Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash

MiniMax M3.1 Flash leads DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 on coding, 59.0 to 56.1 on the Vibe Coding Index, and MiniMax M3.1 Flash costs 3.3x less per output token ($0.60 vs $1.98 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 13 benchmarks have a result for both.

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813DeepSeek
Coding
56.1
Overall
60.8
Output $/M
$1.98
5
MiniMax M3.1 FlashMiniMax
Coding
59.0
Overall
60.6
Output $/M
$0.60
8
vs boards won of 13 shared

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or MiniMax M3.1 Flash: which to pick

Pick MiniMax M3.1 Flash for coding: it scores 59.0 on the Vibe Coding Index against 56.1 for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813, though on 4 benchmarks against 5.

Pick DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 for a larger context window (1.05M against 1M tokens) and work measured by Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) or LMArena WebDev: HTML, where it leads.

Shared results
13
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 only
65
MiniMax M3.1 Flash only
7
Like-for-like categories
5 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 56.1 from 5 benchmarks, MiniMax M3.1 Flash 59.0 from 4 benchmarks.
Widest category
Reasoning, 7.0 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI): DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 14.1% against MiniMax M3.1 Flash 25.3%, 14.8 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 $1.98 against MiniMax M3.1 Flash $0.60 per million output tokens, 3.3x apart.
Context window
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 takes 1.05M tokens, MiniMax M3.1 Flash 1M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813BarsMiniMax M3.1 FlashTies
Coding24
Intelligence01
Agentic work21
Reasoning01
General11
All shared boards58
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index24
Coding benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and MiniMax M3.1 Flash
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813MiniMax M3.1 FlashLeader
LiveBench codingNot measured83.9%Only MiniMax M3.1 Flash measured
LMArena WebDev15821587MiniMax M3.1 Flash
AA Coding Index68.8Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)87.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)96.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)14.1%25.3%MiniMax M3.1 Flash
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)82.3%73.9%DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
Code migration (Vals AI)41.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
IOI (Vals AI)51.6%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)54.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)17.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)53.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)72.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
SciCode51.0%53.4%MiniMax M3.1 Flash
FrontierCode28.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
WeirdML66.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
ALE-Bench1403.2Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: coding1469Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1462Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena WebDev: React15881609MiniMax M3.1 Flash
LMArena WebDev: HTML15661529DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and MiniMax M3.1 Flash
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813MiniMax M3.1 FlashLeader
AA Intelligence Index36.042.7MiniMax M3.1 Flash
Epoch Capabilities Index155.6Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index21
Agentic work benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and MiniMax M3.1 Flash
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813MiniMax M3.1 FlashLeader
AA Agentic Index41.3Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LiveBench researchNot measured72.7%Only MiniMax M3.1 Flash measured
LiveBench browserNot measured92.0%Only MiniMax M3.1 Flash measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured34.7%Only MiniMax M3.1 Flash measured
SREBench (Vals AI)1.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)50.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)26.8%32.1%MiniMax M3.1 Flash
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)40.9%34.1%DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)10.8%7.5%DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)52.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)4.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
APEX-Agents47.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 30 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Reasoning benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and MiniMax M3.1 Flash
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813MiniMax M3.1 FlashLeader
GPQA Diamond92.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LiveBench reasoningNot measured82.9%Only MiniMax M3.1 Flash measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)92.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)41.0%48.0%MiniMax M3.1 Flash
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)91.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
ARC-AGI90.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
ARC-AGI-261.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Chess puzzles46.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Mystery game puzzles43.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1458Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: expert1459Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1463Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and MiniMax M3.1 Flash
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813MiniMax M3.1 FlashLeader
OTIS Mock AIME98.6%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 364.6%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
FrontierMath, tier 426.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
ProofBench50.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: math1441Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1443Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and MiniMax M3.1 Flash
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813MiniMax M3.1 FlashLeader
MMLU Pro87.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)82.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)65.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)73.1%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)42.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
SimpleQA Verified52.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: science1457Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1446Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1459Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1442Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Web design benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and MiniMax M3.1 Flash
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813MiniMax M3.1 FlashLeader
LiveBench designNot measured74.0%Only MiniMax M3.1 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11
General benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and MiniMax M3.1 Flash
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813MiniMax M3.1 FlashLeader
Vals Index53.0%53.8%MiniMax M3.1 Flash
LiveBench data analysisNot measured71.4%Only MiniMax M3.1 Flash measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)80.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)80.3%79.7%DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
DTBench93.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMCA45.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text1446Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1448Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1439Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: English1457Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: non-English1431Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1481Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: Korean1449Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: French1446Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1435Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: Russian1448Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1454Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1458Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1443Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1424Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 28 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and MiniMax M3.1 Flash
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813MiniMax M3.1 FlashLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813$0.0016Fits in one request
MiniMax M3.1 Flash$0.0004Fits in one request

MiniMax M3.1 Flash costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813$0.039Fits in one request
MiniMax M3.1 Flash$0.0093Fits in one request

MiniMax M3.1 Flash costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813$0.152Fits in one request
MiniMax M3.1 Flash$0.036Fits in one request

MiniMax M3.1 Flash costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and MiniMax M3.1 Flash
SpecificationDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813MiniMax M3.1 Flash
MakerDeepSeekMiniMax
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedAugust 12, 2026October 19, 2026
Context window1.05M1M
Input $/Mtok$0.66$0.15
Output $/Mtok$1.98$0.60
Coding index56.159.0
Independent measurements behind it54
Cost per solved task$0.10Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 better than MiniMax M3.1 Flash for coding?

Pick MiniMax M3.1 Flash for coding: it scores 59.0 on the Vibe Coding Index against 56.1 for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813, though on 4 benchmarks against 5. Pick DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 for a larger context window (1.05M against 1M tokens) and work measured by Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) or LMArena WebDev: HTML, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or MiniMax M3.1 Flash?

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 costs $0.66 per million input tokens and $1.98 per million output tokens; MiniMax M3.1 Flash costs $0.15 and $0.60. Cost per solved task is known for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 only.

Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or MiniMax M3.1 Flash?

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.

How many benchmarks is the DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash comparison based on?

13 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813's coding index rests on 5 independent benchmarks and MiniMax M3.1 Flash's on 4. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/deepseek-v4-pro-0813-vs-minimax-minimax-m3-1-flash" title="DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/deepseek-v4-pro-0813-vs-minimax-minimax-m3-1-flash">LLMBenchmark.ai, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash</a></p>