Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Kimi K2 Thinking

Gemini 3.8 Flash leads Kimi K2 Thinking on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 40.9 to 22.0, and Kimi K2 Thinking costs 1.5x less per output token ($2.50 vs $3.75 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 14 benchmarks have a result for both.

Gemini 3.8 FlashGoogle
Coding
61.6
Overall
69.0
Output $/M
$3.75
14
Kimi K2 ThinkingMoonshot AI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$2.50
0
vs boards won of 14 shared

Gemini 3.8 Flash or Kimi K2 Thinking: which to pick

Only Gemini 3.8 Flash has a coding score, 61.6 on the Vibe Coding Index; Kimi K2 Thinking has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Kimi K2 Thinking for output tokens 1.5x cheaper ($2.50 vs $3.75 per million) and a lower cost per solved task ($0.61 against $2.74).

Shared results
14
Gemini 3.8 Flash only
114
Kimi K2 Thinking only
16
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Gemini 3.8 Flash 61.6 from 6 benchmarks, Kimi K2 Thinking not benchmarked.
Widest category
Coding, 27.6 points apart on average over 4 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
WeirdML: Gemini 3.8 Flash 84.8% against Kimi K2 Thinking 42.8%, 42.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Gemini 3.8 Flash $3.75 against Kimi K2 Thinking $2.50 per million output tokens, 1.5x apart.
Context window
Gemini 3.8 Flash takes 1.05M tokens, Kimi K2 Thinking 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGemini 3.8 FlashBarsKimi K2 ThinkingTies
Coding40
Intelligence20
Reasoning30
Knowledge30
Web design10
General10
All shared boards140
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index40
Coding benchmarks for Gemini 3.8 Flash and Kimi K2 Thinking
BenchmarkGemini 3.8 FlashKimi K2 ThinkingLeader
SWE-bench VerifiedNot measured63.4%Only Kimi K2 Thinking measured
LiveBench coding82.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
LMArena WebDev1585Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
AA Coding Index76.3Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)89.5%63.1%Gemini 3.8 Flash
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)80.0%60.2%Gemini 3.8 Flash
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)19.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)78.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
Code migration (Vals AI)36.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)1.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
IOI (Vals AI)56.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)81.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)40.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)18.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)58.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)43.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured85.3%Only Kimi K2 Thinking measured
SciCode56.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured31.1%Only Kimi K2 Thinking measured
Terminal-BenchNot measured35.7%Only Kimi K2 Thinking measured
FrontierCode41.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
FrontierSWE19.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
WeirdML84.8%42.8%Gemini 3.8 Flash
ALE-Bench1269.7597.5Gemini 3.8 Flash
LMArena Text: coding1508Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1507Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
LMArena WebDev: React1577Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1616Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
LMArena WebDev: from an image1593Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
SciCode12.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Intelligence benchmarks for Gemini 3.8 Flash and Kimi K2 Thinking
BenchmarkGemini 3.8 FlashKimi K2 ThinkingLeader
AA Intelligence Index40.922.0Gemini 3.8 Flash
Epoch Capabilities Index157.4145.8Gemini 3.8 Flash
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index27 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Gemini 3.8 Flash and Kimi K2 Thinking
BenchmarkGemini 3.8 FlashKimi K2 ThinkingLeader
AA Agentic Index40.2Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
Design Arena: agents building web apps1238Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1244Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1236Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
Design Arena: agents building Android apps1074Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot games1273Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slides1177Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
Design Arena: spreadsheets1056Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
LiveBench research79.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
LiveBench browser64.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
LiveBench long agentic30.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
SREBench (Vals AI)11.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)61.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)32.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)38.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)12.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)72.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)62.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)8.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
Vals Science Index35.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
Time Horizon Index (Vals AI)18.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
CUA-bench (Vals AI)4.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured93.0%Only Kimi K2 Thinking measured
APEX-Agents64.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
METR time horizonsNot measured59.2%Only Kimi K2 Thinking measured
Remote Labor Index5.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
Vending-Bench 2$5,094Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index30
Reasoning benchmarks for Gemini 3.8 Flash and Kimi K2 Thinking
BenchmarkGemini 3.8 FlashKimi K2 ThinkingLeader
GPQA Diamond94.4%78.5%Gemini 3.8 Flash
LiveBench reasoning89.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)36.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)89.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)95.3%83.8%Gemini 3.8 Flash
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)47.8%23.8%Gemini 3.8 Flash
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)95.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
ARC-AGI98.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
ARC-AGI-289.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
Chess puzzles58.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
Mystery game puzzles47.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1509Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
LMArena Text: expert1526Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1504Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: diagrams1345Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: homework1351Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Gemini 3.8 Flash and Kimi K2 Thinking
BenchmarkGemini 3.8 FlashKimi K2 ThinkingLeader
AIMENot measured85.4%Only Kimi K2 Thinking measured
MGSM (Vals AI)Not measured90.2%Only Kimi K2 Thinking measured
AA Math IndexNot measured94.7Only Kimi K2 Thinking measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured94.7%Only Kimi K2 Thinking measured
OTIS Mock AIME98.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 368.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
FrontierMath, tier 422.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
ProofBench48.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
LMArena Text: math1532Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1519Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index30
Knowledge benchmarks for Gemini 3.8 Flash and Kimi K2 Thinking
BenchmarkGemini 3.8 FlashKimi K2 ThinkingLeader
MMLU Pro90.2%81.1%Gemini 3.8 Flash
LegalBench (Vals AI)87.0%80.2%Gemini 3.8 Flash
CaseLaw (Vals AI)Not measured65.7%Only Kimi K2 Thinking measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured60.6%Only Kimi K2 Thinking measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)74.5%71.7%Gemini 3.8 Flash
MortgageTax (Vals AI)65.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
MedQA (Vals AI)Not measured92.6%Only Kimi K2 Thinking measured
MedCode (Vals AI)48.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured84.8%Only Kimi K2 Thinking measured
SimpleQA Verified69.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
LMArena Text: science1523Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1508Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1497Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1479Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
FACTS Benchmark Suite69.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Web design benchmarks for Gemini 3.8 Flash and Kimi K2 Thinking
BenchmarkGemini 3.8 FlashKimi K2 ThinkingLeader
Design Arena: websites13001113Gemini 3.8 Flash
Design Arena: UI components1319Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
Design Arena: game dev1305Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
Design Arena: data viz1269Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
Design Arena: 3D1295Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
Design Arena: all code categories1304Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
Design Arena: SVG1295Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1265Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
LiveBench design72.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
General benchmarks for Gemini 3.8 Flash and Kimi K2 Thinking
BenchmarkGemini 3.8 FlashKimi K2 ThinkingLeader
Vals Index56.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
LiveBench data analysis54.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)65.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
SAGE (Vals AI)35.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)84.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
IFBenchNot measured68.1%Only Kimi K2 Thinking measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)84.0%72.0%Gemini 3.8 Flash
DTBench95.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
LMCA52.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
CL-benchNot measured17.6%Only Kimi K2 Thinking measured
Surface Evolver Bench76.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
Furniture assembly31.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
LMArena Text1499Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1492Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1488Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
LMArena Vision1315Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
LMArena Text: English1498Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
LMArena Text: non-English1491Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1553Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
LMArena Text: German1501Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1507Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
LMArena Text: Korean1464Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
LMArena Text: French1496Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1487Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
LMArena Text: Russian1514Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
LMArena Text: Polish1497Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1503Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1507Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1494Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1480Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: English1318Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1416Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1333Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: humor1321Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1299Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Gemini 3.8 Flash and Kimi K2 Thinking
BenchmarkGemini 3.8 FlashKimi K2 ThinkingLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Gemini 3.8 Flash$0.0026Fits in one request
Kimi K2 Thinking$0.0019Fits in one request

