Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-4 vs GPT-4o (2024-11-20)

GPT-4o (2024-11-20) leads GPT-4 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 8.4 to 6.7, and GPT-4o (2024-11-20) costs 6.0x less per output token ($10.00 vs $60.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 1 benchmarks have a result for both.

GPT-4OpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$60.00
0
GPT-4o (2024-11-20)OpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$10.00
1
vs boards won of 1 shared

GPT-4 or GPT-4o (2024-11-20): which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick GPT-4 for work measured by AA Intelligence Index, where it leads.

Shared results
1
GPT-4 only
44
GPT-4o (2024-11-20) only
23
Like-for-like categories
1 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-4 not benchmarked, GPT-4o (2024-11-20) not benchmarked.
Widest category
Intelligence, 1.7 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
AA Intelligence Index: GPT-4 6.7 against GPT-4o (2024-11-20) 8.4, 1.7 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GPT-4 $60.00 against GPT-4o (2024-11-20) $10.00 per million output tokens, 6.0x apart.
Context window
GPT-4 takes 8K tokens, GPT-4o (2024-11-20) 128K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGPT-4BarsGPT-4o (2024-11-20)Ties
Intelligence01
All shared boards01
CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index11 boards, none shared
Coding benchmarks for GPT-4 and GPT-4o (2024-11-20)
BenchmarkGPT-4GPT-4o (2024-11-20)Leader
Aider polyglotNot measured18.2%Only GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
SWE-bench Verified22.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-4 measured
SWE-bench Lite39.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-4 measured
SWE-bench (full test set)12.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-4 measured
AA Coding Index13.1Not measuredOnly GPT-4 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured43.4%Only GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
GSO-BenchNot measured0.0%Only GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
WeirdMLNot measured25.1%Only GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
CybenchNot measured12.5%Only GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
LMArena Text: coding1209Not measuredOnly GPT-4 measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1195Not measuredOnly GPT-4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 28 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for GPT-4 and GPT-4o (2024-11-20)
BenchmarkGPT-4GPT-4o (2024-11-20)Leader
AA Intelligence Index6.78.4GPT-4o (2024-11-20)
Epoch Capabilities Index125.7Not measuredOnly GPT-4 measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for GPT-4 and GPT-4o (2024-11-20)
BenchmarkGPT-4GPT-4o (2024-11-20)Leader
TheAgentCompanyNot measured8.6%Only GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 40 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards, none shared
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-4 and GPT-4o (2024-11-20)
BenchmarkGPT-4GPT-4o (2024-11-20)Leader
GPQA DiamondNot measured53.8%Only GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured62.2%Only GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)34.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-4 measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured47.9%Only GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
VPCTNot measured40.0%Only GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
BIG-Bench Hard75.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-4 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1200Not measuredOnly GPT-4 measured
LMArena Text: expert1149Not measuredOnly GPT-4 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1209Not measuredOnly GPT-4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for GPT-4 and GPT-4o (2024-11-20)
BenchmarkGPT-4GPT-4o (2024-11-20)Leader
AIMENot measured11.9%Only GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)Not measured74.0%Only GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
MGSM (Vals AI)Not measured90.4%Only GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured6.3%Only GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
MATH level 5Not measured49.8%Only GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
GSM8K92.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4 measured
LMArena Text: math1230Not measuredOnly GPT-4 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1228Not measuredOnly GPT-4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index14 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for GPT-4 and GPT-4o (2024-11-20)
BenchmarkGPT-4GPT-4o (2024-11-20)Leader
MMLU ProNot measured72.6%Only GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured82.2%Only GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)Not measured59.7%Only GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured45.9%Only GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured74.5%Only GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured57.4%Only GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)56.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-4 measured
MMLU86.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-4 measured
GeoBenchNot measured71.0%Only GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
AI2 Reasoning Challenge96.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-4 measured
LMArena Text: science1177Not measuredOnly GPT-4 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1145Not measuredOnly GPT-4 measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1191Not measuredOnly GPT-4 measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1145Not measuredOnly GPT-4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
Web designNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for GPT-4 and GPT-4o (2024-11-20)
BenchmarkGPT-4GPT-4o (2024-11-20)Leader
Neither model has a result on 9 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index23 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for GPT-4 and GPT-4o (2024-11-20)
BenchmarkGPT-4GPT-4o (2024-11-20)Leader
IFBench33.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-4 measured
DTBench62.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-4 measured
LMCA17.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-4 measured
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)Not measured81.8%Only GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
HellaSwag95.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-4 measured
WinoGrande87.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-4 measured
LMArena Text1206Not measuredOnly GPT-4 measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1201Not measuredOnly GPT-4 measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1191Not measuredOnly GPT-4 measured
LMArena Text: English1220Not measuredOnly GPT-4 measured
LMArena Text: non-English1194Not measuredOnly GPT-4 measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1184Not measuredOnly GPT-4 measured
LMArena Text: German1198Not measuredOnly GPT-4 measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1137Not measuredOnly GPT-4 measured
LMArena Text: Korean1087Not measuredOnly GPT-4 measured
LMArena Text: French1220Not measuredOnly GPT-4 measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1197Not measuredOnly GPT-4 measured
LMArena Text: Russian1195Not measuredOnly GPT-4 measured
LMArena Text: Polish1265Not measuredOnly GPT-4 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1206Not measuredOnly GPT-4 measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1190Not measuredOnly GPT-4 measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1219Not measuredOnly GPT-4 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1184Not measuredOnly GPT-4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 23 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GPT-4 and GPT-4o (2024-11-20)
BenchmarkGPT-4GPT-4o (2024-11-20)Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-4$0.060Fits in one request
GPT-4o (2024-11-20)$0.0075Fits in one request

GPT-4o (2024-11-20) costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-4$1.68Exceeds the context window
GPT-4o (2024-11-20)$0.155Fits in one request

GPT-4o (2024-11-20) costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-4$6.60Exceeds the context window
GPT-4o (2024-11-20)$0.600Exceeds the context window

GPT-4o (2024-11-20) costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-4 and GPT-4o (2024-11-20)
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-4OpenAI GPT-4o (2024-11-20)
MakerOpenAIOpenAI
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedMay 28, 2023November 20, 2024
Context window8K128K
Input $/Mtok$30.00$2.50
Output $/Mtok$60.00$10.00
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-4 better than GPT-4o (2024-11-20) for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick GPT-4 for work measured by AA Intelligence Index, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, GPT-4 or GPT-4o (2024-11-20)?

GPT-4 costs $30.00 per million input tokens and $60.00 per million output tokens; GPT-4o (2024-11-20) costs $2.50 and $10.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-4 or GPT-4o (2024-11-20)?

GPT-4o (2024-11-20), with 128K tokens against 8K.

How many benchmarks is the GPT-4 vs GPT-4o (2024-11-20) comparison based on?

1 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. GPT-4's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and GPT-4o (2024-11-20)'s on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next