GLM 5.3 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Flash
GLM 5.3 Flash and Qwen3.8 Flash cost about the same per output token ($0.50 vs $0.47 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 7 benchmarks have a result for both.
GLM 5.3 Flash or Qwen3.8 Flash: which to pick
Only GLM 5.3 Flash has a coding score, 57.7 on the Vibe Coding Index; Qwen3.8 Flash has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.
Pick Qwen3.8 Flash for output tokens 1.1x cheaper ($0.47 vs $0.50 per million) and work measured by LiveBench coding or LiveBench research, where it leads.
- Shared results
- 7
- GLM 5.3 Flash only
- 95
- Qwen3.8 Flash only
- 0
- Like-for-like categories
- 5 of 9
Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
No call
Only GLM 5.3 Flash has a coding score, so no call is made.
One side not measured
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
No call
Only GLM 5.3 Flash has a AA Intelligence Index result, 41.8.
Directional only
Agentic work
AA Agentic Index
No call
Only GLM 5.3 Flash has a AA Agentic Index result, 50.9.
Directional only
Reasoning
GPQA Diamond
No call
Only GLM 5.3 Flash has a GPQA Diamond result, 86.4%.
Directional only
Knowledge
MMLU Pro
No call
Only GLM 5.3 Flash has a MMLU Pro result, 86.1%.
Directional only
Web design
Design Arena: websites
No call
Only GLM 5.3 Flash has a Design Arena: websites result, 1272.
Directional only
General
Vals Index
No call
Only GLM 5.3 Flash has a Vals Index result, 50.9%.
Directional only
Long documents
Listed context window
GLM 5.3 Flash
GLM 5.3 Flash takes 1.05M tokens against 1M.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
Qwen3.8 Flash
GLM 5.3 Flash $0.0004, Qwen3.8 Flash $0.0004 per turn.
List prices
Cost per solved task
One SWE-bench Verified task, solved
No call
Only GLM 5.3 Flash has the number, $0.02.
Directional only
At a glance
- Coding index
- GLM 5.3 Flash 57.7 from 6 benchmarks, Qwen3.8 Flash not benchmarked.
- Widest category
- Agentic work, 16.4 points apart on average over 3 shared benchmarks.
- Widest single gap
- LiveBench browser: GLM 5.3 Flash 84.0% against Qwen3.8 Flash 48.0%, 36.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- GLM 5.3 Flash $0.50 against Qwen3.8 Flash $0.47 per million output tokens, 1.1x apart.
- Context window
- GLM 5.3 Flash takes 1.05M tokens, Qwen3.8 Flash 1M.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | GLM 5.3 Flash | Bars | Qwen3.8 Flash | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 0 | 1 | ||
| Agentic work | 1 | 2 | ||
| Reasoning | 0 | 1 | ||
| Web design | 1 | 0 | ||
| General | 1 | 0 | ||
| All shared boards | 3 | 4 |
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index01
| Benchmark | GLM 5.3 Flash | Qwen3.8 Flash | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench coding | 80.6% | 87.4% | Qwen3.8 Flash |
| LMArena WebDev | 1607 | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| AA Coding Index | 71.5 | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) | 80.5% | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI) | 92.0% | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI) | 37.4% | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) | 30.8% | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| Code migration (Vals AI) | 20.5% | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| ProgramBench (Vals AI) | 0.0% | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| IOI (Vals AI) | 52.5% | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI) | 62.9% | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI) | 16.0% | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| SkillsBench (Vals AI) | 40.2% | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| CyberBench (Vals AI) | 67.9% | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| SciCode | 51.6% | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| FrontierCode | 31.8% | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| FrontierSWE | 18.1% | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| ALE-Bench | 303.6 | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| LMArena Text: coding | 1507 | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | 1500 | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| LMArena WebDev: React | 1624 | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| LMArena WebDev: HTML | 1577 | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| LMArena WebDev: from an image | 1578 | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here | |||
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | GLM 5.3 Flash | Qwen3.8 Flash | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 41.8 | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 153.1 | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index12
| Benchmark | GLM 5.3 Flash | Qwen3.8 Flash | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Agentic Index | 50.9 | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| LiveBench research | 70.1% | 74.6% | Qwen3.8 Flash |
| LiveBench browser | 84.0% | 48.0% | GLM 5.3 Flash |
| LiveBench long agentic | 28.4% | 37.1% | Qwen3.8 Flash |
| SREBench (Vals AI) | 0.8% | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| Finance Agent (Vals AI) | 57.9% | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI) | 31.6% | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| Legal Research Bench (Vals AI) | 45.2% | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI) | 10.4% | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI) | 55.9% | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI) | 2.9% | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| APEX-Agents | 52.8% | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 29 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
| Benchmark | GLM 5.3 Flash | Qwen3.8 Flash | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 86.4% | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| LiveBench reasoning | 77.6% | 87.4% | Qwen3.8 Flash |
| MMMU Pro (Vals AI) | 86.0% | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | 91.2% | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | 39.9% | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run) | 90.2% | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| ARC-AGI | 91.0% | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 65.8% | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| Chess puzzles | 21.0% | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| Mystery game puzzles | 8.0% | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | 1490 | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| LMArena Text: expert | 1511 | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | 1488 | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| LMArena Vision: diagrams | 1317 | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| LMArena Vision: homework | 1318 | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here | |||
