Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite vs Kimi K3
Updated October 21, 2026. 18 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.
Decision reading
Only Kimi K3 has a coding score, 62.3 on the Vibe Coding Index; Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite has the edge where output tokens cost 37.5x less.
- Shared results
- 18
- Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite only
- 10
- Kimi K3 only
- 99
- Like-for-like categories
- 5 of 9
Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
No call
Only Kimi K3 has a coding score, so no call is made.
One side not measured
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
Kimi K3
Kimi K3 leads, 43.6 against 10.4.
Same board, both measured
Agentic work
AA Agentic Index
No call
Only Kimi K3 has a AA Agentic Index result, 50.0.
Directional only
Reasoning
GPQA Diamond
Kimi K3
Kimi K3 leads, 92.9% against 70.2%.
Same board, both measured
Math
AIME
No call
Only Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite has a AIME result, 42.1%.
Directional only
Knowledge
MMLU Pro
Kimi K3
Kimi K3 leads, 88.0% against 79.1%.
Same board, both measured
Web design
Design Arena: websites
No call
Only Kimi K3 has a Design Arena: websites result, 1335.
Directional only
General
Vals Index
No call
Only Kimi K3 has a Vals Index result, 53.0%.
Directional only
Long documents
Listed context window
No call
Both take 1.05M tokens.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite $0.0003, Kimi K3 $0.011 per turn.
List prices
Cost per solved task
One SWE-bench Verified task, solved
No call
Only Kimi K3 has the number, $0.81.
Directional only
At a glance
- Coding index
- Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite not benchmarked, Kimi K3 62.3 from 6 benchmarks.
- Widest category
- Intelligence, 31.6 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
- Widest single gap
- Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run): Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite 6.8% against Kimi K3 46.9%, 40.1 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite $0.40 against Kimi K3 $15.00 per million output tokens, 37.5x apart.
- Context window
- Both take 1.05M tokens.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite | Bars | Kimi K3 | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 0 | 1 | ||
| Intelligence | 0 | 2 | ||
| Reasoning | 0 | 4 | ||
| Knowledge | 0 | 6 | ||
| General | 0 | 5 | ||
| All shared boards | 0 | 18 |
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index01
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite | Kimi K3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench coding | Not measured | 59.3% | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| LMArena WebDev | Not measured | 1655 | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| AA Coding Index | Not measured | 76.2 | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) | 71.4% | 87.2% | Kimi K3 |
| SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI) | Not measured | 93.4% | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI) | Not measured | 17.2% | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 85.0% | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| Code migration (Vals AI) | Not measured | 16.1% | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| ProgramBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 2.0% | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| IOI (Vals AI) | Not measured | 48.9% | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI) | Not measured | 80.9% | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI) | Not measured | 44.2% | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI) | Not measured | 18.2% | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| CyberBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 75.2% | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) | 59.3% | Not measured | Only Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured |
| SciCode | Not measured | 59.5% | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) | 4.5% | Not measured | Only Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured |
| FrontierCode | Not measured | 44.2% | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| FrontierSWE | Not measured | 25.9% | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| WeirdML | Not measured | 82.6% | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| ALE-Bench | Not measured | 1524.5 | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| LMArena Text: coding | Not measured | 1508 | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | Not measured | 1499 | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| LMArena WebDev: React | Not measured | 1670 | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| LMArena WebDev: HTML | Not measured | 1644 | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| LMArena WebDev: from an image | Not measured | 1579 | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here | |||
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite | Kimi K3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 10.4 | 43.6 | Kimi K3 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 133.8 | 157.9 | Kimi K3 |
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index25 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite | Kimi K3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Agentic Index | Not measured | 50.0 | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building web apps | Not measured | 1295 | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps | Not measured | 1315 | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building mobile apps | Not measured | 1268 | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building Android apps | Not measured | 1256 | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building Godot games | Not measured | 1223 | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building games | Not measured | 1252 | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| Design Arena: HTML slides | Not measured | 1256 | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| Design Arena: PowerPoint slides | Not measured | 1273 | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| Design Arena: spreadsheets | Not measured | 1054 | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| LiveBench research | Not measured | 79.0% | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| LiveBench browser | Not measured | 16.0% | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| LiveBench long agentic | Not measured | 42.8% | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| Finance Agent (Vals AI) | Not measured | 53.1% | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 33.4% | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| Legal Research Bench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 46.1% | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI) | Not measured | 12.9% | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI) | Not measured | 66.7% | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| BioMysteryBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 72.6% | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI) | Not measured | 1.4% | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| Time Horizon Index (Vals AI) | Not measured | 10.5% | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| τ²-Bench Telecom | 19.0% | Not measured | Only Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured |
| APEX-Agents | Not measured | 47.8% | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| PostTrainBench | Not measured | 32.0% | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| Vending-Bench 2 | Not measured | $5,165 | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite | Kimi K3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 70.2% | 92.9% | Kimi K3 |
| LiveBench reasoning | Not measured | 90.7% | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| MMMU Pro (Vals AI) | 75.4% | 88.2% | Kimi K3 |
