Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Gemini 4 Hydrogen vs GLM 5.1

Gemini 4 Hydrogen leads GLM 5.1 on coding, 77.9 to 49.2 on the Vibe Coding Index, and GLM 5.1 costs 1.7x less per output token ($4.40 vs $7.50 per million). Updated November 14, 2026; 34 benchmarks have a result for both.

Gemini 4 HydrogenGoogle
Coding
77.9
Overall
77.1
Output $/M
$7.50
34
GLM 5.1Z.ai
Coding
49.2
Overall
61.9
Output $/M
$4.40
0
vs boards won of 34 shared

Gemini 4 Hydrogen or GLM 5.1: which to pick

Pick Gemini 4 Hydrogen for coding: it scores 77.9 on the Vibe Coding Index against 49.2 for GLM 5.1.

Pick GLM 5.1 for output tokens 1.7x cheaper ($4.40 vs $7.50 per million).

Shared results
34
Gemini 4 Hydrogen only
16
GLM 5.1 only
59
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Gemini 4 Hydrogen 77.9 from 4 benchmarks, GLM 5.1 49.2 from 3 benchmarks.
Widest category
Agentic work, 26.0 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI): Gemini 4 Hydrogen 87.8% against GLM 5.1 31.5%, 56.3 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Gemini 4 Hydrogen $7.50 against GLM 5.1 $4.40 per million output tokens, 1.7x apart.
Context window
Gemini 4 Hydrogen takes 1.05M tokens, GLM 5.1 205K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGemini 4 HydrogenBarsGLM 5.1Ties
Coding70
Agentic work10
Reasoning30
Math20
Knowledge40
Web design40
General130
All shared boards340
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index70
Coding benchmarks for Gemini 4 Hydrogen and GLM 5.1
BenchmarkGemini 4 HydrogenGLM 5.1Leader
LiveBench coding78.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Hydrogen measured
LMArena WebDev17041508Gemini 4 Hydrogen
AA Coding IndexNot measured55.8Only GLM 5.1 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured81.4%Only GLM 5.1 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured76.4%Only GLM 5.1 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)54.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Hydrogen measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)87.8%31.5%Gemini 4 Hydrogen
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured25.8%Only GLM 5.1 measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only GLM 5.1 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured56.9%Only GLM 5.1 measured
SciCodeNot measured44.8%Only GLM 5.1 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured43.2%Only GLM 5.1 measured
Terminal-Bench 4.0 (Artificial Analysis run)54.0%2.0%Gemini 4 Hydrogen
FrontierCode 2.039.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Hydrogen measured
WeirdMLNot measured57.1%Only GLM 5.1 measured
ALE-BenchNot measured887.1Only GLM 5.1 measured
LMArena Text: coding15161485Gemini 4 Hydrogen
LMArena Text: software and IT15131483Gemini 4 Hydrogen
LMArena WebDev: React17241504Gemini 4 Hydrogen
LMArena WebDev: HTML17431510Gemini 4 Hydrogen
Terminal-Bench 2.1Not measured58.7%Only GLM 5.1 measured
CursorBench 4.057.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Hydrogen measured
Neither model has a result on the other 30 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for Gemini 4 Hydrogen and GLM 5.1
BenchmarkGemini 4 HydrogenGLM 5.1Leader
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured150.7Only GLM 5.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Agentic work benchmarks for Gemini 4 Hydrogen and GLM 5.1
BenchmarkGemini 4 HydrogenGLM 5.1Leader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured23.9Only GLM 5.1 measured
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1153Only GLM 5.1 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack appsNot measured1141Only GLM 5.1 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile appsNot measured1153Only GLM 5.1 measured
Design Arena: agents building Android appsNot measured1174Only GLM 5.1 measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot gamesNot measured1036Only GLM 5.1 measured
Design Arena: agents building gamesNot measured1106Only GLM 5.1 measured
Design Arena: HTML slidesNot measured1065Only GLM 5.1 measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slidesNot measured1155Only GLM 5.1 measured
Design Arena: spreadsheetsNot measured1315Only GLM 5.1 measured
LiveBench research86.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Hydrogen measured
LiveBench browser77.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Hydrogen measured
LiveBench long agentic61.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Hydrogen measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured44.8%Only GLM 5.1 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)52.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Hydrogen measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)53.8%27.9%Gemini 4 Hydrogen
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)11.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Hydrogen measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured97.7%Only GLM 5.1 measured
APEX-AgentsNot measured40.9%Only GLM 5.1 measured
Vending-Bench 2Not measured$5,634Only GLM 5.1 measured
MCP AtlasNot measured75.6%Only GLM 5.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 23 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index30
Reasoning benchmarks for Gemini 4 Hydrogen and GLM 5.1
BenchmarkGemini 4 HydrogenGLM 5.1Leader
GPQA DiamondNot measured84.5%Only GLM 5.1 measured
LiveBench reasoning88.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Hydrogen measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured86.8%Only GLM 5.1 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured30.1%Only GLM 5.1 measured
HLE-Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)58.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Hydrogen measured
CritPt v2, hard subset (Artificial Analysis run)66.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Hydrogen measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured89.9%Only GLM 5.1 measured
SimpleBenchNot measured55.1%Only GLM 5.1 measured
Chess puzzlesNot measured20.0%Only GLM 5.1 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts15201473Gemini 4 Hydrogen
LMArena Text: expert15581477Gemini 4 Hydrogen
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English15141482Gemini 4 Hydrogen
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Math benchmarks for Gemini 4 Hydrogen and GLM 5.1
BenchmarkGemini 4 HydrogenGLM 5.1Leader
AIMENot measured91.9%Only GLM 5.1 measured
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured93.3%Only GLM 5.1 measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Not measured36.8%Only GLM 5.1 measured
ProofBenchNot measured22.2%Only GLM 5.1 measured
LMArena Text: math15071472Gemini 4 Hydrogen
LMArena Text: mathematical work15341471Gemini 4 Hydrogen
MathArenaNot measured19.3%Only GLM 5.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
Knowledge benchmarks for Gemini 4 Hydrogen and GLM 5.1
BenchmarkGemini 4 HydrogenGLM 5.1Leader
MMLU ProNot measured86.9%Only GLM 5.1 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured84.4%Only GLM 5.1 measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)Not measured51.5%Only GLM 5.1 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured64.5%Only GLM 5.1 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured71.2%Only GLM 5.1 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured41.6%Only GLM 5.1 measured
AA-Omniscience46.3Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Hydrogen measured
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured34.0%Only GLM 5.1 measured
LMArena Text: science15191479Gemini 4 Hydrogen
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14881474Gemini 4 Hydrogen
LMArena Text: legal and government15321466Gemini 4 Hydrogen
LMArena Text: business and finance14861453Gemini 4 Hydrogen
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
Web design benchmarks for Gemini 4 Hydrogen and GLM 5.1
BenchmarkGemini 4 HydrogenGLM 5.1Leader
Design Arena: websites13201290Gemini 4 Hydrogen
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1292Only GLM 5.1 measured
Design Arena: game dev13691255Gemini 4 Hydrogen
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1366Only GLM 5.1 measured
Design Arena: 3D14151336Gemini 4 Hydrogen
Design Arena: all code categories13331260Gemini 4 Hydrogen
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1207Only GLM 5.1 measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1141Only GLM 5.1 measured
LiveBench design77.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Hydrogen measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index130
General benchmarks for Gemini 4 Hydrogen and GLM 5.1
BenchmarkGemini 4 HydrogenGLM 5.1Leader
Vals Index68.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Hydrogen measured
LiveBench data analysis83.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 4 Hydrogen measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured61.8%Only GLM 5.1 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured72.3%Only GLM 5.1 measured
IFBenchNot measured76.3%Only GLM 5.1 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured73.7%Only GLM 5.1 measured
GDPval-AANot measured1125Only GLM 5.1 measured
ExploitBenchNot measured18.1%Only GLM 5.1 measured
LMArena Text15021462Gemini 4 Hydrogen
LMArena Text: instruction following15191452Gemini 4 Hydrogen
LMArena Text: creative writing15091453Gemini 4 Hydrogen
LMArena Text: English14991475Gemini 4 Hydrogen
LMArena Text: non-English14951448Gemini 4 Hydrogen
LMArena Text: Chinese16311516Gemini 4 Hydrogen
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1466Only GLM 5.1 measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1441Only GLM 5.1 measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1423Only GLM 5.1 measured
LMArena Text: French15121469Gemini 4 Hydrogen
LMArena Text: Spanish14941469Gemini 4 Hydrogen
LMArena Text: Russian14921454Gemini 4 Hydrogen
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1452Only GLM 5.1 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn14851472Gemini 4 Hydrogen
LMArena Text: longer queries15241467Gemini 4 Hydrogen
LMArena Text: writing and language15001454Gemini 4 Hydrogen
LMArena Text: entertainment and media15031443Gemini 4 Hydrogen
Neither model has a result on the other 24 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Gemini 4 Hydrogen and GLM 5.1
BenchmarkGemini 4 HydrogenGLM 5.1Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Gemini 4 Hydrogen$0.0053Fits in one request
GLM 5.1$0.0036Fits in one request

