LLMBenchmark.ai

Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-4o (2024-11-20) vs GPT-6 Luna

Updated October 21, 2026. 3 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

GPT-4o (2024-11-20)OpenAI
Coding
18.2
Overall
8.4
Output $/M
$10.00
0
GPT-6 LunaOpenAI
Coding
71.4
Overall
38.1
Output $/M
$0.50
3
vs boards won of 3 shared

Decision reading

GPT-4o (2024-11-20) scores 18.2 and GPT-6 Luna 71.4 on the Vibe Coding Index, but no coding benchmark measured both, so the gap is directional, not a ranking.

Pick GPT-6 Luna when output tokens cost 20.0x less, or when the context window is larger, 1.05M against 128K tokens.

Shared results
3
GPT-4o (2024-11-20) only
21
GPT-6 Luna only
99
Like-for-like categories
3 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-4o (2024-11-20) 18.2 from 1 benchmark, GPT-6 Luna 71.4 from 2 benchmarks.
Widest category
Math, 92.6 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
OTIS Mock AIME: GPT-4o (2024-11-20) 6.3% against GPT-6 Luna 98.9%, 92.6 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GPT-4o (2024-11-20) $10.00 against GPT-6 Luna $0.50 per million output tokens, 20.0x apart.
Context window
GPT-4o (2024-11-20) takes 128K tokens, GPT-6 Luna 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGPT-4o (2024-11-20)BarsGPT-6 LunaTies
Intelligence01
Reasoning01
Math01
All shared boards03
CodingDirectional onlyFour of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index23 boards, none shared
Coding benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-11-20) and GPT-6 Luna
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-11-20)GPT-6 LunaLeader
Aider polyglot18.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
LiveBench codingNot measured84.5%Only GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena WebDevNot measured1578Only GPT-6 Luna measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)43.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured13.6%Only GPT-6 Luna measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured81.7%Only GPT-6 Luna measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured42.5%Only GPT-6 Luna measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.5%Only GPT-6 Luna measured
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured55.6%Only GPT-6 Luna measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured73.0%Only GPT-6 Luna measured
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)Not measured37.5%Only GPT-6 Luna measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)Not measured76.3%Only GPT-6 Luna measured
SciCodeNot measured54.6%Only GPT-6 Luna measured
FrontierCodeNot measured42.4%Only GPT-6 Luna measured
GSO-Bench0.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
WeirdML25.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
Cybench12.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
ALE-BenchNot measured1576.9Only GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1437Only GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1423Only GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1573Only GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1595Only GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1571Only GPT-6 Luna measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-11-20) and GPT-6 Luna
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-11-20)GPT-6 LunaLeader
AA Intelligence Index8.438.1GPT-6 Luna
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured156.8Only GPT-6 Luna measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index18 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-11-20) and GPT-6 Luna
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-11-20)GPT-6 LunaLeader
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1189Only GPT-6 Luna measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack appsNot measured1158Only GPT-6 Luna measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile appsNot measured1133Only GPT-6 Luna measured
LiveBench researchNot measured43.5%Only GPT-6 Luna measured
LiveBench browserNot measured72.0%Only GPT-6 Luna measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured48.1%Only GPT-6 Luna measured
SREBench (Vals AI)Not measured2.7%Only GPT-6 Luna measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured49.9%Only GPT-6 Luna measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured19.9%Only GPT-6 Luna measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured30.3%Only GPT-6 Luna measured
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured4.2%Only GPT-6 Luna measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured68.5%Only GPT-6 Luna measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)Not measured61.5%Only GPT-6 Luna measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)Not measured4.3%Only GPT-6 Luna measured
Vals Science IndexNot measured28.4%Only GPT-6 Luna measured
APEX-AgentsNot measured44.3%Only GPT-6 Luna measured
TheAgentCompany8.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
SpireClimbNot measured0.0%Only GPT-6 Luna measured
Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-11-20) and GPT-6 Luna
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-11-20)GPT-6 LunaLeader
GPQA Diamond53.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
LiveBench reasoningNot measured81.8%Only GPT-6 Luna measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)Not measured19.4%Only GPT-6 Luna measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)62.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured38.5%Only GPT-6 Luna measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)47.9%90.5%GPT-6 Luna
ARC-AGINot measured86.7%Only GPT-6 Luna measured
ARC-AGI-2Not measured59.3%Only GPT-6 Luna measured
Chess puzzlesNot measured36.0%Only GPT-6 Luna measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured7.0%Only GPT-6 Luna measured
VPCT40.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1410Only GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1442Only GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1410Only GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1245Only GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1261Only GPT-6 Luna measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Math benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-11-20) and GPT-6 Luna
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-11-20)GPT-6 LunaLeader
AIME11.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)74.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
MGSM (Vals AI)90.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
OTIS Mock AIME6.3%98.9%GPT-6 Luna
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Not measured78.9%Only GPT-6 Luna measured
FrontierMath, tier 4Not measured56.1%Only GPT-6 Luna measured
ProofBenchNot measured64.0%Only GPT-6 Luna measured
MATH level 549.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1409Only GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1427Only GPT-6 Luna measured
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index13 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-11-20) and GPT-6 Luna
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-11-20)GPT-6 LunaLeader
MMLU Pro72.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)82.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)59.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)45.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)74.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)57.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured44.7%Only GPT-6 Luna measured
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured41.4%Only GPT-6 Luna measured
GeoBench71.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1386Only GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1352Only GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1400Only GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1388Only GPT-6 Luna measured
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-11-20) and GPT-6 Luna
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-11-20)GPT-6 LunaLeader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1272Only GPT-6 Luna measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1297Only GPT-6 Luna measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1259Only GPT-6 Luna measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1215Only GPT-6 Luna measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1217Only GPT-6 Luna measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1271Only GPT-6 Luna measured
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1253Only GPT-6 Luna measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1156Only GPT-6 Luna measured
LiveBench designNot measured82.5%Only GPT-6 Luna measured
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index32 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-11-20) and GPT-6 Luna
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-11-20)GPT-6 LunaLeader
Vals IndexNot measured52.3%Only GPT-6 Luna measured
LiveBench data analysisNot measured73.4%Only GPT-6 Luna measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured57.6%Only GPT-6 Luna measured
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured48.1%Only GPT-6 Luna measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured83.7%Only GPT-6 Luna measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured83.3%Only GPT-6 Luna measured
DTBenchNot measured90.1%Only GPT-6 Luna measured
LMCANot measured44.5%Only GPT-6 Luna measured
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)81.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
Furniture assemblyNot measured44.2%Only GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena TextNot measured1389Only GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1408Only GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1363Only GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena VisionNot measured1216Only GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1393Only GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1381Only GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1427Only GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1376Only GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1369Only GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1359Only GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1408Only GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1391Only GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1392Only GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1383Only GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1392Only GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1408Only GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1384Only GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1364Only GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1204Only GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1266Only GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1225Only GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1205Only GPT-6 Luna measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-11-20) and GPT-6 Luna
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-11-20)GPT-6 LunaLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-4o (2024-11-20)$0.0075Fits in one request
GPT-6 Luna$0.0003Fits in one request

