Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Gemini 3.8 Flash vs GPT-4.1 Nano

Gemini 3.8 Flash leads GPT-4.1 Nano on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 40.9 to 7.8, and GPT-4.1 Nano costs 9.4x less per output token ($0.40 vs $3.75 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 54 benchmarks have a result for both.

Gemini 3.8 FlashGoogle
Coding
61.6
Overall
69.0
Output $/M
$3.75
54
GPT-4.1 NanoOpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
24.7
Output $/M
$0.40
0
vs boards won of 54 shared

Gemini 3.8 Flash or GPT-4.1 Nano: which to pick

Only Gemini 3.8 Flash has a coding score, 61.6 on the Vibe Coding Index; GPT-4.1 Nano has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick GPT-4.1 Nano for output tokens 9.4x cheaper ($0.40 vs $3.75 per million).

Shared results
54
Gemini 3.8 Flash only
82
GPT-4.1 Nano only
17
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Gemini 3.8 Flash 61.6 from 6 benchmarks, GPT-4.1 Nano not benchmarked.
Widest category
Reasoning, 52.1 points apart on average over 11 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
ARC-AGI: Gemini 3.8 Flash 98.5% against GPT-4.1 Nano 0.0%, 98.5 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Gemini 3.8 Flash $3.75 against GPT-4.1 Nano $0.40 per million output tokens, 9.4x apart.
Context window
Gemini 3.8 Flash takes 1.05M tokens, GPT-4.1 Nano 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGemini 3.8 FlashBarsGPT-4.1 NanoTies
Coding50
Intelligence20
Reasoning110
Math30
Knowledge90
Web design60
General180
All shared boards540
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index50
Coding benchmarks for Gemini 3.8 Flash and GPT-4.1 Nano
BenchmarkGemini 3.8 FlashGPT-4.1 NanoLeader
Aider polyglotNot measured8.9%Only GPT-4.1 Nano measured
LiveBench coding82.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
LMArena WebDev1585Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
AA Coding Index76.311.1Gemini 3.8 Flash
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)89.5%42.7%Gemini 3.8 Flash
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)80.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)19.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)78.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
Code migration (Vals AI)36.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)1.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
IOI (Vals AI)56.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)81.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)40.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)18.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)58.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)43.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured32.6%Only GPT-4.1 Nano measured
SciCode56.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured3.8%Only GPT-4.1 Nano measured
FrontierCode41.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
FrontierSWE19.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
WeirdML84.8%19.0%Gemini 3.8 Flash
ALE-Bench1269.7Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
LMArena Text: coding15081306Gemini 3.8 Flash
LMArena Text: software and IT15071305Gemini 3.8 Flash
LMArena WebDev: React1577Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1616Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
LMArena WebDev: from an image1593Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
SciCode12.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
SWE-Bench Pro V294.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
SWE Atlas: Codebase QnA47.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
SWE Atlas: Refactoring44.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
SWE Atlas: Test Writing53.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Intelligence benchmarks for Gemini 3.8 Flash and GPT-4.1 Nano
BenchmarkGemini 3.8 FlashGPT-4.1 NanoLeader
AA Intelligence Index40.97.8Gemini 3.8 Flash
Epoch Capabilities Index157.4129.5Gemini 3.8 Flash
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index27 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Gemini 3.8 Flash and GPT-4.1 Nano
BenchmarkGemini 3.8 FlashGPT-4.1 NanoLeader
AA Agentic Index40.2Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
Design Arena: agents building web apps1238Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1244Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1236Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
Design Arena: agents building Android apps1078Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot games1273Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slides1152Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
Design Arena: spreadsheets1037Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
LiveBench research79.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
LiveBench browser64.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
LiveBench long agentic30.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
SREBench (Vals AI)11.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)61.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)32.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)38.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)12.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)72.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)62.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)8.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
Vals Science Index35.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
Time Horizon Index (Vals AI)18.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
CUA-bench (Vals AI)4.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured17.3%Only GPT-4.1 Nano measured
APEX-Agents64.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
Remote Labor Index5.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
Vending-Bench 2$5,094Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)Not measured33.1%Only GPT-4.1 Nano measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index110
Reasoning benchmarks for Gemini 3.8 Flash and GPT-4.1 Nano