GLM 5.1 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Gemini 4 Hydrogen$0.098Fits in one request
GLM 5.1$0.083Fits in one request

GLM 5.1 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Gemini 4 Hydrogen$0.375Fits in one request
GLM 5.1$0.324Exceeds the context window

GLM 5.1 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Gemini 4 Hydrogen and GLM 5.1
SpecificationGoogle Gemini 4 HydrogenZ.ai GLM 5.1
MakerGoogleZ.ai
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedNovember 12, 2026April 7, 2026
Context window1.05M205K
Input $/Mtok$1.50$1.40
Output $/Mtok$7.50$4.40
Coding index77.949.2
Independent measurements behind it43
Cost per solved taskNot computable$0.60
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Gemini 4 Hydrogen better than GLM 5.1 for coding?

Pick Gemini 4 Hydrogen for coding: it scores 77.9 on the Vibe Coding Index against 49.2 for GLM 5.1. Pick GLM 5.1 for output tokens 1.7x cheaper ($4.40 vs $7.50 per million).

Which is cheaper, Gemini 4 Hydrogen or GLM 5.1?

Gemini 4 Hydrogen costs $1.50 per million input tokens and $7.50 per million output tokens; GLM 5.1 costs $1.40 and $4.40. Cost per solved task is known for GLM 5.1 only.

Which has the bigger context window, Gemini 4 Hydrogen or GLM 5.1?

Gemini 4 Hydrogen, with 1.05M tokens against 205K.

How many benchmarks is the Gemini 4 Hydrogen vs GLM 5.1 comparison based on?

34 benchmarks have a result for both models as of November 14, 2026. Gemini 4 Hydrogen's coding index rests on 4 independent benchmarks and GLM 5.1's on 3. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/gemini-4-hydrogen-vs-glm-5-1" title="Gemini 4 Hydrogen vs GLM 5.1, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/gemini-4-hydrogen-vs-glm-5-1">LLMBenchmark.ai, Gemini 4 Hydrogen vs GLM 5.1</a></p>