LLMBenchmark.ai

Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Gemini 3.8 Flash vs o1

Updated October 21, 2026. 51 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

Gemini 3.8 FlashGoogle
Coding
70.5
Overall
40.9
Output $/M
$4.125
51
o1OpenAI
Coding
61.7
Overall
15.2
Output $/M
$60.00
0
vs boards won of 51 shared

Decision reading

Pick Gemini 3.8 Flash for coding: it scores 70.5 on the Vibe Coding Index against 61.7 for o1.

o1 is neither cheaper nor larger in context, and leads no benchmark both models were measured on.

Shared results
51
Gemini 3.8 Flash only
75
o1 only
17
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Gemini 3.8 Flash 70.5 from 2 benchmarks, o1 61.7 from 1 benchmark.
Widest category
Coding, 32.3 points apart on average over 5 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
ARC-AGI: Gemini 3.8 Flash 98.5% against o1 30.7%, 67.8 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Gemini 3.8 Flash $4.125 against o1 $60.00 per million output tokens, 14.5x apart.
Context window
Gemini 3.8 Flash takes 1.05M tokens, o1 200K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGemini 3.8 FlashBarso1Ties
Coding50
Intelligence20
Reasoning100
Math40
Knowledge80
General220
All shared boards510
CodingLike-for-likeFour of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index50
Coding benchmarks for Gemini 3.8 Flash and o1
BenchmarkGemini 3.8 Flasho1Leader
Aider polyglotNot measured61.7%Only o1 measured
LiveBench coding82.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
LMArena WebDev1585Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
AA Coding Index76.339.7Gemini 3.8 Flash
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)89.5%50.3%Gemini 3.8 Flash
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)80.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)19.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)78.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
Code migration (Vals AI)36.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)1.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
IOI (Vals AI)56.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)81.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)40.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)18.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)58.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)43.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured67.9%Only o1 measured
SciCode56.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured12.9%Only o1 measured
FrontierCode41.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
FrontierSWE19.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
WeirdML84.8%46.1%Gemini 3.8 Flash
ALE-Bench1269.7Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
LMArena Text: coding15081367Gemini 3.8 Flash
LMArena Text: software and IT15071366Gemini 3.8 Flash
LMArena WebDev: React1577Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1616Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
LMArena WebDev: from an image1593Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Intelligence benchmarks for Gemini 3.8 Flash and o1
BenchmarkGemini 3.8 Flasho1Leader
AA Intelligence Index40.915.2Gemini 3.8 Flash
Epoch Capabilities Index157.4141.7Gemini 3.8 Flash
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index27 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Gemini 3.8 Flash and o1
BenchmarkGemini 3.8 Flasho1Leader
AA Agentic Index40.2Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
Design Arena: agents building web apps1238Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1244Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1236Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
Design Arena: agents building Android apps1078Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot games1273Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slides1178Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
Design Arena: spreadsheets1052Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
LiveBench research79.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
LiveBench browser64.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
LiveBench long agentic30.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
SREBench (Vals AI)11.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)61.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)32.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)38.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)12.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)72.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)62.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)8.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
Vals Science Index35.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
Time Horizon Index (Vals AI)18.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
CUA-bench (Vals AI)4.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured62.6%Only o1 measured
APEX-Agents64.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
METR time horizonsNot measured51.1%Only o1 measured
Remote Labor Index5.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
Vending-Bench 2$5,094Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index100
Reasoning benchmarks for Gemini 3.8 Flash and o1
BenchmarkGemini 3.8 Flasho1Leader
GPQA Diamond94.4%73.2%Gemini 3.8 Flash
LiveBench reasoning89.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)36.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)89.1%77.4%Gemini 3.8 Flash
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)95.3%74.7%Gemini 3.8 Flash
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)47.8%7.0%Gemini 3.8 Flash
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)95.4%76.8%Gemini 3.8 Flash
ARC-AGI98.5%30.7%Gemini 3.8 Flash
ARC-AGI-289.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
SimpleBenchNot measured40.1%Only o1 measured
Chess puzzles58.0%10.0%Gemini 3.8 Flash
Mystery game puzzles47.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
VPCTNot measured37.0%Only o1 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts15091371Gemini 3.8 Flash
LMArena Text: expert15261361Gemini 3.8 Flash
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English15041372Gemini 3.8 Flash
LMArena Vision: diagrams1345Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: homework1351Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
Math benchmarks for Gemini 3.8 Flash and o1
BenchmarkGemini 3.8 Flasho1Leader
AIMENot measured71.5%Only o1 measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)Not measured90.4%Only o1 measured
MGSM (Vals AI)Not measured89.3%Only o1 measured
OTIS Mock AIME98.9%73.3%Gemini 3.8 Flash
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 368.4%14.7%Gemini 3.8 Flash
FrontierMath, tier 422.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
ProofBench48.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
MATH level 5Not measured94.7%Only o1 measured
LMArena Text: math15321388Gemini 3.8 Flash
LMArena Text: mathematical work15191390Gemini 3.8 Flash
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index80
Knowledge benchmarks for Gemini 3.8 Flash and o1
BenchmarkGemini 3.8 Flasho1Leader
MMLU Pro90.2%83.5%Gemini 3.8 Flash
LegalBench (Vals AI)87.0%80.4%Gemini 3.8 Flash
TaxEval (Vals AI)74.5%74.3%Gemini 3.8 Flash
MortgageTax (Vals AI)65.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
MedQA (Vals AI)Not measured96.5%Only o1 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)48.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured84.1%Only o1 measured
SimpleQA Verified69.7%41.1%Gemini 3.8 Flash
GeoBenchNot measured80.0%Only o1 measured
LMArena Text: science15231369Gemini 3.8 Flash
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare15081355Gemini 3.8 Flash
LMArena Text: legal and government14971368Gemini 3.8 Flash
LMArena Text: business and finance14791328Gemini 3.8 Flash
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Gemini 3.8 Flash and o1
BenchmarkGemini 3.8 Flasho1Leader
Design Arena: websites1301Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
Design Arena: UI components1318Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
Design Arena: game dev1305Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
Design Arena: data viz1269Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
Design Arena: 3D1295Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
Design Arena: all code categories1304Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
Design Arena: SVG1295Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1264Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
LiveBench design72.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index220
General benchmarks for Gemini 3.8 Flash and o1
BenchmarkGemini 3.8 Flasho1Leader
Vals Index56.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
LiveBench data analysis54.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)65.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
SAGE (Vals AI)35.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)84.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
IFBenchNot measured70.3%Only o1 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)84.0%65.0%Gemini 3.8 Flash
DTBench95.7%74.7%Gemini 3.8 Flash
LMCA52.9%22.3%Gemini 3.8 Flash
Fiction.LiveBenchNot measured83.3%Only o1 measured
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)Not measured70.2%Only o1 measured
Surface Evolver Bench76.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
Furniture assembly31.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
LMArena Text14991366Gemini 3.8 Flash
LMArena Text: instruction following14921367Gemini 3.8 Flash
LMArena Text: creative writing14881347Gemini 3.8 Flash
LMArena Vision13151168Gemini 3.8 Flash
LMArena Text: English14981372Gemini 3.8 Flash
LMArena Text: non-English14911358Gemini 3.8 Flash
LMArena Text: Chinese15531394Gemini 3.8 Flash
LMArena Text: German15011337Gemini 3.8 Flash
LMArena Text: Japanese15071346Gemini 3.8 Flash
LMArena Text: Korean14641396Gemini 3.8 Flash
LMArena Text: French14961344Gemini 3.8 Flash
LMArena Text: Spanish14871345Gemini 3.8 Flash
LMArena Text: Russian15141356Gemini 3.8 Flash
LMArena Text: Polish1497Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn15031355Gemini 3.8 Flash
LMArena Text: longer queries15071378Gemini 3.8 Flash
LMArena Text: writing and language14941360Gemini 3.8 Flash
LMArena Text: entertainment and media14801358Gemini 3.8 Flash
LMArena Vision: English13181162Gemini 3.8 Flash
LMArena Vision: Chinese14161235Gemini 3.8 Flash
LMArena Vision: reading text1333Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: humor1321Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1299Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Gemini 3.8 Flash and o1
BenchmarkGemini 3.8 Flasho1Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Gemini 3.8 Flash$0.0029Fits in one request
o1$0.045Fits in one request

