Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-5.4 vs Hy4 preview

GPT-5.4 leads Hy4 preview on coding, 64.4 to 44.3 on the Vibe Coding Index, and Hy4 preview costs 6.0x less per output token ($2.501 vs $15.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 10 benchmarks have a result for both.

GPT-5.4OpenAI
Coding
64.4
Overall
69.6
Output $/M
$15.00
2
Hy4 previewTencent
Coding
44.3
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$2.501
8
vs boards won of 10 shared

GPT-5.4 or Hy4 preview: which to pick

Pick GPT-5.4 for coding: it scores 64.4 on the Vibe Coding Index against 44.3 for Hy4 preview.

Pick Hy4 preview for output tokens 6.0x cheaper ($2.501 vs $15.00 per million) and work measured by LMArena WebDev or Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI), where it leads.

Shared results
10
GPT-5.4 only
100
Hy4 preview only
14
Like-for-like categories
4 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-5.4 64.4 from 3 benchmarks, Hy4 preview 44.3 from 3 benchmarks.
Widest category
Math, 19.0 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
LMArena WebDev: React: GPT-5.4 1454 against Hy4 preview 1653, 24.4 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GPT-5.4 $15.00 against Hy4 preview $2.501 per million output tokens, 6.0x apart.
Context window
GPT-5.4 takes 1.05M tokens, Hy4 preview 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGPT-5.4BarsHy4 previewTies
Coding15
Math01
Knowledge11
General01
All shared boards28
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index15
Coding benchmarks for GPT-5.4 and Hy4 preview
BenchmarkGPT-5.4Hy4 previewLeader
LMArena WebDev14641631Hy4 preview
AA Coding Index71.1Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)84.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)78.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured8.1%Only Hy4 preview measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)67.4%77.5%Hy4 preview
Code migration (Vals AI)35.0%47.4%Hy4 preview
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.5%0.0%GPT-5.4
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured59.3%Only Hy4 preview measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured55.1%Only Hy4 preview measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)51.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)Not measured65.4%Only Hy4 preview measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)57.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Terminal-Bench81.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
GSO-Bench31.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
WeirdML77.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
MirrorCode15.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
ALE-Bench1607.0Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: coding1496Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1491Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena WebDev: React14541653Hy4 preview
LMArena WebDev: HTML14781620Hy4 preview
LMArena WebDev: from an image1436Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for GPT-5.4 and Hy4 preview
BenchmarkGPT-5.4Hy4 previewLeader
AA Intelligence Index39.0Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Epoch Capabilities Index157.3Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index19 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for GPT-5.4 and Hy4 preview
BenchmarkGPT-5.4Hy4 previewLeader
Design Arena: agents building web apps1059Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1017Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1087Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Design Arena: agents building Android apps1031Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot games1135Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
SREBench (Vals AI)Not measured2.3%Only Hy4 preview measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured55.1%Only Hy4 preview measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured32.6%Only Hy4 preview measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured45.2%Only Hy4 preview measured
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured8.8%Only Hy4 preview measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured58.1%Only Hy4 preview measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)Not measured69.3%Only Hy4 preview measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)Not measured1.4%Only Hy4 preview measured
τ²-Bench Telecom87.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
APEX-Agents52.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
METR time horizons74.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
DeepResearch Bench35.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
PostTrainBench19.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Vending-Bench 2$6,144Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 22 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index16 boards, none shared
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-5.4 and Hy4 preview
BenchmarkGPT-5.4Hy4 previewLeader
GPQA Diamond91.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)87.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)92.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)43.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)93.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
ARC-AGI93.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
ARC-AGI-274.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Chess puzzles48.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Mystery game puzzles37.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
EBR-bench25.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1485Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: expert1507Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1479Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Vision: diagrams1327Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Vision: homework1336Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Kagi LLM Benchmark63.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Math benchmarks for GPT-5.4 and Hy4 preview
BenchmarkGPT-5.4Hy4 previewLeader
AIME96.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
OTIS Mock AIME97.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 378.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
FrontierMath, tier 449.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
ProofBench56.0%75.0%Hy4 preview
LMArena Text: math1488Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1497Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11
Knowledge benchmarks for GPT-5.4 and Hy4 preview
BenchmarkGPT-5.4Hy4 previewLeader
MMLU Pro87.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)86.0%83.8%GPT-5.4
CaseLaw (Vals AI)63.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)65.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)74.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)68.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
MedQA (Vals AI)96.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)41.3%43.3%Hy4 preview
SimpleQA Verified45.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: science1479Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1458Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1486Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1474Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for GPT-5.4 and Hy4 preview
BenchmarkGPT-5.4Hy4 previewLeader
Design Arena: websites1198Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Design Arena: UI components1212Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Design Arena: game dev1194Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Design Arena: data viz1196Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Design Arena: 3D1065Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1179Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Design Arena: SVG1141Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1188Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
General benchmarks for GPT-5.4 and Hy4 preview
BenchmarkGPT-5.4Hy4 previewLeader
Vals IndexNot measured53.2%Only Hy4 preview measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured68.6%Only Hy4 preview measured
SAGE (Vals AI)43.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)77.5%83.6%Hy4 preview
IFBench73.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)82.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
DTBench94.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMCA52.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
CL-bench27.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Furniture assembly37.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
CL-bench Life21.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text1469Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1469Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1439Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Vision1303Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: English1467Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: non-English1465Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1520Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: German1472Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1485Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: Korean1449Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: French1493Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1452Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: Russian1480Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: Polish1472Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1482Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1473Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1458Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1438Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Vision: English1301Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1354Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1312Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Vision: humor1284Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things1251Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1283Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
LMArena Document1471Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GPT-5.4 and Hy4 preview
BenchmarkGPT-5.4Hy4 previewLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-5.4$0.010Fits in one request
Hy4 preview$0.0021Fits in one request

Hy4 preview costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-5.4$0.170Fits in one request
Hy4 preview$0.049Fits in one request

Hy4 preview costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-5.4$0.650Fits in one request
Hy4 preview$0.192Fits in one request

Hy4 preview costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-5.4 and Hy4 preview
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-5.4Tencent Hy4 preview
MakerOpenAITencent
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedMarch 5, 2026August 28, 2026
Context window1.05M1.05M
Input $/Mtok$2.50$0.834
Output $/Mtok$15.00$2.501
Coding index64.444.3
Independent measurements behind it33
Cost per solved task$1.02Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-5.4 better than Hy4 preview for coding?

Pick GPT-5.4 for coding: it scores 64.4 on the Vibe Coding Index against 44.3 for Hy4 preview. Pick Hy4 preview for output tokens 6.0x cheaper ($2.501 vs $15.00 per million) and work measured by LMArena WebDev or Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI), where it leads.

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.4 or Hy4 preview?

GPT-5.4 costs $2.50 per million input tokens and $15.00 per million output tokens; Hy4 preview costs $0.834 and $2.501. Cost per solved task is known for GPT-5.4 only.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-5.4 or Hy4 preview?

GPT-5.4, with 1.05M tokens against 1.05M.

How many benchmarks is the GPT-5.4 vs Hy4 preview comparison based on?

10 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. GPT-5.4's coding index rests on 3 independent benchmarks and Hy4 preview's on 3. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/gpt-5-4-vs-tencent-hy4-preview" title="GPT-5.4 vs Hy4 preview, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/gpt-5-4-vs-tencent-hy4-preview">LLMBenchmark.ai, GPT-5.4 vs Hy4 preview</a></p>