BenchmarkGemini 3.8 FlashGPT-4.1 NanoLeader
GPQA Diamond94.4%50.8%Gemini 3.8 Flash
LiveBench reasoning89.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)36.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)89.1%55.0%Gemini 3.8 Flash
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)95.3%51.2%Gemini 3.8 Flash
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)47.8%3.8%Gemini 3.8 Flash
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)95.4%48.9%Gemini 3.8 Flash
ARC-AGI98.5%0.0%Gemini 3.8 Flash
ARC-AGI-289.2%0.0%Gemini 3.8 Flash
Chess puzzles58.0%0.0%Gemini 3.8 Flash
Mystery game puzzles47.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts15091286Gemini 3.8 Flash
LMArena Text: expert15261271Gemini 3.8 Flash
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English15041293Gemini 3.8 Flash
LMArena Vision: diagrams1345Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: homework1351Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
Kagi LLM BenchmarkNot measured33.3%Only GPT-4.1 Nano measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Scale run)34.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index30
Math benchmarks for Gemini 3.8 Flash and GPT-4.1 Nano
BenchmarkGemini 3.8 FlashGPT-4.1 NanoLeader
AIMENot measured26.5%Only GPT-4.1 Nano measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)Not measured80.2%Only GPT-4.1 Nano measured
MGSM (Vals AI)Not measured69.3%Only GPT-4.1 Nano measured
AA Math IndexNot measured24.0Only GPT-4.1 Nano measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured24.0%Only GPT-4.1 Nano measured
OTIS Mock AIME98.9%28.9%Gemini 3.8 Flash
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 368.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
FrontierMath, tier 422.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
ProofBench48.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
MATH level 5Not measured70.0%Only GPT-4.1 Nano measured
LMArena Text: math15321274Gemini 3.8 Flash
LMArena Text: mathematical work15191274Gemini 3.8 Flash
MathArena34.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index90
Knowledge benchmarks for Gemini 3.8 Flash and GPT-4.1 Nano
BenchmarkGemini 3.8 FlashGPT-4.1 NanoLeader
MMLU Pro90.2%63.5%Gemini 3.8 Flash
LegalBench (Vals AI)87.0%61.1%Gemini 3.8 Flash
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured42.1%Only GPT-4.1 Nano measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)74.5%60.8%Gemini 3.8 Flash
MortgageTax (Vals AI)65.3%52.8%Gemini 3.8 Flash
MedQA (Vals AI)Not measured68.2%Only GPT-4.1 Nano measured
MedCode (Vals AI)48.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured65.7%Only GPT-4.1 Nano measured
SimpleQA Verified69.7%6.0%Gemini 3.8 Flash
LMArena Text: science15231297Gemini 3.8 Flash
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare15081276Gemini 3.8 Flash
LMArena Text: legal and government14971300Gemini 3.8 Flash
LMArena Text: business and finance14791267Gemini 3.8 Flash
FACTS Benchmark Suite69.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
PRBench Finance49.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
PRBench Legal48.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index60
Web design benchmarks for Gemini 3.8 Flash and GPT-4.1 Nano
BenchmarkGemini 3.8 FlashGPT-4.1 NanoLeader
Design Arena: websites1300973Gemini 3.8 Flash
Design Arena: UI components1316913Gemini 3.8 Flash
Design Arena: game dev1304970Gemini 3.8 Flash
Design Arena: data viz1271891Gemini 3.8 Flash
Design Arena: 3D1294924Gemini 3.8 Flash
Design Arena: all code categories1303962Gemini 3.8 Flash
Design Arena: SVG1295Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1264Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
LiveBench design72.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index180
General benchmarks for Gemini 3.8 Flash and GPT-4.1 Nano
BenchmarkGemini 3.8 FlashGPT-4.1 NanoLeader
Vals Index56.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
LiveBench data analysis54.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)65.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
SAGE (Vals AI)35.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)84.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
IFBenchNot measured32.0%Only GPT-4.1 Nano measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)84.0%20.3%Gemini 3.8 Flash
DTBench95.7%52.5%Gemini 3.8 Flash
LMCA52.9%5.5%Gemini 3.8 Flash
Fiction.LiveBenchNot measured25.0%Only GPT-4.1 Nano measured
Surface Evolver Bench76.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
Furniture assembly31.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
LMArena Text14991285Gemini 3.8 Flash
LMArena Text: instruction following14921266Gemini 3.8 Flash
LMArena Text: creative writing14881260Gemini 3.8 Flash
LMArena Vision13151063Gemini 3.8 Flash
LMArena Text: English14981303Gemini 3.8 Flash
LMArena Text: non-English14911260Gemini 3.8 Flash
LMArena Text: Chinese15531270Gemini 3.8 Flash
LMArena Text: German15011288Gemini 3.8 Flash
LMArena Text: Japanese15071198Gemini 3.8 Flash
LMArena Text: Korean1464Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
LMArena Text: French1496Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1487Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
LMArena Text: Russian15141261Gemini 3.8 Flash
LMArena Text: Polish1497Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn15031277Gemini 3.8 Flash
LMArena Text: longer queries15071283Gemini 3.8 Flash
LMArena Text: writing and language14941261Gemini 3.8 Flash
LMArena Text: entertainment and media14801243Gemini 3.8 Flash
LMArena Vision: English13181101Gemini 3.8 Flash
LMArena Vision: Chinese1416Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1333Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: humor1321Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1299Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.8 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Gemini 3.8 Flash and GPT-4.1 Nano
BenchmarkGemini 3.8 FlashGPT-4.1 NanoLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Gemini 3.8 Flash$0.0026Fits in one request
GPT-4.1 Nano$0.0003Fits in one request

