Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Muse Ember

Muse Ember leads Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview on coding, 64.9 to 32.3 on the Vibe Coding Index, and Muse Ember costs 24.0x less per output token ($0.50 vs $12.00 per million). Updated November 14, 2026; 10 benchmarks have a result for both.

Gemini 3.1 Pro PreviewGoogle
Coding
32.3
Overall
56.0
Output $/M
$12.00
1
Muse EmberMeta
Coding
64.9
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.50
9
vs boards won of 10 shared

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview or Muse Ember: which to pick

Pick Muse Ember for coding: it scores 64.9 on the Vibe Coding Index against 32.3 for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview, though on 3 benchmarks against 4.

Pick Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview for work measured by HLE-Diamond (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.

Shared results
10
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview only
133
Muse Ember only
5
Like-for-like categories
3 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview 32.3 from 4 benchmarks, Muse Ember 64.9 from 3 benchmarks.
Widest category
Coding, 34.4 points apart on average over 6 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI): Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview 32.0% against Muse Ember 83.7%, 51.7 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview $12.00 against Muse Ember $0.50 per million output tokens, 24.0x apart.
Context window
Both take 1.05M tokens.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewBarsMuse EmberTies
Coding06
Agentic work03
Reasoning10
All shared boards19
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index06
Coding benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and Muse Ember
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewMuse EmberLeader
LMArena WebDev14461609Muse Ember
AA Coding Index68.8Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)88.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)78.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)2.5%39.4%Muse Ember
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)32.0%83.7%Muse Ember
Code migration (Vals AI)17.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
IOI (Vals AI)51.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)70.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)6.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
SciCode58.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)53.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Terminal-Bench 4.0 (Artificial Analysis run)4.0%40.9%Muse Ember
FrontierCode 2.0Not measured27.2%Only Muse Ember measured
Terminal-Bench80.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
GSO-Bench22.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
WeirdML72.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
MirrorCode8.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
ALE-Bench1160.6Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: coding1483Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1486Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena WebDev: React14371616Muse Ember
LMArena WebDev: HTML14891621Muse Ember
LMArena WebDev: from an image1480Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
SciCode14.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
GameBench 265.0Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 25 boards here
IntelligenceNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and Muse Ember
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewMuse EmberLeader
Neither model has a result on 2 boards here
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index03
Agentic work benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and Muse Ember
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewMuse EmberLeader
AA Agentic Index8.2Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Design Arena: agents building web apps1102Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1042Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1086Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Design Arena: agents building Android apps1035Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot games1143Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Design Arena: agents building games1057Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Design Arena: HTML slides1048Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slides1035Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Design Arena: spreadsheets944Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
SREBench (Vals AI)0.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)43.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)9.3%38.2%Muse Ember
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)20.7%49.0%Muse Ember
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured25.0%Only Muse Ember measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)52.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)60.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)1.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Vals Science Index27.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
τ²-Bench Telecom95.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
APEX-Agents35.1%64.3%Muse Ember
METR time horizons77.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
BALROG57.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
DeepResearch Bench47.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
PostTrainBench18.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Vending-Bench 2$911Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
MCP Atlas78.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
τ³-Banking26.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Reasoning benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and Muse Ember
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewMuse EmberLeader
GPQA Diamond95.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)20.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)88.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)94.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)47.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
HLE-Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)31.4%25.1%Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
CritPt v2, hard subset (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured39.0%Only Muse Ember measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)94.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
ARC-AGI98.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
ARC-AGI-277.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
SimpleBench79.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Chess puzzles51.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Mystery game puzzles34.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
EBR-bench14.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1485Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: expert1483Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1480Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Vision: diagrams1311Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Vision: homework1317Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and Muse Ember
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewMuse EmberLeader
AIME98.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
OTIS Mock AIME95.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 359.6%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
FrontierMath, tier 426.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
ProofBench26.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: math1485Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1476Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
MathArena28.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index16 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and Muse Ember
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewMuse EmberLeader
MMLU Pro91.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)87.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)64.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)64.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)72.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)69.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
MedQA (Vals AI)96.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
MedCode (Vals AI)59.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
AA-OmniscienceNot measured7.7Only Muse Ember measured
SimpleQA Verified73.5%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
GeoBench84.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: science1496Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1486Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1486Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1460Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
FACTS Benchmark Suite69.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and Muse Ember
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewMuse EmberLeader
Design Arena: websites1226Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Design Arena: UI components1215Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Design Arena: game dev1191Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Design Arena: data viz1206Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Design Arena: 3D1214Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Design Arena: all code categories1220Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Design Arena: SVG1275Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1265Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index42 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and Muse Ember
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewMuse EmberLeader
Vals IndexNot measured60.5%Only Muse Ember measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)53.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
SAGE (Vals AI)83.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)76.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Vals Multimodal Index56.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
IFBench77.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)82.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
GDPval-AA799Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
DTBench97.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMCA53.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
CL-bench20.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Furniture assembly26.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
ExploitBench26.1%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
CL-bench Life16.9%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text1480Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1465Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1483Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Vision1296Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: English1478Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: non-English1476Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1528Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: German1491Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1492Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: Korean1456Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: French1487Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1479Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: Russian1497Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: Polish1498Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1486Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1482Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1481Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1465Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Vision: English1287Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1362Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1304Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Vision: humor1323Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Vision: captioning1343Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things1329Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1324Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
LMArena Document1443Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
MultiChallenge71.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
EQ-Bench 41132Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and Muse Ember
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewMuse EmberLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview$0.0080Fits in one request
Muse Ember$0.0003Fits in one request

Muse Ember costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview$0.136Fits in one request
Muse Ember$0.0065Fits in one request

Muse Ember costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview$0.520Fits in one request
Muse Ember$0.025Fits in one request

Muse Ember costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and Muse Ember
SpecificationGoogle Gemini 3.1 Pro PreviewMeta Muse Ember
MakerGoogleMeta
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedFebruary 19, 2026November 9, 2026
Context window1.05M1.05M
Input $/Mtok$2.00$0.10
Output $/Mtok$12.00$0.50
Coding index32.364.9
Independent measurements behind it43
Cost per solved task$0.99Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview better than Muse Ember for coding?

Pick Muse Ember for coding: it scores 64.9 on the Vibe Coding Index against 32.3 for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview, though on 3 benchmarks against 4. Pick Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview for work measured by HLE-Diamond (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview or Muse Ember?

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview costs $2.00 per million input tokens and $12.00 per million output tokens; Muse Ember costs $0.10 and $0.50. Cost per solved task is known for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview only.

Which has the bigger context window, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview or Muse Ember?

Neither: both take 1.05M tokens.

How many benchmarks is the Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Muse Ember comparison based on?

10 benchmarks have a result for both models as of November 14, 2026. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview's coding index rests on 4 independent benchmarks and Muse Ember's on 3. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/gemini-3-1-pro-preview-vs-meta-muse-ember" title="Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Muse Ember, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/gemini-3-1-pro-preview-vs-meta-muse-ember">LLMBenchmark.ai, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Muse Ember</a></p>