LLMBenchmark.ai

Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-4o (2024-08-06) vs Inkling

Updated October 21, 2026. 43 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

GPT-4o (2024-08-06)OpenAI
Coding
23.1
Overall
7.7
Output $/M
$10.00
0
T InklingThinking Machines
Coding
49.7
Overall
25.0
Output $/M
$4.05
43
vs boards won of 43 shared

Decision reading

Pick Inkling for coding: it scores 49.7 on the Vibe Coding Index against 23.1 for GPT-4o (2024-08-06).

GPT-4o (2024-08-06) is neither cheaper nor larger in context, and leads no benchmark both models were measured on.

Shared results
43
GPT-4o (2024-08-06) only
15
Inkling only
59
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-4o (2024-08-06) 23.1 from 1 benchmark, Inkling 49.7 from 2 benchmarks.
Widest category
Math, 44.3 points apart on average over 4 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
OTIS Mock AIME: GPT-4o (2024-08-06) 6.4% against Inkling 88.9%, 82.5 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GPT-4o (2024-08-06) $10.00 against Inkling $4.05 per million output tokens, 2.5x apart.
Context window
GPT-4o (2024-08-06) takes 128K tokens, Inkling 524K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGPT-4o (2024-08-06)BarsInklingTies
Coding02
Intelligence01
Reasoning09
Math04
Knowledge010
General017
All shared boards043
CodingLike-for-likeFour of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index02
Coding benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-08-06) and Inkling
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-08-06)InklingLeader
Aider polyglot23.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
SWE-bench Lite21.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LiveBench codingNot measured64.0%Only Inkling measured
LMArena WebDevNot measured1414Only Inkling measured
AA Coding IndexNot measured52.1Only Inkling measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured85.5%Only Inkling measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured77.6%Only Inkling measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured0.5%Only Inkling measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured19.2%Only Inkling measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured11.8%Only Inkling measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only Inkling measured
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured14.9%Only Inkling measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured47.6%Only Inkling measured
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)Not measured7.3%Only Inkling measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)Not measured26.1%Only Inkling measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)Not measured66.8%Only Inkling measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)31.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
SciCodeNot measured47.0%Only Inkling measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)8.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
FrontierCodeNot measured14.0%Only Inkling measured
FrontierSWENot measured4.1%Only Inkling measured
WeirdMLNot measured32.3%Only Inkling measured
ALE-BenchNot measured946.0Only Inkling measured
LMArena Text: coding12831466Inkling
LMArena Text: software and IT12781465Inkling
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1404Only Inkling measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1399Only Inkling measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-08-06) and Inkling
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-08-06)InklingLeader
AA Intelligence Index7.725.0Inkling
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured148.4Only Inkling measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index13 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-08-06) and Inkling
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-08-06)InklingLeader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured22.5Only Inkling measured
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1196Only Inkling measured
LiveBench researchNot measured59.9%Only Inkling measured
LiveBench browserNot measured16.0%Only Inkling measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured14.1%Only Inkling measured
SREBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only Inkling measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured46.6%Only Inkling measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured15.3%Only Inkling measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured28.4%Only Inkling measured
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured3.8%Only Inkling measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured38.4%Only Inkling measured
τ²-Bench Telecom28.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
APEX-AgentsNot measured33.8%Only Inkling measured
Neither model has a result on the other 26 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index09
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-08-06) and Inkling
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-08-06)InklingLeader
GPQA DiamondNot measured87.1%Only Inkling measured
LiveBench reasoningNot measured78.3%Only Inkling measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)64.0%78.5%Inkling
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)52.1%87.2%Inkling
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)2.3%31.9%Inkling
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)49.2%88.3%Inkling
ARC-AGINot measured79.5%Only Inkling measured
ARC-AGI-2Not measured36.5%Only Inkling measured
SimpleBench17.8%50.0%Inkling
Chess puzzles6.0%21.0%Inkling
LMArena Text: hard prompts12641451Inkling
LMArena Text: expert12411466Inkling
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English12771448Inkling
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Math benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-08-06) and Inkling
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-08-06)InklingLeader
AIME14.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)75.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
MGSM (Vals AI)90.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
OTIS Mock AIME6.4%88.9%Inkling
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 30.4%33.3%Inkling
FrontierMath, tier 4Not measured4.9%Only Inkling measured
ProofBenchNot measured0.0%Only Inkling measured
MATH level 553.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: math12851479Inkling
LMArena Text: mathematical work12831460Inkling
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index010
Knowledge benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-08-06) and Inkling
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-08-06)InklingLeader
MMLU Pro74.1%86.3%Inkling
LegalBench (Vals AI)80.1%83.0%Inkling
CorpFin (Vals AI)39.4%68.6%Inkling
TaxEval (Vals AI)71.1%75.3%Inkling
MortgageTax (Vals AI)61.0%64.0%Inkling
MedQA (Vals AI)88.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured41.2%Only Inkling measured
SimpleQA Verified26.0%40.3%Inkling
MMLU84.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: science12741455Inkling
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare12521447Inkling
LMArena Text: legal and government12751448Inkling
LMArena Text: business and finance12321438Inkling
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-08-06) and Inkling
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-08-06)InklingLeader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1224Only Inkling measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1200Only Inkling measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1166Only Inkling measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1160Only Inkling measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1161Only Inkling measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1206Only Inkling measured
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1109Only Inkling measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1089Only Inkling measured
LiveBench designNot measured58.3%Only Inkling measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index017
General benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-08-06) and Inkling
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-08-06)InklingLeader
Vals IndexNot measured29.0%Only Inkling measured
LiveBench data analysisNot measured72.8%Only Inkling measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured58.5%Only Inkling measured
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured36.5%Only Inkling measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured85.4%Only Inkling measured
Vals Multimodal IndexNot measured49.4%Only Inkling measured
IFBench36.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)41.0%77.3%Inkling
DTBenchNot measured87.5%Only Inkling measured
LMCANot measured37.6%Only Inkling measured
LMArena Text12831442Inkling
LMArena Text: instruction following12671425Inkling
LMArena Text: creative writing12741390Inkling
LMArena Vision1065Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: English12971442Inkling
LMArena Text: non-English12621434Inkling
LMArena Text: Chinese12541493Inkling
LMArena Text: German12571445Inkling
LMArena Text: Japanese12341429Inkling
LMArena Text: Korean12181403Inkling
LMArena Text: French12631455Inkling
LMArena Text: Spanish12691449Inkling
LMArena Text: Russian12721430Inkling
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1450Only Inkling measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn12791437Inkling
LMArena Text: longer queries12831435Inkling
LMArena Text: writing and language12901404Inkling
LMArena Text: entertainment and media12671394Inkling
LMArena Vision: English1072Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1009Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-08-06) and Inkling
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-08-06)InklingLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-4o (2024-08-06)$0.0075Fits in one request
Inkling$0.0030Fits in one request

