BenchmarkGPT-5 NanoInkling SmallLeader
GPQA Diamond63.4%83.6%Inkling Small
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)70.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Nano measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)67.6%89.5%Inkling Small
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)9.5%33.3%Inkling Small
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)69.4%88.5%Inkling Small
ARC-AGI20.7%84.0%Inkling Small
ARC-AGI-22.6%40.1%Inkling Small
Chess puzzles22.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Nano measured
Mystery game puzzles9.0%6.0%GPT-5 Nano
VPCT37.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Nano measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts13281423Inkling Small
LMArena Text: expert13211441Inkling Small
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English13381429Inkling Small
LMArena Vision: diagrams11411251Inkling Small
LMArena Vision: homework11571257Inkling Small
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index15
Math benchmarks for GPT-5 Nano and Inkling Small
BenchmarkGPT-5 NanoInkling SmallLeader
AIME81.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Nano measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)93.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Nano measured
MGSM (Vals AI)89.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Nano measured
AA Math Index83.7Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Nano measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)83.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Nano measured
OTIS Mock AIME81.1%90.0%Inkling Small
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 320.0%46.3%Inkling Small
FrontierMath, tier 42.4%17.1%Inkling Small
ProofBench12.0%6.0%GPT-5 Nano
MATH level 595.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Nano measured
LMArena Text: math13171459Inkling Small
LMArena Text: mathematical work13261441Inkling Small
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index010
Knowledge benchmarks for GPT-5 Nano and Inkling Small
BenchmarkGPT-5 NanoInkling SmallLeader
MMLU Pro76.1%85.6%Inkling Small
LegalBench (Vals AI)50.1%83.0%Inkling Small
CaseLaw (Vals AI)52.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Nano measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured69.6%Only Inkling Small measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)67.4%75.5%Inkling Small
MortgageTax (Vals AI)53.6%62.3%Inkling Small
MedQA (Vals AI)93.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Nano measured
MedCode (Vals AI)30.4%37.9%Inkling Small
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)78.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Nano measured
SimpleQA Verified11.7%19.1%Inkling Small
LMArena Text: science13181428Inkling Small
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare13351413Inkling Small
LMArena Text: legal and government12981415Inkling Small
LMArena Text: business and finance13111413Inkling Small
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for GPT-5 Nano and Inkling Small
BenchmarkGPT-5 NanoInkling SmallLeader
Design Arena: websites1101Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Nano measured
Design Arena: UI components1066Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Nano measured
Design Arena: game dev1045Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Nano measured
Design Arena: data viz1056Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Nano measured
Design Arena: 3D966Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Nano measured
Design Arena: all code categories1084Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Nano measured
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index024
General benchmarks for GPT-5 Nano and Inkling Small
BenchmarkGPT-5 NanoInkling SmallLeader
Vals IndexNot measured27.6%Only Inkling Small measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured59.4%Only Inkling Small measured
SAGE (Vals AI)30.4%32.7%Inkling Small
MedScribe (Vals AI)72.9%84.1%Inkling Small
Vals Multimodal IndexNot measured50.0%Only Inkling Small measured
IFBench67.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Nano measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)45.0%75.7%Inkling Small
DTBench62.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Nano measured
LMCA7.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Nano measured
Fiction.LiveBench44.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Nano measured
LMArena Text13201413Inkling Small
LMArena Text: instruction following13061399Inkling Small
LMArena Text: creative writing12491334Inkling Small
LMArena Vision11591237Inkling Small
LMArena Text: English13211421Inkling Small
LMArena Text: non-English13131401Inkling Small
LMArena Text: Chinese13561464Inkling Small
LMArena Text: German13271408Inkling Small
LMArena Text: Japanese12271401Inkling Small
LMArena Text: Korean12691367Inkling Small
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1435Only Inkling Small measured
LMArena Text: Spanish13601422Inkling Small
LMArena Text: Russian12961394Inkling Small
LMArena Text: Polish13141428Inkling Small
LMArena Text: multi-turn13111416Inkling Small
LMArena Text: longer queries13121402Inkling Small
LMArena Text: writing and language12831357Inkling Small
LMArena Text: entertainment and media12681352Inkling Small
LMArena Vision: English11701243Inkling Small
LMArena Vision: Chinese11761292Inkling Small
LMArena Vision: reading text11521243Inkling Small
LMArena Vision: humor11101207Inkling Small
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1205Only Inkling Small measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GPT-5 Nano and Inkling Small
BenchmarkGPT-5 NanoInkling SmallLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-5 Nano$0.0003Fits in one request
Inkling Small$0.0010Fits in one request

GPT-5 Nano costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-5 Nano$0.0037Fits in one request
Inkling Small$0.026Fits in one request

GPT-5 Nano costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-5 Nano$0.014Fits in one request
Inkling Small$0.102Fits in one request

GPT-5 Nano costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-5 Nano and Inkling Small
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-5 NanoThinking Machines Inkling Small
MakerOpenAIThinking Machines
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedAugust 7, 2025July 30, 2026
Context window400K524K
Input $/Mtok$0.05$0.45
Output $/Mtok$0.40$1.20
Coding index34.829.9
Independent measurements behind it11
Cost per solved task$0.109$0.16
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-5 Nano better than Inkling Small for coding?

Pick GPT-5 Nano for coding: it scores 34.8 on the Vibe Coding Index against 29.9 for Inkling Small. Pick Inkling Small when the context window is larger, 524K against 400K tokens, or when what matters is LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) or LMArena Text: coding, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, GPT-5 Nano or Inkling Small?

GPT-5 Nano costs $0.05 per million input tokens and $0.40 per million output tokens; Inkling Small costs $0.45 and $1.20. Per solved SWE-bench Verified task, GPT-5 Nano costs $0.109 and Inkling Small $0.16.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-5 Nano or Inkling Small?

Inkling Small, with 524K tokens against 400K.

How many benchmarks is the GPT-5 Nano vs Inkling Small comparison based on?

57 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. GPT-5 Nano's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and Inkling Small's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next