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | GLM 5.3 Flash | Qwen3.8 Flash | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME | 93.9% | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3 | 55.8% | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| FrontierMath, tier 4 | 17.1% | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| ProofBench | 21.0% | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| LMArena Text: math | 1503 | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | 1497 | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here | |||
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | GLM 5.3 Flash | Qwen3.8 Flash | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU Pro | 86.1% | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| LegalBench (Vals AI) | 83.9% | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| TaxEval (Vals AI) | 75.6% | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| LMArena Text: science | 1484 | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | 1475 | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | 1473 | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | 1460 | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here | |||
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
| Benchmark | GLM 5.3 Flash | Qwen3.8 Flash | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: websites | 1272 | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| Design Arena: UI components | 1316 | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| Design Arena: game dev | 1278 | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| Design Arena: data viz | 1261 | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| Design Arena: 3D | 1316 | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| Design Arena: all code categories | 1282 | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| Design Arena: SVG | 1284 | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| Design Arena: ASCII art | 1268 | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| LiveBench design | 77.2% | 72.8% | GLM 5.3 Flash |
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
| Benchmark | GLM 5.3 Flash | Qwen3.8 Flash | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vals Index | 50.9% | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| LiveBench data analysis | 76.4% | 74.2% | GLM 5.3 Flash |
| MedScribe (Vals AI) | 88.9% | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | 80.0% | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 52.5% | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| LMArena Text | 1471 | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | 1478 | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | 1441 | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| LMArena Vision | 1294 | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| LMArena Text: English | 1474 | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| LMArena Text: non-English | 1462 | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | 1531 | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| LMArena Text: German | 1462 | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| LMArena Text: Japanese | 1444 | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| LMArena Text: Korean | 1436 | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| LMArena Text: French | 1491 | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | 1475 | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| LMArena Text: Russian | 1465 | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| LMArena Text: Polish | 1450 | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | 1469 | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | 1481 | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | 1455 | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | 1440 | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| LMArena Vision: English | 1295 | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| LMArena Vision: Chinese | 1363 | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| LMArena Vision: reading text | 1299 | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| LMArena Vision: humor | 1279 | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| LMArena Vision: creative writing | 1270 | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | GLM 5.3 Flash | Qwen3.8 Flash | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
Qwen3.8 Flash costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
Qwen3.8 Flash costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
Qwen3.8 Flash costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | Z.ai GLM 5.3 Flash | Qwen3.8 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Z.ai | Qwen |
| Weights | Open weights | Open weights |
| Released | August 26, 2026 | August 26, 2026 |
| Context window | 1.05M | 1M |
| Input $/Mtok | $0.15 | $0.15 |
| Output $/Mtok | $0.50 | $0.47 |
| Coding index | 57.7 | Not benchmarked |
| Independent measurements behind it | 6 | 1 |
| Cost per solved task | $0.02 | Not computable |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is GLM 5.3 Flash better than Qwen3.8 Flash for coding?
Only GLM 5.3 Flash has a coding score, 57.7 on the Vibe Coding Index; Qwen3.8 Flash has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Qwen3.8 Flash for output tokens 1.1x cheaper ($0.47 vs $0.50 per million) and work measured by LiveBench coding or LiveBench research, where it leads.
Which is cheaper, GLM 5.3 Flash or Qwen3.8 Flash?
GLM 5.3 Flash costs $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.50 per million output tokens; Qwen3.8 Flash costs $0.15 and $0.47. Cost per solved task is known for GLM 5.3 Flash only.
Which has the bigger context window, GLM 5.3 Flash or Qwen3.8 Flash?
GLM 5.3 Flash, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.
How many benchmarks is the GLM 5.3 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Flash comparison based on?
7 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. GLM 5.3 Flash's coding index rests on 6 independent benchmarks and Qwen3.8 Flash's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.