LLMBenchmark.ai

Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL

Updated October 21, 2026. 4 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813DeepSeek
Coding
54.6
Overall
36.0
Output $/M
$1.98
4
Nemotron 3.5 Super VLNVIDIA
Coding
65.5
Overall
26.5
Output $/M
$0.50
0
vs boards won of 4 shared

Decision reading

Pick Nemotron 3.5 Super VL for coding: it scores 65.5 on the Vibe Coding Index against 54.6 for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813.

Pick DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 when what matters is SciCode or AA Intelligence Index, where it leads.

Shared results
4
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 only
74
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL only
12
Like-for-like categories
4 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 54.6 from 1 benchmark, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 65.5 from 1 benchmark.
Widest category
General, 11.3 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR): DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 80.3% against Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 69.0%, 11.3 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 $1.98 against Nemotron 3.5 Super VL $0.50 per million output tokens, 4.0x apart.
Context window
Both take 1.05M tokens.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813BarsNemotron 3.5 Super VLTies
Coding10
Intelligence10
Reasoning10
General10
All shared boards40
CodingLike-for-likeFour of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index10
Coding benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813Nemotron 3.5 Super VLLeader
LiveBench codingNot measured65.5%Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
LMArena WebDev1582Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
AA Coding Index68.8Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)87.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)96.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)14.1%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)82.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)41.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
IOI (Vals AI)51.6%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)54.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)17.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)53.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)72.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
SciCode51.0%47.8%DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
FrontierCode28.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
WeirdML66.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
ALE-Bench1403.2Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: coding1469Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1462Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena WebDev: React1588Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1566Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813Nemotron 3.5 Super VLLeader
AA Intelligence Index36.026.5DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
Epoch Capabilities Index155.6Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index12 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813Nemotron 3.5 Super VLLeader
AA Agentic Index41.3Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LiveBench researchNot measured70.9%Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
LiveBench browserNot measured4.0%Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured15.8%Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
SREBench (Vals AI)1.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)50.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)26.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)40.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)10.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)52.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)4.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
APEX-Agents47.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 27 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Reasoning benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813Nemotron 3.5 Super VLLeader
GPQA Diamond92.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LiveBench reasoningNot measured78.8%Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)92.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)41.0%30.7%DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)91.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
ARC-AGI90.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
ARC-AGI-261.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Chess puzzles46.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Mystery game puzzles43.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1458Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: expert1459Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1463Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813Nemotron 3.5 Super VLLeader
OTIS Mock AIME98.6%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 364.6%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
FrontierMath, tier 426.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
ProofBench50.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: math1441Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1443Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813Nemotron 3.5 Super VLLeader
MMLU Pro87.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)82.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)65.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)73.1%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)42.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
SimpleQA Verified52.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: science1457Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1446Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1459Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1442Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813Nemotron 3.5 Super VLLeader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1171Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1148Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1108Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1132Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1155Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
LiveBench designNot measured60.7%Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
General benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813Nemotron 3.5 Super VLLeader
Vals Index53.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LiveBench data analysisNot measured64.6%Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)80.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)80.3%69.0%DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
DTBench93.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMCA45.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text1446Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1448Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1439Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: English1457Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: non-English1431Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1481Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: Korean1449Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: French1446Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1435Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: Russian1448Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1454Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1458Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1443Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1424Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 26 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813Nemotron 3.5 Super VLLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813$0.0016Fits in one request
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL$0.0004Fits in one request

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813$0.039Fits in one request
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL$0.0090Fits in one request

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813$0.152Fits in one request
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL$0.035Fits in one request

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
SpecificationDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
MakerDeepSeekNVIDIA
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedAugust 12, 2026October 15, 2026
Context window1.05M1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.66$0.15
Output $/Mtok$1.98$0.50
Coding index54.665.5
Independent measurements behind it11
Cost per solved task$0.10Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 better than Nemotron 3.5 Super VL for coding?

Pick Nemotron 3.5 Super VL for coding: it scores 65.5 on the Vibe Coding Index against 54.6 for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813. Pick DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 when what matters is SciCode or AA Intelligence Index, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL?

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 costs $0.66 per million input tokens and $1.98 per million output tokens; Nemotron 3.5 Super VL costs $0.15 and $0.50. Cost per solved task is known for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 only.

Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL?

Neither: both take 1.05M tokens.

How many benchmarks is the DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL comparison based on?

4 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next