Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GLM 5.2 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro

MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads GLM 5.2 on coding, 65.4 to 61.1 on the Vibe Coding Index, and MiMo-V2.6-Pro costs 5.1x less per output token ($0.87 vs $4.40 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 49 benchmarks have a result for both.

GLM 5.2Z.ai
Coding
61.1
Overall
62.5
Output $/M
$4.40
2
MiMo-V2.6-ProXiaomi
Coding
65.4
Overall
68.4
Output $/M
$0.87
45
vs boards won of 49 shared, 2 tied

GLM 5.2 or MiMo-V2.6-Pro: which to pick

Pick MiMo-V2.6-Pro for coding: it scores 65.4 on the Vibe Coding Index against 61.1 for GLM 5.2.

Pick GLM 5.2 for work measured by LMArena Text: legal and government or LMArena Text: multi-turn, where it leads.

Shared results
49
GLM 5.2 only
49
MiMo-V2.6-Pro only
24
Like-for-like categories
8 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GLM 5.2 61.1 from 4 benchmarks, MiMo-V2.6-Pro 65.4 from 4 benchmarks.
Widest category
Math, 13.8 points apart on average over 3 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
ProofBench: GLM 5.2 35.0% against MiMo-V2.6-Pro 70.0%, 35.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GLM 5.2 $4.40 against MiMo-V2.6-Pro $0.87 per million output tokens, 5.1x apart.
Context window
GLM 5.2 takes 1.05M tokens, MiMo-V2.6-Pro 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGLM 5.2BarsMiMo-V2.6-ProTies
Coding092 ties
Intelligence01
Agentic work06
Reasoning04
Math03
Knowledge14
Web design06
General112
All shared boards2452 ties
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index09
Coding benchmarks for GLM 5.2 and MiMo-V2.6-Pro
BenchmarkGLM 5.2MiMo-V2.6-ProLeader
LiveBench codingNot measured81.5%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LMArena WebDev16041625MiMo-V2.6-Pro
AA Coding Index68.8Not measuredOnly GLM 5.2 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)69.5%Not measuredOnly GLM 5.2 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)82.8%Not measuredOnly GLM 5.2 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured31.3%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)64.0%85.2%MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Code migration (Vals AI)37.9%43.0%MiMo-V2.6-Pro
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.5%0.5%Tie
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured39.3%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)67.8%67.8%Tie
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)Not measured41.3%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)45.1%Not measuredOnly GLM 5.2 measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)Not measured72.9%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
SciCode51.2%60.9%MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)50.8%Not measuredOnly GLM 5.2 measured
FrontierCode24.5%Not measuredOnly GLM 5.2 measured
WeirdML70.1%Not measuredOnly GLM 5.2 measured
ALE-Bench1047.01158.1MiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Text: coding14871533MiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Text: software and IT14861528MiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena WebDev: React16171639MiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena WebDev: HTML15651616MiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1598Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for GLM 5.2 and MiMo-V2.6-Pro
BenchmarkGLM 5.2MiMo-V2.6-ProLeader
AA Intelligence Index33.746.3MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Epoch Capabilities Index151.9Not measuredOnly GLM 5.2 measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index06
Agentic work benchmarks for GLM 5.2 and MiMo-V2.6-Pro
BenchmarkGLM 5.2MiMo-V2.6-ProLeader
AA Agentic Index38.4Not measuredOnly GLM 5.2 measured
Design Arena: agents building web apps12221290MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1241Not measuredOnly GLM 5.2 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1159Not measuredOnly GLM 5.2 measured
Design Arena: agents building Android apps1178Not measuredOnly GLM 5.2 measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot games1142Not measuredOnly GLM 5.2 measured
Design Arena: agents building games1206Not measuredOnly GLM 5.2 measured
Design Arena: HTML slides1125Not measuredOnly GLM 5.2 measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slides1170Not measuredOnly GLM 5.2 measured
LiveBench researchNot measured76.7%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LiveBench browserNot measured88.0%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured47.5%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
SREBench (Vals AI)0.0%3.0%MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Finance Agent (Vals AI)49.7%57.3%MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured32.4%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)31.3%47.1%MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured13.8%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)61.5%62.9%MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)Not measured2.9%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
τ²-Bench Telecom99.1%Not measuredOnly GLM 5.2 measured
APEX-Agents45.2%54.4%MiMo-V2.6-Pro
PostTrainBench31.7%Not measuredOnly GLM 5.2 measured
Vending-Bench 2$8,314Not measuredOnly GLM 5.2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Reasoning benchmarks for GLM 5.2 and MiMo-V2.6-Pro
BenchmarkGLM 5.2MiMo-V2.6-ProLeader
GPQA Diamond85.6%Not measuredOnly GLM 5.2 measured
LiveBench reasoningNot measured79.6%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)Not measured15.3%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)89.5%Not measuredOnly GLM 5.2 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)41.1%49.4%MiMo-V2.6-Pro
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)91.9%Not measuredOnly GLM 5.2 measured
ARC-AGI77.0%Not measuredOnly GLM 5.2 measured
ARC-AGI-222.8%Not measuredOnly GLM 5.2 measured
SimpleBench58.8%Not measuredOnly GLM 5.2 measured
Chess puzzles22.0%Not measuredOnly GLM 5.2 measured
Mystery game puzzles19.0%Not measuredOnly GLM 5.2 measured
EBR-bench9.5%Not measuredOnly GLM 5.2 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14811511MiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Text: expert14871541MiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14811520MiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1281Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1264Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
Kagi LLM Benchmark62.6%Not measuredOnly GLM 5.2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index03
Math benchmarks for GLM 5.2 and MiMo-V2.6-Pro
BenchmarkGLM 5.2MiMo-V2.6-ProLeader
OTIS Mock AIME86.4%Not measuredOnly GLM 5.2 measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 359.2%Not measuredOnly GLM 5.2 measured
FrontierMath, tier 429.3%Not measuredOnly GLM 5.2 measured
ProofBench35.0%70.0%MiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Text: math14831500MiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Text: mathematical work14891511MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index14
Knowledge benchmarks for GLM 5.2 and MiMo-V2.6-Pro
BenchmarkGLM 5.2MiMo-V2.6-ProLeader
MMLU Pro86.7%Not measuredOnly GLM 5.2 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)84.1%Not measuredOnly GLM 5.2 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)66.1%Not measuredOnly GLM 5.2 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)73.3%Not measuredOnly GLM 5.2 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)40.8%45.0%MiMo-V2.6-Pro
SimpleQA Verified34.2%Not measuredOnly GLM 5.2 measured
LMArena Text: science14891506MiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14751497MiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Text: legal and government14861485GLM 5.2
LMArena Text: business and finance14511468MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index06
Web design benchmarks for GLM 5.2 and MiMo-V2.6-Pro
BenchmarkGLM 5.2MiMo-V2.6-ProLeader
Design Arena: websites12851308MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Design Arena: UI components12941340MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Design Arena: game dev12681314MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Design Arena: data viz12851336MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Design Arena: 3D12871330MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Design Arena: all code categories12871317MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Design Arena: SVG1213Not measuredOnly GLM 5.2 measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1191Not measuredOnly GLM 5.2 measured
LiveBench designNot measured78.5%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index112
General benchmarks for GLM 5.2 and MiMo-V2.6-Pro
BenchmarkGLM 5.2MiMo-V2.6-ProLeader
Vals IndexNot measured57.8%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LiveBench data analysisNot measured72.3%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured68.9%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured45.0%Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)83.5%88.3%MiMo-V2.6-Pro
IFBench73.3%Not measuredOnly GLM 5.2 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)78.3%86.3%MiMo-V2.6-Pro
DTBench93.6%Not measuredOnly GLM 5.2 measured
LMCA45.8%Not measuredOnly GLM 5.2 measured
Surface Evolver Bench55.6%Not measuredOnly GLM 5.2 measured
LMArena Text14701491MiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Text: instruction following14661491MiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Text: creative writing14631466MiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena VisionNot measured1263Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LMArena Text: English14751504MiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Text: non-English14591474MiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Text: Chinese15221529MiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Text: German1470Not measuredOnly GLM 5.2 measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1450Not measuredOnly GLM 5.2 measured
LMArena Text: Korean1440Not measuredOnly GLM 5.2 measured
LMArena Text: French1479Not measuredOnly GLM 5.2 measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1478Not measuredOnly GLM 5.2 measured
LMArena Text: Russian14681479MiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Text: Polish1456Not measuredOnly GLM 5.2 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn14691466GLM 5.2
LMArena Text: longer queries14801501MiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Text: writing and language14631470MiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Text: entertainment and media14501465MiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1268Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1270Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GLM 5.2 and MiMo-V2.6-Pro
BenchmarkGLM 5.2MiMo-V2.6-ProLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GLM 5.2$0.0036Fits in one request
MiMo-V2.6-Pro$0.0009Fits in one request