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | 62.5% | 93.5% | Kimi K3 |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | 6.8% | 46.9% | Kimi K3 |
| GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run) | Not measured | 93.1% | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| ARC-AGI | Not measured | 94.5% | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| ARC-AGI-2 | Not measured | 60.4% | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| SimpleBench | Not measured | 60.7% | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| Chess puzzles | Not measured | 37.0% | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| Mystery game puzzles | Not measured | 26.0% | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | Not measured | 1495 | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| LMArena Text: expert | Not measured | 1520 | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | Not measured | 1496 | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here | |||
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite | Kimi K3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AIME | 42.1% | Not measured | Only Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured |
| MGSM (Vals AI) | 89.5% | Not measured | Only Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured |
| AA Math Index | 53.3 | Not measured | Only Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured |
| AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run) | 53.3% | Not measured | Only Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured |
| OTIS Mock AIME | Not measured | 97.2% | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3 | Not measured | 72.2% | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| FrontierMath, tier 4 | Not measured | 39.0% | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| ProofBench | Not measured | 87.0% | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| LMArena Text: math | Not measured | 1494 | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | Not measured | 1505 | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here | |||
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index06
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite | Kimi K3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU Pro | 79.1% | 88.0% | Kimi K3 |
| LegalBench (Vals AI) | 82.0% | 86.2% | Kimi K3 |
| CorpFin (Vals AI) | 57.6% | 71.6% | Kimi K3 |
| TaxEval (Vals AI) | 66.2% | 75.7% | Kimi K3 |
| MortgageTax (Vals AI) | 57.6% | 66.3% | Kimi K3 |
| MedQA (Vals AI) | 88.9% | Not measured | Only Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured |
| MedCode (Vals AI) | 34.2% | 49.4% | Kimi K3 |
| MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run) | 75.9% | Not measured | Only Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured |
| SimpleQA Verified | Not measured | 50.6% | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| LMArena Text: science | Not measured | 1508 | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | Not measured | 1489 | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | Not measured | 1503 | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | Not measured | 1470 | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here | |||
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite | Kimi K3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: websites | Not measured | 1335 | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| Design Arena: UI components | Not measured | 1344 | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| Design Arena: game dev | Not measured | 1360 | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| Design Arena: data viz | Not measured | 1350 | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| Design Arena: 3D | Not measured | 1388 | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| Design Arena: all code categories | Not measured | 1361 | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| Design Arena: SVG | Not measured | 1302 | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| LiveBench design | Not measured | 77.2% | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here | |||
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite | Kimi K3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vals Index | Not measured | 53.0% | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| LiveBench data analysis | Not measured | 78.7% | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 68.2% | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| SAGE (Vals AI) | 30.8% | 52.8% | Kimi K3 |
| MedScribe (Vals AI) | 75.8% | 88.0% | Kimi K3 |
| Vals Multimodal Index | Not measured | 73.4% | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| IFBench | 49.9% | Not measured | Only Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite measured |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | 55.7% | 88.7% | Kimi K3 |
| DTBench | 62.8% | 91.2% | Kimi K3 |
| LMCA | 18.1% | 52.7% | Kimi K3 |
| Surface Evolver Bench | Not measured | 95.0% | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| Furniture assembly | Not measured | 34.2% | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| LMArena Text | Not measured | 1476 | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | Not measured | 1485 | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | Not measured | 1457 | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| LMArena Text: English | Not measured | 1481 | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| LMArena Text: non-English | Not measured | 1466 | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | Not measured | 1529 | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| LMArena Text: German | Not measured | 1490 | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| LMArena Text: Japanese | Not measured | 1494 | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| LMArena Text: Korean | Not measured | 1460 | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| LMArena Text: French | Not measured | 1492 | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | Not measured | 1472 | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| LMArena Text: Russian | Not measured | 1485 | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| LMArena Text: Polish | Not measured | 1458 | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | Not measured | 1489 | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | Not measured | 1494 | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | Not measured | 1471 | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | Not measured | 1453 | Only Kimi K3 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite | Kimi K3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | Google Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite | MoonshotAI Kimi K3 |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Moonshot AI | |
| Weights | No public weights listed | Open weights |
| Released | July 22, 2025 | July 16, 2026 |
| Context window | 1.05M | 1.05M |
| Input $/Mtok | $0.10 | $3.00 |
| Output $/Mtok | $0.40 | $15.00 |
| Coding index | Not benchmarked | 62.3 |
| Independent measurements behind it | 0 | 6 |
| Cost per solved task | Not computable | $0.81 |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite better than Kimi K3 for coding?
Only Kimi K3 has a coding score, 62.3 on the Vibe Coding Index; Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite has the edge where output tokens cost 37.5x less.
Which is cheaper, Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite or Kimi K3?
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite costs $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.40 per million output tokens; Kimi K3 costs $3.00 and $15.00. Cost per solved task is known for Kimi K3 only.
Which has the bigger context window, Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite or Kimi K3?
Neither: both take 1.05M tokens.
How many benchmarks is the Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite vs Kimi K3 comparison based on?
18 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Kimi K3's on 6. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.