Gemini 3.8 Flash costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Gemini 3.8 Flash$0.054Fits in one request
o1$0.930Fits in one request

Gemini 3.8 Flash costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Gemini 3.8 Flash$0.206Fits in one request
o1$3.60Exceeds the context window

Gemini 3.8 Flash costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Gemini 3.8 Flash and o1
SpecificationGoogle Gemini 3.8 FlashOpenAI o1
MakerGoogleOpenAI
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedSeptember 2, 2026December 17, 2024
Context window1.05M200K
Input $/Mtok$0.825$15.00
Output $/Mtok$4.125$60.00
Coding index70.561.7
Independent measurements behind it21
Cost per solved task$2.74Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Gemini 3.8 Flash better than o1 for coding?

Pick Gemini 3.8 Flash for coding: it scores 70.5 on the Vibe Coding Index against 61.7 for o1. o1 is neither cheaper nor larger in context, and leads no benchmark both models were measured on.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.8 Flash or o1?

Gemini 3.8 Flash costs $0.825 per million input tokens and $4.125 per million output tokens; o1 costs $15.00 and $60.00. Cost per solved task is known for Gemini 3.8 Flash only.

Which has the bigger context window, Gemini 3.8 Flash or o1?

Gemini 3.8 Flash, with 1.05M tokens against 200K.

How many benchmarks is the Gemini 3.8 Flash vs o1 comparison based on?

51 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Gemini 3.8 Flash's coding index rests on 2 independent benchmarks and o1's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next