MiMo-V2.6-Pro costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GLM 5.2$0.083Fits in one request
MiMo-V2.6-Pro$0.024Fits in one request

MiMo-V2.6-Pro costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GLM 5.2$0.324Fits in one request
MiMo-V2.6-Pro$0.096Fits in one request

MiMo-V2.6-Pro costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GLM 5.2 and MiMo-V2.6-Pro
SpecificationZ.ai GLM 5.2Xiaomi MiMo-V2.6-Pro
MakerZ.aiXiaomi
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedJune 16, 2026September 21, 2026
Context window1.05M1.05M
Input $/Mtok$1.40$0.435
Output $/Mtok$4.40$0.87
Coding index61.165.4
Independent measurements behind it44
Cost per solved task$0.86Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GLM 5.2 better than MiMo-V2.6-Pro for coding?

Pick MiMo-V2.6-Pro for coding: it scores 65.4 on the Vibe Coding Index against 61.1 for GLM 5.2. Pick GLM 5.2 for work measured by LMArena Text: legal and government or LMArena Text: multi-turn, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, GLM 5.2 or MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

GLM 5.2 costs $1.40 per million input tokens and $4.40 per million output tokens; MiMo-V2.6-Pro costs $0.435 and $0.87. Cost per solved task is known for GLM 5.2 only.

Which has the bigger context window, GLM 5.2 or MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro, with 1.05M tokens against 1.05M.

How many benchmarks is the GLM 5.2 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro comparison based on?

49 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. GLM 5.2's coding index rests on 4 independent benchmarks and MiMo-V2.6-Pro's on 4. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/glm-5-2-vs-xiaomi-mimo-v2-6-pro" title="GLM 5.2 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/glm-5-2-vs-xiaomi-mimo-v2-6-pro">LLMBenchmark.ai, GLM 5.2 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro</a></p>