Inkling costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-4o (2024-08-06)$0.155Fits in one request
Inkling$0.062Fits in one request

Inkling costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-4o (2024-08-06)$0.600Exceeds the context window
Inkling$0.240Fits in one request

Inkling costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-4o (2024-08-06) and Inkling
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-4o (2024-08-06)Thinking Machines Inkling
MakerOpenAIThinking Machines
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedAugust 6, 2024July 17, 2026
Context window128K524K
Input $/Mtok$2.50$1.00
Output $/Mtok$10.00$4.05
Coding index23.149.7
Independent measurements behind it12
Cost per solved taskNot computable$0.76
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-4o (2024-08-06) better than Inkling for coding?

Pick Inkling for coding: it scores 49.7 on the Vibe Coding Index against 23.1 for GPT-4o (2024-08-06). GPT-4o (2024-08-06) is neither cheaper nor larger in context, and leads no benchmark both models were measured on.

Which is cheaper, GPT-4o (2024-08-06) or Inkling?

GPT-4o (2024-08-06) costs $2.50 per million input tokens and $10.00 per million output tokens; Inkling costs $1.00 and $4.05. Cost per solved task is known for Inkling only.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-4o (2024-08-06) or Inkling?

Inkling, with 524K tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks is the GPT-4o (2024-08-06) vs Inkling comparison based on?

43 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. GPT-4o (2024-08-06)'s coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and Inkling's on 2. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next