GLM 5.3 Flash vs GPT-4o
Updated October 21, 2026. 11 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.
Decision reading
GLM 5.3 Flash scores 71.0 and GPT-4o 38.8 on the Vibe Coding Index, but no coding benchmark measured both, so the gap is directional, not a ranking.
Pick GLM 5.3 Flash when output tokens cost 20.0x less, or when the context window is larger, 1.05M against 128K tokens.
- Shared results
- 11
- GLM 5.3 Flash only
- 91
- GPT-4o only
- 15
- Like-for-like categories
- 3 of 9
Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, four public coding benchmarks
No call
71.0 against 38.8, from different benchmarks with none in common.
Directional only
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
No call
Only GLM 5.3 Flash has a AA Intelligence Index result, 41.8.
Directional only
Agentic work
AA Agentic Index
No call
Only GLM 5.3 Flash has a AA Agentic Index result, 50.9.
Directional only
Reasoning
GPQA Diamond
No call
Only GLM 5.3 Flash has a GPQA Diamond result, 86.4%.
Directional only
Knowledge
MMLU Pro
No call
Only GLM 5.3 Flash has a MMLU Pro result, 86.1%.
Directional only
Web design
Design Arena: websites
GLM 5.3 Flash
GLM 5.3 Flash leads, 1272 against 831.
Same board, both measured
General
Vals Index
No call
Only GLM 5.3 Flash has a Vals Index result, 50.9%.
Directional only
Long documents
Listed context window
GLM 5.3 Flash
GLM 5.3 Flash takes 1.05M tokens against 128K.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
GLM 5.3 Flash
GLM 5.3 Flash $0.0004, GPT-4o $0.0075 per turn.
List prices
Cost per solved task
One SWE-bench Verified task, solved
No call
Only GLM 5.3 Flash has the number, $0.02.
Directional only
At a glance
- Coding index
- GLM 5.3 Flash 71.0 from 2 benchmarks, GPT-4o 38.8 from 1 benchmark.
- Widest category
- Reasoning, 56.7 points apart on average over 4 shared benchmarks.
- Widest single gap
- ARC-AGI: GLM 5.3 Flash 91.0% against GPT-4o 4.5%, 86.5 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- GLM 5.3 Flash $0.50 against GPT-4o $10.00 per million output tokens, 20.0x apart.
- Context window
- GLM 5.3 Flash takes 1.05M tokens, GPT-4o 128K.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | GLM 5.3 Flash | Bars | GPT-4o | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reasoning | 4 | 0 | ||
| Web design | 6 | 0 | ||
| General | 1 | 0 | ||
| All shared boards | 11 | 0 |
CodingDirectional onlyFour of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index29 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | GLM 5.3 Flash | GPT-4o | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified | Not measured | 38.8% | Only GPT-4o measured |
| SWE-bench Lite | Not measured | 38.0% | Only GPT-4o measured |
| SWE-bench (full test set) | Not measured | 18.8% | Only GPT-4o measured |
| SWE-bench Multimodal | Not measured | 30.4% | Only GPT-4o measured |
| LiveBench coding | 80.6% | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| LMArena WebDev | 1607 | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| AA Coding Index | 71.5 | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) | 80.5% | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI) | 92.0% | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI) | 37.4% | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) | 30.8% | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| Code migration (Vals AI) | 20.5% | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| ProgramBench (Vals AI) | 0.0% | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| IOI (Vals AI) | 52.5% | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI) | 62.9% | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI) | 16.0% | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| SkillsBench (Vals AI) | 40.2% | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| CyberBench (Vals AI) | 67.9% | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 30.9% | Only GPT-4o measured |
| SciCode | 51.6% | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 8.3% | Only GPT-4o measured |
| FrontierCode | 31.8% | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| FrontierSWE | 18.1% | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| ALE-Bench | 303.6 | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| LMArena Text: coding | 1507 | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | 1500 | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| LMArena WebDev: React | 1624 | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| LMArena WebDev: HTML | 1577 | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| LMArena WebDev: from an image | 1578 | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here | |||
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | GLM 5.3 Flash | GPT-4o | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 41.8 | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 153.1 | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index14 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | GLM 5.3 Flash | GPT-4o | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Agentic Index | 50.9 | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| LiveBench research | 70.1% | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| LiveBench browser | 84.0% | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| LiveBench long agentic | 28.4% | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| SREBench (Vals AI) | 0.8% | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| Finance Agent (Vals AI) | 57.9% | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI) | 31.6% | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| Legal Research Bench (Vals AI) | 45.2% | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI) | 10.4% | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI) | 55.9% | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI) | 2.9% | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| τ²-Bench Telecom | Not measured | 25.1% | Only GPT-4o measured |
| APEX-Agents | 52.8% | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| GDPval | Not measured | 9.9% | Only GPT-4o measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 25 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
| Benchmark | GLM 5.3 Flash | GPT-4o | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 86.4% | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| LiveBench reasoning | 77.6% | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| MMMU Pro (Vals AI) | 86.0% | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | 91.2% | 54.3% | GLM 5.3 Flash |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | 39.9% | 2.4% | GLM 5.3 Flash |
| GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run) | 90.2% | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| ARC-AGI | 91.0% | 4.5% | GLM 5.3 Flash |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 65.8% | 0.0% | GLM 5.3 Flash |
