GLM 5.3 vs Inkling Small
GLM 5.3 leads Inkling Small on coding, 70.6 to 27.3 on the Vibe Coding Index, and Inkling Small costs 3.7x less per output token ($1.20 vs $4.40 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 69 benchmarks have a result for both.
GLM 5.3 or Inkling Small: which to pick
Pick GLM 5.3 for coding: it scores 70.6 on the Vibe Coding Index against 27.3 for Inkling Small.
Pick Inkling Small for output tokens 3.7x cheaper ($1.20 vs $4.40 per million) and a lower cost per solved task ($0.16 against $0.36).
- Shared results
- 69
- GLM 5.3 only
- 31
- Inkling Small only
- 15
- Like-for-like categories
- 7 of 9
Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
GLM 5.3
GLM 5.3 scores 70.6 against 27.3.
6 and 4 benchmarks behind the scores
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
GLM 5.3
GLM 5.3 leads, 44.8 against 25.7.
Same board, both measured
Agentic work
AA Agentic Index
GLM 5.3
GLM 5.3 leads, 53.1 against 23.5.
Same board, both measured
Reasoning
GPQA Diamond
GLM 5.3
GLM 5.3 leads, 88.1% against 83.6%.
Same board, both measured
Knowledge
MMLU Pro
GLM 5.3
GLM 5.3 leads, 86.8% against 85.6%.
Same board, both measured
Web design
Design Arena: websites
No call
Only GLM 5.3 has a Design Arena: websites result, 1295.
Directional only
General
Vals Index
GLM 5.3
GLM 5.3 leads, 59.7% against 27.6%.
Same board, both measured
Long documents
Listed context window
GLM 5.3
GLM 5.3 takes 1.05M tokens against 524K.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
Inkling Small
GLM 5.3 $0.0036, Inkling Small $0.0010 per turn.
List prices
Cost per solved task
One SWE-bench Verified task, solved
Inkling Small
GLM 5.3 $0.36, Inkling Small $0.16.
Published attempt cost and pass rate
At a glance
- Coding index
- GLM 5.3 70.6 from 6 benchmarks, Inkling Small 27.3 from 4 benchmarks.
- Widest category
- Coding, 23.6 points apart on average over 17 shared benchmarks.
- Widest single gap
- IOI (Vals AI): GLM 5.3 68.4% against Inkling Small 9.3%, 59.1 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- GLM 5.3 $4.40 against Inkling Small $1.20 per million output tokens, 3.7x apart.
- Context window
- GLM 5.3 takes 1.05M tokens, Inkling Small 524K.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | GLM 5.3 | Bars | Inkling Small | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 16 | 1 | ||
| Intelligence | 2 | 0 | ||
| Agentic work | 6 | 0 | ||
| Reasoning | 8 | 0 | ||
| Math | 6 | 0 | ||
| Knowledge | 8 | 1 | ||
| General | 21 | 0 | ||
| All shared boards | 67 | 2 |
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index161
| Benchmark | GLM 5.3 | Inkling Small | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench coding | 82.8% | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 measured |
| LMArena WebDev | 1621 | 1409 | GLM 5.3 |
| AA Coding Index | 74.8 | 52.9 | GLM 5.3 |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) | 80.5% | 85.9% | Inkling Small |
| SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI) | 95.4% | 82.2% | GLM 5.3 |
| Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI) | 38.9% | 0.0% | GLM 5.3 |
| Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) | 78.1% | 19.1% | GLM 5.3 |
| Code migration (Vals AI) | 44.2% | 13.7% | GLM 5.3 |
| ProgramBench (Vals AI) | 1.5% | 0.5% | GLM 5.3 |
| IOI (Vals AI) | 68.4% | 9.3% | GLM 5.3 |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI) | 71.5% | 55.1% | GLM 5.3 |
| Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI) | 20.0% | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 measured |
| SkillsBench (Vals AI) | 47.5% | 33.6% | GLM 5.3 |
| CyberBench (Vals AI) | 72.1% | 64.1% | GLM 5.3 |
| SciCode | 59.0% | 49.7% | GLM 5.3 |
| FrontierCode | 40.1% | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 measured |
| FrontierSWE | 30.2% | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 measured |
| WeirdML | 75.4% | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 measured |
| ALE-Bench | 1317.4 | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 measured |
| LMArena Text: coding | 1497 | 1450 | GLM 5.3 |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | 1493 | 1447 | GLM 5.3 |
| LMArena WebDev: React | 1641 | 1399 | GLM 5.3 |
| LMArena WebDev: HTML | 1595 | 1398 | GLM 5.3 |
| LMArena WebDev: from an image | Not measured | 1410 | Only Inkling Small measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here | |||
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
| Benchmark | GLM 5.3 | Inkling Small | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 44.8 | 25.7 | GLM 5.3 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 156.0 | 150.3 | GLM 5.3 |
