LLMBenchmark.ai

Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-4o (2024-11-20) vs Grok 4.6

Updated October 21, 2026. 11 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

GPT-4o (2024-11-20)OpenAI
Coding
18.2
Overall
8.4
Output $/M
$10.00
1
Grok 4.6xAI
Coding
76.4
Overall
44.3
Output $/M
$6.00
10
vs boards won of 11 shared

Decision reading

Pick Grok 4.6 for coding: it scores 76.4 on the Vibe Coding Index against 18.2 for GPT-4o (2024-11-20).

Pick GPT-4o (2024-11-20) when the benchmark that matters is TaxEval (Vals AI), where it leads.

Shared results
11
GPT-4o (2024-11-20) only
13
Grok 4.6 only
112
Like-for-like categories
5 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-4o (2024-11-20) 18.2 from 1 benchmark, Grok 4.6 76.4 from 2 benchmarks.
Widest category
Math, 92.9 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
OTIS Mock AIME: GPT-4o (2024-11-20) 6.3% against Grok 4.6 99.2%, 92.9 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GPT-4o (2024-11-20) $10.00 against Grok 4.6 $6.00 per million output tokens, 1.7x apart.
Context window
GPT-4o (2024-11-20) takes 128K tokens, Grok 4.6 500K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGPT-4o (2024-11-20)BarsGrok 4.6Ties
Coding02
Intelligence01
Reasoning02
Math01
Knowledge14
All shared boards110
CodingLike-for-likeFour of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index02
Coding benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-11-20) and Grok 4.6
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-11-20)Grok 4.6Leader
Aider polyglot18.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
LiveBench codingNot measured89.1%Only Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena WebDevNot measured1617Only Grok 4.6 measured
AA Coding IndexNot measured76.8Only Grok 4.6 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)43.4%88.2%Grok 4.6
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured95.6%Only Grok 4.6 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured17.2%Only Grok 4.6 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured76.2%Only Grok 4.6 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured44.6%Only Grok 4.6 measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured1.0%Only Grok 4.6 measured
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured47.6%Only Grok 4.6 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured78.3%Only Grok 4.6 measured
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)Not measured14.8%Only Grok 4.6 measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)Not measured55.8%Only Grok 4.6 measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)Not measured67.7%Only Grok 4.6 measured
SciCodeNot measured56.5%Only Grok 4.6 measured
FrontierCodeNot measured48.0%Only Grok 4.6 measured
FrontierSWENot measured25.3%Only Grok 4.6 measured
GSO-Bench0.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
WeirdML25.1%67.3%Grok 4.6
Cybench12.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
ALE-BenchNot measured1508.1Only Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1466Only Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1457Only Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1631Only Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1597Only Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1603Only Grok 4.6 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-11-20) and Grok 4.6
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-11-20)Grok 4.6Leader
AA Intelligence Index8.444.3Grok 4.6
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured156.6Only Grok 4.6 measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index23 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-11-20) and Grok 4.6
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-11-20)Grok 4.6Leader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured53.0Only Grok 4.6 measured
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1247Only Grok 4.6 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack appsNot measured1264Only Grok 4.6 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile appsNot measured1234Only Grok 4.6 measured
Design Arena: agents building Android appsNot measured1297Only Grok 4.6 measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot gamesNot measured1276Only Grok 4.6 measured
Design Arena: agents building gamesNot measured1208Only Grok 4.6 measured
Design Arena: HTML slidesNot measured1249Only Grok 4.6 measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slidesNot measured1241Only Grok 4.6 measured
LiveBench researchNot measured84.5%Only Grok 4.6 measured
LiveBench browserNot measured64.0%Only Grok 4.6 measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured40.7%Only Grok 4.6 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured53.7%Only Grok 4.6 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured33.1%Only Grok 4.6 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured48.1%Only Grok 4.6 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured62.7%Only Grok 4.6 measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)Not measured72.2%Only Grok 4.6 measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)Not measured11.4%Only Grok 4.6 measured
Vals Science IndexNot measured38.1%Only Grok 4.6 measured
Time Horizon Index (Vals AI)Not measured5.8%Only Grok 4.6 measured
APEX-AgentsNot measured65.3%Only Grok 4.6 measured
TheAgentCompany8.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
Vending-Bench 2Not measured$9,047Only Grok 4.6 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-11-20) and Grok 4.6
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-11-20)Grok 4.6Leader
GPQA Diamond53.8%94.7%Grok 4.6
LiveBench reasoningNot measured91.2%Only Grok 4.6 measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)Not measured30.6%Only Grok 4.6 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)62.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured94.9%Only Grok 4.6 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured44.1%Only Grok 4.6 measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)47.9%94.0%Grok 4.6
ARC-AGINot measured87.5%Only Grok 4.6 measured
ARC-AGI-2Not measured67.1%Only Grok 4.6 measured
SimpleBenchNot measured75.9%Only Grok 4.6 measured
Chess puzzlesNot measured33.0%Only Grok 4.6 measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured34.0%Only Grok 4.6 measured
EBR-benchNot measured30.5%Only Grok 4.6 measured
VPCT40.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1448Only Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1469Only Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1445Only Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1285Only Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1283Only Grok 4.6 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Math benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-11-20) and Grok 4.6
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-11-20)Grok 4.6Leader
AIME11.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)74.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
MGSM (Vals AI)90.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
OTIS Mock AIME6.3%99.2%Grok 4.6
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Not measured66.0%Only Grok 4.6 measured
FrontierMath, tier 4Not measured31.7%Only Grok 4.6 measured
ProofBenchNot measured51.0%Only Grok 4.6 measured
MATH level 549.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1417Only Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1464Only Grok 4.6 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index14
Knowledge benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-11-20) and Grok 4.6
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-11-20)Grok 4.6Leader
MMLU Pro72.6%89.4%Grok 4.6
LegalBench (Vals AI)82.2%86.3%Grok 4.6
CaseLaw (Vals AI)59.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)45.9%66.2%Grok 4.6
TaxEval (Vals AI)74.5%71.1%GPT-4o (2024-11-20)
MortgageTax (Vals AI)57.4%64.2%Grok 4.6
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured44.7%Only Grok 4.6 measured
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured49.3%Only Grok 4.6 measured
GeoBench71.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1437Only Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1420Only Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1429Only Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1416Only Grok 4.6 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-11-20) and Grok 4.6
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-11-20)Grok 4.6Leader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1289Only Grok 4.6 measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1294Only Grok 4.6 measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1296Only Grok 4.6 measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1283Only Grok 4.6 measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1277Only Grok 4.6 measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1292Only Grok 4.6 measured
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1239Only Grok 4.6 measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1278Only Grok 4.6 measured
LiveBench designNot measured79.8%Only Grok 4.6 measured
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index33 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-11-20) and Grok 4.6
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-11-20)Grok 4.6Leader
LiveBench data analysisNot measured75.3%Only Grok 4.6 measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured66.8%Only Grok 4.6 measured
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured28.9%Only Grok 4.6 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured86.5%Only Grok 4.6 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured81.0%Only Grok 4.6 measured
DTBenchNot measured97.3%Only Grok 4.6 measured
LMCANot measured48.5%Only Grok 4.6 measured
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)81.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
Furniture assemblyNot measured40.0%Only Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena TextNot measured1429Only Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1431Only Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1426Only Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena VisionNot measured1263Only Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1433Only Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1420Only Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1476Only Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1426Only Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1378Only Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1391Only Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1455Only Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1414Only Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1421Only Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1430Only Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1425Only Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1456Only Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1429Only Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1421Only Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1270Only Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1289Only Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1272Only Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1270Only Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1262Only Grok 4.6 measured
LMArena DocumentNot measured1452Only Grok 4.6 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-11-20) and Grok 4.6
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-11-20)Grok 4.6Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-4o (2024-11-20)$0.0075Fits in one request
Grok 4.6$0.0050Fits in one request