| Chess puzzles | 21.0% | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| Mystery game puzzles | 8.0% | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | 1490 | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| LMArena Text: expert | 1511 | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | 1488 | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| LMArena Vision: diagrams | 1317 | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| LMArena Vision: homework | 1318 | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here | |||
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | GLM 5.3 Flash | GPT-4o | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Math Index | Not measured | 6.0 | Only GPT-4o measured |
| AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 6.0% | Only GPT-4o measured |
| OTIS Mock AIME | 93.9% | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3 | 55.8% | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| FrontierMath, tier 4 | 17.1% | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| ProofBench | 21.0% | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| LMArena Text: math | 1503 | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | 1497 | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here | |||
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | GLM 5.3 Flash | GPT-4o | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU Pro | 86.1% | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| LegalBench (Vals AI) | 83.9% | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| TaxEval (Vals AI) | 75.6% | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 74.8% | Only GPT-4o measured |
| MMLU | Not measured | 88.1% | Only GPT-4o measured |
| LMArena Text: science | 1484 | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | 1475 | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | 1473 | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | 1460 | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here | |||
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index60
| Benchmark | GLM 5.3 Flash | GPT-4o | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: websites | 1272 | 831 | GLM 5.3 Flash |
| Design Arena: UI components | 1316 | 885 | GLM 5.3 Flash |
| Design Arena: game dev | 1279 | 906 | GLM 5.3 Flash |
| Design Arena: data viz | 1262 | 858 | GLM 5.3 Flash |
| Design Arena: 3D | 1316 | 869 | GLM 5.3 Flash |
| Design Arena: all code categories | 1282 | 861 | GLM 5.3 Flash |
| Design Arena: SVG | 1284 | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| Design Arena: ASCII art | 1269 | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| LiveBench design | 77.2% | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
| Benchmark | GLM 5.3 Flash | GPT-4o | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vals Index | 50.9% | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| LiveBench data analysis | 76.4% | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| MedScribe (Vals AI) | 88.9% | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| IFBench | Not measured | 34.3% | Only GPT-4o measured |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | 80.0% | 49.3% | GLM 5.3 Flash |
| DTBench | Not measured | 64.5% | Only GPT-4o measured |
| LMCA | Not measured | 16.6% | Only GPT-4o measured |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 52.5% | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| LMArena Text | 1471 | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | 1478 | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | 1441 | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| LMArena Vision | 1294 | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| LMArena Text: English | 1474 | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| LMArena Text: non-English | 1462 | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | 1531 | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| LMArena Text: German | 1462 | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| LMArena Text: Japanese | 1444 | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| LMArena Text: Korean | 1436 | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| LMArena Text: French | 1491 | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | 1475 | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| LMArena Text: Russian | 1465 | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| LMArena Text: Polish | 1450 | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | 1469 | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | 1481 | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | 1455 | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | 1440 | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| LMArena Vision: English | 1295 | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| LMArena Vision: Chinese | 1363 | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| LMArena Vision: reading text | 1299 | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| LMArena Vision: humor | 1279 | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| LMArena Vision: creative writing | 1270 | Not measured | Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | GLM 5.3 Flash | GPT-4o | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
GLM 5.3 Flash costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
GLM 5.3 Flash costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
GLM 5.3 Flash costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | Z.ai GLM 5.3 Flash | OpenAI GPT-4o |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Z.ai | OpenAI |
| Weights | Open weights | No public weights listed |
| Released | August 26, 2026 | May 13, 2024 |
| Context window | 1.05M | 128K |
| Input $/Mtok | $0.15 | $2.50 |
| Output $/Mtok | $0.50 | $10.00 |
| Coding index | 71.0 | 38.8 |
| Independent measurements behind it | 2 | 1 |
| Cost per solved task | $0.02 | Not computable |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is GLM 5.3 Flash better than GPT-4o for coding?
GLM 5.3 Flash scores 71.0 and GPT-4o 38.8 on the Vibe Coding Index, but no coding benchmark measured both, so the gap is directional, not a ranking. Pick GLM 5.3 Flash when output tokens cost 20.0x less, or when the context window is larger, 1.05M against 128K tokens.
Which is cheaper, GLM 5.3 Flash or GPT-4o?
GLM 5.3 Flash costs $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.50 per million output tokens; GPT-4o costs $2.50 and $10.00. Cost per solved task is known for GLM 5.3 Flash only.
Which has the bigger context window, GLM 5.3 Flash or GPT-4o?
GLM 5.3 Flash, with 1.05M tokens against 128K.
How many benchmarks is the GLM 5.3 Flash vs GPT-4o comparison based on?
11 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. GLM 5.3 Flash's coding index rests on 2 independent benchmarks and GPT-4o's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.