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index60
| Benchmark | GLM 5.3 | Inkling Small | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Agentic Index | 53.1 | 23.5 | GLM 5.3 |
| Design Arena: agents building mobile apps | 1194 | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 measured |
| Design Arena: HTML slides | 1189 | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 measured |
| Design Arena: PowerPoint slides | 1230 | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 measured |
| LiveBench research | 73.2% | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 measured |
| LiveBench browser | 0.0% | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 measured |
| LiveBench long agentic | 35.9% | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 measured |
| SREBench (Vals AI) | 9.2% | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 measured |
| Finance Agent (Vals AI) | 55.8% | 41.3% | GLM 5.3 |
| Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI) | 39.7% | 15.4% | GLM 5.3 |
| Legal Research Bench (Vals AI) | 49.0% | 25.5% | GLM 5.3 |
| Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI) | 14.6% | 2.9% | GLM 5.3 |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI) | 56.3% | 31.8% | GLM 5.3 |
| Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI) | 5.7% | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 measured |
| APEX-Agents | 56.6% | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 measured |
| Vending-Bench 2 | $8,164 | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 25 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index80
| Benchmark | GLM 5.3 | Inkling Small | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 88.1% | 83.6% | GLM 5.3 |
| LiveBench reasoning | 85.8% | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 measured |
| MysteryMechanism (Vals AI) | 23.0% | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 measured |
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | 91.7% | 89.5% | GLM 5.3 |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | 42.3% | 33.3% | GLM 5.3 |
| GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run) | 90.9% | 88.5% | GLM 5.3 |
| ARC-AGI | Not measured | 84.0% | Only Inkling Small measured |
| ARC-AGI-2 | Not measured | 40.1% | Only Inkling Small measured |
| Chess puzzles | 37.0% | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 measured |
| Mystery game puzzles | 33.0% | 6.0% | GLM 5.3 |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | 1490 | 1423 | GLM 5.3 |
| LMArena Text: expert | 1514 | 1441 | GLM 5.3 |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | 1496 | 1429 | GLM 5.3 |
| LMArena Vision: diagrams | Not measured | 1251 | Only Inkling Small measured |
| LMArena Vision: homework | Not measured | 1257 | Only Inkling Small measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here | |||
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index60
| Benchmark | GLM 5.3 | Inkling Small | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME | 91.1% | 90.0% | GLM 5.3 |
| FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3 | 68.8% | 46.3% | GLM 5.3 |
| FrontierMath, tier 4 | 29.3% | 17.1% | GLM 5.3 |
| ProofBench | 49.0% | 6.0% | GLM 5.3 |
| LMArena Text: math | 1495 | 1459 | GLM 5.3 |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | 1497 | 1441 | GLM 5.3 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here | |||
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index81
| Benchmark | GLM 5.3 | Inkling Small | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU Pro | 86.8% | 85.6% | GLM 5.3 |
| LegalBench (Vals AI) | 84.8% | 83.0% | GLM 5.3 |
| CorpFin (Vals AI) | Not measured | 69.6% | Only Inkling Small measured |
| TaxEval (Vals AI) | 72.4% | 75.5% | Inkling Small |
| MortgageTax (Vals AI) | Not measured | 62.3% | Only Inkling Small measured |
| MedCode (Vals AI) | 42.9% | 37.9% | GLM 5.3 |
| SimpleQA Verified | 41.0% | 19.1% | GLM 5.3 |
| LMArena Text: science | 1498 | 1428 | GLM 5.3 |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | 1481 | 1413 | GLM 5.3 |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | 1473 | 1415 | GLM 5.3 |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | 1459 | 1413 | GLM 5.3 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here | |||
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | GLM 5.3 | Inkling Small | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: websites | 1295 | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 measured |
| Design Arena: UI components | 1314 | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 measured |
| Design Arena: game dev | 1311 | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 measured |