Grok 4.6 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-4o (2024-11-20)$0.155Fits in one request
Grok 4.6$0.118Fits in one request

Grok 4.6 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-4o (2024-11-20)$0.600Exceeds the context window
Grok 4.6$0.460Fits in one request

Grok 4.6 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-4o (2024-11-20) and Grok 4.6
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-4o (2024-11-20)SpaceXAI Grok 4.6
MakerOpenAIxAI
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedNovember 20, 2024August 12, 2026
Context window128K500K
Input $/Mtok$2.50$2.00
Output $/Mtok$10.00$6.00
Coding index18.276.4
Independent measurements behind it12
Cost per solved taskNot computable$0.82
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-4o (2024-11-20) better than Grok 4.6 for coding?

Pick Grok 4.6 for coding: it scores 76.4 on the Vibe Coding Index against 18.2 for GPT-4o (2024-11-20). Pick GPT-4o (2024-11-20) when the benchmark that matters is TaxEval (Vals AI), where it leads.

Which is cheaper, GPT-4o (2024-11-20) or Grok 4.6?

GPT-4o (2024-11-20) costs $2.50 per million input tokens and $10.00 per million output tokens; Grok 4.6 costs $2.00 and $6.00. Cost per solved task is known for Grok 4.6 only.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-4o (2024-11-20) or Grok 4.6?

Grok 4.6, with 500K tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks is the GPT-4o (2024-11-20) vs Grok 4.6 comparison based on?

11 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. GPT-4o (2024-11-20)'s coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and Grok 4.6's on 2. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next