GPT-4.1 Nano costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Gemini 3.8 Flash$0.049Fits in one request
GPT-4.1 Nano$0.0062Fits in one request

GPT-4.1 Nano costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Gemini 3.8 Flash$0.188Fits in one request
GPT-4.1 Nano$0.024Fits in one request

GPT-4.1 Nano costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Gemini 3.8 Flash and GPT-4.1 Nano
SpecificationGoogle Gemini 3.8 FlashOpenAI GPT-4.1 Nano
MakerGoogleOpenAI
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedSeptember 2, 2026April 14, 2025
Context window1.05M1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.75$0.10
Output $/Mtok$3.75$0.40
Coding index61.6Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it60
Cost per solved task$2.74Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Gemini 3.8 Flash better than GPT-4.1 Nano for coding?

Only Gemini 3.8 Flash has a coding score, 61.6 on the Vibe Coding Index; GPT-4.1 Nano has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick GPT-4.1 Nano for output tokens 9.4x cheaper ($0.40 vs $3.75 per million).

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.8 Flash or GPT-4.1 Nano?

Gemini 3.8 Flash costs $0.75 per million input tokens and $3.75 per million output tokens; GPT-4.1 Nano costs $0.10 and $0.40. Cost per solved task is known for Gemini 3.8 Flash only.

Which has the bigger context window, Gemini 3.8 Flash or GPT-4.1 Nano?

Gemini 3.8 Flash, with 1.05M tokens against 1.05M.

How many benchmarks is the Gemini 3.8 Flash vs GPT-4.1 Nano comparison based on?

54 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Gemini 3.8 Flash's coding index rests on 6 independent benchmarks and GPT-4.1 Nano's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next