| Design Arena: data viz | 1260 | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 measured |
| Design Arena: 3D | 1332 | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 measured |
| Design Arena: all code categories | 1304 | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 measured |
| Design Arena: SVG | 1294 | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 measured |
| Design Arena: ASCII art | 1208 | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 measured |
| LiveBench design | 77.3% | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 measured |
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index210
| Benchmark | GLM 5.3 | Inkling Small | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vals Index | 59.7% | 27.6% | GLM 5.3 |
| LiveBench data analysis | 70.2% | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 measured |
| Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI) | 68.5% | 59.4% | GLM 5.3 |
| SAGE (Vals AI) | Not measured | 32.7% | Only Inkling Small measured |
| MedScribe (Vals AI) | 88.8% | 84.1% | GLM 5.3 |
| Vals Multimodal Index | Not measured | 50.0% | Only Inkling Small measured |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | 79.7% | 75.7% | GLM 5.3 |
| DTBench | 87.7% | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 measured |
| LMCA | 55.5% | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 measured |
| LMArena Text | 1474 | 1413 | GLM 5.3 |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | 1479 | 1399 | GLM 5.3 |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | 1458 | 1334 | GLM 5.3 |
| LMArena Vision | Not measured | 1237 | Only Inkling Small measured |
| LMArena Text: English | 1482 | 1421 | GLM 5.3 |
| LMArena Text: non-English | 1459 | 1401 | GLM 5.3 |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | 1532 | 1464 | GLM 5.3 |
| LMArena Text: German | 1488 | 1408 | GLM 5.3 |
| LMArena Text: Japanese | 1460 | 1401 | GLM 5.3 |
| LMArena Text: Korean | 1460 | 1367 | GLM 5.3 |
| LMArena Text: French | 1503 | 1435 | GLM 5.3 |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | 1462 | 1422 | GLM 5.3 |
| LMArena Text: Russian | 1469 | 1394 | GLM 5.3 |
| LMArena Text: Polish | 1466 | 1428 | GLM 5.3 |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | 1472 | 1416 | GLM 5.3 |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | 1483 | 1402 | GLM 5.3 |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | 1469 | 1357 | GLM 5.3 |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | 1447 | 1352 | GLM 5.3 |
| LMArena Vision: English | Not measured | 1243 | Only Inkling Small measured |
| LMArena Vision: Chinese | Not measured | 1292 | Only Inkling Small measured |
| LMArena Vision: reading text | Not measured | 1243 | Only Inkling Small measured |
| LMArena Vision: humor | Not measured | 1207 | Only Inkling Small measured |
| LMArena Vision: creative writing | Not measured | 1205 | Only Inkling Small measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | GLM 5.3 | Inkling Small | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
Inkling Small costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
Inkling Small costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
Inkling Small costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | Z.ai GLM 5.3 | Thinking Machines Inkling Small |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Z.ai | Thinking Machines |
| Weights | Open weights | Open weights |
| Released | August 18, 2026 | July 30, 2026 |
| Context window | 1.05M | 524K |
| Input $/Mtok | $1.40 | $0.45 |
| Output $/Mtok | $4.40 | $1.20 |
| Coding index | 70.6 | 27.3 |
| Independent measurements behind it | 6 | 4 |
| Cost per solved task | $0.36 | $0.16 |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is GLM 5.3 better than Inkling Small for coding?
Pick GLM 5.3 for coding: it scores 70.6 on the Vibe Coding Index against 27.3 for Inkling Small. Pick Inkling Small for output tokens 3.7x cheaper ($1.20 vs $4.40 per million) and a lower cost per solved task ($0.16 against $0.36).
Which is cheaper, GLM 5.3 or Inkling Small?
GLM 5.3 costs $1.40 per million input tokens and $4.40 per million output tokens; Inkling Small costs $0.45 and $1.20. Per solved SWE-bench Verified task, GLM 5.3 costs $0.36 and Inkling Small $0.16.
Which has the bigger context window, GLM 5.3 or Inkling Small?
GLM 5.3, with 1.05M tokens against 524K.
How many benchmarks is the GLM 5.3 vs Inkling Small comparison based on?
69 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. GLM 5.3's coding index rests on 6 independent benchmarks and Inkling Small's on 4. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.