Kimi K2 Thinking costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Gemini 3.8 Flash$0.049Fits in one request
Kimi K2 Thinking$0.037Fits in one request

Kimi K2 Thinking costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Gemini 3.8 Flash$0.188Fits in one request
Kimi K2 Thinking$0.145Fits in one request

Kimi K2 Thinking costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Gemini 3.8 Flash and Kimi K2 Thinking
SpecificationGoogle Gemini 3.8 FlashMoonshotAI Kimi K2 Thinking
MakerGoogleMoonshot AI
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedSeptember 2, 2026November 6, 2025
Context window1.05M262K
Input $/Mtok$0.75$0.60
Output $/Mtok$3.75$2.50
Coding index61.6Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it61
Cost per solved task$2.74$0.61
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Gemini 3.8 Flash better than Kimi K2 Thinking for coding?

Only Gemini 3.8 Flash has a coding score, 61.6 on the Vibe Coding Index; Kimi K2 Thinking has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Kimi K2 Thinking for output tokens 1.5x cheaper ($2.50 vs $3.75 per million) and a lower cost per solved task ($0.61 against $2.74).

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.8 Flash or Kimi K2 Thinking?

Gemini 3.8 Flash costs $0.75 per million input tokens and $3.75 per million output tokens; Kimi K2 Thinking costs $0.60 and $2.50. Per solved SWE-bench Verified task, Gemini 3.8 Flash costs $2.74 and Kimi K2 Thinking $0.61.

Which has the bigger context window, Gemini 3.8 Flash or Kimi K2 Thinking?

Gemini 3.8 Flash, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks is the Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Kimi K2 Thinking comparison based on?

14 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Gemini 3.8 Flash's coding index rests on 6 independent benchmarks and Kimi K2 Thinking's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next