Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-3.5 Turbo vs Inkling Small

Inkling Small leads GPT-3.5 Turbo on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 25.7 to 5.5, and Inkling Small costs 1.3x less per output token ($1.20 vs $1.50 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 5 benchmarks have a result for both.

GPT-3.5 TurboOpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.50
0
T Inkling SmallThinking Machines
Coding
27.3
Overall
43.6
Output $/M
$1.20
5
vs boards won of 5 shared

GPT-3.5 Turbo or Inkling Small: which to pick

Only Inkling Small has a coding score, 27.3 on the Vibe Coding Index; GPT-3.5 Turbo has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Shared results
5
GPT-3.5 Turbo only
8
Inkling Small only
79
Like-for-like categories
4 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-3.5 Turbo not benchmarked, Inkling Small 27.3 from 4 benchmarks.
Widest category
Reasoning, 56.4 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run): GPT-3.5 Turbo 29.7% against Inkling Small 89.5%, 59.8 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GPT-3.5 Turbo $1.50 against Inkling Small $1.20 per million output tokens, 1.3x apart.
Context window
GPT-3.5 Turbo takes 16K tokens, Inkling Small 524K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGPT-3.5 TurboBarsInkling SmallTies
Coding01
Intelligence01
Reasoning02
Knowledge01
All shared boards05
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index01
Coding benchmarks for GPT-3.5 Turbo and Inkling Small
BenchmarkGPT-3.5 TurboInkling SmallLeader
LMArena WebDevNot measured1409Only Inkling Small measured
AA Coding Index10.752.9Inkling Small
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured85.9%Only Inkling Small measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured82.2%Only Inkling Small measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only Inkling Small measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured19.1%Only Inkling Small measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured13.7%Only Inkling Small measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.5%Only Inkling Small measured
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured9.3%Only Inkling Small measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured55.1%Only Inkling Small measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)Not measured33.6%Only Inkling Small measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)Not measured64.1%Only Inkling Small measured
SciCodeNot measured49.7%Only Inkling Small measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1450Only Inkling Small measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1447Only Inkling Small measured
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1399Only Inkling Small measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1398Only Inkling Small measured
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1410Only Inkling Small measured
SciCode0.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-3.5 Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 20 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for GPT-3.5 Turbo and Inkling Small
BenchmarkGPT-3.5 TurboInkling SmallLeader
AA Intelligence Index5.525.7Inkling Small
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured150.3Only Inkling Small measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for GPT-3.5 Turbo and Inkling Small
BenchmarkGPT-3.5 TurboInkling SmallLeader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured23.5Only Inkling Small measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured41.3%Only Inkling Small measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured15.4%Only Inkling Small measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured25.5%Only Inkling Small measured
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured2.9%Only Inkling Small measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured31.8%Only Inkling Small measured
Neither model has a result on the other 35 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-3.5 Turbo and Inkling Small
BenchmarkGPT-3.5 TurboInkling SmallLeader
GPQA Diamond30.6%83.6%Inkling Small
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)29.7%89.5%Inkling Small
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured33.3%Only Inkling Small measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured88.5%Only Inkling Small measured
ARC-AGINot measured84.0%Only Inkling Small measured
ARC-AGI-2Not measured40.1%Only Inkling Small measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured6.0%Only Inkling Small measured
BIG-Bench Hard61.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-3.5 Turbo measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1423Only Inkling Small measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1441Only Inkling Small measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1429Only Inkling Small measured
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1251Only Inkling Small measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1257Only Inkling Small measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for GPT-3.5 Turbo and Inkling Small
BenchmarkGPT-3.5 TurboInkling SmallLeader
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured90.0%Only Inkling Small measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Not measured46.3%Only Inkling Small measured
FrontierMath, tier 4Not measured17.1%Only Inkling Small measured
ProofBenchNot measured6.0%Only Inkling Small measured
GSM8K57.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-3.5 Turbo measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1459Only Inkling Small measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1441Only Inkling Small measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Knowledge benchmarks for GPT-3.5 Turbo and Inkling Small
BenchmarkGPT-3.5 TurboInkling SmallLeader
MMLU ProNot measured85.6%Only Inkling Small measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)64.4%83.0%Inkling Small
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured69.6%Only Inkling Small measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured75.5%Only Inkling Small measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured62.3%Only Inkling Small measured
MedQA (Vals AI)58.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-3.5 Turbo measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured37.9%Only Inkling Small measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)46.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-3.5 Turbo measured
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured19.1%Only Inkling Small measured
MMLU68.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-3.5 Turbo measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1428Only Inkling Small measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1413Only Inkling Small measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1415Only Inkling Small measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1413Only Inkling Small measured
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
Web designNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for GPT-3.5 Turbo and Inkling Small
BenchmarkGPT-3.5 TurboInkling SmallLeader
Neither model has a result on 9 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index31 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for GPT-3.5 Turbo and Inkling Small
BenchmarkGPT-3.5 TurboInkling SmallLeader
Vals IndexNot measured27.6%Only Inkling Small measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured59.4%Only Inkling Small measured
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured32.7%Only Inkling Small measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured84.1%Only Inkling Small measured
Vals Multimodal IndexNot measured50.0%Only Inkling Small measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured75.7%Only Inkling Small measured
DTBench48.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-3.5 Turbo measured
LMCA9.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-3.5 Turbo measured
LMArena TextNot measured1413Only Inkling Small measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1399Only Inkling Small measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1334Only Inkling Small measured
LMArena VisionNot measured1237Only Inkling Small measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1421Only Inkling Small measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1401Only Inkling Small measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1464Only Inkling Small measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1408Only Inkling Small measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1401Only Inkling Small measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1367Only Inkling Small measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1435Only Inkling Small measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1422Only Inkling Small measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1394Only Inkling Small measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1428Only Inkling Small measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1416Only Inkling Small measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1402Only Inkling Small measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1357Only Inkling Small measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1352Only Inkling Small measured
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1243Only Inkling Small measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1292Only Inkling Small measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1243Only Inkling Small measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1207Only Inkling Small measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1205Only Inkling Small measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GPT-3.5 Turbo and Inkling Small
BenchmarkGPT-3.5 TurboInkling SmallLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-3.5 Turbo$0.0013Fits in one request
Inkling Small$0.0010Fits in one request

Inkling Small costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-3.5 Turbo$0.029Exceeds the context window
Inkling Small$0.026Fits in one request

Inkling Small costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-3.5 Turbo$0.115Exceeds the context window
Inkling Small$0.102Fits in one request

Inkling Small costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-3.5 Turbo and Inkling Small
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-3.5 TurboThinking Machines Inkling Small
MakerOpenAIThinking Machines
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedMay 28, 2023July 30, 2026
Context window16K524K
Input $/Mtok$0.50$0.45
Output $/Mtok$1.50$1.20
Coding indexNot benchmarked27.3
Independent measurements behind it04
Cost per solved taskNot computable$0.16
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-3.5 Turbo better than Inkling Small for coding?

Only Inkling Small has a coding score, 27.3 on the Vibe Coding Index; GPT-3.5 Turbo has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Which is cheaper, GPT-3.5 Turbo or Inkling Small?

GPT-3.5 Turbo costs $0.50 per million input tokens and $1.50 per million output tokens; Inkling Small costs $0.45 and $1.20. Cost per solved task is known for Inkling Small only.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-3.5 Turbo or Inkling Small?

Inkling Small, with 524K tokens against 16K.

How many benchmarks is the GPT-3.5 Turbo vs Inkling Small comparison based on?

5 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. GPT-3.5 Turbo's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Inkling Small's on 4. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next