Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs Step 5 Preview

Step 5 Preview leads Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite on coding, 61.1 to 49.0 on the Vibe Coding Index, at about the same output price ($2.70 vs $2.50 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 45 benchmarks have a result for both.

Gemini 3.5 Flash LiteGoogle
Coding
49.0
Overall
49.8
Output $/M
$2.50
10
Step 5 PreviewStepFun
Coding
61.1
Overall
60.5
Output $/M
$2.70
35
vs boards won of 45 shared

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or Step 5 Preview: which to pick

Pick Step 5 Preview for coding: it scores 61.1 on the Vibe Coding Index against 49.0 for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite.

Pick Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite for output tokens 1.1x cheaper ($2.50 vs $2.70 per million) and work measured by LMArena Vision: homework or LMArena Text: creative writing, where it leads.

Shared results
45
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite only
40
Step 5 Preview only
16
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite 49.0 from 3 benchmarks, Step 5 Preview 61.1 from 4 benchmarks.
Widest category
Intelligence, 21.5 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI): Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite 37.2% against Step 5 Preview 70.4%, 33.2 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite $2.50 against Step 5 Preview $2.70 per million output tokens, 1.1x apart.
Context window
Both take 1.05M tokens.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGemini 3.5 Flash LiteBarsStep 5 PreviewTies
Coding08
Intelligence01
Agentic work04
Reasoning15
Math03
Knowledge04
General910
All shared boards1035
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index08
Coding benchmarks for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteStep 5 PreviewLeader
LiveBench codingNot measured85.6%Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena WebDev14351567Step 5 Preview
AA Coding Index49.3Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)79.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)75.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured31.8%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)37.2%70.4%Step 5 Preview
Code migration (Vals AI)6.2%39.0%Step 5 Preview
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured38.1%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)50.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)Not measured40.8%Only Step 5 Preview measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)59.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
SciCode41.3%58.9%Step 5 Preview
WeirdML39.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
ALE-Bench765.3Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Text: coding14531485Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: software and IT14511473Step 5 Preview
LMArena WebDev: React14081583Step 5 Preview
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1556Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena WebDev: from an image14481550Step 5 Preview
SciCode6.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteStep 5 PreviewLeader
AA Intelligence Index22.243.7Step 5 Preview
Epoch Capabilities Index144.9Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Agentic work benchmarks for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteStep 5 PreviewLeader
AA Agentic Index14.3Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LiveBench researchNot measured72.8%Only Step 5 Preview measured
LiveBench browserNot measured24.0%Only Step 5 Preview measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured27.5%Only Step 5 Preview measured
SREBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.4%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)47.4%50.7%Step 5 Preview
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)7.2%27.3%Step 5 Preview
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)13.9%40.4%Step 5 Preview
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)43.2%57.1%Step 5 Preview
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)Not measured67.4%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)Not measured2.9%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Vals Science IndexNot measured29.6%Only Step 5 Preview measured
APEX-Agents29.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Neither model has a result on the other 28 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index15
Reasoning benchmarks for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteStep 5 PreviewLeader
GPQA Diamond83.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LiveBench reasoningNot measured83.8%Only Step 5 Preview measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)Not measured18.5%Only Step 5 Preview measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)83.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)83.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)18.8%46.5%Step 5 Preview
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)83.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
ARC-AGI53.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
ARC-AGI-210.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Chess puzzles21.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Mystery game puzzles19.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14411461Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: expert14341485Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14401454Step 5 Preview
LMArena Vision: diagrams12841308Step 5 Preview
LMArena Vision: homework12911265Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index03
Math benchmarks for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteStep 5 PreviewLeader
OTIS Mock AIME71.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 326.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
FrontierMath, tier 40.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
ProofBench13.0%42.0%Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: math14341458Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: mathematical work14331460Step 5 Preview
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Knowledge benchmarks for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteStep 5 PreviewLeader
MMLU Pro85.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)84.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)60.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)72.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)68.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
MedCode (Vals AI)43.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Text: science14511454Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14381439Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: legal and government14311437Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: business and finance14231435Step 5 Preview
FACTS Benchmark Suite53.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteStep 5 PreviewLeader
LiveBench designNot measured76.9%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index910
General benchmarks for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteStep 5 PreviewLeader
LiveBench data analysisNot measured63.5%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)51.8%58.1%Step 5 Preview
SAGE (Vals AI)47.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)70.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)76.0%88.3%Step 5 Preview
DTBench83.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMCA37.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Text14351440Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: instruction following14191438Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: creative writing14211409Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Vision12691265Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Text: English14381447Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: non-English14271428Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: Chinese14681500Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: German1454Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Text: Japanese14261383Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Text: Korean1407Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Text: French14511438Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Text: Spanish14411441Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Text: Russian14431433Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Text: Polish1437Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn14451437Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Text: longer queries14351449Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: writing and language14281425Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Text: entertainment and media14141412Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
LMArena Vision: English12691290Step 5 Preview
LMArena Vision: Chinese1311Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Vision: reading text12801282Step 5 Preview
LMArena Vision: humor1287Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1260Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteStep 5 PreviewLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite$0.0015Fits in one request
Step 5 Preview$0.0024Fits in one request

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite$0.022Fits in one request
Step 5 Preview$0.058Fits in one request

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite$0.085Fits in one request
Step 5 Preview$0.227Fits in one request

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and Step 5 Preview
SpecificationGoogle Gemini 3.5 Flash LiteStepFun Step 5 Preview
MakerGoogleStepFun
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedJuly 21, 2026October 8, 2026
Context window1.05M1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.30$1.00
Output $/Mtok$2.50$2.70
Coding index49.061.1
Independent measurements behind it34
Cost per solved task$0.41Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite better than Step 5 Preview for coding?

Pick Step 5 Preview for coding: it scores 61.1 on the Vibe Coding Index against 49.0 for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite. Pick Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite for output tokens 1.1x cheaper ($2.50 vs $2.70 per million) and work measured by LMArena Vision: homework or LMArena Text: creative writing, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or Step 5 Preview?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite costs $0.30 per million input tokens and $2.50 per million output tokens; Step 5 Preview costs $1.00 and $2.70. Cost per solved task is known for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite only.

Which has the bigger context window, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or Step 5 Preview?

Neither: both take 1.05M tokens.

How many benchmarks is the Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs Step 5 Preview comparison based on?

45 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite's coding index rests on 3 independent benchmarks and Step 5 Preview's on 4. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/gemini-3-5-flash-lite-vs-stepfun-step-5-preview" title="Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs Step 5 Preview, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/gemini-3-5-flash-lite-vs-stepfun-step-5-preview">LLMBenchmark.ai, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs Step 5 Preview</a></p>