GPT-6 Luna costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-4o (2024-11-20)$0.155Fits in one request
GPT-6 Luna$0.0065Fits in one request

GPT-6 Luna costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-4o (2024-11-20)$0.600Exceeds the context window
GPT-6 Luna$0.025Fits in one request

GPT-6 Luna costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-4o (2024-11-20) and GPT-6 Luna
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-4o (2024-11-20)OpenAI GPT-6 Luna
MakerOpenAIOpenAI
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedNovember 20, 2024September 22, 2026
Context window128K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$2.50$0.10
Output $/Mtok$10.00$0.50
Coding index18.271.4
Independent measurements behind it12
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-4o (2024-11-20) better than GPT-6 Luna for coding?

GPT-4o (2024-11-20) scores 18.2 and GPT-6 Luna 71.4 on the Vibe Coding Index, but no coding benchmark measured both, so the gap is directional, not a ranking. Pick GPT-6 Luna when output tokens cost 20.0x less, or when the context window is larger, 1.05M against 128K tokens.

Which is cheaper, GPT-4o (2024-11-20) or GPT-6 Luna?

GPT-4o (2024-11-20) costs $2.50 per million input tokens and $10.00 per million output tokens; GPT-6 Luna costs $0.10 and $0.50. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-4o (2024-11-20) or GPT-6 Luna?

GPT-6 Luna, with 1.05M tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks is the GPT-4o (2024-11-20) vs GPT-6 Luna comparison based on?

3 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. GPT-4o (2024-11-20)'s coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and GPT-6 Luna's on 2. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next