Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview) vs GLM 5.3 Flash

GLM 5.3 Flash costs 6.0x less per output token than Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview) ($0.50 vs $3.00 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview)Google
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$3.00
GLM 5.3 FlashZ.ai
Coding
57.7
Overall
66.0
Output $/M
$0.50
vs $3.00 vs $0.50 per 1M output tokens. GLM 5.3 Flash is 6.0x cheaper.

Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview) or GLM 5.3 Flash: which to pick

Only GLM 5.3 Flash has a coding score, 57.7 on the Vibe Coding Index; Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview) has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

No benchmark has tested both yet. Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview) has results on Design Arena: images, Design Arena: graphic design and Design Arena: logos; GLM 5.3 Flash on LiveBench coding, LMArena WebDev and AA Coding Index. Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview) not benchmarked, GLM 5.3 Flash 57.7 from 6 benchmarks.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview) $3.00 against GLM 5.3 Flash $0.50 per million output tokens, 6.0x apart.
Context window
Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview) takes 66K tokens, GLM 5.3 Flash 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index23 boards measured
Coding benchmarks for Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview) and GLM 5.3 Flash
BenchmarkNano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview)GLM 5.3 FlashLeader
LiveBench codingNot measured80.6%Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured
LMArena WebDevNot measured1607Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured
AA Coding IndexNot measured71.5Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured80.5%Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured92.0%Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured37.4%Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured30.8%Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured20.5%Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured52.5%Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured62.9%Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)Not measured16.0%Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)Not measured40.2%Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)Not measured67.9%Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured
SciCodeNot measured51.6%Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured
FrontierCodeNot measured31.8%Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured
FrontierSWENot measured18.1%Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured
ALE-BenchNot measured303.6Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1507Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1500Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1624Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1577Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1578Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
Intelligence benchmarks for Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview) and GLM 5.3 Flash
BenchmarkNano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview)GLM 5.3 FlashLeader
AA Intelligence IndexNot measured41.8Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured153.1Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index12 boards measured
Agentic work benchmarks for Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview) and GLM 5.3 Flash
BenchmarkNano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview)GLM 5.3 FlashLeader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured50.9Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured
LiveBench researchNot measured70.1%Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured
LiveBench browserNot measured84.0%Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured28.4%Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured
SREBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.8%Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured57.9%Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured31.6%Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured45.2%Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured10.4%Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured55.9%Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)Not measured2.9%Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured
APEX-AgentsNot measured52.8%Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 29 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index15 boards measured
Reasoning benchmarks for Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview) and GLM 5.3 Flash
BenchmarkNano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview)GLM 5.3 FlashLeader
GPQA DiamondNot measured86.4%Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured
LiveBench reasoningNot measured77.6%Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured86.0%Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured91.2%Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured39.9%Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured90.2%Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured
ARC-AGINot measured91.0%Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured
ARC-AGI-2Not measured65.8%Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured
Chess puzzlesNot measured21.0%Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured8.0%Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1490Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1511Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1488Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1317Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1318Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards measured
Math benchmarks for Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview) and GLM 5.3 Flash
BenchmarkNano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview)GLM 5.3 FlashLeader
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured93.9%Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Not measured55.8%Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured
FrontierMath, tier 4Not measured17.1%Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured
ProofBenchNot measured21.0%Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1503Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1497Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards measured
Knowledge benchmarks for Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview) and GLM 5.3 Flash
BenchmarkNano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview)GLM 5.3 FlashLeader
MMLU ProNot measured86.1%Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured83.9%Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured75.6%Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1484Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1475Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1473Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1460Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards measured
Web design benchmarks for Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview) and GLM 5.3 Flash
BenchmarkNano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview)GLM 5.3 FlashLeader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1272Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1316Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1278Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1261Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1316Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1282Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1284Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1268Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured
LiveBench designNot measured77.2%Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index28 boards measured
General benchmarks for Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview) and GLM 5.3 Flash
BenchmarkNano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview)GLM 5.3 FlashLeader
Vals IndexNot measured50.9%Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured
LiveBench data analysisNot measured76.4%Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured88.9%Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured80.0%Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured
Surface Evolver BenchNot measured52.5%Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured
LMArena TextNot measured1471Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1478Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1441Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured
LMArena VisionNot measured1294Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1474Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1462Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1531Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1462Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1444Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1436Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1491Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1475Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1465Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1450Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1469Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1481Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1455Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1440Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1295Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1363Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1299Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1279Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1270Only GLM 5.3 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here
Image generationDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards measured
Image generation benchmarks for Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview) and GLM 5.3 Flash
BenchmarkNano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview)GLM 5.3 FlashLeader
Design Arena: images1269Not measuredOnly Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview) measured
Design Arena: graphic design1249Not measuredOnly Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview) measured
Design Arena: logos1248Not measuredOnly Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview)$0.0020Fits in one request
GLM 5.3 Flash$0.0004Fits in one request

GLM 5.3 Flash costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview)$0.034Fits in one request
GLM 5.3 Flash$0.0090Fits in one request

GLM 5.3 Flash costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview)$0.130Exceeds the context window
GLM 5.3 Flash$0.035Fits in one request

GLM 5.3 Flash costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview) and GLM 5.3 Flash
SpecificationGoogle Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview)Z.ai GLM 5.3 Flash
MakerGoogleZ.ai
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedFebruary 26, 2026August 26, 2026
Context window66K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.50$0.15
Output $/Mtok$3.00$0.50
Coding indexNot benchmarked57.7
Independent measurements behind it06
Cost per solved taskNot computable$0.02
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview) better than GLM 5.3 Flash for coding?

Only GLM 5.3 Flash has a coding score, 57.7 on the Vibe Coding Index; Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview) has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Which is cheaper, Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview) or GLM 5.3 Flash?

Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview) costs $0.50 per million input tokens and $3.00 per million output tokens; GLM 5.3 Flash costs $0.15 and $0.50. Cost per solved task is known for GLM 5.3 Flash only.

Which has the bigger context window, Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview) or GLM 5.3 Flash?

GLM 5.3 Flash, with 1.05M tokens against 66K.

Has any benchmark tested both Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview) and GLM 5.3 Flash?

No benchmark has tested both yet. Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview) has results on Design Arena: images, Design Arena: graphic design and Design Arena: logos; GLM 5.3 Flash on LiveBench coding, LMArena WebDev and AA Coding Index. Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 21, 2026.

Compare next