LLMBenchmark.ai

Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Updated October 21, 2026. 56 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

Gemini 3.5 Flash LiteGoogle
Coding
33.6
Overall
22.2
Output $/M
$2.50
12
MiMo-V2.6-FlashXiaomi
Coding
61.9
Overall
37.9
Output $/M
$0.28
44
vs boards won of 56 shared

Decision reading

Pick MiMo-V2.6-Flash for coding: it scores 61.9 on the Vibe Coding Index against 33.6 for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite.

Pick Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite when what matters is LMArena Vision: diagrams or LMArena Vision: homework, where it leads.

Shared results
56
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite only
27
MiMo-V2.6-Flash only
10
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite 33.6 from 1 benchmark, MiMo-V2.6-Flash 61.9 from 1 benchmark.
Widest category
Math, 21.5 points apart on average over 3 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
ProofBench: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite 13.0% against MiMo-V2.6-Flash 63.0%, 50.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite $2.50 against MiMo-V2.6-Flash $0.28 per million output tokens, 8.9x apart.
Context window
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite takes 1.05M tokens, MiMo-V2.6-Flash 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGemini 3.5 Flash LiteBarsMiMo-V2.6-FlashTies
Coding012
Intelligence01
Agentic work04
Reasoning24
Math03
Knowledge14
General916
All shared boards1244
CodingLike-for-likeFour of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index012
Coding benchmarks for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and MiMo-V2.6-Flash
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteMiMo-V2.6-FlashLeader
LMArena WebDev14351634MiMo-V2.6-Flash
AA Coding Index49.3Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)79.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)75.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured24.2%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)37.2%79.0%MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Code migration (Vals AI)6.2%40.9%MiMo-V2.6-Flash
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.0%0.5%MiMo-V2.6-Flash
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured47.7%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)50.2%76.4%MiMo-V2.6-Flash
CyberBench (Vals AI)59.1%75.4%MiMo-V2.6-Flash
SciCode41.3%51.3%MiMo-V2.6-Flash
WeirdML39.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
ALE-Bench765.31244.2MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text: coding14531499MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text: software and IT14511497MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena WebDev: React14081648MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1641Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
LMArena WebDev: from an image14481596MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and MiMo-V2.6-Flash
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteMiMo-V2.6-FlashLeader
AA Intelligence Index22.237.9MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Epoch Capabilities Index144.9Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Agentic work benchmarks for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and MiMo-V2.6-Flash
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteMiMo-V2.6-FlashLeader
AA Agentic Index14.3Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
SREBench (Vals AI)Not measured4.2%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)47.4%56.3%MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)7.2%28.5%MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)13.9%38.0%MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured13.3%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)43.2%65.5%MiMo-V2.6-Flash
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)Not measured69.3%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)Not measured4.3%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
Vals Science IndexNot measured31.7%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
APEX-Agents29.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Neither model has a result on the other 28 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index24
Reasoning benchmarks for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and MiMo-V2.6-Flash
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteMiMo-V2.6-FlashLeader
GPQA Diamond83.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)Not measured21.6%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)83.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)83.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)18.8%35.1%MiMo-V2.6-Flash
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)83.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
ARC-AGI53.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
ARC-AGI-210.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Chess puzzles21.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Mystery game puzzles19.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14411475MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text: expert14341496MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14401493MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Vision: diagrams12841276Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Vision: homework12911283Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index03
Math benchmarks for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and MiMo-V2.6-Flash
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteMiMo-V2.6-FlashLeader
OTIS Mock AIME71.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 326.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
FrontierMath, tier 40.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
ProofBench13.0%63.0%MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text: math14341476MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text: mathematical work14331478MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index14
Knowledge benchmarks for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and MiMo-V2.6-Flash
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteMiMo-V2.6-FlashLeader
MMLU Pro85.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)84.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)60.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)72.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)68.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
MedCode (Vals AI)43.5%41.1%Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Text: science14511462MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14381439MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text: legal and government14311441MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text: business and finance14231454MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
Web designNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and MiMo-V2.6-Flash
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteMiMo-V2.6-FlashLeader
Neither model has a result on 9 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index916
General benchmarks for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and MiMo-V2.6-Flash
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteMiMo-V2.6-FlashLeader
Vals IndexNot measured54.8%Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)51.8%67.6%MiMo-V2.6-Flash
SAGE (Vals AI)47.3%43.5%Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
MedScribe (Vals AI)70.9%85.3%MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)76.0%74.3%Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
DTBench83.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMCA37.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Text14351453MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text: instruction following14191452MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text: creative writing14211403Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Vision12691256Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Text: English14381476MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text: non-English14271431MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text: Chinese14681509MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text: German14541458MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text: Japanese14261359Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Text: Korean14071425MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text: French14511480MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text: Spanish14411453MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text: Russian14431409Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Text: Polish14371455MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text: multi-turn14451447MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text: longer queries14351459MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text: writing and language14281424Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Text: entertainment and media14141415MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Vision: English12691269MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Vision: Chinese1311Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Vision: reading text12801270Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Vision: humor1287Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing12601231Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and MiMo-V2.6-Flash
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteMiMo-V2.6-FlashLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite$0.0015Fits in one request
MiMo-V2.6-Flash$0.0003Fits in one request

MiMo-V2.6-Flash costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite$0.022Fits in one request
MiMo-V2.6-Flash$0.0078Fits in one request

MiMo-V2.6-Flash costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite$0.085Fits in one request
MiMo-V2.6-Flash$0.031Fits in one request

MiMo-V2.6-Flash costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and MiMo-V2.6-Flash
SpecificationGoogle Gemini 3.5 Flash LiteXiaomi MiMo-V2.6-Flash
MakerGoogleXiaomi
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedJuly 21, 2026September 21, 2026
Context window1.05M1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.30$0.14
Output $/Mtok$2.50$0.28
Coding index33.661.9
Independent measurements behind it11
Cost per solved task$0.41Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite better than MiMo-V2.6-Flash for coding?

Pick MiMo-V2.6-Flash for coding: it scores 61.9 on the Vibe Coding Index against 33.6 for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite. Pick Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite when what matters is LMArena Vision: diagrams or LMArena Vision: homework, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite costs $0.30 per million input tokens and $2.50 per million output tokens; MiMo-V2.6-Flash costs $0.14 and $0.28. Cost per solved task is known for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite only.

Which has the bigger context window, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash, with 1.05M tokens against 1.05M.

How many benchmarks is the Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash comparison based on?

56 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and MiMo-V2.6-Flash's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next