Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GLM 5.3 Flash vs Fugu Ultra v2

GLM 5.3 Flash costs 60.0x less per output token than Fugu Ultra v2 ($0.50 vs $30.00 per million). Updated October 23, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

GLM 5.3 FlashZ.ai
Coding
57.7
Overall
66.0
Output $/M
$0.50
Fugu Ultra v2Sakana
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$30.00
vs $0.50 vs $30.00 per 1M output tokens. GLM 5.3 Flash is 60.0x cheaper.

GLM 5.3 Flash or Fugu Ultra v2: which to pick

Only GLM 5.3 Flash has a coding score, 57.7 on the Vibe Coding Index; Fugu Ultra v2 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

No benchmark has tested both yet. GLM 5.3 Flash has results on LiveBench coding, LMArena WebDev and AA Coding Index; Fugu Ultra v2 has none yet. Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GLM 5.3 Flash 57.7 from 6 benchmarks, Fugu Ultra v2 not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
GLM 5.3 Flash $0.50 against Fugu Ultra v2 $30.00 per million output tokens, 60.0x apart.
Context window
GLM 5.3 Flash takes 1.05M tokens, Fugu Ultra v2 1M.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index23 boards measured
Coding benchmarks for GLM 5.3 Flash and Fugu Ultra v2
BenchmarkGLM 5.3 FlashFugu Ultra v2Leader
LiveBench coding80.6%Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
LMArena WebDev1608Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
AA Coding Index71.5Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)80.5%Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)92.0%Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)37.4%Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)30.8%Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
Code migration (Vals AI)20.5%Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.0%Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
IOI (Vals AI)52.5%Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)62.9%Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)16.0%Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)40.2%Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)67.9%Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
SciCode51.6%Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
FrontierCode31.8%Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
FrontierSWE18.1%Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
ALE-Bench303.6Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
LMArena Text: coding1508Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1501Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
LMArena WebDev: React1625Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1578Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
LMArena WebDev: from an image1578Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 20 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
Intelligence benchmarks for GLM 5.3 Flash and Fugu Ultra v2
BenchmarkGLM 5.3 FlashFugu Ultra v2Leader
AA Intelligence Index41.8Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
Epoch Capabilities Index153.1Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index12 boards measured
Agentic work benchmarks for GLM 5.3 Flash and Fugu Ultra v2
BenchmarkGLM 5.3 FlashFugu Ultra v2Leader
AA Agentic Index50.9Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
LiveBench research70.1%Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
LiveBench browser84.0%Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
LiveBench long agentic28.4%Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
SREBench (Vals AI)0.8%Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)57.9%Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)31.6%Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)45.2%Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)10.4%Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)55.9%Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)2.9%Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
APEX-Agents52.8%Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 30 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index15 boards measured
Reasoning benchmarks for GLM 5.3 Flash and Fugu Ultra v2
BenchmarkGLM 5.3 FlashFugu Ultra v2Leader
GPQA Diamond86.4%Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
LiveBench reasoning77.6%Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)86.0%Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)91.2%Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)39.9%Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)90.2%Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
ARC-AGI91.0%Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
ARC-AGI-265.8%Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
Chess puzzles21.0%Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
Mystery game puzzles8.0%Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1491Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
LMArena Text: expert1512Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1488Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: diagrams1317Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: homework1318Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards measured
Math benchmarks for GLM 5.3 Flash and Fugu Ultra v2
BenchmarkGLM 5.3 FlashFugu Ultra v2Leader
OTIS Mock AIME93.9%Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 355.8%Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
FrontierMath, tier 417.1%Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
ProofBench21.0%Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
LMArena Text: math1502Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1497Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards measured
Knowledge benchmarks for GLM 5.3 Flash and Fugu Ultra v2
BenchmarkGLM 5.3 FlashFugu Ultra v2Leader
MMLU Pro86.1%Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)83.9%Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)75.6%Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
LMArena Text: science1484Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1475Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1475Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1461Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards measured
Web design benchmarks for GLM 5.3 Flash and Fugu Ultra v2
BenchmarkGLM 5.3 FlashFugu Ultra v2Leader
Design Arena: websites1271Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
Design Arena: UI components1313Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
Design Arena: game dev1277Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
Design Arena: data viz1263Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
Design Arena: 3D1315Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
Design Arena: all code categories1281Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
Design Arena: SVG1283Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1273Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
LiveBench design77.2%Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index28 boards measured
General benchmarks for GLM 5.3 Flash and Fugu Ultra v2
BenchmarkGLM 5.3 FlashFugu Ultra v2Leader
Vals Index50.9%Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
LiveBench data analysis76.4%Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)88.9%Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)80.0%Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
Surface Evolver Bench52.5%Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
LMArena Text1472Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1479Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1441Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
LMArena Vision1294Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
LMArena Text: English1474Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
LMArena Text: non-English1463Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1531Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
LMArena Text: German1457Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1442Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
LMArena Text: Korean1437Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
LMArena Text: French1489Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1472Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
LMArena Text: Russian1466Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
LMArena Text: Polish1450Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1471Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1482Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1455Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1442Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: English1295Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1363Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1299Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: humor1279Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1270Not measuredOnly GLM 5.3 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 20 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GLM 5.3 Flash$0.0004Fits in one request
Fugu Ultra v2$0.020Fits in one request

GLM 5.3 Flash costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GLM 5.3 Flash$0.0090Fits in one request
Fugu Ultra v2$0.340Fits in one request

GLM 5.3 Flash costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GLM 5.3 Flash$0.035Fits in one request
Fugu Ultra v2$1.30Fits in one request

GLM 5.3 Flash costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GLM 5.3 Flash and Fugu Ultra v2
SpecificationZ.ai GLM 5.3 FlashSakana Fugu Ultra v2
MakerZ.aiSakana
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedAugust 26, 2026September 11, 2026
Context window1.05M1M
Input $/Mtok$0.15$5.00
Output $/Mtok$0.50$30.00
Coding index57.7Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it60
Cost per solved task$0.02Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GLM 5.3 Flash better than Fugu Ultra v2 for coding?

Only GLM 5.3 Flash has a coding score, 57.7 on the Vibe Coding Index; Fugu Ultra v2 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Which is cheaper, GLM 5.3 Flash or Fugu Ultra v2?

GLM 5.3 Flash costs $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.50 per million output tokens; Fugu Ultra v2 costs $5.00 and $30.00. Cost per solved task is known for GLM 5.3 Flash only.

Which has the bigger context window, GLM 5.3 Flash or Fugu Ultra v2?

GLM 5.3 Flash, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.

Has any benchmark tested both GLM 5.3 Flash and Fugu Ultra v2?

No benchmark has tested both yet. GLM 5.3 Flash has results on LiveBench coding, LMArena WebDev and AA Coding Index; Fugu Ultra v2 has none yet. Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 23, 2026.

Compare next