Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-4o-mini vs Inkling

Updated October 21, 2026. 15 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

GPT-4o-miniOpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
6.7
Output $/M
$0.60
0
T InklingThinking Machines
Coding
31.5
Overall
25.0
Output $/M
$4.05
15
vs boards won of 15 shared

Decision reading

Only Inkling has a coding score, 31.5 on the Vibe Coding Index; GPT-4o-mini has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

GPT-4o-mini has the edge where output tokens cost 6.8x less.

Shared results
15
GPT-4o-mini only
12
Inkling only
87
Like-for-like categories
5 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-4o-mini not benchmarked, Inkling 31.5 from 6 benchmarks.
Widest category
Coding, 49.9 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI): GPT-4o-mini 26.4% against Inkling 85.5%, 59.1 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GPT-4o-mini $0.60 against Inkling $4.05 per million output tokens, 6.8x apart.
Context window
GPT-4o-mini takes 128K tokens, Inkling 524K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGPT-4o-miniBarsInklingTies
Coding02
Intelligence02
Reasoning05
Knowledge04
General02
All shared boards015
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index02
Coding benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini and Inkling
BenchmarkGPT-4o-miniInklingLeader
LiveBench codingNot measured64.0%Only Inkling measured
LMArena WebDevNot measured1414Only Inkling measured
AA Coding Index11.452.1Inkling
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)26.4%85.5%Inkling
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured77.6%Only Inkling measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured0.5%Only Inkling measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured19.2%Only Inkling measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured11.8%Only Inkling measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only Inkling measured
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured14.9%Only Inkling measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured47.6%Only Inkling measured
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)Not measured7.3%Only Inkling measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)Not measured26.1%Only Inkling measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)Not measured66.8%Only Inkling measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)23.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
SciCodeNot measured47.0%Only Inkling measured
FrontierCodeNot measured14.0%Only Inkling measured
FrontierSWENot measured4.1%Only Inkling measured
WeirdMLNot measured32.3%Only Inkling measured
ALE-BenchNot measured946.0Only Inkling measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1466Only Inkling measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1465Only Inkling measured
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1404Only Inkling measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1399Only Inkling measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Intelligence benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini and Inkling
BenchmarkGPT-4o-miniInklingLeader
AA Intelligence Index6.725.0Inkling
Epoch Capabilities Index126.5148.4Inkling
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index12 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini and Inkling
BenchmarkGPT-4o-miniInklingLeader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured22.5Only Inkling measured
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1196Only Inkling measured
LiveBench researchNot measured59.9%Only Inkling measured
LiveBench browserNot measured16.0%Only Inkling measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured14.1%Only Inkling measured
SREBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only Inkling measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured46.6%Only Inkling measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured15.3%Only Inkling measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured28.4%Only Inkling measured
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured3.8%Only Inkling measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured38.4%Only Inkling measured
APEX-AgentsNot measured33.8%Only Inkling measured
Neither model has a result on the other 27 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini and Inkling
BenchmarkGPT-4o-miniInklingLeader
GPQA Diamond44.2%87.1%Inkling
LiveBench reasoningNot measured78.3%Only Inkling measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)56.6%78.5%Inkling
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)42.6%87.2%Inkling
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)4.2%31.9%Inkling
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured88.3%Only Inkling measured
ARC-AGINot measured79.5%Only Inkling measured
ARC-AGI-20.0%36.5%Inkling
SimpleBenchNot measured50.0%Only Inkling measured
Chess puzzlesNot measured21.0%Only Inkling measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1451Only Inkling measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1466Only Inkling measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1448Only Inkling measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index12 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini and Inkling
BenchmarkGPT-4o-miniInklingLeader
AIME11.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)72.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
MGSM (Vals AI)86.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
AA Math Index14.7Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)14.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured88.9%Only Inkling measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Not measured33.3%Only Inkling measured
FrontierMath, tier 4Not measured4.9%Only Inkling measured
ProofBenchNot measured0.0%Only Inkling measured
GSM8K91.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1479Only Inkling measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1460Only Inkling measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Knowledge benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini and Inkling
BenchmarkGPT-4o-miniInklingLeader
MMLU Pro62.7%86.3%Inkling
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured83.0%Only Inkling measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)45.5%68.6%Inkling
TaxEval (Vals AI)60.5%75.3%Inkling
MortgageTax (Vals AI)54.5%64.0%Inkling
MedQA (Vals AI)72.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured41.2%Only Inkling measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)64.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured40.3%Only Inkling measured
MMLU81.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1455Only Inkling measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1447Only Inkling measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1448Only Inkling measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1438Only Inkling measured
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini and Inkling
BenchmarkGPT-4o-miniInklingLeader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1224Only Inkling measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1200Only Inkling measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1166Only Inkling measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1159Only Inkling measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1161Only Inkling measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1206Only Inkling measured
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1110Only Inkling measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1089Only Inkling measured
LiveBench designNot measured58.3%Only Inkling measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
General benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini and Inkling
BenchmarkGPT-4o-miniInklingLeader
Vals IndexNot measured29.0%Only Inkling measured
LiveBench data analysisNot measured72.8%Only Inkling measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured58.5%Only Inkling measured
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured36.5%Only Inkling measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured85.4%Only Inkling measured
Vals Multimodal IndexNot measured49.4%Only Inkling measured
IFBench31.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured77.3%Only Inkling measured
DTBench54.4%87.5%Inkling
LMCA10.4%37.6%Inkling
PIQA88.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
LMArena TextNot measured1442Only Inkling measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1425Only Inkling measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1390Only Inkling measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1442Only Inkling measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1434Only Inkling measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1493Only Inkling measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1445Only Inkling measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1429Only Inkling measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1403Only Inkling measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1455Only Inkling measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1449Only Inkling measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1430Only Inkling measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1450Only Inkling measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1437Only Inkling measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1435Only Inkling measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1404Only Inkling measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1394Only Inkling measured
Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini and Inkling
BenchmarkGPT-4o-miniInklingLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-4o-mini$0.0004Fits in one request
Inkling$0.0030Fits in one request

GPT-4o-mini costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-4o-mini$0.0093Fits in one request
Inkling$0.061Fits in one request

GPT-4o-mini costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-4o-mini$0.036Exceeds the context window
Inkling$0.235Fits in one request

GPT-4o-mini costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-4o-mini and Inkling
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-4o-miniThinking Machines Inkling
MakerOpenAIThinking Machines
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedJuly 18, 2024July 17, 2026
Context window128K524K
Input $/Mtok$0.15$0.975
Output $/Mtok$0.60$4.05
Coding indexNot benchmarked31.5
Independent measurements behind it06
Cost per solved taskNot computable$0.76
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-4o-mini better than Inkling for coding?

Only Inkling has a coding score, 31.5 on the Vibe Coding Index; GPT-4o-mini has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. GPT-4o-mini has the edge where output tokens cost 6.8x less.

Which is cheaper, GPT-4o-mini or Inkling?

GPT-4o-mini costs $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.60 per million output tokens; Inkling costs $0.975 and $4.05. Cost per solved task is known for Inkling only.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-4o-mini or Inkling?

Inkling, with 524K tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks is the GPT-4o-mini vs Inkling comparison based on?

15 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. GPT-4o-mini's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Inkling's on 6. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next